1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,335 STRIKER: Whatcha looking at? 2 00:00:01,335 --> 00:00:02,790 WOMAN: The Pinto. 3 00:00:02,790 --> 00:00:06,150 STRIKER: I like it. My kind of car. 4 00:00:06,150 --> 00:00:06,945 WOMAN: Oh really? 5 00:00:06,945 --> 00:00:10,185 STRIKER: Sub-compact. Lots of trunk space. What's the price? 6 00:00:10,185 --> 00:00:12,570 WOMAN: Under 2,000 dollars. 7 00:00:12,570 --> 00:00:12,720 STRIKER:Huh? 8 00:00:12,720 --> 00:00:14,070 WOMAN: In 1971. 9 00:00:14,070 --> 00:00:15,705 STRIKER: Oh that makes sense. 10 00:00:15,705 --> 00:00:17,190 Still a good deal though. 11 00:00:17,190 --> 00:00:19,980 But why is it here in the law museum? 12 00:00:19,980 --> 00:00:24,855 WOMAN: The Pinto was at the center of a very important trial in 1979, 13 00:00:24,855 --> 00:00:27,600 State of Indiana v. Ford Motor Company. 14 00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:30,600 This was the first time an American corporation was 15 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:34,015 criminally prosecuted and the whole country was watching. 16 00:00:34,015 --> 00:00:35,000 STRIKER: Why? 17 00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:37,740 WOMAN: Everybody wanted to see if a company could be 18 00:00:37,740 --> 00:00:40,335 punished criminally for creating a product, 19 00:00:40,335 --> 00:00:43,380 in this case, an automobile that was unsafe. 20 00:00:43,380 --> 00:00:44,690 STRIKER: Yipes! 21 00:00:56,000 --> 00:00:58,710 STRIKER: So what was wrong with the Pinto? 22 00:00:58,710 --> 00:01:03,085 WOMAN: Well, the Pinto was created to satisfy two main objectives. 23 00:01:03,085 --> 00:01:08,150 Lee Iacocca, who was executive vice president of the Ford Motor Company, 24 00:01:08,150 --> 00:01:12,260 tasked his engineers with creating a car that would weigh less 25 00:01:12,260 --> 00:01:16,625 than 2,000 pounds and cost less than 2,000 dollars. 26 00:01:16,625 --> 00:01:20,990 German and Japanese manufacturers were making lots of money producing 27 00:01:20,990 --> 00:01:25,975 sub-compact cars and Ford Motor Company wanted in on the action. 28 00:01:25,975 --> 00:01:26,970 STRIKER: What's wrong with that? 29 00:01:26,970 --> 00:01:30,560 WOMAN: Well, nothing but I haven't finished the story. 30 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:36,110 Ford was in a hurry to introduce their car into the market so they 31 00:01:36,110 --> 00:01:42,215 accelerated their production time from their usual 43 months to 25 months. 32 00:01:42,215 --> 00:01:43,940 Compromises were made. 33 00:01:43,940 --> 00:01:47,270 Serious risks associated with the placement of 34 00:01:47,270 --> 00:01:53,325 the Pintos fuel tanks were ignored despite crash tests resulting in flames. 35 00:01:53,325 --> 00:01:54,240 STRIKER: Flames? 36 00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:55,995 WOMAN: Yes, flames. 37 00:01:55,995 --> 00:01:59,240 The rush design placed the fuel tank behind 38 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:03,545 the rear axle instead of over it like most sub-compact cars, 39 00:02:03,545 --> 00:02:06,980 this left only 9 or 10 inches of crush space. 40 00:02:06,980 --> 00:02:11,030 Other design flaws included a thin strip of chrome for 41 00:02:11,030 --> 00:02:15,245 a bumper and a lack of reinforcement around the fuel tank. 42 00:02:15,245 --> 00:02:19,070 The results? At speeds over 25 miles per hour, 43 00:02:19,070 --> 00:02:24,455 the fuel tank ruptured every time it experienced a rear impact. 44 00:02:24,455 --> 00:02:26,555 STRIKER: Yipes! That looks deadly. 45 00:02:26,555 --> 00:02:27,605 WOMAN: It was. 46 00:02:27,605 --> 00:02:28,820 STRIKER: Couldn't they fix it? 47 00:02:28,820 --> 00:02:31,865 WOMAN: They certainly could have improved the situation. 48 00:02:31,865 --> 00:02:33,890 Engineers at Ford came up with 49 00:02:33,890 --> 00:02:38,720 several modifications to significantly improve the safety of the vehicle. 50 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:40,355 STRIKER: So they did make it better? 51 00:02:40,355 --> 00:02:40,918 WOMAN: No. 52 00:02:40,918 --> 00:02:41,740 STRIKER: How come? 53 00:02:41,740 --> 00:02:47,772 WOMAN: Well, despite the cost being only 11 dollars per car, Ford declined. 54 00:02:47,772 --> 00:02:48,355 STRIKER: Why? 55 00:02:48,355 --> 00:02:49,825 WOMAN: It's hard to say. 56 00:02:49,825 --> 00:02:53,930 However, we can gain some insight into the corporate mentality 57 00:02:53,930 --> 00:02:58,055 at Ford from an internal report regarding safety, 58 00:02:58,055 --> 00:03:00,010 which was leaked to the media. 59 00:03:00,010 --> 00:03:01,140 STRIKER: What did it say? 60 00:03:01,140 --> 00:03:04,280 WOMAN: The document, nicknamed the Pinto Memo, 61 00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:07,430 was created by several analysts at Ford. 62 00:03:07,430 --> 00:03:12,590 It compared the cost of making safety improvements in advance with the cost 63 00:03:12,590 --> 00:03:18,100 Ford would most likely incur through death and injury lawsuits and lost vehicles. 64 00:03:18,100 --> 00:03:19,035 STRIKER: What? 65 00:03:19,035 --> 00:03:22,350 WOMAN: It's called a cost-benefit analysis. 66 00:03:22,350 --> 00:03:26,510 Ford estimated that if they did not fix the safety issues, 67 00:03:26,510 --> 00:03:29,270 there would be 180 deaths, 68 00:03:29,270 --> 00:03:34,010 180 injuries, and 2,100 vehicles destroyed. 69 00:03:34,010 --> 00:03:39,575 They even determined a value for each loss, $200,000 per death, 70 00:03:39,575 --> 00:03:42,545 $67,000 per burn injury, 71 00:03:42,545 --> 00:03:45,410 and $700 per lost vehicle, 72 00:03:45,410 --> 00:03:49,550 which was the average resale value of a Pinto at that time. 73 00:03:49,550 --> 00:03:50,765 STRIKER: That's crazy. 74 00:03:50,765 --> 00:03:57,110 WOMAN: The public especially didn't appreciate their $200,000 valuation of a human life. 75 00:03:57,110 --> 00:03:58,415 STRIKER: Uncool. 76 00:03:58,415 --> 00:04:03,350 WOMAN: They compared these costs to those associated with redesigning and installing 77 00:04:03,350 --> 00:04:08,690 better safety features on the 12.5 million cars they expected to sell. 78 00:04:08,690 --> 00:04:11,780 The cost was only $11 per vehicle. 79 00:04:11,780 --> 00:04:12,790 STRIKER: And the result? 80 00:04:12,790 --> 00:04:17,780 WOMAN: They determined it will cost the company approximately $49 million in 81 00:04:17,780 --> 00:04:22,820 lawsuits and lost vehicles to sell the Pinto as it was already designed, 82 00:04:22,820 --> 00:04:24,290 or it would cost 83 00:04:24,290 --> 00:04:32,180 approximately $137 million to redesign and improve the safety defect in advance. 84 00:04:32,180 --> 00:04:34,355 STRIKER: What did they decide to do? 85 00:04:34,355 --> 00:04:35,780 WOMAN: What do you think? 86 00:04:35,780 --> 00:04:37,010 STRIKER: Keep the money? 87 00:04:37,010 --> 00:04:41,590 WOMAN: Yep, they save the money and ignored the safety risk. 88 00:04:41,590 --> 00:04:42,975 STRIKER: What happened? 89 00:04:42,975 --> 00:04:48,760 WOMAN: An estimated 27 people were killed in rear-end collisions involving the Pinto. 90 00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:53,270 Upon impact, the fuel tank would puncture and explode, 91 00:04:53,270 --> 00:04:57,905 often sending fuel into the driver's compartment which would then ignite. 92 00:04:57,905 --> 00:04:59,285 STRIKER: That's terrible. 93 00:04:59,285 --> 00:05:02,285 WOMAN: In one of the few cases that made it to trial, 94 00:05:02,285 --> 00:05:08,315 Grimshaw versus Ford, a California jury awarded a boy who had been badly burned, 95 00:05:08,315 --> 00:05:13,790 127 million dollars, 125 million of which was for 96 00:05:13,790 --> 00:05:19,730 punitive damages to punish Ford for its decision to elevate profits over human life. 97 00:05:19,730 --> 00:05:25,445 Although the judge subsequently reduced the punitive damages to 3.5 million, 98 00:05:25,445 --> 00:05:30,440 the unexpectedly high amount sent the Ford Motor Company scrambling. 99 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:32,320 STRIKER: Scrambling to do what? 100 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:37,130 WOMAN: To settle as many of their pending cases as possible out of court. 101 00:05:37,130 --> 00:05:38,675 STRIKER: How many cases were there? 102 00:05:38,675 --> 00:05:42,500 WOMAN: Ford was involved in dozens of cases related to the Pinto. 103 00:05:42,500 --> 00:05:46,910 However, their public image was suffering more than their bank account. 104 00:05:46,910 --> 00:05:52,820 Here's an opinion given by a California Appellate Court regarding the Ford Motor Company. 105 00:05:52,820 --> 00:05:58,100 STRIKER: "Ford decided to defer correction of the Pinto's shortcomings by engaging in 106 00:05:58,100 --> 00:06:04,405 a cost-benefit analysis balancing human lives and limbs against corporate profits. 107 00:06:04,405 --> 00:06:07,400 Ford's institutional mentality was shown to 108 00:06:07,400 --> 00:06:10,610 be one of callous indifference to public safety. 109 00:06:10,610 --> 00:06:15,110 There was substantial evidence that Ford's conduct constituted 110 00:06:15,110 --> 00:06:21,200 conscious disregard of the probability of injury to members of the consuming public. 111 00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:25,960 The conduct of Ford's management was reprehensible in the extreme. 112 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:29,240 It exhibited a conscious and callous disregard of 113 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:33,890 public safety in order to maximize corporate profits." 114 00:06:33,890 --> 00:06:35,630 Harsh words. 115 00:06:35,630 --> 00:06:37,945 WOMAN: It was a disaster. 116 00:06:37,945 --> 00:06:42,770 In 1976, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 117 00:06:42,770 --> 00:06:46,460 finally introduced rear impact safety regulations. 118 00:06:46,460 --> 00:06:51,505 Ford complied with the standards on their new 1977 Pinto model. 119 00:06:51,505 --> 00:06:56,780 However, the NHTSA also announced that a safety defect existed in 120 00:06:56,780 --> 00:07:03,640 the fuel systems of all Pintos manufactured between 1971 and 1976. 121 00:07:03,640 --> 00:07:09,290 Ford was forced to recall and repair 1.5 million cars. 122 00:07:09,290 --> 00:07:12,815 STRIKER: But what about those criminal charges you mentioned earlier? 123 00:07:12,815 --> 00:07:14,360 WOMAN: Oh yes. That's right. 124 00:07:14,360 --> 00:07:20,045 Prior to 1978, Ford had only been sued for monetary damages. 125 00:07:20,045 --> 00:07:24,605 However, that changed on August 10, 1978, 126 00:07:24,605 --> 00:07:32,405 when three teenage girls were driving in a 1973 Pinto down a highway in rural Indiana, 127 00:07:32,405 --> 00:07:37,925 suddenly their gas cap rolled from the top of their car into the middle of the road, 128 00:07:37,925 --> 00:07:41,600 realizing they forgot to attach it after fueling up, 129 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:44,730 they stopped their car to retrieve it. 130 00:07:44,730 --> 00:07:46,775 Since there was no shoulder available, 131 00:07:46,775 --> 00:07:49,895 they parked their car in a driving lane. 132 00:07:49,895 --> 00:07:54,650 Moments later, a van whose driver was distracted as he searched for 133 00:07:54,650 --> 00:07:59,850 a fallen cigarette hit their Pinto while traveling at 50 miles per hour. 134 00:07:59,850 --> 00:08:05,575 The Pinto burst into flames and all three teenagers were killed. 135 00:08:05,575 --> 00:08:09,110 The state prosecutor charged the Ford Motor Company 136 00:08:09,110 --> 00:08:12,290 with criminal recklessness and reckless homicide. 137 00:08:12,290 --> 00:08:17,225 STRIKER: This was the first time a corporation had ever been charged with a criminal offense? 138 00:08:17,225 --> 00:08:19,895 WOMAN: In a product liability case, yes. 139 00:08:19,895 --> 00:08:22,580 STRIKER: Wow. I'll bet other corporations around 140 00:08:22,580 --> 00:08:25,340 the country were nervous about the outcome of the trial. 141 00:08:25,340 --> 00:08:26,960 WOMAN: Yes, they were. 142 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:28,855 STRIKER: What did the court decide? 143 00:08:28,855 --> 00:08:31,620 WOMAN: On March 13, 1980, 144 00:08:31,620 --> 00:08:35,150 the jury returned not-guilty verdicts on 145 00:08:35,150 --> 00:08:39,485 all three counts of reckless homicide against the Ford Motor Company. 146 00:08:39,485 --> 00:08:41,020 STRIKER: Really, how come? 147 00:08:41,020 --> 00:08:46,160 WOMAN: The prosecution was unable to show that Ford had failed to warn the public about 148 00:08:46,160 --> 00:08:52,085 the Pinto's defects since Ford had issued a recall prior to the date of the accident. 149 00:08:52,085 --> 00:08:54,380 STRIKER: But the girls didn't hear about the recall? 150 00:08:54,380 --> 00:08:57,320 WOMAN: Yes. But just because you don't hear about something 151 00:08:57,320 --> 00:09:00,010 doesn't mean it didn't happen. 152 00:09:00,010 --> 00:09:04,850 The defense also called several Ford engineers to the stand who 153 00:09:04,850 --> 00:09:10,475 testified they bought 1973 Pintos for their wives, children, and themselves. 154 00:09:10,475 --> 00:09:13,985 This showed their confidence in the safety of the car. 155 00:09:13,985 --> 00:09:17,690 But the main reason Ford Motor won the case was 156 00:09:17,690 --> 00:09:21,490 because the impact happened at 50 miles per hour. 157 00:09:21,490 --> 00:09:22,485 STRIKER: Why did that matter? 158 00:09:22,485 --> 00:09:27,350 WOMAN: Well, not even the new rear impact standard in effect for 1977 159 00:09:27,350 --> 00:09:32,765 models required that car fuel tanks be able to withstand crashes at that speed. 160 00:09:32,765 --> 00:09:35,475 STRIKER: I see. So nothing happened to Ford? 161 00:09:35,475 --> 00:09:40,445 WOMAN: Ford Motor paid out well over $100 million in damages, 162 00:09:40,445 --> 00:09:44,585 endured approximately 117 civil lawsuits, 163 00:09:44,585 --> 00:09:47,840 and recalled 1.5 million cars. 164 00:09:47,840 --> 00:09:50,090 STRIKER: I guess that is pretty significant. 165 00:09:50,090 --> 00:09:55,745 I just feel bad for all the people who unknowingly rode in a car that was clearly unsafe. 166 00:09:55,745 --> 00:09:59,210 WOMAN: No car is ever 100% safe. 167 00:09:59,210 --> 00:10:03,980 Just remember, every time you get into a vehicle, drive carefully. 168 00:10:03,980 --> 00:10:05,750 STRIKER: Buckle up for safety. 169 00:10:05,750 --> 00:10:07,615 WOMAN: Good advice, Striker. 170 00:10:07,615 --> 00:10:12,920 Now, let's see if we can learn some other important lessons from the history of law. 171 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:17,060 Click on something and let's go explore.