1
00:00:00,289 --> 00:00:03,486
People say that a long, long time ago,

2
00:00:03,486 --> 00:00:05,811
everybody on Earth spoke the same language

3
00:00:05,811 --> 00:00:07,947
and belonged to the same tribe.

4
00:00:07,947 --> 00:00:10,550
And I guess people had
a little too much time on their hands,

5
00:00:10,550 --> 00:00:13,085
because they decided they
were going to work together

6
00:00:13,085 --> 00:00:15,010
to become as great as God.

7
00:00:15,478 --> 00:00:19,349
So they started to build
a tower up into the heavens.

8
00:00:19,349 --> 00:00:21,649
God saw this and was angry,

9
00:00:21,649 --> 00:00:23,536
and to punish the people
for their arrogance,

10
00:00:23,536 --> 00:00:25,388
God destroyed the tower

11
00:00:25,388 --> 00:00:27,773
and scattered the people
to the ends of the earth

12
00:00:27,773 --> 00:00:30,526
and made them all
speak different languages.

13
00:00:31,016 --> 00:00:33,869
This is the story of the Tower of Babel,

14
00:00:33,869 --> 00:00:36,923
and it's probably not
a literal historical truth,

15
00:00:36,923 --> 00:00:40,683
but it does tell us something
about the way that we understand

16
00:00:40,683 --> 00:00:42,951
languages and speakers.

17
00:00:42,951 --> 00:00:46,494
So for one thing, we often think
about speaking different languages

18
00:00:46,494 --> 00:00:49,831
as meaning that we don't get along
or maybe we're in conflict,

19
00:00:49,831 --> 00:00:54,285
and speaking the same language as meaning
that we belong to the same group

20
00:00:54,285 --> 00:00:57,062
and that we can work together.

21
00:00:57,062 --> 00:00:59,414
Modern linguists know
that the relationship

22
00:00:59,414 --> 00:01:03,851
between language and social categories
is intricate and complex,

23
00:01:03,851 --> 00:01:07,733
and we bring a lot of baggage
to the way that we understand language,

24
00:01:07,733 --> 00:01:09,586
to the point that even
a seemingly simple question,

25
00:01:09,586 --> 00:01:13,545
like, "What makes a person
a speaker of a language?"

26
00:01:13,545 --> 00:01:16,383
can turn out to be really,
really complicated.

27
00:01:16,383 --> 00:01:19,953
I'm a Spanish professor at Ohio State.

28
00:01:19,953 --> 00:01:22,794
I teach mostly upper level courses
where the students have taken

29
00:01:22,794 --> 00:01:27,047
four to five years
of university-level Spanish courses.

30
00:01:27,047 --> 00:01:30,924
So students who are in my class
speak Spanish with me all semester long.

31
00:01:30,924 --> 00:01:34,477
They listen to me speak in Spanish.
They turn in written work in Spanish.

32
00:01:34,477 --> 00:01:38,091
And yet, when I asked my students
at the beginning of the semester,

33
00:01:38,091 --> 00:01:41,023
"Who considers themselves
a Spanish speaker?"

34
00:01:41,023 --> 00:01:43,961
not very many of them raised their hands.

35
00:01:44,143 --> 00:01:46,878
So you can be a really,
really good speaker of a language

36
00:01:46,878 --> 00:01:51,096
and still not consider yourself
a language speaker.

37
00:01:51,957 --> 00:01:55,244
Maybe it's not just about
how well you speak a language.

38
00:01:55,244 --> 00:01:58,963
Maybe it's also about what age
you start learning that language?

39
00:01:58,963 --> 00:02:02,691
But when we look at kids
who speak Spanish at home

40
00:02:02,691 --> 00:02:06,111
but mostly English at work or in school,

41
00:02:06,111 --> 00:02:10,130
they often feel like they don't
speak either language really well.

42
00:02:10,130 --> 00:02:14,291
They sometimes feel like they exist
in a state of languagelessness,

43
00:02:14,291 --> 00:02:17,678
because they don't feel fully comfortable
in Spanish at school,

44
00:02:17,678 --> 00:02:21,841
and they don't feel fully comfortable
in English at home.

45
00:02:22,038 --> 00:02:25,776
We have this really strong idea
that in order to be a good bilingual,

46
00:02:25,776 --> 00:02:29,295
we have to be two
monolinguals in one body.

47
00:02:29,295 --> 00:02:33,606
But linguists know that's not really
how bilingualism works.

48
00:02:33,606 --> 00:02:35,743
It's actually much more common

49
00:02:35,743 --> 00:02:37,159
for people to specialize,

50
00:02:37,159 --> 00:02:40,838
to use one language in one place
and another language in another place.

51
00:02:41,219 --> 00:02:45,941
Now, it's not always only about
how we see ourselves.

52
00:02:46,290 --> 00:02:49,276
It can also be about
how other people see us.

53
00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:52,953
I do my research in Bolivia,

54
00:02:52,953 --> 00:02:54,855
which is a country in South America,

55
00:02:54,855 --> 00:02:57,441
and in Bolivia, as in the United States,

56
00:02:57,441 --> 00:03:01,101
there are different social groups
and different ethnic categories.

57
00:03:01,337 --> 00:03:05,906
One of those ethnic categories
is a group known as Quechua,

58
00:03:05,906 --> 00:03:07,807
who are Indigenous people.

59
00:03:07,807 --> 00:03:10,484
And people who are Quechua
speak Spanish a little bit differently

60
00:03:10,484 --> 00:03:13,269
than your run-of-the-mill Spanish speaker.

61
00:03:13,269 --> 00:03:16,289
In particular, there are some sounds
that sound a little bit more alike

62
00:03:16,289 --> 00:03:18,874
when many Quechua speakers use them.

63
00:03:19,829 --> 00:03:22,602
So a colleague and I designed a study

64
00:03:22,602 --> 00:03:26,539
where we took a series
of very similar-sounding word pairs,

65
00:03:27,387 --> 00:03:31,624
and they were similar-sounding
in exactly the same sorts of ways

66
00:03:31,624 --> 00:03:35,762
that Quechua-speakers often sound similar
when they speak Spanish.

67
00:03:36,667 --> 00:03:40,705
We played those similar-sounding
word pairs to a group of listeners,

68
00:03:40,705 --> 00:03:43,825
and we told half of the listeners
that they were going to listen

69
00:03:43,825 --> 00:03:46,333
to just your normal
run-of-the-mill Spanish speaker,

70
00:03:46,333 --> 00:03:50,404
and the other half of the listeners that
they were going to hear a Quechua speaker.

71
00:03:51,059 --> 00:03:53,242
Everybody heard the same recording,

72
00:03:53,242 --> 00:03:58,053
but what we found was that people
who thought they were listening

73
00:03:58,053 --> 00:03:58,705
to a run-of-the-mill Spanish speaker

74
00:03:58,705 --> 00:04:00,306
made clear differences
between the word pairs,

75
00:04:00,306 --> 00:04:03,258
and people who thought they were
listening to a Quechua speaker

76
00:04:03,258 --> 00:04:06,401
really didn't seem to make
clear differences.

77
00:04:06,620 --> 00:04:08,771
So if a visual would help,

78
00:04:08,771 --> 00:04:11,207
here are the results of our study.

79
00:04:11,207 --> 00:04:12,675
What you see here in the top line

80
00:04:12,675 --> 00:04:14,626
is a little bit of an arch.

81
00:04:14,626 --> 00:04:17,201
That's what you would expect
from people who are making

82
00:04:17,201 --> 00:04:19,287
clear differences between the word pairs,

83
00:04:19,287 --> 00:04:21,056
and that's what you see for people
who though they were listening

84
00:04:21,056 --> 00:04:22,656
to a Spanish speaker.

85
00:04:22,656 --> 00:04:25,056
What you see on the bottom
is a little bit more of a flat line,

86
00:04:25,056 --> 00:04:27,124
and that's what we expect to see

87
00:04:27,124 --> 00:04:29,193
when people are not
making clear differences,

88
00:04:29,193 --> 00:04:32,686
and that came from the group that thought
they were listening to a Quechua speaker.

89
00:04:32,987 --> 00:04:35,839
Now, since nothing
about the recording changed,

90
00:04:35,839 --> 00:04:39,292
that means that it was the social
categories that we gave the listeners

91
00:04:39,292 --> 00:04:42,018
that changed the way
that they perceived language.

92
00:04:42,586 --> 00:04:46,372
This isn't just some funny thing
that only happens in Bolivia.

93
00:04:46,372 --> 00:04:49,041
Research has been carried out
in the United States,

94
00:04:49,041 --> 00:04:51,567
in Canada, in New Zealand,

95
00:04:51,567 --> 00:04:53,769
showing exactly the same thing.

96
00:04:53,769 --> 00:04:57,742
We incorporate social categories
into our understanding of language.

97
00:04:58,290 --> 00:05:02,217
There have even been studies
carried out with American college students

98
00:05:02,217 --> 00:05:05,353
who listen to a university lecture.

99
00:05:05,353 --> 00:05:08,155
Half of the students were shown
a picture of a Caucasian face

100
00:05:08,155 --> 00:05:09,458
as the instructor.

101
00:05:09,458 --> 00:05:12,640
Half of the students were shown
a picture of an Asian face

102
00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:14,502
as the instructor.

103
00:05:14,502 --> 00:05:17,055
And students who saw the Asian face

104
00:05:17,055 --> 00:05:21,081
reported that the lecture was less clear
and harder to understand,

105
00:05:22,015 --> 00:05:25,485
even though everybody listened
to the same recording.

106
00:05:27,670 --> 00:05:32,850
So social categories really influence
the way that we understand language.

107
00:05:32,850 --> 00:05:36,131
And this is an issue that became
especially personal to me

108
00:05:36,131 --> 00:05:38,441
when my children started school.

109
00:05:38,441 --> 00:05:40,643
My children are Latino,

110
00:05:40,643 --> 00:05:43,929
and we speak Spanish at home,
but they speak mostly English

111
00:05:43,929 --> 00:05:45,819
with their friends out in the world,

112
00:05:45,819 --> 00:05:47,972
with their grandparents.

113
00:05:48,257 --> 00:05:50,292
When they started school,
I was told that the district requires

114
00:05:50,292 --> 00:05:54,192
that any household that has a member
who speaks a language other than English,

115
00:05:54,192 --> 00:05:58,986
the children have to be tested
to see if they need

116
00:05:59,887 --> 00:06:02,072
English-as-a-second-language services.

117
00:06:02,072 --> 00:06:05,492
And I was like, "Yes, my kids
are going to ace this test."

118
00:06:05,492 --> 00:06:08,718
But that's not what happened.

119
00:06:08,718 --> 00:06:12,388
So you can see behind me the results
from my daughter's ESL placement exam.

120
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She got a perfect five out of five
for comprehension,

121
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
for reading and listening.

122
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But she only got three out of five
for speaking and writing.

123
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And I was like, "This is really weird,
because this kid talks my ear off

124
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
all the time."

125
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But I figured it's just one test
on one day and it's not a big deal.

126
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Until, several years later,
my son started school,

127
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and my son also scored
as a non-native speaker of English

128
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on the exam.

129
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And I was like, this is really weird,

130
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and it doesn't seem like a coincidence.

131
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So I sent a note in to the teacher,

132
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and she was very kind.

133
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She sent me a long message explaining
why he had been placed in this way.

134
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Some of the things that she said
really caught my attention.

135
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
For one thing, she said that
even a native speaker of English

136
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
might not score at advanced level

137
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on this test,

138
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
depending on what kinds of resource
and enrichment they were getting at home.

139
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Now, this tells me that the test

140
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
wasn't doing a great job
of measuring English proficiency,

141
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but it may have been measuring

142
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
something like how much resources
kids are exposed to at home.

143
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In which case, those kids need
different types of support at school.

144
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They really don't need
English language assistance.

145
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Another thing that she mentioned
caught my attention as a linguist.

146
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She said that she had asked
my son to repeat the sentence,

147
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Who has Jane's pencil?"

148
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And he repeated, "Who has Jane pencil?"

149
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She said this is a typical error made
by a non-native English speaking student

150
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whose native language does not contain
a similar structure for possessives.

151
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The reason this caught my attention
is because I know that there is

152
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a systematic, rule-governed
variety of English

153
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in which this possessive construction
is completely grammatical.

154
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That variety is known to linguists
as "African-American English,"

155
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and African-American English
is actually group of dialects

156
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that's spoken across the United States,

157
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
mostly in African-American communities.

158
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But it just so happens
that my son's school

159
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is about 60 percent African-American.

160
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And we know that at this age,

161
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
children are picking things up
from their friends,

162
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
they're experimenting with language,

163
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
they're using it in different contexts.

164
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I think when the teacher saw my son,

165
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
she didn't see a child

166
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who she expected to speak
African-American English.

167
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And so instead of evaluating him
as a child who was natively acquiring

168
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
multiple dialects of English,

169
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
she evaluated him as a child

170
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whose standard English was deficient.

171
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Language and social categories
are intricately connected,

172
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and we bring so much baggage
to the way that we understand language.

173
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When you ask me a question like,

174
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Who counts as a speaker of a language?"

175
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I don't really have
a simple answer to that question,

176
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but what I can tell you

177
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that people are pattern-seekers,

178
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and we're always looking for ways
to connect the dots

179
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
between different types of information.

180
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This can be a problem

181
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
when our underlying biases
are projected onto language.

182
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When I look at children like my own

183
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and I see them in the gentlest
and most well-meaning of ways

184
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
being racially profiled
as non-native speakers of English,

185
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it makes me wonder,

186
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
what's going to happen

187
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as they move from elementary school

188
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
onto high school and college
and onto their first jobs?

189
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When they walk into an interview,

190
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
will the person sitting
across the table from them

191
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
look at their color or their last name

192
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and hear them as speaking
with a Spanish accent,

193
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or as speaking bad English?

194
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
These are the kinds of judgments
that can have long-reaching effects

195
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on people's lives.

196
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So I hope that that person, just like you,

197
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
will have reflected
on the naturalized links

198
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
between language and social categories,

199
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and will have questioned their assumptions
about what it really means

200
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to be a speaker of a language.

201
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Thank you.

202
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
(Applause)