1 00:00:00,777 --> 00:00:04,559 Images like this, from the Auschwitz concentration camp, 2 00:00:04,583 --> 00:00:08,706 have been seared into our consciousness during the 20th century 3 00:00:08,730 --> 00:00:14,620 and have given us a new understanding of who we are, 4 00:00:14,644 --> 00:00:17,843 where we've come from and the times we live in. 5 00:00:17,867 --> 00:00:21,464 During the 20th century, we witnessed the atrocities 6 00:00:21,488 --> 00:00:26,959 of Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Rwanda and other genocides, 7 00:00:26,983 --> 00:00:30,460 and even though the 21st century is only seven years old, 8 00:00:30,484 --> 00:00:34,285 we have already witnessed an ongoing genocide in Darfur 9 00:00:34,309 --> 00:00:36,507 and the daily horrors of Iraq. 10 00:00:37,087 --> 00:00:40,671 This has led to a common understanding of our situation, 11 00:00:40,695 --> 00:00:43,808 namely, that modernity has brought us terrible violence, 12 00:00:43,832 --> 00:00:47,100 and perhaps that native peoples lived in a state of harmony 13 00:00:47,124 --> 00:00:50,562 that we have departed from, to our peril. 14 00:00:50,586 --> 00:00:54,506 Here is an example from an op-ed on Thanksgiving, 15 00:00:54,530 --> 00:00:56,682 in the "Boston Globe" a couple of years ago, 16 00:00:56,706 --> 00:01:00,085 where the writer wrote, "The Indian life was a difficult one, 17 00:01:00,109 --> 00:01:01,976 but there were no employment problems, 18 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:05,023 community harmony was strong, substance abuse unknown, 19 00:01:05,047 --> 00:01:06,697 crime nearly nonexistent. 20 00:01:06,721 --> 00:01:10,547 What warfare there was between tribes was largely ritualistic 21 00:01:10,571 --> 00:01:13,932 and seldom resulted in indiscriminate or wholesale slaughter." 22 00:01:13,956 --> 00:01:16,451 Now, you're all familiar with this treacle. 23 00:01:16,475 --> 00:01:18,780 We teach it to our children. 24 00:01:18,804 --> 00:01:21,927 We hear it on television and in storybooks. 25 00:01:21,951 --> 00:01:26,724 Now, the original title of this session was, "Everything You Know is Wrong," 26 00:01:26,748 --> 00:01:28,343 and I'm going to present evidence 27 00:01:28,367 --> 00:01:31,346 that this particular part of our common understanding is wrong, 28 00:01:31,370 --> 00:01:35,452 that, in fact, our ancestors were far more violent than we are, 29 00:01:35,476 --> 00:01:39,239 that violence has been in decline for long stretches of time, 30 00:01:39,263 --> 00:01:42,317 and that today, we are probably living in the most peaceful time 31 00:01:42,341 --> 00:01:44,157 in our species's existence. 32 00:01:44,181 --> 00:01:46,801 Now, in the decade of Darfur and Iraq, 33 00:01:46,825 --> 00:01:51,790 a statement like that might seem somewhere between hallucinatory and obscene, 34 00:01:51,814 --> 00:01:57,910 but I'm going to try to convince you that that is the correct picture. 35 00:01:57,934 --> 00:02:01,002 The decline of violence is a fractal phenomenon. 36 00:02:01,026 --> 00:02:04,672 You can see it over millennia, over centuries, over decades 37 00:02:04,696 --> 00:02:06,183 and over years, 38 00:02:06,207 --> 00:02:08,535 although there seems to have been a tipping point 39 00:02:08,559 --> 00:02:11,908 at the onset of the age of reason in the 16th century. 40 00:02:11,932 --> 00:02:15,539 One sees it all over the world, although not homogeneously. 41 00:02:15,563 --> 00:02:17,881 It's especially evident in the West, 42 00:02:17,905 --> 00:02:21,817 beginning with England and Holland around the time of the Enlightenment. 43 00:02:21,841 --> 00:02:25,809 Let me take you on a journey of several powers of 10 -- 44 00:02:25,833 --> 00:02:28,127 from the millennium scale to the year scale -- 45 00:02:28,151 --> 00:02:30,282 to try to persuade you of this. 46 00:02:30,306 --> 00:02:33,930 Until 10,000 years ago, all humans lived as hunter-gatherers, 47 00:02:33,954 --> 00:02:36,582 without permanent settlements or government. 48 00:02:36,606 --> 00:02:41,945 And this is the state that's commonly thought to be one of primordial harmony. 49 00:02:41,969 --> 00:02:45,507 But the archaeologist Lawrence Keeley, 50 00:02:45,531 --> 00:02:50,870 looking at casualty rates among contemporary hunter-gatherers, 51 00:02:50,894 --> 00:02:54,082 which is our best source of evidence about this way of life, 52 00:02:54,106 --> 00:02:56,600 has shown a rather different conclusion. 53 00:02:56,624 --> 00:03:00,301 Here is a graph that he put together, 54 00:03:00,325 --> 00:03:03,418 showing the percentage of male deaths due to warfare 55 00:03:03,442 --> 00:03:07,785 in a number of foraging or hunting and gathering societies. 56 00:03:07,809 --> 00:03:14,197 The red bars correspond to the likelihood that a man will die 57 00:03:14,221 --> 00:03:15,716 at the hands of another man, 58 00:03:15,740 --> 00:03:18,652 as opposed to passing away of natural causes, 59 00:03:18,676 --> 00:03:22,917 in a variety of foraging societies in the New Guinea highlands 60 00:03:22,941 --> 00:03:24,865 and the Amazon rain forest. 61 00:03:24,889 --> 00:03:28,510 And they range from a rate of almost a 60 percent chance that a man will die 62 00:03:28,534 --> 00:03:29,898 at the hands of another man 63 00:03:29,922 --> 00:03:34,177 to, in the case of the Gebusi, only a 15 percent chance. 64 00:03:34,201 --> 00:03:37,269 The tiny little blue bar in the lower left-hand corner 65 00:03:37,293 --> 00:03:40,856 plots the corresponding statistic from the United States and Europe 66 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:42,194 in the 20th century, 67 00:03:42,218 --> 00:03:45,893 and it includes all the deaths of both World Wars. 68 00:03:45,917 --> 00:03:51,080 If the death rate in tribal warfare had prevailed during the 20th century, 69 00:03:51,104 --> 00:03:54,976 there would have been two billion deaths rather than 100 million. 70 00:03:55,844 --> 00:03:57,629 Also on the millennium scale, 71 00:03:57,653 --> 00:04:01,051 we can look at the way of life of early civilizations, 72 00:04:01,075 --> 00:04:04,142 such as the ones described in the Bible. 73 00:04:04,166 --> 00:04:07,976 And in this supposed source of our moral values, 74 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:12,010 one can read descriptions of what was expected in warfare, 75 00:04:12,034 --> 00:04:14,762 such as the following, from Numbers 31: 76 00:04:14,786 --> 00:04:18,068 "And they warred against the Midianites as the Lord commanded Moses, 77 00:04:18,092 --> 00:04:20,270 and they slew all the males. 78 00:04:20,294 --> 00:04:23,586 And Moses said unto them, 'Have you saved all the women alive? 79 00:04:23,610 --> 00:04:26,644 Now, therefore, kill every male among the little ones 80 00:04:26,668 --> 00:04:29,523 and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him, 81 00:04:29,547 --> 00:04:33,010 but all the women children that have not known a man by lying with him, 82 00:04:33,034 --> 00:04:34,527 keep alive for yourselves.'" 83 00:04:34,551 --> 00:04:39,281 In other words: kill the men, kill the children. 84 00:04:39,305 --> 00:04:43,072 If you see any virgins, then you can keep them alive so that you can rape them. 85 00:04:43,096 --> 00:04:47,675 And you can find four or five passages in the Bible of this ilk. 86 00:04:47,699 --> 00:04:53,379 Also in the Bible, one sees that the death penalty was the accepted punishment 87 00:04:53,403 --> 00:04:55,365 for crimes such as homosexuality, 88 00:04:55,389 --> 00:04:59,591 adultery, blasphemy, idolatry, talking back to your parents -- 89 00:04:59,615 --> 00:05:00,668 (Laughter) 90 00:05:00,692 --> 00:05:02,822 and picking up sticks on the Sabbath. 91 00:05:03,576 --> 00:05:07,611 Well, let's click the zoom lens down one order of magnitude 92 00:05:07,635 --> 00:05:09,577 and look at the century scale. 93 00:05:09,601 --> 00:05:13,492 Now, although we don't have statistics for warfare 94 00:05:13,516 --> 00:05:15,722 throughout the Middle Ages to modern times, 95 00:05:15,746 --> 00:05:17,651 we know just from conventional history 96 00:05:17,675 --> 00:05:20,475 that the evidence was under our nose all along 97 00:05:20,499 --> 00:05:24,950 that there has been a reduction in socially sanctioned forms of violence. 98 00:05:24,974 --> 00:05:29,440 For example, any social history will reveal that mutilation and torture 99 00:05:29,464 --> 00:05:31,609 were routine forms of criminal punishment. 100 00:05:31,633 --> 00:05:34,290 The kind of infraction today that would give you a fine, 101 00:05:34,314 --> 00:05:37,873 in those days, would result in your tongue being cut out, 102 00:05:37,897 --> 00:05:40,253 your ears being cut off, you being blinded, 103 00:05:40,277 --> 00:05:42,562 a hand being chopped off and so on. 104 00:05:42,586 --> 00:05:46,841 There were numerous ingenious forms of sadistic capital punishment: 105 00:05:46,865 --> 00:05:49,976 burning at the stake, disemboweling, breaking on the wheel, 106 00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:52,785 being pulled apart by horses and so on. 107 00:05:52,809 --> 00:05:57,330 The death penalty was a sanction for a long list of nonviolent crimes: 108 00:05:57,354 --> 00:06:00,606 criticizing the king, stealing a loaf of bread. 109 00:06:00,630 --> 00:06:04,451 Slavery, of course, was the preferred labor-saving device, 110 00:06:04,475 --> 00:06:07,518 and cruelty was a popular form of entertainment. 111 00:06:07,542 --> 00:06:10,976 Perhaps the most vivid example was the practice of cat burning, 112 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:15,611 in which a cat was hoisted on a stage and lowered in a sling into a fire, 113 00:06:15,635 --> 00:06:20,769 and the spectators shrieked in laughter as the cat, howling in pain, 114 00:06:20,793 --> 00:06:22,360 was burned to death. 115 00:06:23,138 --> 00:06:24,971 What about one-on-one murder? 116 00:06:24,995 --> 00:06:26,859 Well, there, there are good statistics, 117 00:06:26,883 --> 00:06:32,518 because many municipalities recorded the cause of death. 118 00:06:32,542 --> 00:06:36,563 The criminologist Manuel Eisner 119 00:06:36,587 --> 00:06:39,603 scoured all of the historical records across Europe 120 00:06:39,627 --> 00:06:45,123 for homicide rates in any village, hamlet, town, county that he could find, 121 00:06:45,147 --> 00:06:47,548 and then he supplemented them with national data 122 00:06:47,572 --> 00:06:49,961 when nations started keeping statistics. 123 00:06:49,985 --> 00:06:53,976 He plotted on a logarithmic scale, 124 00:06:54,000 --> 00:07:00,975 going from 100 deaths per 100,000 people per year, 125 00:07:00,999 --> 00:07:05,418 which was approximately the rate of homicide in the Middle Ages, 126 00:07:05,442 --> 00:07:08,043 and the figure plummets down 127 00:07:08,067 --> 00:07:12,939 to less than one homicide per 100,000 people per year 128 00:07:12,963 --> 00:07:16,094 in seven or eight European countries. 129 00:07:16,118 --> 00:07:18,689 Then, there is a slight uptick in the 1960s. 130 00:07:18,713 --> 00:07:22,549 The people who said that rock and roll would lead to the decline of moral values 131 00:07:22,573 --> 00:07:24,976 actually had a grain of truth to that. 132 00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:29,762 But there was a decline from at least two orders of magnitude in homicide 133 00:07:29,786 --> 00:07:31,690 from the Middle Ages to the present, 134 00:07:31,714 --> 00:07:35,929 and the elbow occurred in the early 16th century. 135 00:07:36,746 --> 00:07:39,262 Let's click down now to the decade scale. 136 00:07:39,286 --> 00:07:43,367 According to nongovernmental organizations that keep such statistics, 137 00:07:43,391 --> 00:07:46,234 since 1945, in Europe and the Americas, 138 00:07:46,258 --> 00:07:49,976 there has been a steep decline in interstate wars, 139 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:52,763 in deadly ethnic riots or pogroms 140 00:07:52,787 --> 00:07:56,284 and in military coups, even in South America. 141 00:07:56,308 --> 00:08:01,542 Worldwide, there's been a steep decline in deaths in interstate wars. 142 00:08:01,566 --> 00:08:06,186 The yellow bars here show the number of deaths per war per year 143 00:08:06,210 --> 00:08:08,634 from 1950 to the present. 144 00:08:08,658 --> 00:08:11,361 And, as you can see, the death rate goes down 145 00:08:11,385 --> 00:08:15,809 from 65,000 deaths per conflict per year in the 1950s 146 00:08:15,833 --> 00:08:20,088 to less than 2,000 deaths per conflict per year in this decade, 147 00:08:20,112 --> 00:08:21,549 as horrific as it is. 148 00:08:21,573 --> 00:08:24,976 Even in the year scale, one can see a decline of violence. 149 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:28,657 Since the end of the Cold War, there have been fewer civil wars, 150 00:08:28,681 --> 00:08:34,527 fewer genocides -- indeed, a 90 percent reduction since post-World War II highs -- 151 00:08:34,551 --> 00:08:40,113 and even a reversal of the 1960s uptick in homicide and violent crime. 152 00:08:40,137 --> 00:08:43,770 This is from the FBI uniform crime statistics. 153 00:08:43,794 --> 00:08:47,880 You can see that there's a fairly low rate of violence in the '50s and the '60s, 154 00:08:47,904 --> 00:08:51,318 then it soared upward for several decades 155 00:08:51,342 --> 00:08:55,018 and began a precipitous decline, starting in the 1990s, 156 00:08:55,042 --> 00:08:59,976 so that it went back to the level that was last enjoyed in 1960. 157 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:02,305 President Clinton, if you're here: thank you. 158 00:09:02,329 --> 00:09:04,035 (Laughter) 159 00:09:04,059 --> 00:09:05,210 So the question is: 160 00:09:05,234 --> 00:09:09,429 Why are so many people so wrong about something so important? 161 00:09:09,453 --> 00:09:11,279 I think there are a number of reasons. 162 00:09:11,303 --> 00:09:13,216 One of them is we have better reporting. 163 00:09:13,240 --> 00:09:16,930 The Associated Press is a better chronicler of wars 164 00:09:16,954 --> 00:09:18,395 over the surface of the earth 165 00:09:18,419 --> 00:09:20,327 than 16th-century monks were. 166 00:09:20,351 --> 00:09:21,387 (Laughter) 167 00:09:21,411 --> 00:09:22,819 There's a cognitive illusion. 168 00:09:22,843 --> 00:09:24,921 We cognitive psychologists know 169 00:09:24,945 --> 00:09:30,249 that the easier it is to recall specific instances of something, 170 00:09:30,273 --> 00:09:32,976 the higher the probability that you assign to it. 171 00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:37,163 Things that we read about in the paper with gory footage 172 00:09:37,187 --> 00:09:41,780 burn into memory more than reports of a lot more people dying 173 00:09:41,804 --> 00:09:43,544 in their beds of old age. 174 00:09:44,886 --> 00:09:48,161 There are dynamics in the opinion and advocacy markets; 175 00:09:48,185 --> 00:09:53,180 no one ever attracted advocates and donors 176 00:09:53,204 --> 00:09:56,177 by saying, "Things just seem to be getting better and better." 177 00:09:56,201 --> 00:09:57,287 (Laughter) 178 00:09:57,311 --> 00:09:59,907 There's guilt about our treatment of native peoples 179 00:09:59,931 --> 00:10:01,581 in modern intellectual life, 180 00:10:01,605 --> 00:10:04,702 and an unwillingness to acknowledge there could be anything good 181 00:10:04,726 --> 00:10:06,042 about Western culture. 182 00:10:06,066 --> 00:10:11,636 And, of course, our change in standards can outpace the change in behavior. 183 00:10:11,660 --> 00:10:13,851 One of the reasons violence went down 184 00:10:13,875 --> 00:10:17,727 is that people got sick of the carnage and cruelty in their time. 185 00:10:17,751 --> 00:10:19,851 That's a process that seems to be continuing, 186 00:10:19,875 --> 00:10:24,130 but if it outstrips behavior by the standards of the day, 187 00:10:24,154 --> 00:10:27,277 things always look more barbaric than they would have been 188 00:10:27,301 --> 00:10:28,844 by historic standards. 189 00:10:28,868 --> 00:10:31,570 So today, we get exercised -- and rightly so -- 190 00:10:31,594 --> 00:10:38,149 if a handful of murderers get executed by lethal injection in Texas 191 00:10:38,173 --> 00:10:40,987 after a 15-year appeal process. 192 00:10:41,011 --> 00:10:43,972 We don't consider that a couple of hundred years ago, 193 00:10:43,996 --> 00:10:48,303 they may have been burned at the stake for criticizing the king after a trial 194 00:10:48,327 --> 00:10:50,066 that lasted 10 minutes, 195 00:10:50,090 --> 00:10:53,365 and indeed, that that would have been repeated over and over again. 196 00:10:53,389 --> 00:10:55,825 Today, we look at capital punishment 197 00:10:55,849 --> 00:10:59,364 as evidence of how low our behavior can sink, 198 00:10:59,388 --> 00:11:02,001 rather than how high our standards have risen. 199 00:11:02,777 --> 00:11:05,231 Well, why has violence declined? 200 00:11:05,255 --> 00:11:10,015 No one really knows, but I have read four explanations, 201 00:11:10,039 --> 00:11:13,508 all of which, I think, have some grain of plausibility. 202 00:11:13,532 --> 00:11:16,376 The first is: maybe Thomas Hobbes got it right. 203 00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:17,557 He was the one who said 204 00:11:17,581 --> 00:11:21,478 that life in a state of nature was "solitary, poor, nasty, 205 00:11:21,502 --> 00:11:22,989 brutish and short." 206 00:11:23,013 --> 00:11:24,038 (Laughter) 207 00:11:24,062 --> 00:11:26,356 Not because, he argued, 208 00:11:26,380 --> 00:11:29,282 humans have some primordial thirst for blood 209 00:11:29,306 --> 00:11:32,762 or aggressive instinct or territorial imperative, 210 00:11:32,786 --> 00:11:35,089 but because of the logic of anarchy. 211 00:11:35,113 --> 00:11:36,270 In a state of anarchy, 212 00:11:36,294 --> 00:11:40,153 there's a constant temptation to invade your neighbors preemptively, 213 00:11:40,177 --> 00:11:41,639 before they invade you. 214 00:11:41,663 --> 00:11:44,161 More recently, Thomas Schelling gives the analogy 215 00:11:44,185 --> 00:11:46,765 of a homeowner who hears a rustling in the basement. 216 00:11:46,789 --> 00:11:49,787 Being a good American, he has a pistol in the nightstand, 217 00:11:49,811 --> 00:11:51,921 pulls out his gun, walks down the stairs. 218 00:11:51,945 --> 00:11:55,063 And what does he see but a burglar with a gun in his hand? 219 00:11:55,087 --> 00:11:56,724 Now, each one of them is thinking, 220 00:11:56,748 --> 00:12:00,096 "I don't really want to kill that guy, but he's about to kill me. 221 00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:04,254 Maybe I had better shoot him before he shoots me, 222 00:12:04,278 --> 00:12:06,770 especially since, even if he doesn't want to kill me, 223 00:12:06,794 --> 00:12:10,514 he's probably worrying right now that I might kill him before he kills me." 224 00:12:10,538 --> 00:12:11,696 And so on. 225 00:12:11,720 --> 00:12:16,952 Hunter-gatherer peoples explicitly go through this train of thought 226 00:12:16,976 --> 00:12:20,854 and will often raid their neighbors out of fear of being raided first. 227 00:12:21,631 --> 00:12:25,678 Now, one way of dealing with this problem is by deterrence. 228 00:12:25,702 --> 00:12:29,976 You don't strike first, but you have a publicly announced policy 229 00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:33,433 that you will retaliate savagely if you are invaded. 230 00:12:33,457 --> 00:12:38,573 The only thing is that it's liable to having its bluff called, 231 00:12:38,597 --> 00:12:41,916 and therefore can only work if it's credible. 232 00:12:41,940 --> 00:12:46,354 To make it credible, you must avenge all insults and settle all scores, 233 00:12:46,378 --> 00:12:49,542 which leads to the cycles of bloody vendetta. 234 00:12:49,566 --> 00:12:52,759 Life becomes an episode of "The Sopranos." 235 00:12:52,783 --> 00:12:55,557 Hobbes's solution, "Leviathan," 236 00:12:55,581 --> 00:12:59,359 was that if authority for the legitimate use of violence 237 00:12:59,383 --> 00:13:04,059 was vested in a single democratic agency -- a leviathan -- 238 00:13:04,083 --> 00:13:07,541 then such a state can reduce the temptation of attack, 239 00:13:07,565 --> 00:13:09,976 because any kind of aggression will be punished, 240 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:13,824 leaving its profitability zero. 241 00:13:13,848 --> 00:13:17,071 That would remove the temptation to invade preemptively 242 00:13:17,095 --> 00:13:19,500 out of fear of them attacking you first. 243 00:13:19,524 --> 00:13:23,019 It removes the need for a hair trigger for retaliation 244 00:13:23,043 --> 00:13:25,350 to make your deterrent threat credible, 245 00:13:25,374 --> 00:13:28,191 and therefore, it would lead to a state of peace. 246 00:13:28,215 --> 00:13:32,111 Eisner -- the man who plotted the homicide rates 247 00:13:32,135 --> 00:13:35,396 that you failed to see in the earlier slide -- 248 00:13:35,420 --> 00:13:39,249 argued that the timing of the decline of homicide in Europe 249 00:13:39,273 --> 00:13:43,361 coincided with the rise of centralized states. 250 00:13:43,385 --> 00:13:46,242 So that's a bit of a support for the leviathan theory. 251 00:13:46,266 --> 00:13:50,344 Also supporting it is the fact that we today see eruptions of violence 252 00:13:50,368 --> 00:13:54,589 in zones of anarchy, in failed states, collapsed empires, 253 00:13:54,613 --> 00:13:58,820 frontier regions, mafias, street gangs and so on. 254 00:13:59,770 --> 00:14:02,808 The second explanation is that in many times and places, 255 00:14:02,832 --> 00:14:06,811 there is a widespread sentiment that life is cheap. 256 00:14:06,835 --> 00:14:12,317 In earlier times, when suffering and early death were common in one's own life, 257 00:14:12,341 --> 00:14:16,157 one has fewer compunctions about inflicting them on others. 258 00:14:16,181 --> 00:14:20,688 And as technology and economic efficiency make life longer and more pleasant, 259 00:14:20,712 --> 00:14:22,976 one puts a higher value on life in general. 260 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:26,531 This was an argument from the political scientist James Payne. 261 00:14:27,244 --> 00:14:31,732 A third explanation invokes the concept of a nonzero-sum game, 262 00:14:31,756 --> 00:14:36,376 and was worked out in the book "Nonzero" by the journalist Robert Wright. 263 00:14:36,400 --> 00:14:39,032 Wright points out that, in certain circumstances, 264 00:14:39,056 --> 00:14:43,722 cooperation or nonviolence can benefit both parties in an interaction, 265 00:14:43,746 --> 00:14:49,044 such as gains in trade when two parties trade their surpluses 266 00:14:49,068 --> 00:14:50,770 and both come out ahead, 267 00:14:50,794 --> 00:14:53,291 or when two parties lay down their arms 268 00:14:53,315 --> 00:14:55,378 and split the so-called peace dividend 269 00:14:55,402 --> 00:14:58,825 that results in them not having to fight the whole time. 270 00:14:58,849 --> 00:15:01,613 Wright argues that technology has increased the number 271 00:15:01,637 --> 00:15:05,849 of positive-sum games that humans tend to be embroiled in, 272 00:15:05,873 --> 00:15:09,430 by allowing the trade of goods, services and ideas 273 00:15:09,454 --> 00:15:12,868 over longer distances and among larger groups of people. 274 00:15:12,892 --> 00:15:16,665 The result is that other people become more valuable alive than dead, 275 00:15:16,689 --> 00:15:20,209 and violence declines for selfish reasons. 276 00:15:20,233 --> 00:15:21,600 As Wright put it, 277 00:15:21,624 --> 00:15:25,505 "Among the many reasons that I think that we should not bomb the Japanese 278 00:15:25,529 --> 00:15:27,140 is that they built my minivan." 279 00:15:27,164 --> 00:15:28,822 (Laughter) 280 00:15:29,321 --> 00:15:33,411 The fourth explanation is captured in the title of a book 281 00:15:33,435 --> 00:15:36,976 called "The Expanding Circle," by the philosopher Peter Singer, 282 00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:42,215 who argues that evolution bequeathed humans with a sense of empathy, 283 00:15:42,239 --> 00:15:48,008 an ability to treat other people's interests as comparable to one's own. 284 00:15:48,032 --> 00:15:49,591 Unfortunately, by default, 285 00:15:49,615 --> 00:15:53,130 we apply it only to a very narrow circle of friends and family. 286 00:15:53,154 --> 00:15:56,233 People outside that circle are treated as subhuman 287 00:15:56,257 --> 00:15:58,807 and can be exploited with impunity. 288 00:15:58,831 --> 00:16:02,173 But, over history, the circle has expanded. 289 00:16:02,197 --> 00:16:04,512 One can see, in historical record, 290 00:16:04,536 --> 00:16:08,897 it expanding from the village, to the clan, to the tribe, to the nation, 291 00:16:08,921 --> 00:16:12,390 to other races, to both sexes and, in Singer's own arguments, 292 00:16:12,414 --> 00:16:15,756 something that we should extend to other sentient species. 293 00:16:15,780 --> 00:16:18,118 So the question is: 294 00:16:18,142 --> 00:16:20,976 If this has happened, what has powered that expansion? 295 00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:22,970 And there are a number of possibilities, 296 00:16:22,994 --> 00:16:25,866 such as increasing circles of reciprocity 297 00:16:25,890 --> 00:16:28,664 in the sense that Robert Wright argues for. 298 00:16:28,688 --> 00:16:30,528 The logic of the Golden Rule -- 299 00:16:30,552 --> 00:16:34,133 the more you think about and interact with other people, 300 00:16:34,157 --> 00:16:41,127 the more you realize that it is untenable to privilege your interests over theirs, 301 00:16:41,151 --> 00:16:43,363 at least not if you want them to listen to you. 302 00:16:43,387 --> 00:16:47,412 You can't say that my interests are special compared to yours 303 00:16:47,436 --> 00:16:48,699 any more than you can say 304 00:16:48,723 --> 00:16:52,761 the particular spot that I'm standing on is a unique part of the universe 305 00:16:52,785 --> 00:16:56,405 because I happen to be standing on it that very minute. 306 00:16:56,429 --> 00:17:00,330 It may also be powered by cosmopolitanism, by histories 307 00:17:00,354 --> 00:17:05,340 and journalism and memoirs and realistic fiction and travel and literacy, 308 00:17:05,364 --> 00:17:09,196 which allows you to project yourself into the lives of other people 309 00:17:09,220 --> 00:17:12,161 that formerly you may have treated as subhuman, 310 00:17:12,185 --> 00:17:17,093 and also to realize the accidental contingency of your own station in life, 311 00:17:17,117 --> 00:17:19,827 the sense that "There but for fortune go I." 312 00:17:20,785 --> 00:17:22,486 Whatever its causes, 313 00:17:22,510 --> 00:17:26,207 the decline of violence, I think, has profound implications. 314 00:17:26,231 --> 00:17:29,475 It should force us to ask not just, "Why is there war?" 315 00:17:29,499 --> 00:17:32,096 but also, "Why is there peace?" 316 00:17:32,120 --> 00:17:34,052 Not just, "What are we doing wrong?" 317 00:17:34,076 --> 00:17:36,752 but also, "What have we been doing right?" 318 00:17:36,776 --> 00:17:38,855 Because we have been doing something right, 319 00:17:38,879 --> 00:17:41,274 and it sure would be good to find out what it is. 320 00:17:41,298 --> 00:17:42,499 Thank you very much. 321 00:17:42,523 --> 00:17:49,438 (Applause) 322 00:17:52,067 --> 00:17:55,000 Chris Anderson: I loved that talk. 323 00:17:55,024 --> 00:17:57,414 I think a lot of people here in the room would say 324 00:17:57,438 --> 00:18:00,523 that that expansion you were talking about, 325 00:18:00,547 --> 00:18:02,005 that Peter Singer talks about, 326 00:18:02,029 --> 00:18:05,683 is also driven just by technology, by greater visibility of the other 327 00:18:05,707 --> 00:18:08,460 and the sense that the world is therefore getting smaller. 328 00:18:08,484 --> 00:18:10,925 I mean, is that also a grain of truth? 329 00:18:10,949 --> 00:18:12,316 Steven Pinker: Very much. 330 00:18:12,340 --> 00:18:14,730 It would fit both in Wright's theory, 331 00:18:14,754 --> 00:18:18,996 that it allows us to enjoy the benefits of cooperation 332 00:18:19,020 --> 00:18:21,005 over larger and larger circles. 333 00:18:21,029 --> 00:18:26,292 But also, I think it helps us imagine what it's like to be someone else. 334 00:18:26,316 --> 00:18:28,670 I think when you read of these horrific tortures 335 00:18:28,694 --> 00:18:30,441 that were common in the Middle Ages, 336 00:18:30,465 --> 00:18:32,784 you think, "How could they possibly have done it, 337 00:18:32,808 --> 00:18:35,181 how could they not have empathized with the person 338 00:18:35,205 --> 00:18:36,567 that they're disemboweling?" 339 00:18:36,591 --> 00:18:41,115 But clearly, as far as they're concerned, this is just an alien being 340 00:18:41,139 --> 00:18:43,294 that does not have feelings akin to their own. 341 00:18:43,318 --> 00:18:45,208 Anything, I think, that makes it easier 342 00:18:45,232 --> 00:18:47,652 to imagine trading places with someone else 343 00:18:47,676 --> 00:18:50,436 means that it increases your moral consideration 344 00:18:50,460 --> 00:18:51,666 to that other person. 345 00:18:51,690 --> 00:18:54,939 CA: I'd love every news media owner to hear that talk 346 00:18:54,963 --> 00:18:56,674 at some point, it's so important. 347 00:18:56,698 --> 00:18:58,150 CA: Thank you. SP: My pleasure.