The message connected to public theatre is not an advertisement.
I understand that the Theatre Institute is an institution,
but the whole explanation of the artist and the graphics as such have nothing to do with advertising.
And I think that Woynarowski didn't deserve the suggestions
that he is practising some clandestine advertising,
because he is a top-class artist, and I think he deserves respect.
I know that he pulled out also because of the atmosphere that came to surround his figure,
a very mean and unpleasant one,
and I think that's not right.
We are thus left in Warsaw with an old, deteriorating mural, it really is in a bad shape,
and with the sense that today, no mural can ever be painted over.
With this suggestion that these works, which, I think that after all, according to the spirit of street art,
are supposed to be evanescent, temporary,
which are meant as interventions and sometimes the way that they are created borders on the illegal –
that these would be supposed to function eternally.
And it worries me, in that we don’t have an excess of free wall space
which would allow us to paint new murals and leave the ones created earlier.
And, to be honest, the foundations that organise mural painting do not always have the means
and possibilities of maintaining their works in good condition.