1
00:00:08,121 --> 00:00:11,452
Chat with a friend about
an established scientific theory

2
00:00:11,452 --> 00:00:15,690
and she might reply,
"Well, that's just a theory."

3
00:00:15,690 --> 00:00:18,997
But a conversation about
an established scientific law

4
00:00:18,997 --> 00:00:22,994
rarely ends with,
"Well, that's just a law."

5
00:00:22,994 --> 00:00:24,346
Why is that?

6
00:00:24,346 --> 00:00:27,499
What is the difference 
between a theory and a law,

7
00:00:27,499 --> 00:00:29,721
and is one better?

8
00:00:29,721 --> 00:00:32,919
Scientific laws and theories
have different jobs to do.

9
00:00:32,919 --> 00:00:37,191
A scientific law predicts
the results of certain initial conditions.

10
00:00:37,191 --> 00:00:40,917
It might predict your unborn 
child's possible hair colors,

11
00:00:40,917 --> 00:00:45,888
or how far a baseball travels
when launched at a certain angle.

12
00:00:45,888 --> 00:00:50,421
In contrast, a theory tries to provide
the most logical explanation

13
00:00:50,421 --> 00:00:53,695
about why things happen as they do.

14
00:00:53,695 --> 00:00:56,746
A theory might invoke
dominant and recessive genes

15
00:00:56,746 --> 00:01:01,722
to explain how brown-haired parents
ended up with a red-headed child,

16
00:01:01,722 --> 00:01:07,075
or use gravity to shed light 
on the parabolic trajectory of a baseball.

17
00:01:07,075 --> 00:01:08,273
In simplest terms,

18
00:01:08,273 --> 00:01:13,378
a law predicts what happens
while a theory proposes why.

19
00:01:13,378 --> 00:01:16,328
A theory will never grow up into a law,

20
00:01:16,328 --> 00:01:20,413
though the development of one
often triggers progress on the other.

21
00:01:20,413 --> 00:01:25,736
In the 17th century, Johannes Kepler
theorized cosmic musical harmonies

22
00:01:25,736 --> 00:01:29,459
to explain the nature of planetary orbits.

23
00:01:29,459 --> 00:01:33,183
He developed three brilliant laws
of planetary motion

24
00:01:33,183 --> 00:01:36,874
while he was studying decades 
of precise astronomical data

25
00:01:36,874 --> 00:01:40,756
in an effort to find support 
for his theory.

26
00:01:40,756 --> 00:01:43,488
While his three laws 
are still in use today,

27
00:01:43,488 --> 00:01:48,915
gravity replaced his theory of harmonics
to explain the planets' motions.

28
00:01:48,915 --> 00:01:51,167
How did Kepler get part of it wrong?

29
00:01:51,167 --> 00:01:54,569
Well, we weren't handed 
a universal instruction manual.

30
00:01:54,569 --> 00:01:59,623
Instead, we continually propose,
challenge, revise, or even replace

31
00:01:59,623 --> 00:02:03,563
our scientific ideas 
as a work in progress.

32
00:02:03,563 --> 00:02:05,493
Laws usually resist change

33
00:02:05,493 --> 00:02:09,152
since they wouldn't have been adopted
if they didn't fit the data,

34
00:02:09,152 --> 00:02:14,767
though we occasionally revise laws 
in the face of new unexpected information.

35
00:02:14,767 --> 00:02:18,842
A theory's acceptance, however,
is often gladiatorial.

36
00:02:18,842 --> 00:02:22,599
Multiple theories may compete
to supply the best explanation

37
00:02:22,599 --> 00:02:24,978
of a new scientific discovery.

38
00:02:24,978 --> 00:02:26,390
Upon further research,

39
00:02:26,390 --> 00:02:31,350
scientists tend to favor the theory 
that can explain most of the data,

40
00:02:31,350 --> 00:02:34,522
though there may still 
be gaps in our understanding.

41
00:02:34,522 --> 00:02:37,963
Scientists also like 
when a new theory successfully predicts

42
00:02:37,963 --> 00:02:40,834
previously unobserved phenomena,

43
00:02:40,834 --> 00:02:44,543
like when Dmitri Mendeleev's theory
about the periodic table

44
00:02:44,543 --> 00:02:48,040
predicted several undiscovered elements.

45
00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:51,220
The term scientific theory
covers a broad swath.

46
00:02:51,220 --> 00:02:55,363
Some theories are new ideas 
with little experimental evidence

47
00:02:55,363 --> 00:02:58,000
that scientists eye with suspicion,

48
00:02:58,000 --> 00:02:59,666
or even ridicule.

49
00:02:59,666 --> 00:03:00,976
Other theories,

50
00:03:00,976 --> 00:03:04,860
like those involving the Big Bang, 
evolution, and climate change,

51
00:03:04,860 --> 00:03:08,156
have endured years 
of experimental confirmation

52
00:03:08,156 --> 00:03:13,136
before earning acceptance by the majority 
of the scientific community.

53
00:03:13,136 --> 00:03:16,374
You would need to learn more about
a specific explanation

54
00:03:16,374 --> 00:03:19,934
before you'd know how well 
scientists perceive it.

55
00:03:19,934 --> 00:03:23,686
The word theory
alone doesn't tell you.

56
00:03:23,686 --> 00:03:24,842
In full disclosure,

57
00:03:24,842 --> 00:03:28,339
the scientific community has bet
on the wrong horse before:

58
00:03:28,339 --> 00:03:29,244
alchemy,

59
00:03:29,244 --> 00:03:30,786
the geocentric model,

60
00:03:30,786 --> 00:03:32,478
spontaneous generation,

61
00:03:32,478 --> 00:03:34,143
and the interstellar aether

62
00:03:34,143 --> 00:03:39,414
are just a few of many theories 
discarded in favor of better ones.

63
00:03:39,414 --> 00:03:42,118
But even incorrect theories 
have their value.

64
00:03:42,118 --> 00:03:46,411
Discredited alchemy was the birthplace
of modern chemistry,

65
00:03:46,411 --> 00:03:48,078
and medicine made great strides

66
00:03:48,078 --> 00:03:53,184
long before we understood the roles
of bacteria and viruses.

67
00:03:53,184 --> 00:03:57,379
That said, better theories often lead
to exciting new discoveries

68
00:03:57,379 --> 00:04:01,343
that were unimaginable 
under the old way of thinking.

69
00:04:01,343 --> 00:04:04,262
Nor should we assume 
all of our current scientific theories

70
00:04:04,262 --> 00:04:06,596
will stand the test of time.

71
00:04:06,596 --> 00:04:11,052
A single unexpected result is enough
to challenge the status quo.

72
00:04:11,052 --> 00:04:14,962
However, vulnerability to some potentially
better explanation

73
00:04:14,962 --> 00:04:18,236
doesn't weaken 
a current scientific theory.

74
00:04:18,236 --> 00:04:23,119
Instead, it shields science from becoming
unchallenged dogma.

75
00:04:23,119 --> 00:04:26,744
A good scientific law 
is a finely-tuned machine,

76
00:04:26,744 --> 00:04:28,763
accomplishing its task brilliantly

77
00:04:28,763 --> 00:04:31,749
but ignorant of why it works
as well as it does.

78
00:04:31,749 --> 00:04:36,565
A good scientific theory is a bruised,
but unbowed, fighter

79
00:04:36,565 --> 00:04:41,808
who risks defeat if unable to overpower
or adapt to the next challenger.

80
00:04:41,808 --> 00:04:43,061
Though different,

81
00:04:43,061 --> 00:04:47,854
science needs both laws and theories 
to understand the whole picture.

82
00:04:47,854 --> 00:04:51,086
So next time someone comments that
it's just a theory,

83
00:04:51,086 --> 00:04:53,948
challenge them to go nine rounds
with the champ

84
00:04:53,948 --> 00:04:55,891
and see if they can do any better.