[Bradley Kuhn] I have to be honest
I'm really honored to be here
I don't say that to just every conference
I care a lot about Debian
This is my 3rd DebConf I've ever been to.
There have been a lot of them so I
obviously haven't been to that many
But I was at DebConf1
I just learned today that it was zero
based so that it wasn't the first DebConf
which I should have known but didn't for
some reason.
I was at the 2nd DebConf by accident
somewhat because I was going to
Libre Software Meeting and just
happened to
book my flights so that I could be at
DebConf as well
I gave a regular track talk at DebConf10
about the GPL v3
because it was in New York City where I
was living at the time
Here I'm giving an invited speaker talk or
keynote or whatever else it is called here
That really means a lot to me.
I'm a fan of Debian, I'm a user of Debian.
I don't actually consider myself part of
the Debian community
because other than filing a few bugs
over the years
I haven't contributed all that much to
Debian but I've relied on it and used it
and been a fan of it for so long
that I really love your project.
So I am really honored to be invited to
speak here
and I really believe that Debian is a
very special project for a lot of reasons.
First of all, it has thrived for longer
than almost any free software project
in existence in a lot of ways.
There are top 10 lists of projects that
Debian is certainly on as far as longevity
goes, maybe the top 5
It's governance is one of the few
democratically elected and
democratically controlled
governance processes in free software
Everyone is a fan of talking about this
'benevolent dictator' stuff
which I think is really horrible
The fact that somebody would call
themselves a 'self appointed benevolent
dictator for life' is really disturbing.
You are democratic.
You elect your leadership.
You have referendums on major issues
that everyone can vote on.
That is amazingly rare, impressive
and important for free software.
The other thing that really impresses me,
in particular being somebody from the
non-profit world,
is that Debian has been staunchly
non-commercial for it's entire existence.
Of course I don't mean that Debian
can't be used in commercial settings.
DFSG free means that things can be put
into commercial products.
What I mean is that the project itself has
always been non-commercial,
meaning that the people that work on it
are volunteering,
and, even if their employers are paying
them to work on it,
they are part of a community and not
doing their work inside Debian as
officially part of some
commercial activity.
Most free software projects these days
are controlled by
some commercial entity or another.
Debian is not.
I was at Debconf1 which was really
exciting for me.
I was a young executive director of
Free Software.
I showed this picture to Karen Sandler who
I work with and said how different I look.
She said I don't look different at all,
but, speaking as the person that looks
at that face in the mirror every morning,
there are a lot more lines on my face
than there.
That is a smooth looking baby face that I
had 14 years ago that I don't have anymore
I was pretty casual back then.
I'm not in short trousers any more.
It's hard to see and you can see it in
some of the other photos that I was.
Even in this heat like this I haven't
worn short trousers in a very long time.
What's that? [bdale heckles]
Bdale, I was thinking about mentioning you
and now I have to because you are heckling
me [laughter]. Bdale is the one adult
in the room who can dress like
everybody else but I can't pull it off
I respect Bdale that he can.
The tie-dye still works for him.
And I stopped wearing t-shirts years ago
at conferences
and here I'm sweating in my long sleeves
halfway between hacker and suit attire.
And there [in the photo] I'm talking to
Martin Michmayer
I'm going to do questions at the end Lars,
if that's ok.
I'm not good with questions because I
get off topic easy.
I left 17 minutes at the end for questions
which Bdale just took 3 of [laughter]
There I'm talking to Martin Michlmayer
when I first met him.
A lot of things have changed since I
looked at this photo.
But one thing that hasn't changed,
you see this face that Martin is making.
He still makes that face at me every time
I talk to him, which sort of says like
"You do not know what you are talking
about". That hasn't changed, which is good
[laughter]. I'm glad he is laughing in the
back there.
Some things have stayed the same.
Martin still thinks I'm full of it.
And I probably am, so that's ok.
I like people to keep me honest.
Other than jokes, the thing that hasn't
really changed since I was first
introduced to the Debian community, in
person, back in 2001,
is the ethos of this community is still
the same one that I remember
even though a lot of the developers
have changed.
I talked to somebody who had never
even installed Debian when they were at
DebConf1. I talked to someone who was
12 years old at the time of DebConf1.
I find it impressive that what I call the
'morality of the hobbyist contributor'
still lives strongly in Debian.
The people in Debian want to do what is
right for other people -
their users, co-developers,
co-contributors.
They also volunteer to do that.
As I said before, that doesn't mean that
they aren't being paid to do their work.
It's the classic free software thing: lots
of people get paid to write free software.
What I've seen recently, in many free
software projects, is that
companies have used that. I think
OpenStack is one of the worst examples
of this. To control the project by hiring
lots of it's developers.
They have this kindof pull over the
project. I think that a lot of people that
work at OpenStack would say they are
employers employee first and an
OpenStack contributor second.
I don't know anyone in Debian who would
not say 'I am a Debian developer' first
and then I happen to be employed as a
second issue.
Debian is their first priority.
Their job is their second.
That hobbyist culture of 'my volunteer
work matters more to me than
what actually pays me for a living'
is the kind of mentality that I am such a
fan of. I try to live that in my own work
as well.
I like interacting with the community.
I usually find conferences very stressful.
This one I do not find as stressful
other than I'm standing in a room with a
huge number of people. Other than that
I don't find it stressful
because this is the kind of community
that thinks that way.
I think a lot of it has to do with the
other structures you have set up around
yourselves. The idea of having charities
that you work with
which you have chosen to do a multi
charity situation where you have lots
around the world that you can interact
with.
One of them was founded by a Debian
developer initially.
You reach out to other partnerships or
charities as a non-commercial community
That allows you to have an infrastructure
that you can rely on that helps
you maintain that community.
I'm very glad that you do that.
I used to work for the FSF and am still on
the board of directors.
Early in the project Debian was more or
less a GNU project for a while.
It was part of the FSF. I know that
relationship has never been perfect
sometimes rocky and sometimes better,
but the FSF saw this in Debian too
very early on. That it was a really
important way to begin the whole
distribution thing of free software and
that culture was a match with
FSF's culture.
I know where the issues are and I'm
sure John is here to talk about them.
But I think there is a lot of cultural
connect between FSF and Debian.
I'm a little obsessed about this quote.
I saw it in real time.
I was subscribed to comp.os.minux in Aug
of '91 when it was posted
Part of it was that when I started working
for the FSF I started thinking about it
and the FSF when I worked there had 7
employees and still has under 20
That's not big. (08:56)