1
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We have historical records that allow us
to know how the ancient Greeks dressed,

2
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how they lived,

3
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how they fought.

4
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But how did they think?

5
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
One natural idea is that the deepest
aspects of human thought,

6
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
out ability to imagine,

7
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to be concious,

8
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to dream,

9
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
have always been the same.

10
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Another possibility

11
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that the social transformations
that have shaped our culture

12
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
make us also change the structural
columns of human thought.

13
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We may all have different
opinions about this.

14
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Actually, it's a longstanding
philosophical debate.

15
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But is this question
even amenable to science?

16
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Here I'd like to propose that in the same way

17
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that in the same way
that we can reconstruct

18
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how the ancient Greek cities looked like,

19
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
just based on a few bricks,

20
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that the writings of a culture
are the archealogical records --

21
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the fossils --

22
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of human thought.

23
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And in fact,

24
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
doing some form of psychological analysis

25
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of some of the most ancient
books of human culture,

26
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Julian James came in the '70s
with a very wild and radical hypothesis,

27
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that only 3,000 years ago,

28
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
humans were today
what we'd call, schizophrenics.

29
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And he made this claim

30
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
based on the fact that the first humans
writing these books behaved consistently

31
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in different traditions and in different
places of the world,

32
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as if they were hearing and obeying voices

33
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that they perceived
as coming from the Gods,

34
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or from the muses.

35
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
What today we'd call hallucinations.

36
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And only then,

37
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as time went on,

38
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
they began to recognize
that they were the creators --

39
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the owners of these inner voices.

40
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And with this they gained introspection:

41
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the ability to think
about their own thoughts.

42
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So Jaynes' theory is that conciousness,

43
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
at least in the way we perceive it today,

44
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
where we feel that we are the pilots
of our own existence,

45
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is a quite recent cultural development.

46
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this theory is quite spectacular,

47
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because an obvious problem,

48
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which is that it's built on just a few
and very specific examples.

49
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So the question is

50
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whether the theory that introspection
built up only about 3,000 years ago,

51
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
can be examined in a quantitative
and objective way.

52
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And the problem on how
to go about this is quite obvious.

53
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It's not like Plato woke up one day

54
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then he wrote,

55
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Hello, I'm Plato

56
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and as of today I have a fully
introspective consciousness."

57
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
(Laughter)

58
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this still is actually
what is the essence of the problem.

59
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We need to find the emergence
of a concept that's never said.

60
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The word introspection
does not appear a single time

61
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in the books we want to analyze.

62
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So our way to solve this
is to build the space of words.

63
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is a huge space
that contains all words

64
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in such a way that they distance
between any two of them

65
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is indicative of how
closely related they are.

66
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So for instance,

67
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
you want the words dog and cat
to be very close together,

68
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but the words grapefruit and logarithm
to be very far away.

69
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this has to be true for any
two words within the space.

70
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And there are different ways that we
can construct the space of words.

71
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
One is just asking the experts,

72
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a bit like we do with dictionaries.

73
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Another possibility

74
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is following the simple assumption

75
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that when two words are related
they tend to appear in the same sentences,

76
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in the same paragraphs,

77
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in the same documents,

78
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
more often than would be expected
just by pure chance.

79
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this simple hypothesis,

80
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
this simple method,

81
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
with some computational tricks

82
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that have to do with the fact

83
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that this is a very complex
and highly dimensional space,

84
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
turns out to be quite effective.

85
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And just to give you a flavor
of how well this works,

86
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
this is the result we get when
we analyze this for some familiar words.

87
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And you can see first

88
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that words automatically organize
into semantic neighborhoods.

89
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So you get the fruits,

90
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the body parts,

91
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the computer parts,

92
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the scientific terms

93
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and so on.

94
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The algorithm also identifies
the reorganized concepts in a hierarchy.

95
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So for instance,

96
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
you can see that the scientific terms
break down into two subcategories

97
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of the astronomic and the physic terms.

98
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And then their are very fine things.

99
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
For instance,

100
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the word astronomy,

101
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which seems a bit bizarre where it is,

102
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is actually exactly where it should be,

103
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
between what it is --

104
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
an actual science --

105
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and between what it describes --

106
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the astronomical terms.

107
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And we could go on and on with this.

108
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Actually if you stare at this for awhile

109
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and you just build random trajectories,

110
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
you will see that is feels well --

111
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
actually it feels a bit like doing poetry.

112
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this is because in way,

113
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
walking in this space
is like walking in the mind.

114
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And last thing is that this algorithm
also identifies what are our intuitions,

115
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of which words should lead
in the neighborhood of introspection.

116
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So for instance,

117
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
words such as Self, Guilt,
Reason, Emotion,

118
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
are very close to introspection,

119
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but other words,

120
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
such as Red, Football, Candle, Banana,

121
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
are just very far away.

122
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And so once we've built this space,

123
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the question of the history
of introspection,

124
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or of the history of any concept,

125
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which before could seem abstract
and somehow vague,

126
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
becomes concrete --

127
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
becomes amenable to quantitative science.

128
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
All that we have to do is take the books,

129
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we digitize them

130
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and we take this stream
of words as a trajectory

131
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and project them into this space,

132
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then we ask whether this trajectory
spends significant time

133
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
circling closely to the concept
of introspection.

134
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And with this,

135
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we can analyze
the history of introspection

136
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in the ancient Greek tradition,

137
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
for which we have the best
available written record.

138
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So what we did is we took all the books --

139
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we just ordered them by time --

140
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
for each book we take the words

141
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and we project them to the space,

142
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then we ask for each word
how close it is to introspection,

143
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and we just average that.

144
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And then we understand
that as time goes on and on,

145
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
these books get closer,
and closer and closer

146
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to the concept of introspection.

147
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this is exactly what happens
in the ancient Greek tradition.

148
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So you can see that for the oldest books
in the Homeric tradition,

149
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
there is a small increase with books
getting closer to introspection,

150
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but about four centuries before Christ,

151
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
this starts ramping up very rapidly

152
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to an almost five-fold increase

153
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of books getting closer,
and closer and closer

154
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to the concept of introspection.

155
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And one of the nice things about this

156
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that now we can ask

157
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whether this is also true
in a different independent tradition.

158
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So we just ran this same analysis
on the Judeo Christian tradition,

159
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and we got virtually the same pattern.

160
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Again you see a small increase
for the oldest books in the old testament,

161
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then it increases much more rapidly

162
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in the new books of the new testament,

163
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then we get the peak of introspection

164
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in the work Confessions
of Saint Augustine,

165
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
about four centuries after Christ.

166
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this was very important,

167
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because Saint Augustine
had been recognized

168
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
by scholars, philologists, historians,

169
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as one of the founders of introspection.

170
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Actually, some believe him to be
the father of modern psychology.

171
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So our algorithm --

172
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which has the virtue
of being quantitative,

173
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of being objective,

174
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and of course of being extremely fast,

175
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it just runs in a fraction of a second --

176
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
can capture some of the most
important conclusions

177
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of this long tradition of investigation.

178
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this is in a way,
one of the beauties of science,

179
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which is that now this idea can translated

180
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and generalized to a whole
lot of different domains.

181
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So in the same way that we asked
about the past of human conciousness,

182
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
maybe the most challenging question
we can pose to ourselves,

183
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is whether this can tell us something
about the future of our unconciousness.

184
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
To put it more precisely,

185
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whether the words we say today

186
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
can tell us something of where
our minds will be in a few days,

187
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in a few months,

188
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or a few years from now.

189
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And in the way many of us
are now wearing censors

190
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that detect our heart rate,

191
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
our respiration,

192
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
our genes,

193
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on the hopes that this may
help us prevent diseases,

194
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we can ask whether monitoring
and analyzing the words we speak --

195
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we tweet,

196
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we email,

197
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we write --

198
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
can tell us ahead of time whether
something will go wrong with our minds.

199
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And with Guillermo Cecci,

200
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who has been my brother
in this adventure,

201
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we took on this task.

202
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And we did so by analyzing the recorded
speech for 44 young people

203
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who were at a high risk
of developing schizophenia.

204
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And so what we did is we
measured speech at day one

205
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then we asked

206
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whether the properties
of the speech could predict --

207
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
within a window of almost three years --

208
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the future development of psychosis.

209
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But despite our hopes,

210
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we got failure after failure.

211
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There was just not enough
information in semantics

212
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to predict the future
organization of the mind.

213
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It was good enough

214
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to distinguish between a group
of schizophrenics and a control group,

215
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a bit like we had done
for the ancient texts,

216
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but not to predict the future
onto the psychosis.

217
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But then we realized

218
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that maybe the most important thing
was not so much what they were saying

219
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but how they were saying it.

220
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
More specifically,

221
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it was not in which semantic
neighborhoods the words were,

222
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but how far and fast they jumped
from one semantic neighborhood to another.

223
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And so we came up with this measure,

224
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which we termed Semantic Coherence,

225
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which essentially measures

226
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the persistence of speech
within one semantic topic,

227
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
within one semantic category.

228
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And it turned out to be

229
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that for this group of 44 people,

230
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the algorithm based on semantic cohernece

231
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
could predict with 100 percent accuracy

232
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who developed psychosis and who will not.

233
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this was something
that could not be achieved --

234
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
not even close --

235
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
with all the other
existing clinical measures.

236
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And I remember vividly
while I was working on this,

237
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I was sitting on my computer

238
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and I saw a bunch of tweets by Polo.

239
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Polo has been my first student
back in Buenos Aires

240
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and at the time he was living in New York.

241
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And there was something in this tweet --

242
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I could not tell exactly what
because nothing was said explicitly --

243
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but I got this strong hunch,

244
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
this strong intuition
that something was going wrong.

245
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So I picked up the phone
and I called Polo,

246
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and he was not feeling well.

247
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And this simple fact that reading
in between the lines

248
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I could sense through words
his feelings,

249
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
was a simple but very
effective way to help.

250
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
What I tell you today

251
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that we're getting
close to understanding

252
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how we can convert this intuition
that we all have,

253
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that we all share,

254
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
into an algorithm.

255
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And in doing so,

256
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we may be seeing in the future
a very different form of mental health,

257
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
based on objective, quantitative
and automated analysis

258
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of the words we write,

259
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of the words we say.

260
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Gracias.

261
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
(Applause)