WEBVTT 00:00:00.083 --> 00:00:01.962 So I've been using the new MacBook Air 00:00:01.962 --> 00:00:03.461 over the past week now. 00:00:03.461 --> 00:00:05.956 I purposely bought the base model, 00:00:06.066 --> 00:00:07.590 primarily because that's the model 00:00:07.590 --> 00:00:08.883 that most people are going to buy. 00:00:08.883 --> 00:00:11.178 I wanted to see what it would be switching to this 00:00:11.578 --> 00:00:13.475 over my MacBook Pro, 00:00:13.805 --> 00:00:14.980 which is here, 00:00:14.980 --> 00:00:16.975 the M4 Max MacBook Pro. 00:00:17.350 --> 00:00:20.150 This MacBook Pro actually cost me $4,000-- 00:00:20.150 --> 00:00:21.479 over $4,000. 00:00:21.855 --> 00:00:23.126 Yet this costs $1,000. 00:00:23.356 --> 00:00:25.650 This has the M4 Max chip in it 00:00:25.817 --> 00:00:28.520 and it also has a 36 GB of Unified Memory. 00:00:28.570 --> 00:00:30.071 Big jump there between the two. 00:00:30.071 --> 00:00:30.966 But I just wanted to see 00:00:30.966 --> 00:00:32.871 what the M4 MacBook Air would be like 00:00:32.871 --> 00:00:34.325 and whether it could handle 00:00:34.325 --> 00:00:35.660 most of my workload. 00:00:35.660 --> 00:00:38.149 Considering this MacBook Air is a fourth of the price, 00:00:38.329 --> 00:00:40.360 it has been very interesting. 00:00:40.540 --> 00:00:42.419 I also have the Silver version here, 00:00:42.419 --> 00:00:44.060 now that the Space Gray has gone, 00:00:44.250 --> 00:00:45.462 and there is no Space Black, 00:00:45.462 --> 00:00:46.693 I think the Silver looks best. 00:00:46.963 --> 00:00:48.463 And here's a shot comparing the Space Black, 00:00:48.463 --> 00:00:50.759 Space Gray, and Silver for anyone interested. 00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:52.510 What is surprising with this MacBook Pro 00:00:52.510 --> 00:00:54.596 is that Apple have lowered the price. 00:00:54.846 --> 00:00:56.014 Now let me say that again, 00:00:56.014 --> 00:00:58.266 Apple have lowered the price 00:00:58.266 --> 00:01:00.351 of a product, of a new product, 00:01:00.351 --> 00:01:02.812 not something that Apple are known for whatsoever. 00:01:02.812 --> 00:01:04.661 And not only have they lowered the price, 00:01:04.981 --> 00:01:06.899 they have also given you more for the money. 00:01:07.609 --> 00:01:10.445 You now have a 16 GB of Unified Memory compared 00:01:10.445 --> 00:01:12.405 to the 8 GB in previous models. 00:01:12.405 --> 00:01:13.865 The design itself is unchanged, 00:01:13.865 --> 00:01:15.283 which I think is a good thing. 00:01:15.283 --> 00:01:17.077 This form factor is the best. 00:01:17.077 --> 00:01:18.576 It's super thin, light, 00:01:18.576 --> 00:01:19.515 and feels great. 00:01:19.515 --> 00:01:20.455 It always surprises me 00:01:20.455 --> 00:01:22.957 how thin MacBook Airs are when I use them. 00:01:23.416 --> 00:01:24.876 It makes it ideal for travelling. 00:01:24.876 --> 00:01:26.961 Apple have completed nailed the design here. 00:01:27.212 --> 00:01:29.258 I also much prefer the 13 inch size 00:01:29.258 --> 00:01:30.465 over the 15 inch size, 00:01:30.465 --> 00:01:32.258 and that's purely down to personal preference. 00:01:32.258 --> 00:01:34.192 I've always preferred smaller laptops. 00:01:34.302 --> 00:01:36.096 I think to myself it would be even better 00:01:36.096 --> 00:01:37.305 if we saw a 12 inch version. 00:01:37.305 --> 00:01:39.766 But hey, 13 inches, I think, is a great size. 00:01:39.766 --> 00:01:41.893 The 15 inch model is also $200 more. 00:01:41.893 --> 00:01:44.229 Now, I don't think it's worth $200 more. 00:01:44.437 --> 00:01:46.850 But it does also have two more GPU cores. 00:01:46.850 --> 00:01:48.585 And if you really want that 15 inch, 00:01:48.585 --> 00:01:49.966 maybe it might be worth it for you. 00:01:50.026 --> 00:01:50.941 Alongside this MacBook Air, 00:01:50.941 --> 00:01:53.196 I've also been using this new monitor from Asus, 00:01:53.196 --> 00:01:54.650 who are also sponsoring this video. 00:01:54.864 --> 00:01:55.865 When I first unboxed it, 00:01:55.865 --> 00:01:57.200 I was actually really impressed 00:01:57.200 --> 00:01:58.243 by the design of this thing. 00:01:58.243 --> 00:01:59.499 It's not like other monitors. 00:01:59.619 --> 00:02:02.080 You can tell Asus have spent time designing this monitor 00:02:02.080 --> 00:02:03.411 and it looks fantastic. 00:02:03.581 --> 00:02:05.500 The back in particular just looks amazing. 00:02:05.500 --> 00:02:06.793 It also comes with a great stand 00:02:06.793 --> 00:02:07.961 that offers a ton of movement. 00:02:07.961 --> 00:02:09.212 You have tilt, height, 00:02:09.212 --> 00:02:10.505 and rotating options. 00:02:10.755 --> 00:02:13.341 This is part of Asus' ProArt lineup. 00:02:13.508 --> 00:02:17.215 So they provide a bunch of colour accuracy test shots in the box 00:02:17.345 --> 00:02:19.264 to show that it's been thoroughly tested. 00:02:19.264 --> 00:02:20.682 They specifically compare it 00:02:20.682 --> 00:02:23.146 to other much higher-end production monitors, 00:02:23.146 --> 00:02:25.687 which can be in the five figure price range. 00:02:25.687 --> 00:02:28.022 This isn't meant to be compared to cheap OLED monitors 00:02:28.022 --> 00:02:28.849 due to how it's tuned. 00:02:28.849 --> 00:02:31.400 It's designed for anyone who does content creation, 00:02:31.539 --> 00:02:33.815 whether you're a filmmaker, photographer, 00:02:33.945 --> 00:02:35.732 3D artist or a designer. 00:02:36.072 --> 00:02:38.867 If you want super top notch colour accuracy, 00:02:38.867 --> 00:02:40.368 this is a monitor for it. 00:02:40.368 --> 00:02:43.371 It's a 31.5 inch QD-OLED monitor 00:02:43.371 --> 00:02:45.248 that's 4K in resolution, 00:02:45.248 --> 00:02:47.500 and it also does up to 240 Hz. 00:02:47.834 --> 00:02:48.585 And of course, 00:02:48.585 --> 00:02:51.296 viewing any content on it is sublime. 00:02:51.462 --> 00:02:53.756 OLEDs have always been amazing in this area. 00:02:53.756 --> 00:02:55.466 It has Thunderbolt 4 built-in, 00:02:55.466 --> 00:02:57.813 so you can connect a MacBook with one cable 00:02:57.813 --> 00:03:00.169 and daisy chain other thunderbolt accessories 00:03:00.169 --> 00:03:01.556 like another monitor. 00:03:01.556 --> 00:03:04.726 The Thunderbolt port also provides up to 96 watts of power. 00:03:04.726 --> 00:03:07.377 I was able to get 240 Hz right out of the box 00:03:07.377 --> 00:03:08.229 with the MacBook Air, 00:03:08.229 --> 00:03:10.064 and it is buttery smooth. 00:03:10.064 --> 00:03:11.169 It's perfect for anyone who's looking 00:03:11.169 --> 00:03:13.026 for a high-quality OLED monitor 00:03:13.026 --> 00:03:13.693 for their Mac, 00:03:13.693 --> 00:03:15.695 which also has amazing colour accuracy. 00:03:15.945 --> 00:03:16.633 line:1 So make sure to check it out. 00:03:16.633 --> 00:03:18.656 line:1 I'll leave a link to it, down in the description below. 00:03:18.656 --> 00:03:21.159 This MacBook Air also has the new M4 chip in it 00:03:21.159 --> 00:03:23.203 and as most people will know, 00:03:23.411 --> 00:03:25.413 the M-series of chips for Apple 00:03:25.413 --> 00:03:27.332 have just been a revelation. 00:03:27.332 --> 00:03:28.788 You get top notch performance 00:03:28.958 --> 00:03:31.169 for a lot less power and a lot less heat, 00:03:31.461 --> 00:03:32.795 so it's made 00:03:32.795 --> 00:03:34.547 for some very powerful chips 00:03:34.547 --> 00:03:36.966 that can go in very compact laptops. 00:03:36.966 --> 00:03:39.353 This specifically has the base tier M4 chip, 00:03:39.353 --> 00:03:42.472 which has a 10-core CPU and a 8-core GPU. 00:03:42.472 --> 00:03:43.806 I've been using this machine 00:03:43.806 --> 00:03:45.934 just like how I'd use my MacBook Pro. 00:03:45.934 --> 00:03:47.644 I've not hidden anything away from it. 00:03:47.644 --> 00:03:48.311 And let me tell you, 00:03:48.311 --> 00:03:50.146 I have been a lot more impressed 00:03:50.146 --> 00:03:51.105 than I thought I would be. 00:03:51.105 --> 00:03:52.482 I wasn't expecting this 00:03:52.482 --> 00:03:54.067 to be nearly as good 00:03:54.067 --> 00:03:55.318 as my MacBook Pro 00:03:55.318 --> 00:03:56.736 when it comes to a lot of things. 00:03:56.736 --> 00:03:58.196 It handles all of the standard stuff 00:03:58.196 --> 00:03:59.822 extremely well as you'd expect. 00:03:59.822 --> 00:04:01.699 I've been working away at apps like Figma 00:04:01.699 --> 00:04:02.951 for all of my design work, 00:04:02.951 --> 00:04:04.494 and I feel like this is quite basic now. 00:04:04.494 --> 00:04:05.912 I think most people are going to be fine 00:04:05.912 --> 00:04:07.330 using something like Figma, 00:04:07.330 --> 00:04:09.040 especially if you have heavy Figma files, 00:04:09.040 --> 00:04:10.500 now that you have the upgraded 00:04:10.500 --> 00:04:12.418 Unified Memory of 16 GB, 00:04:12.418 --> 00:04:13.836 if you have a heavy Figma files 00:04:13.836 --> 00:04:15.213 with lots of different screens, 00:04:15.213 --> 00:04:16.302 you shouldn't have an issue. 00:04:16.302 --> 00:04:18.216 Lightroom editing as well has been no issues. 00:04:18.216 --> 00:04:20.760 I've been editing photos very, very fast and snappy. 00:04:20.760 --> 00:04:22.281 Being able to go through my library quickly, 00:04:22.281 --> 00:04:23.763 copy and paste edits and stuff. 00:04:23.763 --> 00:04:25.348 It's been very, very smooth. 00:04:25.348 --> 00:04:26.683 So here I am editing a video, 00:04:26.683 --> 00:04:28.764 this is for my sort of favourite Mac apps, 00:04:28.764 --> 00:04:30.145 Mac apps I can't live without. 00:04:30.645 --> 00:04:33.114 I have two clips here, 00:04:33.114 --> 00:04:34.065 I have a screen recording 00:04:34.065 --> 00:04:36.362 and I have the A-roll of myself. 00:04:36.776 --> 00:04:38.903 So if we hover over, we can see, 00:04:38.903 --> 00:04:39.696 A-roll of myself. 00:04:39.696 --> 00:04:40.697 And I also have 00:04:41.322 --> 00:04:42.573 the screen recording. 00:04:42.573 --> 00:04:43.741 And I've got them set up 00:04:43.741 --> 00:04:44.826 as a multicam clip, 00:04:44.826 --> 00:04:46.161 so that I can switch between the two, 00:04:46.161 --> 00:04:48.413 so that when I'm demoing the app, 00:04:48.413 --> 00:04:50.155 you can see me in the corner. 00:04:50.415 --> 00:04:51.916 And obviously, I'm taking up... 00:04:51.916 --> 00:04:55.025 I had the screen recording sort of main focus of the screen. 00:04:55.545 --> 00:04:57.839 When I, for example-- 00:04:57.839 --> 00:04:59.549 Let's have a look at this one. 00:04:59.549 --> 00:05:01.948 So right now I have a set it to 00:05:02.510 --> 00:05:03.835 Better Performance. 00:05:04.095 --> 00:05:05.661 And with Better Performance, 00:05:06.431 --> 00:05:07.268 it does play 00:05:07.598 --> 00:05:08.796 fairly smoothly. 00:05:10.685 --> 00:05:12.860 It can jitter sometimes. 00:05:16.530 --> 00:05:17.817 It's okay right now, 00:05:17.817 --> 00:05:18.985 but that's at Better Performance. 00:05:18.985 --> 00:05:20.815 If I go to Better Quality, 00:05:21.571 --> 00:05:22.626 and I start playing... 00:05:24.282 --> 00:05:25.992 it seems to be doing fine right now. 00:05:25.992 --> 00:05:27.270 But what would happen is-- 00:05:27.270 --> 00:05:28.995 It's not showing right now, 00:05:28.995 --> 00:05:30.163 I think it's because Final Cut Pro 00:05:30.163 --> 00:05:31.664 has done the background rendering. 00:05:31.664 --> 00:05:33.249 If you're in the middle of an edit 00:05:33.249 --> 00:05:34.901 and you have two clips like this, 00:05:34.901 --> 00:05:35.948 two heavy clips, 00:05:35.948 --> 00:05:38.546 because I'm using 10-bit S-log footage, 00:05:38.546 --> 00:05:39.505 quite heavy footage, 00:05:39.505 --> 00:05:40.965 which is also compressed. 00:05:40.965 --> 00:05:42.744 Thankfully, the Mac has, 00:05:42.884 --> 00:05:44.620 the Media Engines and whatever else, 00:05:44.620 --> 00:05:46.179 but it isn't Air. 00:05:46.304 --> 00:05:46.980 It's not Pro, 00:05:46.980 --> 00:05:48.547 so it doesn't have as many Media Engines. 00:05:49.057 --> 00:05:50.599 For doing edits like this, 00:05:51.309 --> 00:05:52.435 it works. 00:05:52.435 --> 00:05:53.519 It's not perfect, 00:05:53.519 --> 00:05:55.563 there are sometimes dropped frames. 00:05:56.230 --> 00:05:57.273 It can be a bit slow 00:05:57.273 --> 00:05:58.259 when it comes to playback. 00:05:58.259 --> 00:05:59.574 I mean, right now, though, 00:05:59.574 --> 00:06:00.610 it's running smoothly. 00:06:00.610 --> 00:06:01.360 I think, like I said, 00:06:01.360 --> 00:06:02.111 it's because it's done 00:06:02.111 --> 00:06:03.404 a lot of background rendering. 00:06:03.404 --> 00:06:04.530 I'm editing this video right now 00:06:04.530 --> 00:06:06.032 and there's a lot going on. 00:06:06.432 --> 00:06:08.785 This is actually one of my more complex videos. 00:06:09.638 --> 00:06:11.954 My review videos are technically a bit easier, 00:06:11.954 --> 00:06:12.789 but for stuff like this, 00:06:12.789 --> 00:06:13.748 we have multicams, 00:06:13.748 --> 00:06:14.499 you have different cameras 00:06:14.499 --> 00:06:15.249 and you're going in and out 00:06:15.249 --> 00:06:16.959 with effects and you have overlays, 00:06:16.959 --> 00:06:17.835 where you have two clips 00:06:17.835 --> 00:06:18.586 on top of each other. 00:06:18.586 --> 00:06:19.962 It has to show both the clips, 00:06:19.962 --> 00:06:22.215 which means it's playing both clips at the same time. 00:06:22.215 --> 00:06:23.918 It can be a bit heavier on the chip, 00:06:24.258 --> 00:06:24.967 but it works. 00:06:24.967 --> 00:06:25.794 I think if you're someone 00:06:25.794 --> 00:06:27.345 who's interested in doing basic video editing. 00:06:27.345 --> 00:06:28.846 Maybe you're shooting stuff with an iPhone 00:06:28.846 --> 00:06:31.265 or a sort of Insta360 or whatever it is, 00:06:31.265 --> 00:06:33.299 one of those handheld gimbal cameras. 00:06:33.559 --> 00:06:35.269 You are not gonna have any issues here 00:06:35.269 --> 00:06:36.437 with the M4 chip. 00:06:36.437 --> 00:06:38.272 You will not have any issues whatsoever. 00:06:38.272 --> 00:06:40.274 And that's what's so impressive to me. 00:06:40.274 --> 00:06:41.734 The only downside with a chip like this, 00:06:41.734 --> 00:06:43.903 which is completely to be expected, by the way, 00:06:43.903 --> 00:06:45.613 is when it comes to rendering video 00:06:45.613 --> 00:06:47.281 in something like Final Cut Pro. 00:06:47.281 --> 00:06:48.616 When I was rendering videos 00:06:48.616 --> 00:06:49.841 the sort of same videos 00:06:49.841 --> 00:06:52.156 that I would edit on my MacBook Pro, 00:06:52.286 --> 00:06:53.871 the render times would be double, 00:06:53.871 --> 00:06:55.581 sometimes triple the time. 00:06:55.581 --> 00:06:58.209 So that can really add on a lot of time, 00:06:58.209 --> 00:06:59.544 if you're rendering a lot of videos. 00:06:59.544 --> 00:07:00.623 Especially for someone like me, 00:07:00.623 --> 00:07:03.005 where I'm rendering multiple videos a week, 00:07:03.005 --> 00:07:04.715 I'm sometimes having to re-render things 00:07:04.715 --> 00:07:06.923 because I'm having to go back and edit something. 00:07:07.093 --> 00:07:08.719 I'm sometimes having to render videos 00:07:08.719 --> 00:07:10.483 for clients and stuff very quickly as well. 00:07:10.763 --> 00:07:12.265 Time for me is very, very valuable. 00:07:12.265 --> 00:07:14.642 So that's really one of the downsides of the M4 chip. 00:07:14.642 --> 00:07:15.560 But again, 00:07:15.560 --> 00:07:17.019 it wasn't really designed for that. 00:07:17.019 --> 00:07:19.105 So it's still an amazing chip 00:07:19.105 --> 00:07:20.106 for everything that it can do. 00:07:20.106 --> 00:07:21.607 If you're someone who's just getting started 00:07:21.607 --> 00:07:22.900 with content creation, 00:07:22.900 --> 00:07:24.513 maybe you're just making that odd video here and there, 00:07:24.513 --> 00:07:27.196 maybe you're doing some 3D rendering, some 3D editing, 00:07:27.196 --> 00:07:28.990 whatever it might be, AI stuff. 00:07:28.990 --> 00:07:30.171 I think this is gonna be completely fine 00:07:30.171 --> 00:07:31.082 just to start out with, 00:07:31.082 --> 00:07:31.993 maybe down the line 00:07:31.993 --> 00:07:33.703 you can consider something like a Pro, 00:07:33.703 --> 00:07:35.746 but for how much this can do, 00:07:35.913 --> 00:07:36.664 the M4 chip can do, 00:07:36.664 --> 00:07:38.708 I've genuinely been very impressed. 00:07:38.708 --> 00:07:40.835 As expected, battery life is fantastic. 00:07:40.835 --> 00:07:42.712 Apple have really nailed the battery life 00:07:42.712 --> 00:07:44.046 when it comes to these laptops now. 00:07:44.046 --> 00:07:45.756 I don't think most people need to worry, 00:07:45.756 --> 00:07:47.467 unless they're doing super, super heavy stuff. 00:07:47.467 --> 00:07:49.177 Maybe you're spending the whole day video editing, 00:07:49.177 --> 00:07:50.887 then yeah, you might need to connect it 00:07:50.887 --> 00:07:51.929 to a charger. 00:07:51.929 --> 00:07:54.566 But for doing sort of admin work and stuff like that, 00:07:54.682 --> 00:07:55.766 web browsing, watching videos, 00:07:55.766 --> 00:07:58.227 it is going to last you the whole day no problem. 00:07:58.227 --> 00:08:00.646 Now let's go through some downsize and improvements 00:08:00.646 --> 00:08:02.356 that I think could be made to the MacBook Air. 00:08:02.356 --> 00:08:03.816 First up is the connectivity. 00:08:03.816 --> 00:08:05.943 I wish it had an extra Thunderbolt port. 00:08:05.943 --> 00:08:07.153 So we have two Thunderbolt ports 00:08:07.153 --> 00:08:08.029 and the charger, 00:08:08.029 --> 00:08:08.529 which is nice, 00:08:08.529 --> 00:08:10.031 it's nice having the MagSafe charger. 00:08:10.031 --> 00:08:12.631 But we know, with the Mac Mini, for example, 00:08:12.631 --> 00:08:14.643 that you can have an extra Thunderbolt port 00:08:14.643 --> 00:08:16.370 with the base M4 chip. 00:08:16.621 --> 00:08:19.214 And the Mac Mini also has two extra USB-C ports, 00:08:19.214 --> 00:08:21.250 so that's five ports in total. 00:08:21.417 --> 00:08:22.897 It would have been nice to maybe see 00:08:22.897 --> 00:08:25.254 an extra Thunderbolt port on this side, specifically, 00:08:25.254 --> 00:08:26.380 because everything is on this side. 00:08:26.380 --> 00:08:28.299 I kind of feel like, it just makes it quite limiting 00:08:28.299 --> 00:08:29.175 when you're connecting stuff, 00:08:29.175 --> 00:08:30.218 because you gotta make sure 00:08:30.218 --> 00:08:32.080 they have enough length on the cable or whatever. 00:08:32.080 --> 00:08:32.929 It would have been nice 00:08:32.929 --> 00:08:34.568 to have another Thunderbolt port on this side 00:08:34.568 --> 00:08:36.015 or even a USB-C port. 00:08:36.015 --> 00:08:37.808 The display on this is, I think, 00:08:37.808 --> 00:08:39.519 actually, that's a disservice. 00:08:39.519 --> 00:08:40.853 I think actually it's better than okay. 00:08:40.853 --> 00:08:42.313 It's actually a really good display. 00:08:42.313 --> 00:08:45.074 However, it isn't an OLED, it isn't a Mini LED, 00:08:45.074 --> 00:08:46.567 it's just a standard LCD display. 00:08:46.567 --> 00:08:48.027 It would be nice to see Mini LED 00:08:48.027 --> 00:08:49.570 or LED at some point 00:08:49.570 --> 00:08:50.947 because they are getting cheaper 00:08:50.947 --> 00:08:51.614 and easier 00:08:51.614 --> 00:08:53.407 to sort of put in machines like this. 00:08:53.407 --> 00:08:54.116 So maybe in the future 00:08:54.116 --> 00:08:55.243 we get something like that. 00:08:55.243 --> 00:08:56.827 Also, you're limited to 60 Hz. 00:08:56.827 --> 00:08:57.849 Now the 60 Hz thing, 00:08:57.849 --> 00:09:00.540 that I feel like a lot of people do complain about. 00:09:00.540 --> 00:09:02.206 But I really do think 60 Hz 00:09:02.206 --> 00:09:03.966 for most people who are buying this machine, 00:09:03.966 --> 00:09:06.027 60 Hz, they probably don't even notice 00:09:06.027 --> 00:09:08.250 the difference between 60 Hz and 120 Hz. 00:09:08.250 --> 00:09:10.967 60 Hz is usually enough for them. 00:09:10.967 --> 00:09:13.636 So that I don't think is as important, 00:09:13.636 --> 00:09:16.222 it would just be nice to have Mini LED or OLED. 00:09:16.222 --> 00:09:17.598 And then finally, is the storage, 00:09:17.598 --> 00:09:19.725 you have 256 GB of storage 00:09:19.725 --> 00:09:20.893 with the base model. 00:09:20.893 --> 00:09:22.186 So because of that, 00:09:22.186 --> 00:09:23.145 I've been using it 00:09:23.145 --> 00:09:25.314 with an external SSD connected up to it, 00:09:25.314 --> 00:09:27.483 I'd say 80% of the time. 00:09:27.483 --> 00:09:28.693 I feel like I'm an edge case though, 00:09:28.693 --> 00:09:29.735 because obviously I'm editing 00:09:29.735 --> 00:09:31.153 lots of photos and videos off. 00:09:31.153 --> 00:09:32.780 I need a hard drive to edit off. 00:09:32.780 --> 00:09:34.365 It's just not gonna be enough storage. 00:09:34.365 --> 00:09:36.867 But that's not even the issue, I think. 00:09:37.034 --> 00:09:38.452 I think it'd be great 00:09:38.452 --> 00:09:40.496 upgrading it to 512 or 1 TB. 00:09:40.496 --> 00:09:42.832 The problem is the pricing for the upgrade. 00:09:43.124 --> 00:09:45.042 It's $200 each time. 00:09:45.042 --> 00:09:47.573 So to upgrade from 256 GB of storage 00:09:47.573 --> 00:09:49.880 to 512 GB of storage, 00:09:49.880 --> 00:09:50.756 where you're only adding 00:09:50.756 --> 00:09:52.820 256 GB of storage here, 00:09:52.820 --> 00:09:54.885 it's an extra $200. 00:09:55.428 --> 00:09:57.138 I think that is ridiculous. 00:09:57.138 --> 00:09:59.485 I think that is just so overpriced 00:09:59.485 --> 00:10:00.369 for what it is. 00:10:01.107 --> 00:10:04.912 I have it written down here, for $140, 00:10:05.021 --> 00:10:07.898 you can get a Samsung T7 00:10:07.982 --> 00:10:10.026 2 TB, external drive, 00:10:10.026 --> 00:10:11.360 for $140. 00:10:11.360 --> 00:10:12.612 To upgrade to 2 TB 00:10:12.612 --> 00:10:13.404 on the MacBook Air, 00:10:13.404 --> 00:10:15.781 it's going to cost you $800. 00:10:16.198 --> 00:10:17.742 How does that make any sense? 00:10:17.742 --> 00:10:18.993 The two biggest changes, though, 00:10:18.993 --> 00:10:20.703 and the two changes that I think make 00:10:20.703 --> 00:10:22.413 the most significant amount of difference 00:10:22.413 --> 00:10:23.664 is the M4 chip 00:10:23.664 --> 00:10:25.875 and that upgraded Unified Memory. 00:10:25.875 --> 00:10:29.003 Going from 8 GB to 16 GB of Unified Memory 00:10:29.003 --> 00:10:30.671 is going to make a world of a difference. 00:10:30.671 --> 00:10:32.256 It's made a world of a difference for me. 00:10:32.256 --> 00:10:33.344 When I've been using apps, 00:10:33.344 --> 00:10:34.962 when I've had so many different apps open 00:10:34.962 --> 00:10:35.856 on this machine, 00:10:36.156 --> 00:10:37.605 when I've had Final Cut Pro, Lightroom, 00:10:37.605 --> 00:10:39.305 Arc, Slack, Notion, 00:10:39.555 --> 00:10:40.931 all open at the same time. 00:10:40.931 --> 00:10:41.891 I've had no issues. 00:10:41.891 --> 00:10:43.267 It's run so smoothly 00:10:43.267 --> 00:10:44.769 because of that doubled memory. 00:10:44.769 --> 00:10:46.187 I think that's where the MacBook Air 00:10:46.187 --> 00:10:47.188 is really good value. 00:10:47.188 --> 00:10:48.939 If you're willing to put up with a few downside, 00:10:48.939 --> 00:10:49.940 as I mentioned, 00:10:49.940 --> 00:10:51.817 this is definitely the best value MacBook 00:10:51.817 --> 00:10:52.860 you can get right now. 00:10:52.860 --> 00:10:54.195 Make sure to check out my other video 00:10:54.195 --> 00:10:56.152 where I did a MacBook buying guide, 00:10:56.152 --> 00:10:58.366 where you can see all of the MacBooks compared, 00:10:58.366 --> 00:10:59.533 what I think is worth the money, 00:10:59.533 --> 00:11:00.576 what I think isn't worth the money. 00:11:00.576 --> 00:11:01.327 Make sure check that out. 00:11:01.327 --> 00:11:03.534 And I also have a video on the must have apps 00:11:03.724 --> 00:11:04.497 if you have a Mac. 00:11:04.705 --> 00:11:06.165 So hopefully, you guys enjoyed it. 00:11:06.165 --> 00:11:07.625 Follow me on Instagram and Twitter. 00:11:07.625 --> 00:11:08.776 And subscribe for more. 00:11:09.355 --> 00:11:13.355 [closing gentle music]