0:00:09.433,0:00:12.399 Uses and Gratification studies taught us that [br]people were 0:00:12.400,0:00:15.733 actively seeking out media to fulfill their needs. 0:00:15.733,0:00:20.066 It makes sense that when people are able to [br]open themselves up to specific content, 0:00:20.066,0:00:22.832 they can also close themselves off to certain [br]messages. 0:00:22.833,0:00:27.199 Closing oneself off to messages may be seen [br]as a coping mechanism. 0:00:27.200,0:00:29.766 Scientists who studied the brain discovered that, 0:00:29.766,0:00:34.699 since we are constantly bombarded with [br]sensory input, in order to make sense of the 0:00:34.700,0:00:36.833 world around us, and not get overwhelmed, 0:00:36.833,0:00:40.933 we have become very adept in blocking [br]unnecessary input 0:00:40.933,0:00:44.866 and at the same time selecting and amplifying [br]relevant data. 0:00:44.866,0:00:48.766 Note that these processes are usually [br]unconscious, 0:00:48.766,0:00:53.332 meaning that they also occur when we do not [br]intend to filter out information. 0:00:53.333,0:00:58.966 A simple example of this, in a crowded room our [br]brain will filter away background noise 0:00:58.966,0:01:03.499 and conversations that we are not interested in, [br]focusing on the people we are talking to. 0:01:03.500,0:01:06.833 Amplifying their voice and blocking other [br]sounds. 0:01:06.833,0:01:10.999 But if someone in one of those other [br]conversations would suddenly drop our name, 0:01:11.000,0:01:14.200 we would probably hear that. 0:01:14.200,0:01:18.266 Because our brain knows that we are interested [br]when people start talking about us! 0:01:18.266,0:01:22.432 Hastorf and Cantril studied this phenomenon in [br]1954. 0:01:22.433,0:01:26.633 They asked several university students from [br]Princeton and Dartmouth to count the 0:01:26.633,0:01:29.733 amount of violations in a Princeton-Dartmouth [br]football game. 0:01:29.733,0:01:34.866 Princeton students reported more Dartmouth [br]violations and Dartmouth students 0:01:34.866,0:01:39.199 had ‘seen’ more Princeton violations. Both [br]groups, 0:01:39.200,0:01:44.400 despite the fact that they had to observe [br]seemingly simple and objective facts, had 0:01:44.400,0:01:47.200 processed the message in a different way, 0:01:47.200,0:01:51.966 filtering out unwanted information – whenever [br]their own team made a violation – and amplifying 0:01:51.966,0:01:56.232 information that corresponded with their [br]predispositions. 0:01:56.233,0:02:01.799 These and similar findings later led to the [br]proposal of the so called Hostile Media Effect. 0:02:01.800,0:02:06.166 In 1982, the first major study of this [br]phenomenon was undertaken 0:02:06.166,0:02:11.066 by Vallone, Ross and Lepper. Pro-Palestinian [br]students and pro-Israeli students 0:02:11.066,0:02:15.399 were shown the same news and asked to count [br]the amount of pro- and anti-Israeli 0:02:15.400,0:02:18.666 and pro- and anti-Palestinian references. 0:02:18.666,0:02:23.532 Both sides found that the media were biased [br]against their side. 0:02:23.533,0:02:28.799 Pro-Israeli students counted more anti-Israel [br]references and fewer pro-Israel references 0:02:28.800,0:02:33.933 than the students who favoured the Palestinians. [br]And vice versa. 0:02:33.933,0:02:37.466 These studies indicate that there is an actual [br]difference of perception 0:02:37.466,0:02:40.499 between members of the same audience. 0:02:40.500,0:02:46.200 They see, hear, remember and process [br]messages differently on a subconscious level. 0:02:46.200,0:02:50.266 This is called a cognitive bias. 0:02:50.266,0:02:53.332 We think we are objectively watching the news [br]or a sports game 0:02:53.333,0:02:57.399 but in reality our mind is already serving as a [br]filter. 0:02:57.400,0:03:03.666 Making selections and blocking out unwanted [br]information. There are many reasons for this. 0:03:03.666,0:03:07.166 We’ll discuss some of them in the next section [br]of our MOOC.