0:00:00.083,0:00:01.962
So I've been using the new MacBook Air

0:00:01.962,0:00:03.461
over the past week now.

0:00:03.461,0:00:05.956
I purposely bought the base model,

0:00:06.066,0:00:07.590
primarily because that's the model

0:00:07.590,0:00:08.883
that most people are going to buy.

0:00:08.883,0:00:11.178
I wanted to see what it would be [br]switching to this

0:00:11.578,0:00:13.475
over my MacBook Pro,

0:00:13.805,0:00:14.980
which is here,

0:00:14.980,0:00:16.975
the M4 Max MacBook Pro.

0:00:17.350,0:00:20.150
This MacBook Pro actually cost me $4,000--

0:00:20.150,0:00:21.479
over $4,000.

0:00:21.855,0:00:23.126
Yet this costs $1,000.

0:00:23.356,0:00:25.650
This has the M4 Max chip in it

0:00:25.817,0:00:28.520
and it also has a 36 GB of Unified Memory.

0:00:28.570,0:00:30.071
Big jump there between the two.

0:00:30.071,0:00:30.966
But I just wanted to see

0:00:30.966,0:00:32.871
what the M4 MacBook Air would be like

0:00:32.871,0:00:34.325
and whether it could handle

0:00:34.325,0:00:35.660
most of my workload.

0:00:35.660,0:00:38.149
Considering this MacBook Air [br]is a fourth of the price,

0:00:38.329,0:00:40.360
it has been very interesting.

0:00:40.540,0:00:42.419
I also have the Silver version here,

0:00:42.419,0:00:44.060
now that the Space Gray has gone,

0:00:44.250,0:00:45.462
and there is no Space Black,

0:00:45.462,0:00:46.693
I think the Silver looks best.

0:00:46.963,0:00:48.463
And here's a shot comparing [br]the Space Black,

0:00:48.463,0:00:50.759
Space Gray, and Silver[br]for anyone interested.

0:00:50.759,0:00:52.510
What is surprising with this MacBook Pro

0:00:52.510,0:00:54.596
is that Apple have lowered the price.

0:00:54.846,0:00:56.014
Now let me say that again,

0:00:56.014,0:00:58.266
Apple have lowered the price

0:00:58.266,0:01:00.351
of a product, of a new product,

0:01:00.351,0:01:02.812
not something that Apple[br]are known for whatsoever.

0:01:02.812,0:01:04.661
And not only have they lowered the price,

0:01:04.981,0:01:06.899
they have also given you[br]more for the money.

0:01:07.609,0:01:10.445
You now have a 16 GB[br]of Unified Memory compared

0:01:10.445,0:01:12.405
to the 8 GB in previous models.

0:01:12.405,0:01:13.865
The design itself is unchanged,

0:01:13.865,0:01:15.283
which I think is a good thing.

0:01:15.283,0:01:17.077
This form factor is the best.

0:01:17.077,0:01:18.576
It's super thin, light,

0:01:18.576,0:01:19.515
and feels great.

0:01:19.515,0:01:20.455
It always surprises me

0:01:20.455,0:01:22.957
how thin MacBook Airs are when I use them.

0:01:23.416,0:01:24.876
It makes it ideal for travelling.

0:01:24.876,0:01:26.961
Apple have completed nailed the design here.

0:01:27.212,0:01:29.258
I also much prefer the 13 inch size

0:01:29.258,0:01:30.465
over the 15 inch size,

0:01:30.465,0:01:32.258
and that's purely down[br]to personal preference.

0:01:32.258,0:01:34.192
I've always preferred smaller laptops.

0:01:34.302,0:01:36.096
I think to myself it would be even better

0:01:36.096,0:01:37.305
if we saw a 12 inch version.

0:01:37.305,0:01:39.766
But hey, 13 inches, I think, is a great size.

0:01:39.766,0:01:41.893
The 15 inch model is also $200 more.

0:01:41.893,0:01:44.229
Now, I don't think it's worth $200 more.

0:01:44.437,0:01:46.850
But it does also have two more GPU cores.

0:01:46.850,0:01:48.585
And if you really want that 15 inch,

0:01:48.585,0:01:49.966
maybe it might be worth it for you.

0:01:50.026,0:01:50.941
Alongside this MacBook Air,

0:01:50.941,0:01:53.196
I've also been using this new monitor from Asus,

0:01:53.196,0:01:54.650
who are also sponsoring this video.

0:01:54.864,0:01:55.865
When I first unboxed it,

0:01:55.865,0:01:57.200
I was actually really impressed

0:01:57.200,0:01:58.243
by the design of this thing.

0:01:58.243,0:01:59.499
It's not like other monitors.

0:01:59.619,0:02:02.080
You can tell Asus have spent time [br]designing this monitor

0:02:02.080,0:02:03.411
and it looks fantastic.

0:02:03.581,0:02:05.500
The back in particular just looks amazing.

0:02:05.500,0:02:06.793
It also comes with a great stand

0:02:06.793,0:02:07.961
that offers a ton of movement.

0:02:07.961,0:02:09.212
You have tilt, height,

0:02:09.212,0:02:10.505
and rotating options.

0:02:10.755,0:02:13.341
This is part of Asus' ProArt lineup.

0:02:13.508,0:02:17.215
So they provide a bunch [br]of colour accuracy test shots in the box

0:02:17.345,0:02:19.264
to show that it's been thoroughly tested.

0:02:19.264,0:02:20.682
They specifically compare it

0:02:20.682,0:02:23.146
to other much higher-end production monitors,

0:02:23.146,0:02:25.687
which can be in the five figure price range.

0:02:25.687,0:02:28.022
This isn't meant to be compared[br]to cheap OLED monitors

0:02:28.022,0:02:28.849
due to how it's tuned.

0:02:28.849,0:02:31.400
It's designed for anyone who does content creation,

0:02:31.539,0:02:33.815
whether you're a filmmaker, photographer,

0:02:33.945,0:02:35.732
3D artist or a designer.

0:02:36.072,0:02:38.867
If you want super top notch[br]colour accuracy,

0:02:38.867,0:02:40.368
this is a monitor for it.

0:02:40.368,0:02:43.371
It's a 31.5 inch QD-OLED monitor

0:02:43.371,0:02:45.248
that's 4K in resolution,

0:02:45.248,0:02:47.500
and it also does up to 240 Hz.

0:02:47.834,0:02:48.585
And of course,

0:02:48.585,0:02:51.296
viewing any content on it is sublime.

0:02:51.462,0:02:53.756
OLEDs have always been amazing[br]in this area.

0:02:53.756,0:02:55.466
It has Thunderbolt 4 built-in,

0:02:55.466,0:02:57.813
so you can connect a MacBook [br]with one cable

0:02:57.813,0:03:00.169
and daisy chain[br]other thunderbolt accessories

0:03:00.169,0:03:01.556
like another monitor.

0:03:01.556,0:03:04.726
The Thunderbolt port also provides [br]up to 96 watts of power.

0:03:04.726,0:03:07.377
I was able to get 240 Hz [br]right out of the box

0:03:07.377,0:03:08.229
with the MacBook Air,

0:03:08.229,0:03:10.064
and it is buttery smooth.

0:03:10.064,0:03:11.169
It's perfect for anyone who's looking

0:03:11.169,0:03:13.026
for a high-quality OLED monitor

0:03:13.026,0:03:13.693
for their Mac,

0:03:13.693,0:03:15.695
which also has amazing colour accuracy.

0:03:15.945,0:03:16.633
So make sure to check it out.

0:03:16.633,0:03:18.656
I'll leave a link to it, [br]down in the description below.

0:03:18.656,0:03:21.159
This MacBook Air also has the new M4 chip in it

0:03:21.159,0:03:23.203
and as most people will know,

0:03:23.411,0:03:25.413
the M-series of chips for Apple

0:03:25.413,0:03:27.332
have just been a revelation.

0:03:27.332,0:03:28.788
You get top notch performance

0:03:28.958,0:03:31.169
for a lot less power and a lot less heat,

0:03:31.461,0:03:32.795
so it's made

0:03:32.795,0:03:34.547
for some very powerful chips

0:03:34.547,0:03:36.966
that can go in very compact laptops.

0:03:36.966,0:03:39.353
This specifically has the base tier M4 chip,

0:03:39.353,0:03:42.472
which has a 10-core CPU and a 8-core GPU.

0:03:42.472,0:03:43.806
I've been using this machine

0:03:43.806,0:03:45.934
just like how I'd use my MacBook Pro.

0:03:45.934,0:03:47.644
I've not hidden anything away from it.

0:03:47.644,0:03:48.311
And let me tell you,

0:03:48.311,0:03:50.146
I have been a lot more impressed

0:03:50.146,0:03:51.105
than I thought I would be.

0:03:51.105,0:03:52.482
I wasn't expecting this

0:03:52.482,0:03:54.067
to be nearly as good

0:03:54.067,0:03:55.318
as my MacBook Pro

0:03:55.318,0:03:56.736
when it comes to a lot of things.

0:03:56.736,0:03:58.196
It handles all of the standard stuff

0:03:58.196,0:03:59.822
extremely well as you'd expect.

0:03:59.822,0:04:01.699
I've been working away at apps like Figma

0:04:01.699,0:04:02.951
for all of my design work,

0:04:02.951,0:04:04.494
and I feel like this is quite basic now.

0:04:04.494,0:04:05.912
I think most people are going to be fine

0:04:05.912,0:04:07.330
using something like Figma,

0:04:07.330,0:04:09.040
especially if you have heavy Figma files,

0:04:09.040,0:04:10.500
now that you have the upgraded

0:04:10.500,0:04:12.418
Unified Memory of 16 GB,

0:04:12.418,0:04:13.836
if you have a heavy Figma files

0:04:13.836,0:04:15.213
with lots of different screens,

0:04:15.213,0:04:16.302
you shouldn't have an issue.

0:04:16.302,0:04:18.216
Lightroom editing as well has been no issues.

0:04:18.216,0:04:20.760
I've been editing photos[br]very, very fast and snappy.

0:04:20.760,0:04:22.281
Being able to go through my library quickly,

0:04:22.281,0:04:23.763
copy and paste edits and stuff.

0:04:23.763,0:04:25.348
It's been very, very smooth.

0:04:25.348,0:04:26.683
So here I am editing a video,

0:04:26.683,0:04:28.764
this is for my sort of favourite Mac apps,

0:04:28.764,0:04:30.145
Mac apps I can't live without.

0:04:30.645,0:04:33.114
I have two clips here,

0:04:33.114,0:04:34.065
I have a screen recording

0:04:34.065,0:04:36.362
and I have the A-roll of myself.

0:04:36.776,0:04:38.903
So if we hover over, we can see,

0:04:38.903,0:04:39.696
A-roll of myself.

0:04:39.696,0:04:40.697
And I also have

0:04:41.322,0:04:42.573
the screen recording.

0:04:42.573,0:04:43.741
And I've got them set up

0:04:43.741,0:04:44.826
as a multicam clip,

0:04:44.826,0:04:46.161
so that I can switch between the two,

0:04:46.161,0:04:48.413
so that when I'm demoing the app,

0:04:48.413,0:04:50.155
you can see me in the corner.

0:04:50.415,0:04:51.916
And obviously, I'm taking up...

0:04:51.916,0:04:55.025
I had the screen recording [br]sort of main focus of the screen.

0:04:55.545,0:04:57.839
When I, for example--

0:04:57.839,0:04:59.549
Let's have a look at this one.

0:04:59.549,0:05:01.948
So right now I have a set it to

0:05:02.510,0:05:03.835
Better Performance.

0:05:04.095,0:05:05.661
And with Better Performance,

0:05:06.431,0:05:07.268
it does play

0:05:07.598,0:05:08.796
fairly smoothly.

0:05:10.685,0:05:12.860
It can jitter sometimes.

0:05:16.530,0:05:17.817
It's okay right now,

0:05:17.817,0:05:18.985
but that's at Better Performance.

0:05:18.985,0:05:20.815
If I go to Better Quality,

0:05:21.571,0:05:22.626
and I start playing...

0:05:24.282,0:05:25.992
it seems to be doing fine right now.

0:05:25.992,0:05:27.270
But what would happen is--

0:05:27.270,0:05:28.995
It's not showing right now,

0:05:28.995,0:05:30.163
I think it's because Final Cut Pro

0:05:30.163,0:05:31.664
has done the background rendering.

0:05:31.664,0:05:33.249
If you're in the middle of an edit

0:05:33.249,0:05:34.901
and you have two clips like this,

0:05:34.901,0:05:35.948
two heavy clips,

0:05:35.948,0:05:38.546
because I'm using 10-bit S-log footage,

0:05:38.546,0:05:39.505
quite heavy footage,

0:05:39.505,0:05:40.965
which is also compressed.

0:05:40.965,0:05:42.744
Thankfully, the Mac has,

0:05:42.884,0:05:44.620
the Media Engines and whatever else,

0:05:44.620,0:05:46.179
but it isn't Air.

0:05:46.304,0:05:46.980
It's not Pro,

0:05:46.980,0:05:48.547
so it doesn't have as many Media Engines.

0:05:49.057,0:05:50.599
For doing edits like this,

0:05:51.309,0:05:52.435
it works.

0:05:52.435,0:05:53.519
It's not perfect,

0:05:53.519,0:05:55.563
there are sometimes dropped frames.

0:05:56.230,0:05:57.273
It can be a bit slow

0:05:57.273,0:05:58.259
when it comes to playback.

0:05:58.259,0:05:59.574
I mean, right now, though,

0:05:59.574,0:06:00.610
it's running smoothly.

0:06:00.610,0:06:01.360
I think, like I said,

0:06:01.360,0:06:02.111
it's because it's done

0:06:02.111,0:06:03.404
a lot of background rendering.

0:06:03.404,0:06:04.530
I'm editing this video right now

0:06:04.530,0:06:06.032
and there's a lot going on.

0:06:06.432,0:06:08.785
This is actually one of my more complex videos.

0:06:09.638,0:06:11.954
My review videos [br]are technically a bit easier,

0:06:11.954,0:06:12.789
but for stuff like this,

0:06:12.789,0:06:13.748
we have multicams,

0:06:13.748,0:06:14.499
you have different cameras

0:06:14.499,0:06:15.249
and you're going in and out

0:06:15.249,0:06:16.959
with effects and you have overlays,

0:06:16.959,0:06:17.835
where you have two clips

0:06:17.835,0:06:18.586
on top of each other.

0:06:18.586,0:06:19.962
It has to show both the clips,

0:06:19.962,0:06:22.215
which means it's playing [br]both clips at the same time.

0:06:22.215,0:06:23.918
It can be a bit heavier on the chip,

0:06:24.258,0:06:24.967
but it works.

0:06:24.967,0:06:25.794
I think if you're someone

0:06:25.794,0:06:27.345
who's interested [br]in doing basic video editing.

0:06:27.345,0:06:28.846
Maybe you're shooting [br]stuff with an iPhone

0:06:28.846,0:06:31.265
or a sort of Insta360 or whatever it is,

0:06:31.265,0:06:33.299
one of those handheld gimbal cameras.

0:06:33.559,0:06:35.269
You are not gonna have any issues here

0:06:35.269,0:06:36.437
with the M4 chip.

0:06:36.437,0:06:38.272
You will not have any issues whatsoever.

0:06:38.272,0:06:40.274
And that's what's so impressive to me.

0:06:40.274,0:06:41.734
The only downside with a chip like this,

0:06:41.734,0:06:43.903
which is completely to be expected, by the way,

0:06:43.903,0:06:45.613
is when it comes to rendering video

0:06:45.613,0:06:47.281
in something like Final Cut Pro.

0:06:47.281,0:06:48.616
When I was rendering videos

0:06:48.616,0:06:49.841
the sort of same videos

0:06:49.841,0:06:52.156
that I would edit on my MacBook Pro,

0:06:52.286,0:06:53.871
the render times would be double,

0:06:53.871,0:06:55.581
sometimes triple the time.

0:06:55.581,0:06:58.209
So that can really add on a lot of time,

0:06:58.209,0:06:59.544
if you're rendering a lot of videos.

0:06:59.544,0:07:00.623
Especially for someone like me,

0:07:00.623,0:07:03.005
where I'm rendering multiple videos a week,

0:07:03.005,0:07:04.715
I'm sometimes having to re-render things

0:07:04.715,0:07:06.923
because I'm having to go back [br]and edit something.

0:07:07.093,0:07:08.719
I'm sometimes having to render videos

0:07:08.719,0:07:10.483
for clients and stuff very quickly as well.

0:07:10.763,0:07:12.265
Time for me is very, very valuable.

0:07:12.265,0:07:14.642
So that's really one of the downsides [br]of the M4 chip.

0:07:14.642,0:07:15.560
But again,

0:07:15.560,0:07:17.019
it wasn't really designed for that.

0:07:17.019,0:07:19.105
So it's still an amazing chip

0:07:19.105,0:07:20.106
for everything that it can do.

0:07:20.106,0:07:21.607
If you're someone [br]who's just getting started

0:07:21.607,0:07:22.900
with content creation,

0:07:22.900,0:07:24.513
maybe you're just making [br]that odd video here and there,

0:07:24.513,0:07:27.196
maybe you're doing some 3D rendering,[br]some 3D editing,

0:07:27.196,0:07:28.990
whatever it might be, AI stuff.

0:07:28.990,0:07:30.171
I think this is gonna be completely fine

0:07:30.171,0:07:31.082
just to start out with,

0:07:31.082,0:07:31.993
maybe down the line

0:07:31.993,0:07:33.703
you can consider something like a Pro,

0:07:33.703,0:07:35.746
but for how much this can do,

0:07:35.913,0:07:36.664
the M4 chip can do,

0:07:36.664,0:07:38.708
I've genuinely been very impressed.

0:07:38.708,0:07:40.835
As expected, battery life is fantastic.

0:07:40.835,0:07:42.712
Apple have really nailed the battery life

0:07:42.712,0:07:44.046
when it comes to these laptops now.

0:07:44.046,0:07:45.756
I don't think most people need to worry,

0:07:45.756,0:07:47.467
unless they're doing [br]super, super heavy stuff.

0:07:47.467,0:07:49.177
Maybe you're spending [br]the whole day video editing,

0:07:49.177,0:07:50.887
then yeah, you might need to connect it

0:07:50.887,0:07:51.929
to a charger.

0:07:51.929,0:07:54.566
But for doing sort of admin work [br]and stuff like that,

0:07:54.682,0:07:55.766
web browsing, watching videos,

0:07:55.766,0:07:58.227
it is going to last you[br]the whole day no problem.

0:07:58.227,0:08:00.646
Now let's go through [br]some downsize and improvements

0:08:00.646,0:08:02.356
that I think could be made to the MacBook Air.

0:08:02.356,0:08:03.816
First up is the connectivity.

0:08:03.816,0:08:05.943
I wish it had an extra Thunderbolt port.

0:08:05.943,0:08:07.153
So we have two Thunderbolt ports

0:08:07.153,0:08:08.029
and the charger,

0:08:08.029,0:08:08.529
which is nice,

0:08:08.529,0:08:10.031
it's nice having the MagSafe charger.

0:08:10.031,0:08:12.631
But we know, with the Mac Mini, for example,

0:08:12.631,0:08:14.643
that you can have an extra Thunderbolt port

0:08:14.643,0:08:16.370
with the base M4 chip.

0:08:16.621,0:08:19.214
And the Mac Mini also has [br]two extra USB-C ports,

0:08:19.214,0:08:21.250
so that's five ports in total.

0:08:21.417,0:08:22.897
It would have been nice to maybe see

0:08:22.897,0:08:25.254
an extra Thunderbolt port on this side, specifically,

0:08:25.254,0:08:26.380
because everything is on this side.

0:08:26.380,0:08:28.299
I kind of feel like, it just makes it quite limiting

0:08:28.299,0:08:29.175
when you're connecting stuff,

0:08:29.175,0:08:30.218
because you gotta make sure

0:08:30.218,0:08:32.080
they have enough length [br]on the cable or whatever.

0:08:32.080,0:08:32.929
It would have been nice

0:08:32.929,0:08:34.568
to have another [br]Thunderbolt port on this side

0:08:34.568,0:08:36.015
or even a USB-C port.

0:08:36.015,0:08:37.808
The display on this is, I think,

0:08:37.808,0:08:39.519
actually, that's a disservice.

0:08:39.519,0:08:40.853
I think actually it's better than okay.

0:08:40.853,0:08:42.313
It's actually a really good display.

0:08:42.313,0:08:45.074
However, it isn't an OLED, it isn't a Mini LED,

0:08:45.074,0:08:46.567
it's just a standard LCD display.

0:08:46.567,0:08:48.027
It would be nice to see Mini LED

0:08:48.027,0:08:49.570
or LED at some point

0:08:49.570,0:08:50.947
because they are getting cheaper

0:08:50.947,0:08:51.614
and easier

0:08:51.614,0:08:53.407
to sort of put in machines like this.

0:08:53.407,0:08:54.116
So maybe in the future

0:08:54.116,0:08:55.243
we get something like that.

0:08:55.243,0:08:56.827
Also, you're limited to 60 Hz.

0:08:56.827,0:08:57.849
Now the 60 Hz thing,

0:08:57.849,0:09:00.540
that I feel like a lot of people [br]do complain about.

0:09:00.540,0:09:02.206
But I really do think 60 Hz

0:09:02.206,0:09:03.966
for most people [br]who are buying this machine,

0:09:03.966,0:09:06.027
60 Hz, they probably don't even notice

0:09:06.027,0:09:08.250
the difference between 60 Hz and 120 Hz.

0:09:08.250,0:09:10.967
60 Hz is usually enough for them.

0:09:10.967,0:09:13.636
So that I don't think is as important,

0:09:13.636,0:09:16.222
it would just be nice [br]to have Mini LED or OLED.

0:09:16.222,0:09:17.598
And then finally, is the storage,

0:09:17.598,0:09:19.725
you have 256 GB of storage

0:09:19.725,0:09:20.893
with the base model.

0:09:20.893,0:09:22.186
So because of that,

0:09:22.186,0:09:23.145
I've been using it

0:09:23.145,0:09:25.314
with an external SSD connected up to it,

0:09:25.314,0:09:27.483
I'd say 80% of the time.

0:09:27.483,0:09:28.693
I feel like I'm an edge case though,

0:09:28.693,0:09:29.735
because obviously I'm editing

0:09:29.735,0:09:31.153
lots of photos and videos off.

0:09:31.153,0:09:32.780
I need a hard drive to edit off.

0:09:32.780,0:09:34.365
It's just not gonna be enough storage.

0:09:34.365,0:09:36.867
But that's not even the issue, I think.

0:09:37.034,0:09:38.452
I think it'd be great

0:09:38.452,0:09:40.496
upgrading it to 512 or 1 TB.

0:09:40.496,0:09:42.832
The problem is the pricing for the upgrade.

0:09:43.124,0:09:45.042
It's $200 each time.

0:09:45.042,0:09:47.573
So to upgrade from 256 GB of storage

0:09:47.573,0:09:49.880
to 512 GB of storage,

0:09:49.880,0:09:50.756
where you're only adding

0:09:50.756,0:09:52.820
256 GB of storage here,

0:09:52.820,0:09:54.885
it's an extra $200.

0:09:55.428,0:09:57.138
I think that is ridiculous.

0:09:57.138,0:09:59.485
I think that is just so overpriced

0:09:59.485,0:10:00.369
for what it is.

0:10:01.107,0:10:04.912
I have it written down here, for $140,

0:10:05.021,0:10:07.898
you can get a Samsung T7

0:10:07.982,0:10:10.026
2 TB, external drive,

0:10:10.026,0:10:11.360
for $140.

0:10:11.360,0:10:12.612
To upgrade to 2 TB

0:10:12.612,0:10:13.404
on the MacBook Air,

0:10:13.404,0:10:15.781
it's going to cost you $800.

0:10:16.198,0:10:17.742
How does that make any sense?

0:10:17.742,0:10:18.993
The two biggest changes, though,

0:10:18.993,0:10:20.703
and the two changes that I think make

0:10:20.703,0:10:22.413
the most significant amount of difference

0:10:22.413,0:10:23.664
is the M4 chip

0:10:23.664,0:10:25.875
and that upgraded Unified Memory.

0:10:25.875,0:10:29.003
Going from 8 GB to 16 GB of Unified Memory

0:10:29.003,0:10:30.671
is going to make a world of a difference.

0:10:30.671,0:10:32.256
It's made a world of a difference for me.

0:10:32.256,0:10:33.344
When I've been using apps,

0:10:33.344,0:10:34.962
when I've had so many different apps open

0:10:34.962,0:10:35.856
on this machine,

0:10:36.156,0:10:37.605
when I've had Final Cut Pro, Lightroom,

0:10:37.605,0:10:39.305
Arc, Slack, Notion,

0:10:39.555,0:10:40.931
all open at the same time.

0:10:40.931,0:10:41.891
I've had no issues.

0:10:41.891,0:10:43.267
It's run so smoothly

0:10:43.267,0:10:44.769
because of that doubled memory.

0:10:44.769,0:10:46.187
I think that's where the MacBook Air

0:10:46.187,0:10:47.188
is really good value.

0:10:47.188,0:10:48.939
If you're willing to put up [br]with a few downside,

0:10:48.939,0:10:49.940
as I mentioned,

0:10:49.940,0:10:51.817
this is definitely the best value MacBook

0:10:51.817,0:10:52.860
you can get right now.

0:10:52.860,0:10:54.195
Make sure to check out my other video

0:10:54.195,0:10:56.152
where I did a MacBook buying guide,

0:10:56.152,0:10:58.366
where you can see [br]all of the MacBooks compared,

0:10:58.366,0:10:59.533
what I think is worth the money,

0:10:59.533,0:11:00.576
what I think isn't worth the money.

0:11:00.576,0:11:01.327
Make sure check that out.

0:11:01.327,0:11:03.534
And I also have a video on the must have apps

0:11:03.724,0:11:04.497
if you have a Mac.

0:11:04.705,0:11:06.165
So hopefully, you guys enjoyed it.

0:11:06.165,0:11:07.625
Follow me on Instagram and Twitter.

0:11:07.625,0:11:08.776
And subscribe for more.

0:11:09.355,0:11:13.355
[closing gentle music]