WEBVTT

00:00:01.229 --> 00:00:03.737
So whenever I visit a school
and talk to students,

00:00:03.737 --> 00:00:06.341
I always ask them the same thing:

00:00:06.941 --> 00:00:08.891
Why do you Google?

00:00:08.891 --> 00:00:12.594
Why is Google the search engine 
of choice for you?

00:00:12.594 --> 00:00:15.277
Strangely enough, I always get
the same three answers.

00:00:15.277 --> 00:00:17.807
One, "Because it works",

00:00:17.807 --> 00:00:20.478
which is a great answer, 
that's why I Google, too.

00:00:20.478 --> 00:00:22.637
Two, somebody will say,

00:00:22.637 --> 00:00:25.461
"I really don't know of any alternatives."

00:00:25.461 --> 00:00:27.320
It's not an equally great answer

00:00:27.320 --> 00:00:28.860
and my reply to that is usually,


00:00:28.860 --> 00:00:30.805
"Try to Google the word 'search engine',

00:00:30.805 --> 00:00:33.357
you may find a couple 
of interesting alternatives."

00:00:33.357 --> 00:00:35.524
And last but not least, thirdly,

00:00:35.524 --> 00:00:38.844
inevitably, one student will raise
her or his hand and say,

00:00:38.844 --> 00:00:43.867
"With Google, I'm certain to always get
the best, unbiased search result."

00:00:45.647 --> 00:00:52.032
Certain to always get 
the best, unbiased search result.

00:00:53.332 --> 00:00:55.654
Now, as a man of the humanities,

00:00:55.654 --> 00:00:57.976
albeit, a digital humanities man,

00:00:57.976 --> 00:00:59.741
that just makes my skin curl,

00:00:59.741 --> 00:01:04.617
even if I, too, realize that that trust,
that idea of the unbiased search result

00:01:04.617 --> 00:01:08.936
is a cornerstone in our collective
love for and appreciation of Google.

00:01:08.936 --> 00:01:13.022
I will show you why that, philosophically,
is almost an impossibility.

00:01:13.022 --> 00:01:16.319
But let me first elaborate, 
just a little bit, on a basic principle

00:01:16.319 --> 00:01:19.331
behind the search query 
that we sometimes seem to forget.

00:01:19.691 --> 00:01:22.054
So whenever you set out 
to Google something,

00:01:22.054 --> 00:01:26.582
start by asking yourself this,
"Am I looking for an isolated fact?

00:01:26.582 --> 00:01:29.519
What is the capital of France?

00:01:29.519 --> 00:01:32.131
What are the building blocks 
of a water molecule?"

00:01:32.131 --> 00:01:34.569
Great -- Google away.

00:01:34.569 --> 00:01:37.356
There's not a group of scientists
who are this close

00:01:37.356 --> 00:01:39.564
to proving that it's actually 
London and H30.

00:01:39.564 --> 00:01:42.000
You don't see a big conspiracy
among those things.

00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:44.786
We agree, on a global scale,
what the answers are

00:01:44.786 --> 00:01:46.550
to these isolated facts.

00:01:46.550 --> 00:01:51.775
But if you complicate your question
just a little bit and ask something like,

00:01:51.775 --> 00:01:54.674
"Why is there 
an Israeli-Palestine conflict?"

00:01:54.854 --> 00:01:57.579
You're not exactly looking 
for a singular fact anymore,

00:01:57.579 --> 00:01:59.739
you're looking for knowledge,

00:01:59.739 --> 00:02:02.873
which is something way more
complicated and delicate.

00:02:02.873 --> 00:02:04.429
And to get to knowledge,

00:02:04.429 --> 00:02:07.564
you have to bring 10 or 20 
or 100 facts to the table

00:02:07.564 --> 00:02:10.350
and acknowledge them and say,
"Yes, these are all true."

00:02:10.350 --> 00:02:12.184
But because of who I am,

00:02:12.184 --> 00:02:14.367
young or old, black or white,
gay or straight,

00:02:14.367 --> 00:02:15.855
I will value them differently.

00:02:15.855 --> 00:02:17.567
And I will say, "Yes, this is true,

00:02:17.567 --> 00:02:19.754
"but this is more
important to me than that."

00:02:19.754 --> 00:02:21.809
And this is where it becomes interesting


00:02:21.809 --> 00:02:24.049
because this is where we become human.

00:02:24.049 --> 00:02:26.528
This is when we start to argue,
to form society

00:02:26.528 --> 00:02:28.321
and to really get somewhere.

00:02:28.321 --> 00:02:30.290
We need to filter all our facts here

00:02:30.290 --> 00:02:32.872
through friends and neighbors
and parents and children

00:02:32.872 --> 00:02:35.032
and coworkers and newspapers
and magazines

00:02:35.032 --> 00:02:38.259
to finally be grounded in real knowledge,

00:02:38.259 --> 00:02:42.323
which is something that a search engine
is a poor help to achieve.

00:02:43.553 --> 00:02:49.636
So I promised you an example
just to show you why it's so hard

00:02:49.636 --> 00:02:53.282
to get to the point of true, clean,
objective knowledge --

00:02:53.282 --> 00:02:54.745
that's food for thought.

00:02:54.745 --> 00:02:58.385
I will conduct a couple of
simple queries, search queries.

00:02:58.745 --> 00:03:02.006
We'll start by "Michelle Obama",


00:03:02.016 --> 00:03:04.706
the First Lady of the United States.

00:03:04.706 --> 00:03:06.303
And we'll click for pictures.


00:03:06.303 --> 00:03:09.303
It works really well, as you can see.

00:03:09.303 --> 00:03:12.530
It's a perfect search result, 
more or less.

00:03:12.530 --> 00:03:15.280
It's just her in the picture,
not even the President.

00:03:15.920 --> 00:03:18.057
How does this work?

00:03:18.057 --> 00:03:19.233
Quite simple,

00:03:19.233 --> 00:03:22.472
Google uses a lot of smartness 
to achieve this, but quite simply

00:03:22.472 --> 00:03:24.556
they look at two things
more than anything.

00:03:24.556 --> 00:03:27.058
First, what does it say in the caption,


00:03:27.058 --> 00:03:29.438
what does it say under the picture
on each website?

00:03:29.438 --> 00:03:31.698
Does it say "Michelle Obama"
under the picture?

00:03:31.748 --> 00:03:34.101
Pretty good indication
it's actually her on there.

00:03:34.101 --> 00:03:37.300
Second, Google looks at the picture file,

00:03:37.300 --> 00:03:40.115
the name of the file as such
uploaded to the website.

00:03:40.115 --> 00:03:42.813
Again, is it called "Michelle Obama.jpeg"?

00:03:42.813 --> 00:03:45.826
Pretty good indication it's not
Clint Eastwood in the picture.

00:03:45.826 --> 00:03:50.261
So you got those two and you get
a search result like this, almost.

00:03:50.261 --> 00:03:56.855
Now, in 2009, Michelle Obama
was the victim of a racist campaign

00:03:56.855 --> 00:04:01.269
where people set out to insult her
through her search results.

00:04:01.269 --> 00:04:04.262
There was a picture distributed widely
over the Internet

00:04:04.262 --> 00:04:07.002
where her face was distorted 
to look like a monkey.

00:04:07.002 --> 00:04:10.230
And that picture was published all over.

00:04:10.230 --> 00:04:13.657
And people published it
very, very purposefully

00:04:13.657 --> 00:04:15.686
to get it up there in the search results.

00:04:15.686 --> 00:04:18.890
They made sure to write 
"Michelle Obama" in the caption

00:04:18.890 --> 00:04:22.977
and they made sure to upload the picture
as "Michelle Obama.jpeg" or the like.

00:04:22.977 --> 00:04:25.368
You get why -- to manipulate 
the search result.

00:04:25.368 --> 00:04:26.687
And it worked, too.

00:04:26.687 --> 00:04:29.501
So when you picture-Googled 
for "Michelle Obama" in 2009,

00:04:29.501 --> 00:04:33.054
that distorted money picture
showed up among the first results.

00:04:33.054 --> 00:04:36.746
Now, the results are self-cleansing,

00:04:36.746 --> 00:04:38.069
and that's sort of the beauty of it

00:04:38.069 --> 00:04:42.016
because Google measures relevance
every hour every day.

00:04:42.016 --> 00:04:44.547
However, Google didn't settle 
for that this time,

00:04:44.547 --> 00:04:47.879
they just thought, "That's racist
and it's a bad search result

00:04:47.879 --> 00:04:50.956
and we're going to go back
and clean that up, manually.

00:04:50.956 --> 00:04:53.812
We are going to write 
some code and fix it",

00:04:53.812 --> 00:04:55.623
which they did,

00:04:55.623 --> 00:04:59.028
and I don't think anyone in this room
thinks that was a bad idea.

00:04:59.028 --> 00:05:00.708
Me neither.

00:05:02.648 --> 00:05:06.071
But then, a couple years go by,

00:05:06.071 --> 00:05:08.997
and the world's most googled Anders,


00:05:08.997 --> 00:05:11.899
Anders Behring Breivik,

00:05:11.899 --> 00:05:13.246
did what he did.

00:05:13.246 --> 00:05:17.774
This is July 22 in 2011 and a terrible day
in Norwegian history.

00:05:17.774 --> 00:05:21.181
This man, a terrorist, blew up
a couple of government buildings,

00:05:21.181 --> 00:05:24.172
walking distance from where we are
right now in Oslo, Norway

00:05:24.172 --> 00:05:26.390
and then he traveled to the 
island of Utøya

00:05:26.390 --> 00:05:29.360
and shot and killed a group of kids.

00:05:29.360 --> 00:05:32.657
Almost 80 people died that day.

00:05:32.657 --> 00:05:36.980
And a lot of people would describe
this act of terror as two steps,

00:05:36.980 --> 00:05:38.613
that he did two things:

00:05:38.613 --> 00:05:40.956
he blew up the buildings 
and he shot those kids.

00:05:40.956 --> 00:05:42.548
It's not true.

00:05:42.548 --> 00:05:44.548
It was three steps.

00:05:44.548 --> 00:05:45.892
He blew up those buildings,

00:05:45.892 --> 00:05:46.844
he shot those kids,

00:05:46.844 --> 00:05:51.481
and he sat down and waited
for the world to Google him.

00:05:51.481 --> 00:05:53.878
And he prepared 
all three steps equally well.

00:05:53.878 --> 00:05:56.921
And if there was somebody who
immediately understood this,

00:05:56.921 --> 00:06:00.706
it was a Swedish web developer,
or search engine optimization expert

00:06:00.706 --> 00:06:02.679
in Stockholm named Nikke Lindqvist,

00:06:02.679 --> 00:06:04.165
he's also a very political guy

00:06:04.165 --> 00:06:07.465
and he was right out there 
in social media, on his blog and Facebook.

00:06:07.465 --> 00:06:08.695
And he told everybody,

00:06:08.695 --> 00:06:11.346
"If there's something that
this guy wants right now,

00:06:11.346 --> 00:06:14.179
it's to control the image of himself.

00:06:14.869 --> 00:06:17.841
Let's see if we can distort that.

00:06:17.841 --> 00:06:21.626
Let's see if we, in the civilized world,
can protest against what he did

00:06:21.626 --> 00:06:25.132
through insulting him 
in his search results."

00:06:25.132 --> 00:06:26.966
And how?

00:06:26.966 --> 00:06:29.056
He told all of his readers the following,

00:06:29.056 --> 00:06:30.656
"Go out there on the Internet,


00:06:30.656 --> 00:06:33.340
find pictures of dog poop
on sidewalks --

00:06:33.934 --> 00:06:36.360
find pictures of dog poop on sidewalks --

00:06:36.360 --> 00:06:40.133
publish them in your feeds,
on your websites, on your blogs/

00:06:40.133 --> 00:06:43.429
Make sure to write the terrorist's
name in the caption,

00:06:43.429 --> 00:06:48.014
make sure to name the picture file
"Breivik.jpeg",

00:06:48.014 --> 00:06:52.278
let's teach Google that that's
the face of the terrorist."

00:06:53.738 --> 00:06:56.060
And it worked.

00:06:56.060 --> 00:06:58.775
Two years after that campaign
against Michelle Obama,

00:06:58.775 --> 00:07:02.065
this manipulation campaign
against Anders Behring Breivik worked.

00:07:02.065 --> 00:07:06.717
If you picture-Googled for him weeks after
the July 22 events from Sweden,

00:07:06.717 --> 00:07:10.637
you'd see that picture of dog poop
high up in your search result,

00:07:10.637 --> 00:07:12.747
as a little protest

00:07:13.637 --> 00:07:17.778
Strangely enough, Google 
didn't intervene this time.

00:07:18.768 --> 00:07:24.178
They did not step in and manually clean
those search results up.

00:07:24.178 --> 00:07:25.943
So the million-dollar question is,

00:07:25.943 --> 00:07:29.096
is there anything different between
these two happenings here?

00:07:29.096 --> 00:07:32.371
Is there anything different between
what happened to Michelle Obama

00:07:32.371 --> 00:07:34.626
and what happened 
to Anders Behring Breivik?

00:07:34.626 --> 00:07:36.972
Of course not.

00:07:36.972 --> 00:07:38.713
It's the exact same thing,

00:07:38.713 --> 00:07:41.523
yet Google intervened in one case
and not in the other.

00:07:41.523 --> 00:07:42.987
Why?

00:07:43.607 --> 00:07:46.607
Because Michelle Obama
is an honorable person, that's why,

00:07:46.607 --> 00:07:50.601
and Anders Behring Breivik
is a despicable person.

00:07:50.601 --> 00:07:51.948
See what happens there?

00:07:51.948 --> 00:07:54.149
An evaluation of a person takes place

00:07:54.149 --> 00:07:56.199
and there's only one player in the world,


00:07:56.199 --> 00:07:57.915
one power-player in the world

00:07:57.915 --> 00:08:00.487
with the authority to say who's who,

00:08:00.487 --> 00:08:02.999
"We like you, we dislike you.

00:08:02.999 --> 00:08:05.047
We believe in you, 
we don't believe in you.

00:08:05.047 --> 00:08:06.560
You're right, you're wrong.

00:08:06.560 --> 00:08:08.007
You're true, you're false.

00:08:08.007 --> 00:08:11.057
You're Obama, and you're Breivik.

00:08:11.057 --> 00:08:13.932
That's power if I ever saw it.

00:08:14.862 --> 00:08:18.941
So I'm asking you to remember
that behind every algorithm

00:08:18.941 --> 00:08:20.925
there's always a person,

00:08:20.925 --> 00:08:22.964
a person with a set of personal beliefs


00:08:22.964 --> 00:08:25.964
that no code could ever
completely eradicate.

00:08:25.964 --> 00:08:28.115
and my message goes out to 
not only Google,

00:08:28.115 --> 00:08:30.956
but to all believers in the faith
of code around the world.

00:08:30.956 --> 00:08:33.916
You need to identify 
your own personal bias.

00:08:33.916 --> 00:08:36.157
You need to understand that 
you are human

00:08:36.157 --> 00:08:38.954
and take responsibility accordingly.

00:08:39.564 --> 00:08:42.774
And I say this because I believe
that we've reach a point in time

00:08:42.774 --> 00:08:44.609
when it's absolutely imperative

00:08:44.609 --> 00:08:47.673
that we tie those bonds
together again, tighter:

00:08:47.673 --> 00:08:50.065
the humanities and the technology.

00:08:50.065 --> 00:08:52.302
Tighter than ever.

00:08:52.312 --> 00:08:55.675
And, if nothing else, to remind us
that that wonderfully seductive idea

00:08:55.675 --> 00:08:58.882
of the unbiased, clean search result


00:08:58.882 --> 00:09:01.592
is, and is likely to remain, a myth.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:01.592 --> 00:09:02.859
Thank you for your time.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:02.859 --> 00:09:05.599
(Applause)