WEBVTT 00:00:00.937 --> 00:00:03.214 I want to start with a question. 00:00:03.238 --> 00:00:05.171 Where does an artwork begin? 00:00:06.119 --> 00:00:09.095 Now sometimes that question is absurd. 00:00:09.119 --> 00:00:12.683 It can seem deceptively simple, 00:00:12.707 --> 00:00:16.397 as it was when I asked the question with this piece, "Portable Planetarium," 00:00:16.421 --> 00:00:18.215 that I made in 2010. 00:00:18.239 --> 00:00:20.104 I asked the question, 00:00:20.128 --> 00:00:23.624 "What would it look like to build a planetarium of one's own?" 00:00:23.998 --> 00:00:25.831 I know you all ask that every morning, 00:00:25.855 --> 00:00:28.182 but I asked myself that question. 00:00:28.562 --> 00:00:30.196 And as an artist, 00:00:30.220 --> 00:00:33.141 I was thinking about our effort, 00:00:33.165 --> 00:00:38.714 our desire, our continual longing that we've had over the years 00:00:38.738 --> 00:00:41.539 to make meaning of the world around us 00:00:41.563 --> 00:00:42.967 through materials. 00:00:43.492 --> 00:00:46.967 And for me, to try and find the kind of wonder, 00:00:46.991 --> 00:00:52.252 but also a kind of futility that lies in that very fragile pursuit, 00:00:52.276 --> 00:00:53.728 is part of my art work. NOTE Paragraph 00:00:53.752 --> 00:00:57.244 So I bring together the materials I find around me, 00:00:57.268 --> 00:01:00.546 I gather them to try and create experiences, 00:01:00.570 --> 00:01:04.229 immersive experiences that occupy rooms, 00:01:04.253 --> 00:01:07.229 that occupy walls, landscapes, buildings. 00:01:07.253 --> 00:01:10.320 But ultimately, I want them to occupy memory. 00:01:10.847 --> 00:01:13.379 And after I've made a work, 00:01:13.403 --> 00:01:18.053 I find that there's usually one memory of that work that burns in my head. 00:01:18.077 --> 00:01:19.617 And this is the memory for me -- 00:01:19.641 --> 00:01:22.281 it was this sudden kind of surprising experience 00:01:22.305 --> 00:01:25.696 of being immersed inside that work of art. 00:01:25.720 --> 00:01:28.760 And it stayed with me and kind of reoccurred in my work 00:01:28.784 --> 00:01:30.322 about 10 years later. NOTE Paragraph 00:01:30.346 --> 00:01:34.291 But I want to go back to my graduate school studio. 00:01:34.315 --> 00:01:37.752 I think it's interesting, sometimes, when you start a body of work, 00:01:37.776 --> 00:01:40.787 you need to just completely wipe the plate clean, 00:01:40.811 --> 00:01:41.986 take everything away. 00:01:42.010 --> 00:01:44.621 And this may not look like wiping the plate clean, 00:01:44.645 --> 00:01:45.845 but for me, it was. 00:01:46.208 --> 00:01:50.006 Because I had studied painting for about 10 years, 00:01:50.030 --> 00:01:51.712 and when I went to graduate school, 00:01:51.736 --> 00:01:54.911 I realized that I had developed skill, but I didn't have a subject. 00:01:54.935 --> 00:01:56.442 It was like an athletic skill, 00:01:56.466 --> 00:01:58.512 because I could paint the figure quickly, 00:01:58.536 --> 00:01:59.702 but I didn't know why. 00:01:59.726 --> 00:02:02.063 I could paint it well, but it didn't have content. 00:02:02.087 --> 00:02:06.047 And so I decided to put all the paint aside for a while, 00:02:06.071 --> 00:02:08.848 and to ask this question, which was, 00:02:08.872 --> 00:02:12.592 "Why and how do objects acquire value for us?" 00:02:12.616 --> 00:02:17.671 How does a shirt that I know thousands of people wear, 00:02:17.695 --> 00:02:18.902 a shirt like this one, 00:02:18.926 --> 00:02:20.839 how does it somehow feel like it's mine? NOTE Paragraph 00:02:20.863 --> 00:02:22.490 So I started with that experiment, 00:02:22.514 --> 00:02:26.229 I decided by collecting materials that had a certain quality to them. 00:02:26.253 --> 00:02:28.903 They were mass-produced, easily accessible, 00:02:28.927 --> 00:02:32.276 completely designed for the purpose of their use, 00:02:32.300 --> 00:02:33.603 not for their esthetic. 00:02:33.627 --> 00:02:37.077 So things like toothpicks, thumbtacks, 00:02:37.101 --> 00:02:38.635 pieces of toilet paper, 00:02:38.659 --> 00:02:43.680 to see if in the way that I put my energy, my hand, my time into them, 00:02:43.704 --> 00:02:48.593 that the behavior could actually create a kind of value in the work itself. 00:02:48.617 --> 00:02:51.887 One of the other ideas is, I wanted the work to become live. 00:02:51.911 --> 00:02:54.019 So I wanted to take it off of the pedestal, 00:02:54.043 --> 00:02:55.410 not have a frame around it, 00:02:55.434 --> 00:02:58.395 have the experience not be that you came to something 00:02:58.419 --> 00:03:00.180 and told you that it was important, 00:03:00.204 --> 00:03:03.489 but that you discover that it was in your own time. NOTE Paragraph 00:03:03.513 --> 00:03:07.381 So this is like a very, very old idea in sculpture, 00:03:07.405 --> 00:03:11.896 which is, how do we breathe life into inanimate materials? 00:03:12.405 --> 00:03:14.604 And so, I would go to a space like this, 00:03:14.628 --> 00:03:15.834 where there was a wall, 00:03:15.858 --> 00:03:17.997 and use the paint itself, 00:03:18.021 --> 00:03:19.695 pull the paint out off the wall, 00:03:19.719 --> 00:03:22.315 the wall paint into space to create a sculpture. 00:03:22.339 --> 00:03:24.395 Because I was also interested in this idea 00:03:24.419 --> 00:03:27.780 that these terms, "sculpture," "painting," "installation" -- 00:03:27.804 --> 00:03:30.766 none of these mattered in the way we actually see the world. 00:03:30.790 --> 00:03:33.320 So I wanted to blur those boundaries, 00:03:33.344 --> 00:03:36.548 both between mediums that artists talk about, 00:03:36.572 --> 00:03:40.254 but also blur the experience of being in life and being in art, 00:03:40.278 --> 00:03:42.148 so that when you are in your everyday, 00:03:42.172 --> 00:03:44.453 or when you are in one of my works, 00:03:44.477 --> 00:03:48.087 and you saw, you recognized the everyday, 00:03:48.111 --> 00:03:52.373 you could then move that experience into your own life, 00:03:52.397 --> 00:03:55.786 and perhaps see the art in everyday life. NOTE Paragraph 00:03:56.386 --> 00:03:58.148 I was in graduate school in the '90s, 00:03:58.172 --> 00:04:01.149 and my studio just became more and more filled with images, 00:04:01.173 --> 00:04:02.323 as did my life. 00:04:02.347 --> 00:04:05.720 And this confusion of images and objects 00:04:05.744 --> 00:04:09.664 was really part of the way I was trying to make sense of materials. 00:04:09.688 --> 00:04:12.458 And also, I was interested in how this might change 00:04:12.482 --> 00:04:15.363 the way that we actually experience time. 00:04:15.387 --> 00:04:17.807 If we're experiencing time through materials, 00:04:17.831 --> 00:04:22.749 what happens when images and objects become confused in space? 00:04:22.773 --> 00:04:27.082 So I started by doing some of these experiments with images. 00:04:27.106 --> 00:04:30.863 And if you look back to the 1880s, 00:04:30.887 --> 00:04:34.831 that's when the first photographs started turning into film. 00:04:34.855 --> 00:04:39.965 And they were done through studies of animals, 00:04:39.989 --> 00:04:41.146 the movement of animals. 00:04:41.170 --> 00:04:44.276 So horses in the United States, birds in France. 00:04:44.300 --> 00:04:45.983 They were these studies of movement 00:04:46.007 --> 00:04:48.487 that then slowly, like zoetropes, became film. NOTE Paragraph 00:04:48.511 --> 00:04:51.307 So I decided, I will take an animal 00:04:51.331 --> 00:04:53.077 and I'm going to play with that idea 00:04:53.101 --> 00:04:57.619 of how the image is not static for us anymore, it's moving. 00:04:57.930 --> 00:04:59.113 It's moving in space. 00:04:59.137 --> 00:05:03.077 And so I chose as my character the cheetah, 00:05:03.101 --> 00:05:07.101 because she is the fastest land-dwelling creature on earth. 00:05:07.125 --> 00:05:08.364 And she holds that record, 00:05:08.388 --> 00:05:10.363 and I want to use her record 00:05:10.387 --> 00:05:14.267 to actually make it kind of a measuring stick for time. 00:05:14.291 --> 00:05:17.646 And so this is what she looked like in the sculpture 00:05:17.670 --> 00:05:19.029 as she moved through space. 00:05:19.053 --> 00:05:22.367 This kind of broken framing of the image in space, 00:05:22.391 --> 00:05:25.145 because I had put up notepad paper 00:05:25.169 --> 00:05:27.644 and had it actually project on it. 00:05:27.668 --> 00:05:30.831 Then I did this experiment where you have kind of a race, 00:05:30.855 --> 00:05:33.403 with these new tools and video that I could play with. 00:05:33.427 --> 00:05:35.301 So the falcon moves out in front, 00:05:35.325 --> 00:05:37.149 the cheetah, she comes in second, 00:05:37.173 --> 00:05:39.977 and the rhino is trying to catch up behind. NOTE Paragraph 00:05:40.001 --> 00:05:41.747 Then another one of the experiments, 00:05:41.771 --> 00:05:42.984 I was thinking about how, 00:05:43.008 --> 00:05:47.231 if we try and remember one thing that happened to us 00:05:47.255 --> 00:05:49.688 when we were, let's say, 10 years old. 00:05:49.712 --> 00:05:53.386 It's very hard to remember even what happened in that year. 00:05:53.410 --> 00:05:55.783 And for me, I can think of maybe one, maybe two, 00:05:55.807 --> 00:06:01.073 and that one moment has expanded in my mind 00:06:01.097 --> 00:06:02.518 to fill that entire year. 00:06:02.542 --> 00:06:05.717 So we don't experience time in minutes and seconds. 00:06:05.741 --> 00:06:09.577 So this is a still of the video that I took, 00:06:09.601 --> 00:06:11.371 printed out on a piece of paper, 00:06:11.395 --> 00:06:14.869 the paper is torn and then the video is projected on top of it. 00:06:15.323 --> 00:06:17.028 And I wanted to play with this idea 00:06:17.052 --> 00:06:20.910 of how, in this kind of complete immersion of images 00:06:20.934 --> 00:06:22.776 that's enveloped us, 00:06:22.800 --> 00:06:26.697 how one image can actually grow 00:06:26.721 --> 00:06:28.329 and can haunt us. NOTE Paragraph 00:06:29.030 --> 00:06:30.284 So I had all of these -- 00:06:30.308 --> 00:06:34.408 these are three out of, like, 100 experiments I was trying with images 00:06:34.432 --> 00:06:35.638 for over about a decade, 00:06:35.662 --> 00:06:37.107 and never showing them, 00:06:37.131 --> 00:06:42.282 and I thought, OK, how do I bring this out of the studio, into a public space, 00:06:42.306 --> 00:06:45.459 but retain this kind of energy of experimentation 00:06:45.483 --> 00:06:47.819 that you see when you go into a laboratory, 00:06:47.843 --> 00:06:49.747 you see when you go into a studio, 00:06:49.771 --> 00:06:51.938 and I had this show coming up and I just said, 00:06:51.962 --> 00:06:55.141 alright, I'm going to put my desk right in the middle of the room. 00:06:55.165 --> 00:06:57.458 So I brought my desk and I put it in the room, 00:06:57.482 --> 00:07:01.491 and it actually worked in this kind of very surprising way to me, 00:07:01.515 --> 00:07:06.614 in that it was this kind of flickering, because of the video screens, from afar. 00:07:06.638 --> 00:07:08.466 And I had all of the projectors on it, 00:07:08.490 --> 00:07:11.022 so the projectors were creating the space around it, 00:07:11.046 --> 00:07:14.094 but you're drawn towards the flickering like a flame. 00:07:14.443 --> 00:07:16.506 And then you were enveloped in the piece 00:07:16.530 --> 00:07:18.847 at the scale that we're all very familiar with, 00:07:18.871 --> 00:07:24.174 which is the scale of being in front of a desk or a sink, or a table 00:07:24.198 --> 00:07:27.563 and you are immersed, then, back into this scale, 00:07:27.587 --> 00:07:31.523 this one-to-one scale of the body in relation to the image. 00:07:31.547 --> 00:07:33.300 But on this surface, 00:07:33.324 --> 00:07:37.768 you had these projections on paper being blown in the wind, 00:07:37.792 --> 00:07:40.656 so there was this confusion of what was an image 00:07:40.680 --> 00:07:42.164 and what was an object. NOTE Paragraph 00:07:42.188 --> 00:07:45.450 So this is what the work looked like when it went into a larger room, 00:07:45.474 --> 00:07:47.276 and it wasn't until I made this piece 00:07:47.300 --> 00:07:52.299 that I realized that it effectively made the interior of a planetarium, 00:07:52.323 --> 00:07:54.261 without even realizing that. 00:07:54.285 --> 00:07:58.815 And I remember, as a child, loving going to the planetarium. 00:07:58.839 --> 00:08:00.503 And back then, the planetarium, 00:08:00.527 --> 00:08:03.990 there was always not only these amazing images on the ceiling, 00:08:04.014 --> 00:08:07.958 but you could see the projector itself whizzing and burring, 00:08:07.982 --> 00:08:11.125 and this amazing camera in the middle of the room. 00:08:11.149 --> 00:08:15.371 And it was that, along with seeing the audience around you looking up, 00:08:15.395 --> 00:08:18.172 because there was an audience around at that time, 00:08:18.196 --> 00:08:21.133 and seeing them, and experiencing, being part of an audience. 00:08:21.157 --> 00:08:24.926 So this is an image from the web that I downloaded 00:08:24.950 --> 00:08:28.148 of people who took images of themselves in the work, 00:08:28.172 --> 00:08:29.322 and I like this image, 00:08:29.346 --> 00:08:32.481 because you see how the figures get mixed with the work. 00:08:32.505 --> 00:08:36.926 So you have the shadow of a visitor against the projection, 00:08:36.950 --> 00:08:39.688 and you also see the projections across a person's shirt. 00:08:39.712 --> 00:08:43.150 So there were these self-portraits made in the work itself, 00:08:43.174 --> 00:08:44.325 and then posted, 00:08:44.349 --> 00:08:48.181 and it felt like a kind of cyclical image-making process. 00:08:48.205 --> 00:08:49.934 And a kind of an end to that. NOTE Paragraph 00:08:49.958 --> 00:08:53.529 But it reminded me and brought me back to the planetarium, 00:08:53.553 --> 00:08:54.855 and that interior, 00:08:54.879 --> 00:08:56.831 and I started to go back to painting. 00:08:56.855 --> 00:09:01.061 And thinking about how a painting is actually, for me, 00:09:01.085 --> 00:09:03.919 about the interior images that we all have. 00:09:03.943 --> 00:09:05.688 There's so many interior images, 00:09:05.712 --> 00:09:08.688 and we've become so focused on what's outside our eyes. 00:09:09.204 --> 00:09:12.701 And how do we store memory in our mind, 00:09:12.725 --> 00:09:15.546 how certain images emerge out of nowhere 00:09:15.570 --> 00:09:17.618 or can fall apart over time. 00:09:17.642 --> 00:09:21.118 And I started to call this series the "Afterimage" series, 00:09:21.142 --> 00:09:25.347 which was a reference to this idea that if we all close our eyes right now, 00:09:25.371 --> 00:09:27.950 you can see there's this flickering light that lingers, 00:09:27.974 --> 00:09:30.117 and when we open it again, it lingers again -- 00:09:30.141 --> 00:09:31.656 this is happening all the time. 00:09:31.680 --> 00:09:37.161 And an afterimage is something that a photograph can never replace, 00:09:37.185 --> 00:09:39.415 you never feel that in a photograph. 00:09:39.439 --> 00:09:43.106 So it really reminds you of the limits of the camera's lens. 00:09:43.130 --> 00:09:46.304 So it was this idea of taking the images that were outside of me -- 00:09:46.328 --> 00:09:47.482 this is my studio -- 00:09:47.506 --> 00:09:51.990 and then trying to figure out how they were being represented inside me. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:52.014 --> 00:09:53.400 So really quickly, 00:09:53.424 --> 00:09:57.600 I'm just going to whiz through how a process might develop 00:09:57.624 --> 00:09:58.776 for the next piece. 00:09:58.800 --> 00:10:01.347 So it might start with a sketch, 00:10:01.371 --> 00:10:03.716 or an image that's burned in my memory 00:10:03.740 --> 00:10:04.903 from the 18th century -- 00:10:04.927 --> 00:10:07.175 it's Piranesi's "Colosseum." 00:10:07.830 --> 00:10:10.196 Or a model the size of a basketball -- 00:10:10.220 --> 00:10:11.839 I built this around a basketball, 00:10:11.863 --> 00:10:14.974 the scale's evidenced by the red cup behind it. 00:10:14.998 --> 00:10:17.998 And that model can be put into a larger piece as a seed, 00:10:18.022 --> 00:10:20.378 and that seed can grow into a bigger piece. 00:10:20.402 --> 00:10:23.735 And that piece can fill a very, very large space. 00:10:24.077 --> 00:10:29.456 But it can funnel down into a video that's just made from my iPhone, 00:10:29.480 --> 00:10:33.085 of a puddle outside my studio in a rainy night. 00:10:34.457 --> 00:10:38.444 So this is an afterimage of the painting made in my memory, 00:10:38.468 --> 00:10:42.118 and even that painting can fade as memory does. NOTE Paragraph 00:10:42.142 --> 00:10:45.690 So this is the scale of a very small image 00:10:45.714 --> 00:10:46.967 from my sketchbook. 00:10:46.991 --> 00:10:48.752 You can see how it can explode 00:10:48.776 --> 00:10:51.776 to a subway station that spans three blocks. 00:10:52.149 --> 00:10:54.593 And you could see how going into the subway station 00:10:54.617 --> 00:10:58.880 is like a journey through the pages of a sketchbook, 00:10:58.904 --> 00:11:04.039 and you can see sort of a diary of work writ across a public space, 00:11:04.063 --> 00:11:06.753 and you're turning the pages of 20 years of art work 00:11:06.777 --> 00:11:09.007 as you move through the subway. 00:11:09.031 --> 00:11:12.666 But even that sketch actually has a different origin, 00:11:12.690 --> 00:11:18.918 it has an origin in a sculpture that climbs a six-story building, 00:11:18.942 --> 00:11:22.125 and is scaled to a cat from the year 2002. 00:11:22.149 --> 00:11:25.268 I remember that because I had two black cats at the time. 00:11:25.617 --> 00:11:28.395 And this is an image of a work from Japan 00:11:28.419 --> 00:11:30.705 that you can see the afterimage of in the subway. 00:11:30.729 --> 00:11:32.498 Or a work in Venice, 00:11:32.522 --> 00:11:35.387 where you see the image etched in the wall. 00:11:35.411 --> 00:11:39.696 Or how a sculpture that I did at SFMOMA in 2001, 00:11:39.720 --> 00:11:42.188 and created this kind of dynamic line, 00:11:42.212 --> 00:11:45.141 how I stole that to create a dynamic line 00:11:45.165 --> 00:11:48.117 as you descend down into the subway itself. NOTE Paragraph 00:11:48.141 --> 00:11:50.768 And this merging of mediums is really interesting to me. 00:11:50.792 --> 00:11:54.435 So how can you take a line that pulls tension like a sculpture 00:11:54.459 --> 00:11:55.862 and put it into a print? 00:11:55.886 --> 00:11:58.425 Or then use line like a drawing in a sculpture 00:11:58.449 --> 00:12:00.734 to create a dramatic perspective? 00:12:00.758 --> 00:12:04.251 Or how can a painting mimic the process of printmaking? 00:12:05.013 --> 00:12:08.173 How can an installation use the camera's lens 00:12:08.197 --> 00:12:09.952 to frame a landscape? 00:12:10.308 --> 00:12:15.300 How can a painting on string become a moment, in Denmark, 00:12:15.324 --> 00:12:17.202 in the middle of a trek? 00:12:18.180 --> 00:12:20.601 And how, on the High Line, can you create a piece 00:12:20.625 --> 00:12:23.649 that camouflages itself into the nature itself 00:12:23.673 --> 00:12:27.298 and becomes a habitat for the nature around it. NOTE Paragraph 00:12:28.729 --> 00:12:31.776 And I'll just end with two pieces that I'm making now. 00:12:31.800 --> 00:12:33.688 This is a piece called "Fallen Sky" 00:12:33.712 --> 00:12:37.180 that's going to be a permanent commission in Hudson Valley, 00:12:37.204 --> 00:12:40.450 and it's kind of the planetarium finally come down 00:12:40.474 --> 00:12:42.744 and grounding itself in the earth. 00:12:42.768 --> 00:12:46.280 And this is a work from 2013 that's going to be reinstalled, 00:12:46.304 --> 00:12:49.978 have a new life in the reopening of MOMA. 00:12:50.280 --> 00:12:53.804 And it's a piece that the tool itself is the sculpture. 00:12:53.828 --> 00:12:56.526 So the pendulum, as it swings, 00:12:56.550 --> 00:12:59.426 is used as a tool to create the piece. 00:12:59.450 --> 00:13:02.335 So each of the piles of objects 00:13:02.359 --> 00:13:07.912 go right up to one centimeter to the tip of that pendulum. 00:13:07.936 --> 00:13:11.871 So you have this combination of the lull of that beautiful swing, 00:13:11.895 --> 00:13:15.808 but also the tension that it constantly could destroy the piece itself. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:16.474 --> 00:13:19.736 And so, it doesn't really matter where any of these pieces end up, 00:13:19.760 --> 00:13:22.547 because the real point for me 00:13:22.571 --> 00:13:25.625 is that they end up in your memory over time. 00:13:25.649 --> 00:13:29.177 And they generate ideas beyond themselves. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:29.817 --> 00:13:30.968 Thank you. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:30.992 --> 00:13:37.612 (Applause)