WEBVTT

00:00:00.380 --> 00:00:03.230
People say that a long, long time ago,

00:00:03.254 --> 00:00:05.537
everybody on earth spoke the same language

00:00:05.561 --> 00:00:07.480
and belonged to the same tribe.

00:00:07.980 --> 00:00:10.950
And I guess people had
a little too much time on their hands,

00:00:10.974 --> 00:00:13.516
because they decided
they were going to work together

00:00:13.540 --> 00:00:14.823
to become as great as God.

00:00:15.303 --> 00:00:18.573
So they started to build a tower
up into the heavens.

00:00:19.293 --> 00:00:21.195
God saw this and was angry,

00:00:21.219 --> 00:00:23.356
and to punish the people
for their arrogance,

00:00:23.380 --> 00:00:24.782
God destroyed the tower

00:00:24.806 --> 00:00:27.529
and scattered the people
to the ends of the earth

00:00:27.553 --> 00:00:29.709
and made them all
speak different languages.

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:30.896 --> 00:00:33.674
This is the story of the Tower of Babel,

00:00:33.698 --> 00:00:36.899
and it's probably not
a literal historical truth,

00:00:36.923 --> 00:00:38.388
but it does tell us something

00:00:38.412 --> 00:00:42.471
about the way that we understand
languages and speakers.

00:00:42.951 --> 00:00:46.242
So for one thing, we often think
about speaking different languages

00:00:46.266 --> 00:00:50.362
as meaning that we don't get along
or maybe we're in conflict,

00:00:50.386 --> 00:00:53.897
and speaking the same language as meaning
that we belong to the same group

00:00:53.921 --> 00:00:55.579
and that we can work together.

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:56.768 --> 00:00:58.199
Modern linguists know

00:00:58.223 --> 00:01:01.321
that the relationship between
language and social categories

00:01:01.345 --> 00:01:03.504
is intricate and complex,

00:01:03.528 --> 00:01:07.567
and we bring a lot of baggage
to the way that we understand language,

00:01:07.591 --> 00:01:10.043
to the point that even
a seemingly simple question,

00:01:10.067 --> 00:01:13.237
like, "What makes a person
a speaker of a language?"

00:01:13.261 --> 00:01:15.582
can turn out to be really,
really complicated.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:16.717 --> 00:01:19.601
I'm a Spanish professor at Ohio State.

00:01:19.625 --> 00:01:21.645
I teach mostly upper-level courses,

00:01:21.669 --> 00:01:23.939
where the students have taken
four to five years

00:01:23.963 --> 00:01:26.463
of university-level Spanish courses.

00:01:26.487 --> 00:01:30.739
So students who are in my class
speak Spanish with me all semester long.

00:01:30.763 --> 00:01:34.453
They listen to me speak in Spanish.
They turn in written work in Spanish.

00:01:34.477 --> 00:01:37.734
And yet, when I asked my students
at the beginning of the semester,

00:01:37.758 --> 00:01:40.852
"Who considers themselves
a Spanish speaker?"

00:01:40.876 --> 00:01:43.228
not very many of them raise their hands.

00:01:43.873 --> 00:01:46.585
So you can be a really,
really good speaker of a language

00:01:46.609 --> 00:01:50.319
and still not consider yourself
a language speaker.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:51.750 --> 00:01:55.132
Maybe it's not just about
how well you speak a language.

00:01:55.156 --> 00:01:58.851
Maybe it's also about what age
you start learning that language.

00:01:59.761 --> 00:02:03.033
But when we look at kids
who speak Spanish at home

00:02:03.057 --> 00:02:06.764
but mostly English at work or in school,

00:02:06.788 --> 00:02:10.321
they often feel like they don't
speak either language really well.

00:02:10.345 --> 00:02:14.077
They sometimes feel like they exist
in a state of languagelessness,

00:02:14.101 --> 00:02:17.976
because they don't feel fully comfortable
in Spanish at school,

00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:21.088
and they don't feel fully comfortable
in English at home.

00:02:21.847 --> 00:02:25.801
We have this really strong idea
that in order to be a good bilingual,

00:02:25.825 --> 00:02:28.536
we have to be two
monolinguals in one body.

00:02:29.239 --> 00:02:32.813
But linguists know that's not really
how bilingualism works.

00:02:32.837 --> 00:02:36.302
It's actually much more common
for people to specialize,

00:02:36.326 --> 00:02:40.819
to use one language in one place
and another language in another place.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:42.453 --> 00:02:46.107
Now, it's not always only about
how we see ourselves.

00:02:46.131 --> 00:02:49.282
It can also be about
how other people see us.

00:02:50.179 --> 00:02:52.357
I do my research in Bolivia,

00:02:52.381 --> 00:02:54.831
which is a country in South America.

00:02:54.855 --> 00:02:57.044
And in Bolivia, as in the United States,

00:02:57.068 --> 00:03:00.712
there are different social groups
and different ethnic categories.

00:03:01.233 --> 00:03:05.267
One of those ethnic categories
is a group known as Quechua,

00:03:05.291 --> 00:03:06.941
who are Indigenous people.

00:03:07.441 --> 00:03:10.616
And people who are Quechua
speak Spanish a little bit differently

00:03:10.640 --> 00:03:12.885
than your run-of-the-mill Spanish speaker.

00:03:12.909 --> 00:03:16.373
In particular, there are some sounds
that sound a little bit more alike

00:03:16.397 --> 00:03:18.325
when many Quechua speakers use them.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:19.741 --> 00:03:22.491
So a colleague and I designed a study

00:03:22.515 --> 00:03:27.363
where we took a series
of very similar-sounding word pairs,

00:03:27.387 --> 00:03:30.908
and they were similar-sounding
in exactly the same sorts of ways

00:03:30.932 --> 00:03:35.715
that Quechua speakers often sound similar
when they speak Spanish.

00:03:36.628 --> 00:03:40.477
We played those similar-sounding
word pairs to a group of listeners,

00:03:40.501 --> 00:03:43.580
and we told half of the listeners
that they were going to listen

00:03:43.604 --> 00:03:46.108
to just your normal
run-of-the-mill Spanish speaker

00:03:46.132 --> 00:03:50.486
and the other half of the listeners that
they were going to hear a Quechua speaker.

00:03:50.510 --> 00:03:52.781
Everybody heard the same recording,

00:03:52.805 --> 00:03:55.955
but what we found was that people
who thought they were listening

00:03:55.979 --> 00:03:57.745
to a run-of-the-mill Spanish speaker

00:03:57.769 --> 00:04:00.074
made clear differences
between the word pairs,

00:04:00.098 --> 00:04:03.259
and people who thought they were
listening to a Quechua speaker

00:04:03.283 --> 00:04:05.803
really didn't seem to make
clear differences.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:06.445 --> 00:04:08.573
So if a visual would help,

00:04:08.597 --> 00:04:10.624
here are the results of our study.

00:04:10.648 --> 00:04:13.696
What you see here in the top line
is a little bit of an arch.

00:04:13.720 --> 00:04:15.444
That's what you would expect

00:04:15.468 --> 00:04:18.731
from people who are making
clear differences between the word pairs,

00:04:18.755 --> 00:04:20.416
and that's what you see for people

00:04:20.440 --> 00:04:22.891
who though they were
listening to a Spanish speaker.

00:04:22.915 --> 00:04:25.894
What you see on the bottom
is a little bit more of a flat line,

00:04:25.918 --> 00:04:27.474
and that's what we expect to see

00:04:27.498 --> 00:04:29.611
when people are not
making clear differences,

00:04:29.635 --> 00:04:33.558
and that came from the group that thought
they were listening to a Quechua speaker.

00:04:33.582 --> 00:04:35.785
Now, since nothing
about the recording changed,

00:04:35.809 --> 00:04:39.188
that means that it was the social
categories that we gave the listeners

00:04:39.212 --> 00:04:42.088
that changed the way
they perceived language.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:42.586 --> 00:04:46.120
This isn't just some funny thing
that only happens in Bolivia.

00:04:46.144 --> 00:04:48.912
Research has been carried out
in the United States,

00:04:48.936 --> 00:04:51.288
in Canada, in New Zealand,

00:04:51.312 --> 00:04:53.288
showing exactly the same thing.

00:04:53.312 --> 00:04:57.460
We incorporate social categories
into our understanding of language.

00:04:58.100 --> 00:05:02.004
There have even been studies
carried out with American college students

00:05:02.028 --> 00:05:04.169
who listen to a university lecture.

00:05:04.774 --> 00:05:07.885
Half of the students were shown
a picture of a Caucasian face

00:05:07.909 --> 00:05:09.267
as the instructor.

00:05:09.291 --> 00:05:12.394
Half of the students were shown
a picture of an Asian face

00:05:12.418 --> 00:05:14.212
as the instructor.

00:05:14.236 --> 00:05:16.550
And students who saw the Asian face

00:05:16.574 --> 00:05:21.586
reported that the lecture was less clear
and harder to understand,

00:05:21.610 --> 00:05:25.080
even though everybody listened
to the same recording.

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:27.621 --> 00:05:32.778
So social categories really influence
the way that we understand language.

00:05:32.802 --> 00:05:35.572
And this is an issue that became
especially personal to me

00:05:35.596 --> 00:05:37.273
when my children started school.

00:05:38.131 --> 00:05:40.317
My children are Latino,

00:05:40.341 --> 00:05:41.959
and we speak Spanish at home,

00:05:41.983 --> 00:05:45.144
but they speak mostly English
with their friends out in the world,

00:05:45.168 --> 00:05:46.530
with their grandparents.

00:05:47.129 --> 00:05:48.361
When they started school,

00:05:48.385 --> 00:05:50.177
I was told that the district requires

00:05:50.201 --> 00:05:54.368
that any household that has a member
who speaks a language other than English,

00:05:54.392 --> 00:05:55.988
the children have to be tested

00:05:56.012 --> 00:05:59.128
to see if they need
English as a second language services.

00:05:59.683 --> 00:06:03.817
And I was like, "Yes! My kids
are going to ace this test."

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:05.563 --> 00:06:07.918
But that's not what happened.

00:06:07.942 --> 00:06:12.389
So you can see behind me the results
from my daughter's ESL placement exam.

00:06:12.413 --> 00:06:17.134
She got a perfect five out of five
for comprehension,

00:06:17.158 --> 00:06:19.233
for reading and listening.

00:06:19.919 --> 00:06:25.183
But she only got three out of five
for speaking and writing.

00:06:25.207 --> 00:06:27.188
And I was like, "This is really weird,

00:06:27.212 --> 00:06:30.012
because this kid
talks my ear off all the time."

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:30.036 --> 00:06:31.152
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:31.525 --> 00:06:35.925
But I figured it's just one test
on one day, and it's not a big deal.

00:06:36.699 --> 00:06:39.851
Until, several years later,
my son started school,

00:06:39.875 --> 00:06:43.772
and my son also scored
as a non-native speaker of English

00:06:43.796 --> 00:06:45.096
on the exam.

00:06:46.160 --> 00:06:48.482
And I was like, "This is really weird,

00:06:48.506 --> 00:06:50.555
and it doesn't seem like a coincidence."

00:06:50.579 --> 00:06:52.256
So I sent a note in to the teacher,

00:06:52.280 --> 00:06:53.550
and she was very kind.

00:06:53.574 --> 00:06:57.800
She sent me a long message explaining
why he had been placed in this way.

00:06:58.354 --> 00:07:01.430
Some of the things that she said
really caught my attention.

00:07:02.173 --> 00:07:05.670
For one thing, she said that
even a native speaker of English

00:07:05.694 --> 00:07:07.524
might not score at advanced level

00:07:07.548 --> 00:07:08.987
on this test,

00:07:09.011 --> 00:07:13.226
depending on what kinds of resource
and enrichment they were getting at home.

00:07:14.797 --> 00:07:18.021
Now, this tells me that the test
wasn't doing a great job

00:07:18.045 --> 00:07:20.234
of measuring English proficiency,

00:07:20.258 --> 00:07:23.455
but it may have been measuring
something like how much resources

00:07:23.479 --> 00:07:25.027
kids are exposed to at home,

00:07:25.051 --> 00:07:29.264
in which case, those kids need
different types of support at school.

00:07:29.288 --> 00:07:31.990
They really don't need
English language assistance.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:33.167 --> 00:07:37.063
Another thing that she mentioned
caught my attention as a linguist.

00:07:37.696 --> 00:07:40.796
She said that she had asked my son
to repeat the sentence,

00:07:40.820 --> 00:07:43.079
"Who has Jane's pencil?"

00:07:44.476 --> 00:07:47.838
And he repeated, "Who has Jane pencil?"

00:07:48.716 --> 00:07:53.729
She said this is a typical error made
by a non-native English-speaking student

00:07:53.753 --> 00:07:58.209
whose native language does not contain
a similar structure for possessives.

00:07:59.282 --> 00:08:01.109
The reason this caught my attention

00:08:01.133 --> 00:08:03.066
is because I know

00:08:03.090 --> 00:08:07.174
that there is a systematic,
rule-governed variety of English

00:08:07.198 --> 00:08:11.434
in which this possessive construction
is completely grammatical.

00:08:12.406 --> 00:08:16.474
That variety is known to linguists
as "African-American English."

00:08:17.284 --> 00:08:20.115
And African-American English
is actually group of dialects

00:08:20.139 --> 00:08:22.156
that's spoken across the United States,

00:08:22.180 --> 00:08:24.739
mostly in African-American communities.

00:08:25.648 --> 00:08:27.688
But it just so happens
that my son's school

00:08:27.712 --> 00:08:30.117
is about 60 percent African-American.

00:08:30.840 --> 00:08:33.110
And we know that at this age,

00:08:33.134 --> 00:08:35.627
children are picking things up
from their friends,

00:08:35.651 --> 00:08:37.501
they're experimenting with language,

00:08:37.525 --> 00:08:39.690
they're using it in different contexts.

00:08:40.394 --> 00:08:44.241
I think when the teacher saw my son,

00:08:44.265 --> 00:08:49.323
she didn't see a child who she expected
to speak African-American English.

00:08:50.156 --> 00:08:54.332
And so instead of evaluating him
as a child who was natively acquiring

00:08:54.356 --> 00:08:56.931
multiple dialects of English,

00:08:56.955 --> 00:09:01.479
she evaluated him as a child
whose standard English was deficient.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:04.765 --> 00:09:08.531
Language and social categories
are intricately connected,

00:09:08.555 --> 00:09:12.791
and we bring so much baggage
to the way that we understand language.

00:09:13.415 --> 00:09:14.976
When you ask me a question like,

00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:17.781
"Who counts as a speaker of a language?"

00:09:17.805 --> 00:09:20.856
I don't really have
a simple answer to that question.

00:09:20.880 --> 00:09:22.125
But what I can tell you

00:09:22.149 --> 00:09:24.578
is that people are pattern seekers,

00:09:24.602 --> 00:09:27.702
and we're always looking for ways
to connect the dots

00:09:27.726 --> 00:09:30.415
between different types of information.

00:09:31.886 --> 00:09:33.169
This can be a problem

00:09:33.193 --> 00:09:37.438
when our underlying biases
are projected onto language.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:38.929 --> 00:09:41.729
When I look at children like my own,

00:09:41.753 --> 00:09:46.615
and I see them in the gentlest
and most well-meaning of ways

00:09:46.639 --> 00:09:50.644
being racially profiled
as non-native speakers of English,

00:09:52.215 --> 00:09:53.860
it makes me wonder:

00:09:53.884 --> 00:09:55.136
What's going to happen

00:09:55.160 --> 00:09:57.355
as they move from elementary school

00:09:57.379 --> 00:10:01.817
onto high school and college
and onto their first jobs?

00:10:01.841 --> 00:10:03.996
When they walk into an interview,

00:10:04.020 --> 00:10:07.172
will the person sitting
across the table from them

00:10:07.196 --> 00:10:10.316
look at their color or their last name

00:10:10.340 --> 00:10:13.186
and hear them as speaking
with a Spanish accent

00:10:13.210 --> 00:10:15.884
or as speaking bad English?

00:10:16.576 --> 00:10:19.881
These are the kinds of judgments
that can have long-reaching effects

00:10:19.905 --> 00:10:21.473
on people's lives.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:23.094 --> 00:10:26.336
So I hope that that person, just like you,

00:10:26.360 --> 00:10:29.181
will have reflected
on the naturalized links

00:10:29.205 --> 00:10:31.868
between language and social categories

00:10:31.892 --> 00:10:35.310
and will have questioned their assumptions
about what it really means

00:10:35.334 --> 00:10:37.536
to be a speaker of a language.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:38.121 --> 00:10:39.449
Thank you.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:39.473 --> 00:10:41.243
(Applause)