WEBVTT 00:00:01.106 --> 00:00:05.212 I come to you today to speak of liars, 00:00:05.212 --> 00:00:06.705 lawsuits 00:00:06.705 --> 00:00:08.595 and laughter. 00:00:09.045 --> 00:00:12.178 The first time I heard about Holocaust denial, 00:00:12.178 --> 00:00:13.480 I laughed. 00:00:14.097 --> 00:00:16.018 Holocaust denial? 00:00:16.370 --> 00:00:19.823 The Holocaust which has the dubious distinction 00:00:19.823 --> 00:00:24.318 of being the best-documented genocide in the world? 00:00:25.046 --> 00:00:27.373 Who could believe it didn't happen? 00:00:28.225 --> 00:00:29.902 Think about it. 00:00:30.289 --> 00:00:32.851 For deniers to be right, 00:00:32.851 --> 00:00:35.026 who would have to be wrong? 00:00:35.260 --> 00:00:37.220 Well, first of all -- 00:00:37.220 --> 00:00:38.132 the victims, 00:00:38.132 --> 00:00:42.738 the survivors who have told us their harrowing stories. 00:00:43.761 --> 00:00:45.983 Who else would have to be wrong? 00:00:46.251 --> 00:00:48.051 The bystanders. 00:00:48.305 --> 00:00:52.306 The people who lived in the myriads of towns and villages and cities 00:00:52.306 --> 00:00:54.301 on the Eastern front, 00:00:54.301 --> 00:00:56.766 who watched their neighbors be rounded up -- 00:00:56.766 --> 00:01:00.002 men, women, children, young, old -- 00:01:00.002 --> 00:01:02.677 and be marched to the outskirts of the town 00:01:02.677 --> 00:01:05.973 to be shot and left dead in ditches. 00:01:06.271 --> 00:01:07.701 Or the Poles, 00:01:07.701 --> 00:01:12.121 who lived in towns and villages around the death camps, 00:01:12.266 --> 00:01:14.516 who watched day after day 00:01:14.665 --> 00:01:17.460 as the trains went in filled with people 00:01:17.638 --> 00:01:18.996 and came out empty. 00:01:19.867 --> 00:01:21.585 But above all, 00:01:21.771 --> 00:01:23.701 who would have to be wrong? 00:01:24.227 --> 00:01:25.897 The perpetrators. 00:01:26.335 --> 00:01:29.667 The people who say, "We did it. 00:01:29.784 --> 00:01:31.216 I did it." 00:01:31.398 --> 00:01:33.414 Now maybe they add a caveat -- 00:01:33.570 --> 00:01:36.140 they say, "I didn't have a choice, 00:01:36.304 --> 00:01:37.993 I was forced to do it." 00:01:38.303 --> 00:01:41.565 But nonetheless, they say, "I did it." 00:01:42.081 --> 00:01:43.546 Think about it. 00:01:43.765 --> 00:01:49.611 In not one war crimes trial since the end of World War II 00:01:49.611 --> 00:01:56.163 has a perpetrator of any nationality ever said, "It didn't happen." 00:01:57.301 --> 00:02:01.540 Again, they may have said, "I was forced," but never that it didn't happen. 00:02:01.883 --> 00:02:03.380 Having thought that through, 00:02:03.380 --> 00:02:07.354 I decided denial was not going to be on my agenda; 00:02:07.354 --> 00:02:09.088 I had bigger things to worry about, 00:02:09.088 --> 00:02:10.091 to write about, 00:02:10.091 --> 00:02:11.115 to research, 00:02:11.118 --> 00:02:12.714 and I moved on. 00:02:13.157 --> 00:02:16.052 Fast forward a little over a decade, 00:02:16.052 --> 00:02:17.789 and two senior scholars -- 00:02:17.789 --> 00:02:19.072 scholars of the Holocaust, 00:02:19.072 --> 00:02:21.760 two of the most prominent historians of the Holocaust -- 00:02:21.760 --> 00:02:22.878 approached me and said, 00:02:22.878 --> 00:02:24.250 "Deborah, let's have coffee. 00:02:24.250 --> 00:02:27.628 We have a research idea that we think is perfect for you." 00:02:27.628 --> 00:02:31.484 Intrigued and flattered that they came to me with an idea 00:02:31.484 --> 00:02:33.249 and thought me worthy of it, 00:02:33.249 --> 00:02:35.848 I asked, "What is it?" 00:02:35.848 --> 00:02:39.040 and they said, "Holocaust denial." 00:02:39.528 --> 00:02:42.155 And for the second time, I laughed. 00:02:42.471 --> 00:02:44.125 Holocaust denial? 00:02:44.418 --> 00:02:46.285 The flat Earth folks? 00:02:46.548 --> 00:02:48.416 The Elvis is alive people? 00:02:48.646 --> 00:02:51.054 I should study them? 00:02:51.437 --> 00:02:52.777 And these two guys said, 00:02:52.777 --> 00:02:55.290 "Yeah, we're intrigued. 00:02:55.290 --> 00:02:56.885 What are they about? 00:02:56.885 --> 00:02:58.501 What's their objective? 00:02:58.501 --> 00:03:02.567 How do they manage to get people to believe what they say?" 00:03:02.891 --> 00:03:06.552 So thinking, if they thought it was worthwhile, 00:03:06.552 --> 00:03:09.770 I would take a momentary diversion -- 00:03:09.770 --> 00:03:10.951 maybe a year, 00:03:10.951 --> 00:03:12.829 maybe two, three, maybe even four -- 00:03:12.829 --> 00:03:15.221 in academic terms, that's momentary. 00:03:15.221 --> 00:03:16.386 (Laughter) 00:03:16.386 --> 00:03:18.796 We work very slowly. 00:03:18.796 --> 00:03:19.797 (Laughter) 00:03:20.217 --> 00:03:22.147 And I would look at them. 00:03:22.147 --> 00:03:23.205 So I did. 00:03:23.413 --> 00:03:26.275 I did my research and I came up with a number of things, 00:03:26.275 --> 00:03:28.635 two of which I'd like to share with you today. 00:03:28.839 --> 00:03:30.270 One: 00:03:30.270 --> 00:03:35.547 deniers are wolves in sheep's clothing. 00:03:35.919 --> 00:03:38.907 They are the same nazis, neo-Nazis -- 00:03:38.907 --> 00:03:42.134 you can decide whether you want to put a "neo" there or not. 00:03:42.922 --> 00:03:45.459 But when I looked at them, 00:03:45.459 --> 00:03:49.983 I didn't see any SS-like uniforms, 00:03:49.983 --> 00:03:53.157 swastika-like symbols on the wall, 00:03:53.157 --> 00:03:55.440 Sieg heil salutes -- 00:03:55.440 --> 00:03:56.836 none of that. 00:03:56.836 --> 00:03:59.868 What I found instead 00:03:59.868 --> 00:04:04.483 were people parading as respectable academics. 00:04:05.043 --> 00:04:06.431 What did they have? 00:04:06.431 --> 00:04:08.068 They had an institute. 00:04:08.068 --> 00:04:11.776 An institute for historical review. 00:04:12.519 --> 00:04:13.886 They had a journal -- 00:04:13.886 --> 00:04:15.190 a slick journal -- 00:04:15.190 --> 00:04:18.305 a journal of historical review. 00:04:18.557 --> 00:04:21.128 One filled with papers -- 00:04:21.128 --> 00:04:23.390 footnote-laden papers. 00:04:23.963 --> 00:04:26.123 And they had a new name. 00:04:26.596 --> 00:04:28.954 Not neo-Nazis, 00:04:28.954 --> 00:04:31.528 not anti-Semites -- 00:04:31.528 --> 00:04:32.930 revisionists. 00:04:33.150 --> 00:04:35.388 They said, "We are revisionists. 00:04:35.388 --> 00:04:38.227 We are out to do one thing: 00:04:38.227 --> 00:04:42.050 to revise mistakes in history." 00:04:42.504 --> 00:04:48.026 But all you had to do was go one inch below the surface, 00:04:48.026 --> 00:04:49.798 and what did you find there? 00:04:49.956 --> 00:04:52.351 The same adulation of Hitler, 00:04:52.351 --> 00:04:54.458 praise of the Third Reich, 00:04:54.458 --> 00:04:57.168 anti-Semitism, racism, prejudice. 00:04:57.946 --> 00:04:59.842 This is what intrigued me. 00:05:00.208 --> 00:05:07.438 It was anti-Semitism, racism, prejudice parading as rational discourse. 00:05:08.810 --> 00:05:10.578 The other thing I found -- 00:05:10.578 --> 00:05:14.300 many of us have been taught to think there are facts and there are opinions -- 00:05:14.300 --> 00:05:15.779 after studying deniers, 00:05:15.779 --> 00:05:17.487 I think differently. 00:05:17.668 --> 00:05:19.339 There are facts, 00:05:19.339 --> 00:05:21.124 there are opinions, 00:05:21.124 --> 00:05:23.135 and there are lies. 00:05:23.388 --> 00:05:28.716 And what deniers want to do is take their lies, 00:05:28.716 --> 00:05:30.591 dress them up as opinions -- 00:05:30.591 --> 00:05:32.604 maybe edgy opinions, 00:05:32.604 --> 00:05:35.247 maybe sort of out-of-the-box opinions -- 00:05:35.247 --> 00:05:36.654 but then if they're opinions, 00:05:36.654 --> 00:05:38.809 they should be part of the conversation. 00:05:38.809 --> 00:05:42.457 And then they encroach on the facts. 00:05:43.425 --> 00:05:45.011 I published my work -- 00:05:45.011 --> 00:05:46.208 the book was published, 00:05:46.208 --> 00:05:49.745 "Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory," 00:05:49.745 --> 00:05:51.724 it came out in many different countries, 00:05:51.724 --> 00:05:54.014 including here and Penguin UK, 00:05:54.018 --> 00:05:57.643 and I was done with those folks and ready to move on. 00:05:58.386 --> 00:06:02.673 Then came the letter from Penguin UK, 00:06:02.820 --> 00:06:06.471 and for the third time, I laughed ... 00:06:06.750 --> 00:06:08.594 mistakenly. 00:06:09.241 --> 00:06:10.987 I opened the letter, 00:06:11.175 --> 00:06:16.806 and it informed me that David Irving was bringing a libel suit against me 00:06:16.917 --> 00:06:18.337 in the United Kingdom 00:06:18.513 --> 00:06:21.804 for calling him a Holocaust denier. 00:06:22.095 --> 00:06:23.992 David Irving suing me? 00:06:24.180 --> 00:06:25.222 Who was David Irving? 00:06:25.375 --> 00:06:28.005 David Irving was a writer of historical works, 00:06:28.165 --> 00:06:29.991 most of them about World War II, 00:06:30.161 --> 00:06:33.273 and virtually all of those works took the position 00:06:33.418 --> 00:06:36.889 that the Nazis were really not so bad, 00:06:37.042 --> 00:06:39.944 and the allies were really not so good, 00:06:40.102 --> 00:06:40.586 and the Jews, 00:06:40.777 --> 00:06:41.533 whatever happened to them, 00:06:41.704 --> 00:06:43.505 they sort of deserved it. 00:06:44.397 --> 00:06:45.791 He knew the documents, 00:06:45.938 --> 00:06:47.313 he knew the facts, 00:06:47.477 --> 00:06:50.875 but he somehow twisted them to get this opinion. 00:06:51.158 --> 00:06:53.661 He hadn't always been a Holocaust denier, 00:06:53.823 --> 00:06:55.458 but in the late 80s, 00:06:55.628 --> 00:06:58.843 he embraced it with great vigor. 00:06:59.921 --> 00:07:03.644 The reason I laughed also was this was a man 00:07:03.843 --> 00:07:05.580 who not only was a Holocaust denier, 00:07:05.771 --> 00:07:07.336 but seemed quite proud of it. 00:07:07.519 --> 00:07:08.132 He was a man -- 00:07:08.321 --> 00:07:09.314 and I a quote -- 00:07:09.483 --> 00:07:12.752 who said, "I'm going to sink the battleship Auschwitz." 00:07:13.568 --> 00:07:18.019 He was a man who pointed to the number tattooed on a survivor's arm 00:07:18.152 --> 00:07:21.430 and said, "How much money have you made 00:07:21.576 --> 00:07:25.689 from having the number tattooed on your arm?" 00:07:25.894 --> 00:07:27.705 Here was a man who said, 00:07:27.883 --> 00:07:31.908 "More people died in Senator Kennedy's car at Chappaquidic 00:07:32.058 --> 00:07:35.326 than died in gas chambers at Auschwitz." 00:07:35.539 --> 00:07:36.489 That's an American reference, 00:07:36.677 --> 00:07:38.140 but you can look it up. 00:07:39.594 --> 00:07:42.471 This was not a man who seemed at all ashamed or reticent 00:07:42.625 --> 00:07:44.741 about being a Holocaust denier. 00:07:45.327 --> 00:07:49.091 Now, lots of my academic colleagues counseled me -- 00:07:49.250 --> 00:07:50.979 "Eh, Deborah, just ignore it." 00:07:51.221 --> 00:07:54.908 When I explained you can't just ignore a libel suit, 00:07:55.067 --> 00:07:57.757 they said, "Who's gonna believe him anyway?" 00:07:58.090 --> 00:07:59.745 But here was the problem. 00:08:00.083 --> 00:08:02.723 British law put the oneous, 00:08:02.867 --> 00:08:05.372 but the burden of proof on me 00:08:05.559 --> 00:08:08.143 to prove the truth of what I said, 00:08:08.324 --> 00:08:10.773 in contrast to as it would have been in the United States 00:08:10.992 --> 00:08:12.319 and in many other countries, 00:08:12.525 --> 00:08:15.844 on him to prove the falsehood. 00:08:16.207 --> 00:08:17.648 What did that mean? 00:08:17.878 --> 00:08:20.925 That meant if I didn't fight, 00:08:21.107 --> 00:08:23.823 he would win by default. 00:08:24.168 --> 00:08:25.761 And if he won by default, 00:08:25.963 --> 00:08:28.427 he could then legitimately say, 00:08:28.627 --> 00:08:33.626 "My David Irving version of the Holocaust is a legitimate version. 00:08:33.803 --> 00:08:37.776 Deborah Lipstadt libeled me when she called me a Holocaust denier. 00:08:37.964 --> 00:08:42.062 Ipso-facto, I David Irving, am not a Holocaust denier." 00:08:42.375 --> 00:08:44.277 And what is that version? 00:08:44.714 --> 00:08:47.643 There was no plan to murder the Jews, 00:08:47.827 --> 00:08:49.692 there were no gas chambers, 00:08:49.860 --> 00:08:51.499 there were no mass shootings, 00:08:51.661 --> 00:08:54.645 Hitler had nothing to do with any suffering that went on, 00:08:54.835 --> 00:09:00.715 and the Jews have made this all up to get money from Germany 00:09:00.879 --> 00:09:02.745 and to get a state, 00:09:02.941 --> 00:09:06.181 and they've done it with the aid and abetance of the allies -- 00:09:06.378 --> 00:09:09.483 they've planted the documents and planted the evidence. 00:09:10.600 --> 00:09:15.994 I couldn't let that stand and ever face a survivor -- 00:09:16.161 --> 00:09:18.279 or a child of survivors. 00:09:18.476 --> 00:09:20.042 I couldn't let that stand 00:09:20.227 --> 00:09:24.714 and consider myself a responsible historian. 00:09:25.525 --> 00:09:27.243 So we fought, 00:09:27.429 --> 00:09:28.798 and for those of you who haven't seen "Denial," 00:09:28.940 --> 00:09:30.543 spoiler alert -- 00:09:30.719 --> 00:09:31.730 we won. 00:09:32.002 --> 00:09:33.180 (Laughter) 00:09:33.403 --> 00:09:35.580 (Applause) 00:09:40.164 --> 00:09:47.814 The judge found David Irving to be a liar, 00:09:47.973 --> 00:09:48.720 a racist, 00:09:48.921 --> 00:09:50.278 and anti-Semite. 00:09:50.464 --> 00:09:52.647 His view of history was tendacious, 00:09:52.810 --> 00:09:54.619 he lied, he distorted, 00:09:54.807 --> 00:09:57.203 and most importantly, 00:09:57.398 --> 00:09:59.353 he did it deliberately. 00:09:59.682 --> 00:10:01.018 We showed a pattern, 00:10:01.191 --> 00:10:03.510 and over 25 different major instances -- 00:10:03.666 --> 00:10:04.395 not small things, 00:10:04.607 --> 00:10:06.414 many of us in the audience write books, 00:10:06.565 --> 00:10:07.580 are writing books -- 00:10:07.767 --> 00:10:09.316 we always make mistakes, 00:10:09.481 --> 00:10:11.381 that's why we're glad to have second editions -- 00:10:11.550 --> 00:10:12.387 correct the mistakes. 00:10:12.602 --> 00:10:13.907 (Laughter) 00:10:14.838 --> 00:10:18.817 But these always moved in the same direction: 00:10:18.980 --> 00:10:20.984 blame the Jews, 00:10:21.153 --> 00:10:23.729 exonerate the Nazis. 00:10:24.042 --> 00:10:25.968 But how did we win? 00:10:26.419 --> 00:10:31.799 What we did is follow his footnotes back to his sources. 00:10:32.334 --> 00:10:34.055 And what did we find? 00:10:34.286 --> 00:10:35.568 Not in most cases, 00:10:35.725 --> 00:10:37.294 and not in the preponderance of cases, 00:10:37.467 --> 00:10:39.086 but in every single instance 00:10:39.270 --> 00:10:41.953 where he made some reference to the Holocaust, 00:10:42.134 --> 00:10:46.189 that his supposed evidence was disorted, 00:10:46.322 --> 00:10:47.545 half-truth, 00:10:47.701 --> 00:10:48.884 date-changed, 00:10:49.045 --> 00:10:51.274 sequence-changed, 00:10:51.447 --> 00:10:53.396 someone put in a meeting who wasn't there. 00:10:53.619 --> 00:10:54.725 In other words, 00:10:54.914 --> 00:10:56.284 he didn't have the evidence. 00:10:56.516 --> 00:10:58.187 His evidence didn't prove it. 00:10:58.399 --> 00:11:01.427 We didn't prove what happened. 00:11:01.786 --> 00:11:04.255 We proved that what he said happened, 00:11:04.438 --> 00:11:05.920 and by extension all deniers 00:11:06.091 --> 00:11:09.704 because he either quotes them or they get their arguments from him, 00:11:09.865 --> 00:11:10.921 is not true. 00:11:11.159 --> 00:11:12.081 What they claim -- 00:11:12.266 --> 00:11:15.136 they don't have the evidence to prove it. 00:11:16.826 --> 00:11:23.221 So why is my story more than just the story of a quirky, long, 00:11:23.367 --> 00:11:25.326 six-year difficult lawsuit? 00:11:25.544 --> 00:11:30.411 An American professor being dragged into a court room 00:11:30.561 --> 00:11:33.428 by a man that the court declared in its judgement 00:11:33.644 --> 00:11:35.739 was a neo-nazi polemecist. 00:11:35.948 --> 00:11:37.872 What message does it have? 00:11:38.172 --> 00:11:40.918 I think in the context of the question of truth, 00:11:41.105 --> 00:11:43.305 it has a very significant message. 00:11:43.623 --> 00:11:45.221 Because today, 00:11:45.412 --> 00:11:46.911 as we well know, 00:11:47.086 --> 00:11:51.469 truth and facts are under assault. 00:11:51.814 --> 00:11:55.089 Social media, for all the gifts it has given us, 00:11:55.239 --> 00:11:58.785 has also allowed the difference between facts -- 00:11:58.928 --> 00:12:00.745 established facts -- 00:12:00.990 --> 00:12:04.841 and lies to be flattened. 00:12:05.080 --> 00:12:06.706 Third of all, 00:12:06.888 --> 00:12:08.359 extremism. 00:12:08.988 --> 00:12:12.763 You made not see Klu Klux Klan robes, 00:12:12.904 --> 00:12:14.641 you may not see burning crosses. 00:12:14.858 --> 00:12:19.280 You may not even hear outright white supremacist language. 00:12:19.454 --> 00:12:21.241 It may go by names, "Alt-right, 00:12:21.419 --> 00:12:22.425 National Front" -- 00:12:22.690 --> 00:12:24.089 pick you names -- 00:12:24.297 --> 00:12:29.875 but underneath it's that same extremism that I found in Holocaust denial 00:12:30.008 --> 00:12:33.601 parading as rational discourse. 00:12:35.365 --> 00:12:40.344 We live in an age where truth is on the defensive. 00:12:40.605 --> 00:12:42.992 I'm reminded of a New Yorker cartoon. 00:12:43.169 --> 00:12:45.572 A quiz show recently appeared in the New Yorker 00:12:45.720 --> 00:12:48.629 where the host of the quiz show is saying to one of the contestants, 00:12:48.806 --> 00:12:51.178 "Yes, mam, you had the right answer, 00:12:51.357 --> 00:12:53.621 but your opponent yelled more loudly than you did, 00:12:53.755 --> 00:12:55.280 so he gets the point." 00:12:56.449 --> 00:12:58.294 What can we do? 00:12:58.761 --> 00:13:00.122 First of all, 00:13:00.278 --> 00:13:05.504 we cannot be beguiled by rational appearances. 00:13:05.707 --> 00:13:07.339 We've got to look underneath, 00:13:07.491 --> 00:13:10.119 and we will find there the extremism. 00:13:11.095 --> 00:13:13.221 Second of all, 00:13:13.429 --> 00:13:19.510 we must understand that truth is not relative. 00:13:21.267 --> 00:13:22.824 Number three -- 00:13:23.007 --> 00:13:26.399 we must go on the offensive, 00:13:26.570 --> 00:13:28.563 not the defensive. 00:13:28.975 --> 00:13:31.435 When someone makes an outrageous claim, 00:13:31.593 --> 00:13:34.910 even though they may hold one of the highest offices in the land, 00:13:35.059 --> 00:13:37.093 if not the world -- 00:13:37.238 --> 00:13:38.581 we must say to them, 00:13:38.777 --> 00:13:40.476 "Where's the proof? 00:13:40.678 --> 00:13:42.540 Where's the evidence?" 00:13:42.748 --> 00:13:45.538 We must hold their feet to the fire. 00:13:45.745 --> 00:13:50.298 We must not treat it as if their lies are the same as the facts. 00:13:51.607 --> 00:13:52.449 And as I said earlier, 00:13:52.648 --> 00:13:54.926 truth is not relative. 00:13:55.225 --> 00:13:57.944 Many of us have grown up in the world of the academy 00:13:58.090 --> 00:13:59.644 and enlightened liberal thought, 00:13:59.804 --> 00:14:03.011 where we're taught everything is open to debate. 00:14:03.417 --> 00:14:05.221 But that's not the case. 00:14:05.464 --> 00:14:09.111 There are certain things that are true. 00:14:09.428 --> 00:14:12.377 There are indisputable facts -- 00:14:12.554 --> 00:14:14.244 objective truths. 00:14:14.713 --> 00:14:19.296 Galileo taught it to us centuries ago, 00:14:19.443 --> 00:14:24.127 even after being forced to recant by the Vatican 00:14:24.277 --> 00:14:26.791 that the Earth moved around the Sun, 00:14:26.967 --> 00:14:27.722 he came out, 00:14:27.883 --> 00:14:29.943 and what is he reported to have said? 00:14:30.371 --> 00:14:34.480 "And yet, it still moves." 00:14:35.532 --> 00:14:38.077 The Earth is not flat. 00:14:38.393 --> 00:14:41.261 The climate is changing. 00:14:41.667 --> 00:14:43.678 Elvis is not alive. 00:14:43.947 --> 00:14:45.285 (Laughter) 00:14:45.465 --> 00:14:47.353 (Applause) 00:14:47.877 --> 00:14:49.931 And most importantly, 00:14:50.103 --> 00:14:54.752 truth and fact are under assault. 00:14:55.575 --> 00:14:56.998 The job ahead of us, 00:14:57.170 --> 00:14:58.226 the past ahead of us, 00:14:58.413 --> 00:15:01.865 the challenge ahead of us is great. 00:15:02.098 --> 00:15:04.735 The time to fight is short. 00:15:05.543 --> 00:15:09.230 We must act now; 00:15:09.412 --> 00:15:12.500 later will be too late. 00:15:12.737 --> 00:15:14.110 Thank you very much. 00:15:14.365 --> 00:15:16.248 (Applause)