1 00:00:01,425 --> 00:00:05,060 - [Narrator] On his quest to master econometrics, 2 00:00:05,223 --> 00:00:08,813 Grasshopper Kamal has made great progress, 3 00:00:08,813 --> 00:00:13,662 stretching his capabilities and outsmarting his foes. 4 00:00:14,223 --> 00:00:16,640 Alas, today he's despondent, 5 00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:19,336 for one challenge remains unmet. 6 00:00:19,336 --> 00:00:24,130 Kamal cannot yet decode the scriptures of academic research, 7 00:00:24,130 --> 00:00:27,347 journals like "The American Economic Review" 8 00:00:27,347 --> 00:00:29,080 and "Econometrica." 9 00:00:29,202 --> 00:00:33,501 These seemed to him to be inscribed in an obscure foreign tongue. 10 00:00:33,501 --> 00:00:35,478 - [Kamal] Ugh, what the... ? 11 00:00:36,711 --> 00:00:40,018 - These volumes are opaque to the novice, Kamal, 12 00:00:40,018 --> 00:00:42,205 but can be deciphered with study. 13 00:00:42,467 --> 00:00:45,109 Let us learn to read them together. 14 00:00:52,485 --> 00:00:55,317 Let's dive into the West Point study, 15 00:00:55,317 --> 00:00:58,278 published in the "Economics of Education Review." 16 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This paper reports on a randomized evaluation 17 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of student electronics use in Economics 101 classrooms. 18 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 First, a quick review of the research design. 19 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - Okay. 20 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Josh] 'Metrics masters teaching at West Point, 21 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the military college that trains American Army officers 22 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 designed a randomized trial to answer this question. 23 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 These masters randomly assigned West Point cadets 24 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 into Economics classes operating under different rules. 25 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Unlike most American colleges, 26 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the West Point default is no electronics. 27 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 For purposes of this experiment, some students were left 28 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 in such traditional technology-free classes, 29 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 no lap tops, no tablets and no phones! 30 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 [voice echoes] 31 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This is the control group, or baseline case. 32 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Another group was allowed to use electronics. 33 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This is the treatment group, subject to a changed environment. 34 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The treatment in this case is the unrestricted use 35 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of laptops or tablets in class. 36 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Every causal question has a clear outcome, 37 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the variables we hope to influence defined in advance of the study. 38 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The outcomes in the West Point electronics study 39 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 are final exam scores. 40 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The study seeks to answer the following question, 41 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 what is the causal effect of classroom electronics on learning 42 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 as measured by exam scores? 43 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - Economics journal articles usually begin with a table 44 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of descriptive statistics, giving key facts 45 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 about the study sample. 46 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - Oh my gosh, I remember this table, so confusing! 47 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Columns 1 to 3 report mean, or average, characteristics. 48 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 These give a sense of who we're studying. 49 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Let's start with column 1 which describes covariates 50 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 in a control group. 51 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Covariates are characteristics of the control and treatment groups 52 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 measured before the experiment begins. 53 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 For example, we see the control group has an average age a bit over 20. 54 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Many of these covariates are dummy variables. 55 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 A dummy variable can only have two values, a zero or a one. 56 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 For example, student gender is captured by a dummy variable 57 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that equals one for woman and zero for man. 58 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The mean of this variable is the proportion female. 59 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 We also see that the control group is 13% Hispanic 60 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and 19% had prior military service. 61 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The table notes are key. 62 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Refer to these as you scan the table. 63 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 These notes explain what's shown in each column and panel. 64 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The notes tell us, for example, that standard deviations 65 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 are reported in brackets. 66 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Standard deviations tell us how spread out the data are. 67 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 For example, a standard deviation of 0.52 tells us that most 68 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of the control group's GPAs fall between 2.35, 69 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 which is 0.52 below the mean GPA of 2.87, 70 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and 3.39, which is 0.52 above 2.87. 71 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 A lower standard deviation would mean the GPAs were 72 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 more tightly clustered around the mean. 73 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] Yeah, but they're missing from most of the variables. 74 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] That's right. 75 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Masters usually omit standard deviations for dummies 76 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 because the mean of this variable determines its standard deviaton. 77 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This study compares two treatment groups with the control group. 78 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The first was allowed free use of laptops and tablets. 79 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The second treatment was more restrictive, 80 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 allowing only tablets placed flat on the desk. 81 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The treatment groups look much like the control group. 82 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Hmmm... 83 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This takes us to the next feature of this table, columns 4 through 6 84 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 use statistical tests to compare the characteristics 85 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of the treatment and control group before the experiment. 86 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In column 4, the two treatment groups are combined. 87 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 You can see that the difference in proportion female 88 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 between the treatment and control group is only 0.03. 89 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The difference is not statistically significant. 90 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 It is the sort of difference we can easily put down 91 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 to chance results in our sample selection process. 92 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] Hmm, how do we know that? 93 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] Remember the rule of thumb? 94 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Statistical estimates that exceed the standard 95 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 by a multiple of 2 in absolute value 96 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 are usually said to be statistically significant. 97 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The standard error is 0.03, 98 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 same as the difference in proportion female. 99 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 So the ratio of the latter to the former is only 1, 100 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 which of course is less than 2. 101 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] Uh huh. So none of the treatment/control differences 102 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 in the table are more than twice their standard errors. 103 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] Correct. 104 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The random division of students appears to have succeeded 105 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 in creating groups that are indeed comparable. 106 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 We can be confident therefore that any later differences 107 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 in classroom achievement are the result of the experimental 108 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 intervention rather than a reflection 109 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of preexisting differences. 110 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Ceteris paribus achieved! 111 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] Cool. Wait, what about the bottom, 112 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the numbers with the stars? 113 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Those differences are a lot more than double the standard error. 114 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] Good eye, Kamal! 115 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The table has many numbers. 116 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Those in Panel B are important too. 117 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This panel measures the extent to which students in treatment 118 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and control groups actually use computers in class. 119 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The treatment here was to allow computer use. 120 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The researchers must show that students allowed 121 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 to use computers took advantage of the opportunity to do so. 122 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 If they didn't, then there's really no treatment. 123 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Luckily, 81% of those in the first treatment group 124 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 used computers compared with none in the control group. 125 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 And many in the second tablet treatment group 126 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 used computers as well. 127 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 These differences in computer use are large 128 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and statistically significant. 129 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 We also get to see the sample size in each group. 130 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] The stars are just like decoration? 131 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] Some academic papers use stars to indicate differences 132 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that are statistically significant. 133 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This makes them jump out at you. 134 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Here three stars indicate that the result is statistically different 135 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 from zero with a p value less than 1%. 136 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In other words, there's less than a 1 in 100 chance 137 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 this result is purely a chance finding. 138 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 [applause] 139 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Two stars indicate a 1 in 20 or 5% chance of a chance finding. 140 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 And one star denotes results we might see as often as 10% 141 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of the time merely due to chance. 142 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Today, stars are seen as a little old fashioned. 143 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Some journals omit them. 144 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] What about those last two columns? 145 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] Unlike column 4, which combines 146 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 both treatment groups into one, these last two columns 147 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 look separately at treatment/control differences 148 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 for each treatment group. 149 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This provides a more detailed analysis of balance. 150 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Also, for now, you can ignore this row 151 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 which provides another test of significance. 152 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Now we get to the article's punchline, table 4. 153 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This table reports regression estimates 154 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of the effects of electronics use on measures of student learning. 155 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal Why does the study report regression estimates? 156 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 See, that's why I was getting lost. 157 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 I thought one reason why we liked randomized trials 158 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 is that we use them to obtain causal effects 159 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 simply by comparing treatment and control groups. 160 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Since these groups are balanced, no need to use regression. 161 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] Well said, Kamal. 162 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In practice, it's customary to report regression estimates 163 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 for two reasons. 164 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 First, evidence of balance not withstanding, an abundance 165 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of caution might lead the analyst to allow for chance differences. 166 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Second, regression estimates are likely to be more precise. 167 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 That is, they have lower standard errors than 168 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the simple treatment control comparisons. 169 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 The dependent variable in this study 170 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 is the outcome of interest. 171 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Since the question at hand is how classroom electronics 172 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 affect learning, a good outcome is the economics final exam score. 173 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Each column reports results from a different regression model. 174 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Models are distinguished by the control variables 175 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 or covariates they include besides treatment status. 176 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Estimates with no covariates are simple comparisons 177 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 of treatment and control groups. 178 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] I thought they just forgot to fill it out. 179 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] Column 1 suggests electronics use reduced 180 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 final exam scores by 0.28 standard deviations. 181 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In our last lesson, Master Joshway explained, we use standard deviation 182 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 units because these units are easily compared across studies. 183 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Column 2 reports results from a model 184 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that adds demographic controls. 185 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Here we're comparing test scores but holding constant factors 186 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 such as age and sex. 187 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Column 3 reports results from a model that adds GPA 188 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 to the list of covariates. 189 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Column 4 adds ACT scores. 190 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Analysts often report results this way, 191 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 starting with models that include few or no covariates 192 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and then reporting estimates from models that add more 193 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and more covariates as we move across columns. 194 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Looking across columns, what do you notice? 195 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] Well, the coefficient on using a computer is always 196 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 a pretty big negative number. 197 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] That's right! 198 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 We can also see that the standard errors are small enough 199 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 to make these negative results statistically significant. 200 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In other words, the primary takeaway from this experiment 201 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 is that electronics in the classroom reduce student learning. 202 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kama] GPA and ACT scores are also significant. 203 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Why is that? 204 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] Good observation! 205 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 That's not surprising. 206 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 We expect these variables to predict college performance. 207 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] Oh right, of course. 208 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Kids who got better grades before are more likely to get 209 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 a better grade in this course. 210 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] You'll also notice a lot of other information on this table. 211 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Remaining panels in the table report effects of electronics use 212 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 on components of the final exam, 213 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 such as the multiple choice questions. 214 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 These results are mostly consistent with computer use effects 215 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 on overall scores. 216 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] What about the rows not in English? 217 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Narrator] These rows give additional statistical information. 218 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 R-squared is a measure of goodness of fit. 219 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This isn't too important, though some readers may want to know it. 220 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Other rows report on alternative tests of statistical significance 221 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that you can ignore for now. 222 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Kamal] Oh my gosh, these tables aren't that hard. 223 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Thank you so much. 224 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Next up is regression. 225 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 See you then! 226 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 ♪ [music] ♪ 227 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 You're on your way to mastering econometrics. 228 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Make sure this video sticks 229 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 by taking a few quick practice questions. 230 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Or, if you're ready, click for the next video. 231 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 You can also check out MRU's website for more courses, 232 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 teacher resources and more.