I've got a question for you.
Which of you was always top of the class?
All your life, top of the class?
Right.
--Liar (Laughter)
Well, in precisely 9 minutes and 30 seconds,
I'm going to make you proud
that you weren't always top of the class.
(Applause)
You're going to go home tonight
and tell your partner, your children,
your friends and relatives:
"Hallelujah, thank God, I wasn't always top of my class!"
In 2007, when I started blogging, I began studying
the lives of several people
who were successful in their lives.
And each of them was successful in their field,
each one succeeded in a different way.
But there was one thing all these people shared,
just one thing
which intrigued me, and this was the fact
that these people, these characters --
none of them had been really successful at school.
And some of them had even cut short their education
and others didn't even make it to school
for long periods of time.
So this was a little worrying and frustrating for me
when I remembered
all those years in which parents and teachers
told us, you must work hard, you must get the best marks,
you must be one of the best
to get into the best higher education establishments
and in the end, I note that the reality is this:
all those who have been successful at the school of life
were not necessarily those who were top of the class.
So this meant we needed an answer to the following question:
Why isn't it necessary to succeed at school in order to be successful in life?
Or even: why is there no direct link between success at school
and success in life?
Because, to mention people you know very well,
such as Steve Jobs
or Bill Gates who have businesses -
they employ people who were top of the class.
But when did they leave school?
They both dropped out
during their fresher year at university.
So how come, then, that we, who try to be top of the class
end up working in businesses for people who
perhaps don't even know how to read and write?
So that's when I started looking, and luckily
I took the right approach right from the start, so I couldn't - or I didn't have to - look very hard.
I started looking by identifying the qualities these people share
which have allowed them to be successful in life.
And I found 5 of these.
Next, I tried to see these qualities in the education system
all over the world, how are these qualities developed?
Or at least appreciated or accommodated in the education system?
And I was shocked to find I had discovered that these qualities --
not only are they not developed within the education system,
but they are even punished in the education system.
In other words, if you are unlucky enough to possess one or even several of these qualities
you can be absolutely sure that you will be unable to succeed in the education system.
And when you get to the workplace, you will be needing these qualities.
So the first of these qualities is about being passionate.
Just imagine this discussion with Einstein:
you meet Einstein and you say to him:
"Now, Einstein, it seems that you love physics, right?"
And he says to you: "No, I hate physics.
You know, I'm only doing physics
because my parents made me do it.
I hate it...but hey, Hamdullah, I've been lucky,
I've discovered a few theories, got a Nobel prize, and all that...well, I've been lucky."
Or it could be that you could talk to Bill Gates, and so you say to him:
"So, Bill Gates, it seems that you're turned on by computers?"
And he says: "Nah, it's just destiny that pushed me to get into computers.
Well Hamdullah, it's really taken off!"
Can you imagine this type of discussion?
It's impossible because we know that these people are passionately enthusiastic.
So, what is passion?
Passion means having an emotional and sentimental approach
to a job.
And if you are unfortunate enough to have this quality as school, you are going to fall in love
with certain subjects, and you will work hard on those.
And you'll hate the other subjects, and you won't work as hard on them.
And as soon as you get to secondary school, you'll discover what we call the subject weightings.
The subject weightings - the head will never come to you at the beginning of the year and say:
"So, what do you like? You like maths? Ah! Let's raise its weighting.
You don't like physics? We'll bring it down."
It will never ever happen like that.
The weighting is already set.
If you're good at maths, physics and languages, we take the highest weighting.
If you like geography and history, and you work hard at those but you hate maths
then you'll never get a good mark, or never the top mark, in the exam.
Which means you'll be hearing this sort of thing all the time:
"He's a hard worker, in certain subjects, he really is very, very good.
But in other subjects, he really could do better."
That's what they're passionate about at school: it's someone who could always do better.
And that's why those at the top of the class have no feelings.
They have no passion. They work at everything!
They work hard in every subject!
And they are good at all the subjects.
And this creates a big problem for those at the top of the class.
Because later on, they can apply to study medicine, law, and accountancy.
They can do it all.
At the outset, they are impressed by their abilities.
But later, when you get to work, they'll say to you:
"No, no, no: Stop!"
If you want to succeed, there are two things that are very important, primordial in life.
If you want to achieve happiness and excellence, you must be passionate about what you do.
But without passion, you can't succeed at work, nor even in your personal life.
Yet at school, we've always been forced to take compulsory subjects, rather than follow our passion.
Second quality: curiosity.
Curiosity is the foundation of all discovery.
It's curiosity that allows each of us
to discover solutions to everyday problems.
So -- how does curiosity manifest itself at school?
A curious pupil or student is someone
who seeks to know more.
Such a student is more likely to read what is suggested in class, to carry out their own research,
to discover new ways of solving mathematical problems.
And because this student is very proud of what they do,
they are happy to have learned a lot, and will try
to develop their own ideas in the exam.
And if the teacher doesn't understand
what you are talking about,
you work really hard, you put in more energy
than anyone else,
you hand in a really great, highly developed paper,
your teacher doesn't get it,
and awards you a shockingly low mark,
often accompanied by the remark: Off Topic.
This is why, in the education system,
being top doesn't mean you are smart.
In the education system, the fact of being top
just means you have the ability to cram information
and then to regurgitate it
just as it was, without developing it at all.
And then when you get to the world of work,
you'll be told that no,
to be able to get the third ingredient of success,
which is promotion at work,
each time you have to learn, train yourself,
look further, know more,
never settle for the information you were given at school.
And you know what the difference is,
between these people who didn't pass,
or who didn't complete their education system,
in comparison with those who did graduate?
One small difference which changes life.
In fact, those who didn't graduate and who become entrepreneurs, heads of state,
or who take on big projects, they often have
this worry about not having known enough.
So they are constantly searching,
they are real self-starters.
Unlike those who sat at the top of the class and who,
once they've got their qualification, get gifts
and they say to themselves: "I've finished my studies."
And this is where the catastrophe lies.
Third quality: being goal-oriented.
Peter Drucker, the father of management,
taught us that ultimately, within companies,
it is essential to have annual, considered, goals.
It isn't a matter of achieving high performance and being effective
in the absolute, you have to be effective and high-performing in order to achieve your objectives.
Which is, incidentally, very intelligent, as well as being what the whole planet is currently following
as a managerial style.
Imagine a pupil who has the same state of mind, and is also very intelligent.
This pupil is thinking about which job they would like to do.
Which career they'd like to pursue.
They look back on their time at school, deciding which marks they want to get,
what sort of work they want to do, what work they can do
in order to get where they want to be.
So you say to him or her: "Why don't you do enough work? Why don't you try to be the best in the class?"
And they say to you: "But it's not necessary. Being top of the class doesn't meet my objectives."
And then it will be said of that pupil by the school, that they lack commitment.
Pupils who have visibility, vision at school, are non-committed pupils.
So the school rewards just the act of mixing objective and tool.
And it rewards the tool, which is the mark.
It never rewards pupils who at the end of the year come to say:
"Here are my plans for a career. This is what I intend to do."
And here is the necessary energy which I will deploy
to achieve this objective.
And I will spend the rest of the time playing,
because I want to play."
And this is what is never rewarded at school.
The fourth quality is creativity.
Creativity is fundamental - and yet it's the very first
thing they take away from you at school.
A study has shown - I'm not sure of the figures -
but it showed
that about 92% of the most creative people
in the world are less than 5 years old.
7% or 8% of creative people are over 5.
So what happened?
School happened.
School prevents the pupil or the child from thinking
as they are used to doing,
working as they are used to working or learning.
Now it has to be done in just one way, saying what has
to be said, thinking in just one way
and drawing in just one way.
There are lines that must not be crossed at school.
And so later on, in a working life, people say to you:
"No, you have to be creative, innovation, you must bring something new."
Even though at school, we have been taught the opposite.
You've got a sheet of paper.
You've got a blank sheet of paper.
I'll just ask you to spend 10 seconds, quickly,
turning it into a flying object capable of flying
as effectively as possible.
10 seconds! The countdown has started.
Quick, quick, quick...
A flying object which can fly as effectively as possible.
Very good. Launch your planes, your flying objects.
Yes, that's great.
People will say they didn't like my talk.
Okay. I note that people have done that.
Did I say make a plane?
No!
No, I said to make a flying object that can fly as effectively as possible.
But this flies better than that.
In other words school has prevented you from really thinking in a creative way.
How is creativity seen at school?
It's someone who draws.
It's someone who always asks weird questions at school.
It's someone who's always at the back,
it's someone who likes to address matters
that the teacher hasn't addressed.
So it's someone who is often distracted.
And this is why those at the top of the class
always control their creativity.
And to be top of the class, you have to
kill your own creativity in the education system.
The final quality is being sociable.
The act of being sociable is typified at school by excessive chattering.
A pupil who is sociable, whose intelligence is sociable, cannot work all alone
and look at the teacher for a whole hour.
That pupil needs a certain ambience, needs to talk, needs to seek out the others beside them.
Because the absence of sociability is, for that pupil, a risk, an emptiness, that is unbearable.
And the worst thing of all is that at school,
those who are most sociable cheat in the exams.
Why?
Not because they want to cheat or because they have no morals.
It's because for them, it's a nice gesture to be sociable
even during exams.
They are unable to solve a problem all alone.
Sometimes, and we've noticed this many times,
pupils finish their exam
and then they wait to see if there are
any friends in need of help.
They say to the others: "Do you need help?"
(Applause)
And unfortunately, this is why today we do team building,
synergy, and so on...
And it is also why it doesn't work.
Because for years, the school has confused two notions:
at school, synergy equals cheating.
Whereas it is in fact pure team building.
Once, a teacher caught me
passing my work to a classmate.
And I tried to explain to the teacher, back then,
that I was forced to cheat.
He said: "No, that's not good, you mustn't do it."
But I said: "But it's a friend. I can't say no to him."
He told me no: "I don't care, in the exam,
you have to solve your problem all alone."
I told him: "But you don't understand,
I can't sacrifice this friendship."
He said: "Not even if it gets you a zero?"
I said: "Yes, even if I get a zero. He's a friend.
And I can't sacrifice my reputation either."
It's very important for anyone who is socially intelligent,
who is in possession of social reasoning.
And later on, in a working life, you are told:
"You must do the opposite, you must never work alone."
You have to contribute to the others, you have to give the others what you know. Maintain your reputation.
So throughout your school careeer,
you're prevented from doing this.
This is why nobody like those who are top of the class.
(Applause)
This is why those who are top of the class
have such difficulty integrating into the class.
And this is why those who are top of the class
are always unhappy.
And this is why, the higher you climb in the company,
the more team building you need to do.
Because the more these people are intelligent
and best in he class, the more used they are
to working alone and the more likely they are