WEBVTT 00:00:01.145 --> 00:00:02.846 When someone mentions Cuba, 00:00:02.846 --> 00:00:04.925 what do you think about? 00:00:04.925 --> 00:00:07.826 Classic, classic cars? Perhaps good cigars? 00:00:07.826 --> 00:00:11.926 Maybe you think of a famous baseball player. 00:00:11.926 --> 00:00:14.353 What about when somebody mentions North Korea? 00:00:14.353 --> 00:00:16.496 You think about those missile tests, 00:00:16.496 --> 00:00:18.315 maybe their notorious leader 00:00:18.315 --> 00:00:21.155 or his good friend, Dennis Rodman. NOTE Paragraph 00:00:21.155 --> 00:00:22.457 (Laughter) NOTE Paragraph 00:00:22.457 --> 00:00:24.829 One thing that likely doesn't come to mind 00:00:24.829 --> 00:00:27.021 is a vision of a country 00:00:27.021 --> 00:00:28.643 with an open economy 00:00:28.643 --> 00:00:33.148 whose citizens have access to a wide range of affordable consumer products. NOTE Paragraph 00:00:35.527 --> 00:00:40.319 I'm not here to argue how these countries got to where they are today. 00:00:40.319 --> 00:00:43.968 I simply want to use them as an example of countries and citizens 00:00:43.968 --> 00:00:46.847 who have been affected, negatively affected, 00:00:46.847 --> 00:00:50.151 by a trade policy that restricts imports 00:00:50.151 --> 00:00:52.893 and protects local industries. 00:00:52.893 --> 00:00:55.832 Recently we've heard a number of countries 00:00:55.832 --> 00:00:57.882 talk about restricting imports 00:00:57.882 --> 00:01:01.066 and protecting their local domestic industries. 00:01:01.066 --> 00:01:04.082 Now this may sound fine in a soundbyte, 00:01:04.082 --> 00:01:07.375 but what it really is is protectionism. 00:01:07.375 --> 00:01:11.893 We heard about this during the 2016 Presidential election, 00:01:11.893 --> 00:01:14.269 we heard about it during the Brexit debates 00:01:14.269 --> 00:01:18.928 and most recently during the French elections. 00:01:18.928 --> 00:01:23.847 In fact, it's been a really important topic being talked about around the world, 00:01:23.847 --> 00:01:26.403 and many aspiring political leaders 00:01:26.403 --> 00:01:31.194 are running on platforms positioning protectionism as a good thing. NOTE Paragraph 00:01:31.194 --> 00:01:34.114 Now, I could see why they think protectionism is good, 00:01:34.114 --> 00:01:39.412 because sometimes it seems like trade is unfair. 00:01:39.412 --> 00:01:41.533 Some have blamed trade 00:01:41.533 --> 00:01:44.791 for some of the problems we've been having here at home in the US. 00:01:44.791 --> 00:01:46.371 For years we've been hearing about 00:01:46.371 --> 00:01:49.840 the loss the high-paying US manufacturing jobs. 00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:53.299 Many think that manufacturing is declining the US 00:01:53.299 --> 00:01:56.580 because companies are moving their operations offshore 00:01:56.580 --> 00:02:00.250 to markets with lower cost labor 00:02:00.250 --> 00:02:03.047 like China, Mexico and Vietnam. 00:02:03.047 --> 00:02:04.639 They also think trade agreements 00:02:04.639 --> 00:02:06.634 sometimes are unfair, 00:02:06.634 --> 00:02:08.392 like NAFTA 00:02:08.392 --> 00:02:10.300 and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, 00:02:10.300 --> 00:02:14.412 because these trade agreements allow companies to reimport 00:02:14.412 --> 00:02:18.011 those cheaply produced goods back into the US 00:02:18.011 --> 00:02:21.112 and other countries from where the jobs were taken. 00:02:21.112 --> 00:02:24.231 So it kind of feels like the exporters win 00:02:24.231 --> 00:02:26.374 and the importers lose. NOTE Paragraph 00:02:27.203 --> 00:02:28.419 Now, the reality is 00:02:28.419 --> 00:02:31.935 output in the manufacturing sector in the US 00:02:31.935 --> 00:02:34.188 is actually growing, 00:02:34.188 --> 00:02:35.754 but we are losing jobs. 00:02:35.754 --> 00:02:37.689 We're losing lots of them. 00:02:37.689 --> 00:02:40.341 In fact, from 2000 to 2010, 00:02:40.341 --> 00:02:44.740 5.7 million manufacturing jobs were lost. 00:02:44.740 --> 00:02:49.456 But they're not being lost for the reasons you might think. 00:02:49.456 --> 00:02:51.860 Mike Johnson in Toledo, Ohio 00:02:51.860 --> 00:02:54.417 didn't lose his jobs at the factory 00:02:54.417 --> 00:02:56.979 to Miguel Sanchez in Monterrey, Mexico. 00:02:56.979 --> 00:02:57.860 No. 00:02:57.860 --> 00:03:01.404 Mike lost his job to a machine. 00:03:01.404 --> 00:03:05.250 87 percent of lost manufacturing jobs 00:03:05.250 --> 00:03:08.383 have been eliminated because we've made improvements 00:03:08.383 --> 00:03:11.516 in our own productivity through automation. 00:03:11.516 --> 00:03:15.754 So that means that one out of 10 00:03:15.754 --> 00:03:16.753 lost manufacturing jobs 00:03:16.753 --> 00:03:19.989 was due to offshoring. 00:03:19.989 --> 00:03:22.520 Now this is not just a US phenomenon. 00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:23.583 No. 00:03:23.583 --> 00:03:27.089 In fact, automation is spreading to every production line 00:03:27.089 --> 00:03:29.971 in every country around the world. NOTE Paragraph 00:03:29.971 --> 00:03:31.621 But look, I get it: 00:03:31.621 --> 00:03:33.171 if you just lost your job 00:03:33.171 --> 00:03:35.428 and then you read in the newspaper that your old company 00:03:35.428 --> 00:03:37.552 just struck up a deal with China, 00:03:37.552 --> 00:03:39.852 it's easy to think you were just replaced 00:03:39.852 --> 00:03:42.135 in a one-for-one deal. NOTE Paragraph 00:03:42.135 --> 00:03:44.314 When I hear stories like this, I think that what people picture 00:03:44.314 --> 00:03:49.336 is that trade happens 00:03:49.336 --> 00:03:49.830 between only two countries. 00:03:49.830 --> 00:03:51.756 Manufacturers in one country 00:03:51.756 --> 00:03:53.827 produce products and they export them 00:03:53.827 --> 00:03:57.224 to consumers in other countries, 00:03:57.224 --> 00:04:00.105 and it feels like the manufacturing countries win 00:04:00.105 --> 00:04:03.635 and the importing countries lose. NOTE Paragraph 00:04:03.635 --> 00:04:07.230 Well, reality's a little bit different. 00:04:07.230 --> 00:04:09.109 I'm a supply chain professional, 00:04:09.109 --> 00:04:12.335 and I live and work in Mexico, 00:04:12.335 --> 00:04:14.450 and I work in the middle 00:04:14.450 --> 00:04:17.376 of a highly connected network of manufacturers 00:04:17.376 --> 00:04:19.628 all collaborating from around the world 00:04:19.628 --> 00:04:22.914 to produce many of the products we use today. 00:04:22.914 --> 00:04:25.306 What I see from my front row seat 00:04:25.306 --> 00:04:29.792 in Mexico City actually looks more like this, 00:04:29.792 --> 00:04:34.711 and this is a more accurate depiction of what trade really looks like. 00:04:34.711 --> 00:04:38.545 I've had the pleasure of being able to see how many different products 00:04:38.545 --> 00:04:40.815 are manufactured, from golf clubs 00:04:40.815 --> 00:04:42.255 to laptop computers 00:04:42.255 --> 00:04:44.925 to Internet servers, automobiles, 00:04:44.925 --> 00:04:46.974 and even airplanes, 00:04:46.974 --> 00:04:50.714 and believe me, none of it happens in a straight line. NOTE Paragraph 00:04:50.714 --> 00:04:53.008 Let me give you an example. 00:04:53.008 --> 00:04:57.939 A few months ago, I was touring the manufacturing plant 00:04:57.939 --> 00:05:01.156 of a multinational aerospace company 00:05:01.156 --> 00:05:03.175 in ??, Mexico, 00:05:03.175 --> 00:05:07.678 and the VP of logistics points out a completed tail assembly. 00:05:07.678 --> 00:05:12.106 It turns out the tail assemblies are assembled from panels 00:05:12.106 --> 00:05:14.548 that are manufactured in France, 00:05:14.548 --> 00:05:16.919 and they're assembled in Mexico 00:05:16.919 --> 00:05:20.360 using components imported from the US. 00:05:20.360 --> 00:05:22.477 When those tail assemblies are done, 00:05:22.477 --> 00:05:24.865 they're exported via truck to Canada 00:05:24.865 --> 00:05:27.007 to their primary assembly plant 00:05:27.007 --> 00:05:29.497 where they come together 00:05:29.497 --> 00:05:30.821 with thousands of other parts, 00:05:30.821 --> 00:05:33.175 like the wings and the seats 00:05:33.175 --> 00:05:36.155 and the little shades over the little windows, 00:05:36.155 --> 00:05:39.797 all coming in to become a part of a new airplane. 00:05:39.797 --> 00:05:41.237 Think about it. 00:05:41.237 --> 00:05:43.626 These new airplanes, 00:05:43.626 --> 00:05:45.626 before they even take their first flight, 00:05:45.626 --> 00:05:48.204 they have more stamps in their passports 00:05:48.204 --> 00:05:50.942 than Angelina Jolie. NOTE Paragraph 00:05:50.942 --> 00:05:54.510 Now this approach to processing goes on all around the world 00:05:54.510 --> 00:05:57.009 to manufacture many of the products 00:05:57.009 --> 00:05:59.665 we use every day, 00:05:59.665 --> 00:06:02.759 from skin cream to airplanes. 00:06:02.759 --> 00:06:04.167 When you go home tonight, 00:06:04.167 --> 00:06:05.928 take a look in your house. 00:06:05.928 --> 00:06:08.161 You might be surprised to find 00:06:08.161 --> 00:06:10.243 a label that looks like this one: 00:06:10.243 --> 00:06:12.653 "Manufactured in the U.S.A. From U.S. And Foreign Parts." NOTE Paragraph 00:06:12.653 --> 00:06:17.667 Economist Michael Porter 00:06:17.667 --> 00:06:20.149 described what's going on here best. 00:06:20.149 --> 00:06:22.410 Many decades ago, he said 00:06:22.410 --> 00:06:24.945 that it's most beneficial for a country 00:06:24.945 --> 00:06:26.594 to focus on producing 00:06:26.594 --> 00:06:32.245 the products it can produce most efficiently 00:06:32.245 --> 00:06:34.147 and trading for the rest. 00:06:34.147 --> 00:06:34.807 So what he's talking about here 00:06:34.807 --> 00:06:35.819 is share production, 00:06:35.819 --> 00:06:38.765 and efficiency is the name of the game. 00:06:38.765 --> 00:06:41.530 You've probably seen an example of this 00:06:41.530 --> 00:06:44.124 at home or at work. NOTE Paragraph 00:06:44.124 --> 00:06:46.652 Let's take a look at an example. 00:06:46.652 --> 00:06:48.756 Think about how your house was built, 00:06:48.756 --> 00:06:51.215 or your kitchen renovated. 00:06:51.215 --> 00:06:53.395 Typically there's a general contractor 00:06:53.395 --> 00:06:55.459 who is responsible for coordinating 00:06:55.459 --> 00:06:57.135 the efforts of all the different contractors: 00:06:57.135 --> 00:06:59.669 an architect to draw the plans, 00:06:59.669 --> 00:07:03.285 an earth-moving company to dig the foundation, 00:07:03.285 --> 00:07:05.301 a plumber, carpenter, and so on. 00:07:05.301 --> 00:07:07.094 So why doesn't the general contractor 00:07:07.094 --> 00:07:09.873 pick just one company 00:07:09.873 --> 00:07:11.243 to do all the work, 00:07:11.243 --> 00:07:12.848 like, say, the architect? 00:07:12.848 --> 00:07:14.785 Because this is silly. 00:07:14.785 --> 00:07:16.770 The general contractor selects experts 00:07:16.770 --> 00:07:19.190 because it takes years 00:07:19.190 --> 00:07:21.702 to learn and master 00:07:21.702 --> 00:07:24.872 how to do each of the tasks it takes to build a house or renovate a kitchen, 00:07:24.872 --> 00:07:28.349 some of them requiring special training. 00:07:28.349 --> 00:07:29.385 Think about it: 00:07:29.385 --> 00:07:31.542 would you want your architect 00:07:31.542 --> 00:07:33.581 to install your toilet? 00:07:33.581 --> 00:07:35.061 Of course not. NOTE Paragraph 00:07:35.061 --> 00:07:38.489 So let's apply this process to the corporate world. 00:07:38.489 --> 00:07:41.103 Companies today focus on manufacturing 00:07:41.103 --> 00:07:44.518 what they produce best and most efficiently 00:07:44.518 --> 00:07:46.985 and they trade for everything else. 00:07:46.985 --> 00:07:49.841 So this means they rely 00:07:49.841 --> 00:07:54.736 on a global, interconnected, interdependent network of manufacturers 00:07:54.736 --> 00:07:56.052 to produce these products. 00:07:56.052 --> 00:07:58.185 In fact, that network is so interconnected 00:07:58.185 --> 00:07:59.819 it's almost impossible 00:07:59.819 --> 00:08:04.460 to dismantle and produce products in just one country. 00:08:04.460 --> 00:08:06.796 Let's take a look at the interconnected web 00:08:06.796 --> 00:08:08.586 we saw a few moments ago, 00:08:08.586 --> 00:08:10.700 and let's focus on just one strand 00:08:10.700 --> 00:08:14.348 between the US and Mexico. 00:08:14.348 --> 00:08:17.867 The Wilson Institute says that share production represents 00:08:17.867 --> 00:08:23.397 40 percent of the half a trillion dollars of trade between the US and Mexico. 00:08:23.397 --> 00:08:26.090 That's about 200 billion dollars, 00:08:26.090 --> 00:08:30.006 or the same as the GDP for Portugal. 00:08:30.006 --> 00:08:32.566 So let's just imagine 00:08:32.566 --> 00:08:35.625 that the US decides to impose 00:08:35.625 --> 00:08:40.233 a 20 percent border tax on all imports from Mexico. 00:08:40.233 --> 00:08:41.317 Okay, fine, 00:08:41.317 --> 00:08:46.423 but do you think Mexico is just going to stand by and let that happen? 00:08:46.423 --> 00:08:48.085 No. No way. 00:08:48.085 --> 00:08:51.880 So in retaliation, they impose a similar tax on all goods 00:08:51.880 --> 00:08:54.868 being imported from the US, 00:08:54.868 --> 00:08:57.512 and a little game of tit-for-tat ensues, 00:08:57.512 --> 00:09:02.296 and 20 percent, just imagine that 20 percent duties 00:09:02.296 --> 00:09:05.444 are added to every good, product, product component 00:09:05.444 --> 00:09:08.180 crossing back and forth across the border, 00:09:08.180 --> 00:09:11.430 and you could be looking at more than a 40 percent increase in duties, 00:09:11.430 --> 00:09:14.092 or 80 billion dollars. 00:09:14.092 --> 00:09:15.979 Now don't kid yourself, 00:09:15.979 --> 00:09:18.715 these costs are going to be passed along 00:09:18.715 --> 00:09:22.058 to you and to me. 00:09:22.058 --> 00:09:25.676 Now, let's think about what that impact 00:09:25.676 --> 00:09:29.683 might have on some of the products, 00:09:29.683 --> 00:09:30.998 or the prices of the products, that we buy every day. 00:09:30.998 --> 00:09:35.249 So if a 30 percent increase in duties were actually passed along, 00:09:35.249 --> 00:09:39.959 we would be looking at some pretty important increases in prices. 00:09:39.959 --> 00:09:45.000 A Lincoln MKZ would go from 37,000 dollars to 48,000, 00:09:45.000 --> 00:09:49.041 and the price of a Sharp 60-inch HDTV 00:09:49.041 --> 00:09:54.294 would go from 898 dollars to 1,167 dollars, 00:09:54.294 --> 00:09:57.868 and the price of a 16-ounce jar of CVS skin moisturizer 00:09:57.868 --> 00:10:00.684 would go from 13 dollars to 17 dollars. 00:10:00.684 --> 00:10:07.925 Now remember, this is only looking at one strand of the production chain 00:10:07.925 --> 00:10:09.264 between the US and Mexico, 00:10:09.264 --> 00:10:12.320 so multiply this out across all of the strands. 00:10:12.320 --> 00:10:14.578 The impact could be considerable. NOTE Paragraph 00:10:14.578 --> 00:10:17.305 Now just think about this: 00:10:17.305 --> 00:10:21.303 even if we were able to dismantle this network 00:10:21.303 --> 00:10:24.983 and produce products in just one country, 00:10:24.983 --> 00:10:27.590 which by the way is easier said than done, 00:10:27.590 --> 00:10:29.987 we would still only be saving 00:10:29.987 --> 00:10:33.953 or protecting one out of 10 lost manufacturing jobs. 00:10:33.953 --> 00:10:37.665 That's right, because remember, 00:10:37.665 --> 00:10:40.382 most of those jobs, 87 percent, 00:10:40.382 --> 00:10:43.701 were lost due to improvements in our own productivity. 00:10:43.701 --> 00:10:48.410 And unfortunately, those jobs, they're gone for good. 00:10:48.410 --> 00:10:50.518 So the real question is, 00:10:50.518 --> 00:10:53.155 does it make sense for us to drive up prices 00:10:53.155 --> 00:10:57.430 to the point where many of us can't afford the basic goods 00:10:57.430 --> 00:10:59.368 we use every day 00:10:59.368 --> 00:11:01.775 for the purpose of saving a job 00:11:01.775 --> 00:11:05.820 that might be eliminated in a couple of years anyway? NOTE Paragraph 00:11:05.820 --> 00:11:09.462 The reality is that share production 00:11:09.462 --> 00:11:11.980 allows us to manufacture higher quality products 00:11:11.980 --> 00:11:13.329 at lower costs. 00:11:13.329 --> 00:11:15.229 It's that simple. 00:11:15.229 --> 00:11:17.515 It allows us to get more 00:11:17.515 --> 00:11:19.472 out of the limited resources and expertise we have, 00:11:19.472 --> 00:11:23.766 and at the same time benefit from lower prices. 00:11:23.766 --> 00:11:25.937 It's really important to remember 00:11:25.937 --> 00:11:28.783 that for share production to be effective, 00:11:28.783 --> 00:11:34.230 it relies on efficient cross-border movement of raw materials, 00:11:34.230 --> 00:11:37.239 components and finished products. NOTE Paragraph 00:11:37.239 --> 00:11:39.136 So remember this: 00:11:39.136 --> 00:11:41.495 the next time you're hearing somebody 00:11:41.495 --> 00:11:43.464 try to sell you on the idea 00:11:43.464 --> 00:11:46.687 that protectionism is a good deal, 00:11:46.687 --> 00:11:48.328 it's just not. NOTE Paragraph 00:11:48.328 --> 00:11:50.678 Thank you. NOTE Paragraph 00:11:50.678 --> 00:11:52.028 (Applause)