1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,933 ♪ 2 00:00:01,933 --> 00:00:03,263 Alright, here we go! 3 00:00:04,064 --> 00:00:07,198 If I want to turn this globe into a flat map, 4 00:00:07,198 --> 00:00:09,250 I’m going to have to cut it open. 5 00:00:17,008 --> 00:00:21,512 In order to get this globe to look anything close to a rectangle lying flat, 6 00:00:21,512 --> 00:00:24,032 I've had to cut it in several places. 7 00:00:24,032 --> 00:00:28,256 I've had to stretch it so the countries are starting to look all wonky. 8 00:00:28,256 --> 00:00:34,034 And even still, it's almost impossible to get it to lay flat. 9 00:00:34,034 --> 00:00:37,294 And that right there is the eternal dilemma of map makers. 10 00:00:37,904 --> 00:00:39,989 The surface of a sphere cannot be 11 00:00:39,989 --> 00:00:43,017 represented as a plane without some form of distortion. 12 00:00:43,017 --> 00:00:46,239 That was mathematically proved, by this guy, a long time ago. 13 00:00:46,239 --> 00:00:47,578 Since around 1500s, 14 00:00:47,578 --> 00:00:50,687 mathematicians have set about creating algorithms that 15 00:00:50,687 --> 00:00:53,100 would translate the globe into something flat. 16 00:00:53,100 --> 00:00:55,723 And to do this, they use a process called projection. 17 00:00:56,173 --> 00:00:58,862 Popular rectangular maps use a cylindrical projections. 18 00:00:59,042 --> 00:01:03,401 Imagine putting a theoretical cylinder over the globe and projecting each of the 19 00:01:03,401 --> 00:01:07,360 points of the sphere onto the cylinder’s surface. 20 00:01:07,036 --> 00:01:10,595 Unroll the cylinder, and you have a flat, rectangular map. 21 00:01:10,975 --> 00:01:13,939 But you could also project the globe onto other objects, 22 00:01:13,939 --> 00:01:16,974 and the math used by map makers to project the globe 23 00:01:16,974 --> 00:01:20,440 Will effect what the map looks like once it’s all flattened out. 24 00:01:20,161 --> 00:01:25,027 And here’s the big problem: Every one of these projections comes with trade offs in 25 00:01:25,081 --> 00:01:28,426 shape, distance, direction and land area. 26 00:01:28,425 --> 00:01:30,719 Certain map projections can be either misleading 27 00:01:30,719 --> 00:01:32,901 or very helpful depending on what 28 00:01:32,901 --> 00:01:34,280 you are using them for. 29 00:01:34,028 --> 00:01:35,067 Here’s an example. 30 00:01:35,067 --> 00:01:37,833 This map is called the Mercator projection. 31 00:01:38,013 --> 00:01:41,031 If you’re American, you probably studied this map in school. 32 00:01:41,031 --> 00:01:43,336 It’s the projection Google Maps uses. 33 00:01:43,336 --> 00:01:46,408 The Mercator projection is popular or a couple of reasons. 34 00:01:46,438 --> 00:01:49,179 First, it generally preserves the shape of the countries. 35 00:01:49,179 --> 00:01:53,707 Brazil on the globe has the same shape as Brazil on the Mercator projection. 36 00:01:53,707 --> 00:01:54,707 [Ding] 37 00:01:54,707 --> 00:01:58,100 But the real purpose of the Mercator projection was navigation -- 38 00:01:58,100 --> 00:02:01,418 it preserves direction, which is a big deal if you are 39 00:02:01,418 --> 00:02:03,749 trying to navigate the ocean with only a compass. 40 00:02:03,749 --> 00:02:06,364 It was designed so that a line drawn between two points 41 00:02:06,364 --> 00:02:08,138 on the map would provide the exact 42 00:02:08,138 --> 00:02:11,869 angle to follow on a compass to travel between those points. 43 00:02:12,039 --> 00:02:15,967 If we go back to the globe, you can see that this line is not shortest route. 44 00:02:15,967 --> 00:02:20,235 But it provides a simple, reliable way to navigate across the ocean. 45 00:02:20,371 --> 00:02:23,698 Gerardus Mercator, who created the projection in the 16th century, 46 00:02:23,698 --> 00:02:27,189 was able to preserve direction by varying the distance between 47 00:02:27,189 --> 00:02:29,852 the latitude lines and also making them straight. 48 00:02:30,002 --> 00:02:32,079 Creating a grid of right angles. 49 00:02:32,519 --> 00:02:34,294 But that created some other problems. 50 00:02:34,354 --> 00:02:37,277 Where Mercator fails is its representation of size. 51 00:02:37,277 --> 00:02:39,856 Look at the size of Africa as compared to Greenland. 52 00:02:39,856 --> 00:02:42,321 On the Mercator map they look about the same size. 53 00:02:42,321 --> 00:02:45,393 But if you look at a globe for Greenland’s true size, 54 00:02:45,393 --> 00:02:48,001 you’ll see it’s way smaller than Africa 55 00:02:48,431 --> 00:02:51,266 By a factor of 14 in fact. 56 00:02:52,196 --> 00:02:55,594 If we put a bunch of dots, on the globe, that are all the same size, 57 00:02:55,594 --> 00:02:58,125 and then we projected that onto the Mercator map 58 00:02:58,125 --> 00:02:59,388 we would end up with this. 59 00:02:59,388 --> 00:03:02,315 The circles retain their round shape, but are enlarged 60 00:03:02,315 --> 00:03:04,043 as they get closer to the poles. 61 00:03:04,043 --> 00:03:08,053 One modern critique of this is that the distortion perpetuates imperialist 62 00:03:08,053 --> 00:03:11,612 attitudes of European domination over the southern hemisphere 63 00:03:11,612 --> 00:03:16,008 "The Mercator projection has fostered European imperialist attitudes for centuries 64 00:03:16,008 --> 00:03:18,554 and created a ethnic bias against the third world." 65 00:03:18,964 --> 00:03:19,833 "Really?" 66 00:03:19,894 --> 00:03:23,162 So if you want to see a map that more accurately displays land area, 67 00:03:23,162 --> 00:03:26,540 you can use the Gall-Peters projection, 68 00:03:26,540 --> 00:03:27,674 this is called an equal-area map. 69 00:03:28,244 --> 00:03:29,819 Look at Greenland and Africa now. 70 00:03:29,819 --> 00:03:31,390 The size comparison is accurate. 71 00:03:31,395 --> 00:03:33,198 Much better than the Mercator. 72 00:03:33,198 --> 00:03:37,098 but it’s obvious now that the country shapes are totally distorted. 73 00:03:37,098 --> 00:03:41,016 Here are the dots again so we can see how the projection preserves area 74 00:03:41,016 --> 00:03:43,835 while totally distorting shape. 75 00:03:45,034 --> 00:03:47,191 Something happened in the late 60s 76 00:03:47,191 --> 00:03:49,449 that would change the whole purpose of mapping 77 00:03:49,449 --> 00:03:51,325 and the way we think about projections. 78 00:03:51,325 --> 00:03:55,320 Satellites orbiting our planet started sending location and navigation data 79 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:57,923 to little receiver units all around the world. 80 00:03:57,927 --> 00:03:58,957 [Rocket blasting off] 81 00:03:58,957 --> 00:04:02,369 "Today orbiting satellites of the Navy Navigation Satellite System 82 00:04:03,332 --> 00:04:07,612 provide round the clock, ultra precise position fixes, from space, 83 00:04:07,612 --> 00:04:11,109 to units everywhere in any kind of weather." 84 00:04:12,935 --> 00:04:16,406 This global positioning system wiped out the need for paper maps 85 00:04:16,406 --> 00:04:18,168 as a means of navigating 86 00:04:18,168 --> 00:04:19,488 both the seas and the sky. 87 00:04:19,488 --> 00:04:23,684 Map projection choices became less about navigational imperatives and more about 88 00:04:23,684 --> 00:04:25,820 aesthetics, design,and presentation 89 00:04:26,076 --> 00:04:30,521 The Mercator map, that once vital tool of pre-GPS navigation, 90 00:04:30,521 --> 00:04:32,539 was shunned by cartographers who 91 00:04:32,539 --> 00:04:33,980 now saw it as misleading. 92 00:04:34,074 --> 00:04:38,296 But even still, most web mapping tools like Google Maps, use the Mercator. 93 00:04:38,731 --> 00:04:42,609 This is because the Mercator’s ability to preserve shape and angles makes 94 00:04:42,609 --> 00:04:46,789 close-up views of cities more accurate -- a 90 degree left turn on the map 95 00:04:46,789 --> 00:04:50,000 is a 90 degree left turn on the street you’re driving down. 96 00:04:50,168 --> 00:04:52,945 The distortion is minimal when you are close up. 97 00:04:52,965 --> 00:04:57,062 But on a world map scale, cartographers rarely use the Mercator. 98 00:04:57,610 --> 00:04:59,576 Most modern cartographers have settled on a 99 00:04:59,576 --> 00:05:02,229 variety of non-rectangular projections that 100 00:05:02,229 --> 00:05:05,380 split the difference between distorting either size or shape. 101 00:05:05,380 --> 00:05:09,215 In 1998 The National Geographic Society adopted The Winkel-Tripel projection 102 00:05:09,215 --> 00:05:10,910 because of it’s pleasant balance 103 00:05:10,910 --> 00:05:12,866 between size and shape accuracy. 104 00:05:13,155 --> 00:05:16,043 But the fact remains, that there is no one right projection. 105 00:05:16,043 --> 00:05:19,536 Cartographers and mathematicians have created a huge library 106 00:05:19,536 --> 00:05:21,230 of available projections. 107 00:05:21,230 --> 00:05:23,446 Each with a new perspective on the planet. 108 00:05:23,446 --> 00:05:25,207 And each useful for a different task. 109 00:05:25,207 --> 00:05:27,649 The best way to see the Earth is to look at a globe. 110 00:05:27,649 --> 00:05:31,670 But as long we use flat maps, we'll have to deal with the trade-offs 111 00:05:31,670 --> 00:05:32,276 of projections, 112 00:05:32,276 --> 00:05:33,652 And just remember: 113 00:05:33,652 --> 00:05:35,050 there’s no right answer. 114 00:05:37,609 --> 00:05:40,538 If you yourself want to poke fun at the Mercator projection 115 00:05:40,538 --> 00:05:44,350 You can do so, by going to thetruesize.com 116 00:05:44,350 --> 00:05:48,364 Which is a fun tool that allows you to drag around whatever country you want 117 00:05:48,364 --> 00:05:51,758 around the map and see how it is distorted depending on where it is. 118 00:05:51,758 --> 00:05:54,700 I also want to say a big thanks, to Mike Bostock 119 00:05:54,700 --> 00:05:56,342 who's open source project on map projections, 120 00:05:56,342 --> 00:05:57,996 was a huge help in this video. 121 00:05:57,996 --> 00:06:02,436 I'll put a link to both of those things down in the description.