Benvenuti al più ampio studio sulle cadute in arrampicata Negli ultimi due anni abbiamo misurato e analizzato centinaia di cadute Grandi, piccole, con arrampicatori pesanti e leggeri e un sacco di attrito "Non riesco a fare sicura dinamica così!" All'inizio avevo due domante principali a cui volevo rispondere in questo studio; la prima è la quantità di lasco incide sulla caduta? Se l'assicuratore dà più corda, ovviamente l'arrampicatore farà una caduta più lunga, e se cadrà verticalmente la caduta sarà più dura perché cadrà di più. Tuttavia, nell'arrampicata si verifica spesso un piccolo pendolo, una piccola oscillazione verso la parete, quindi la domanda è: cadere di più riduce questo pendolo? Riduce la forza dell'impatto con il quale l'arrampicatore colpirà la parete? E la seconda parte dello studio cerca di rispondere alla domanda "qual è il miglior metodo per assicurare?" Compareremo il saltare in alto con il fare un passo avanti, e come bonus se cambia if the blayer is heavier and as an extra bonus we also compared against the tube style soft catches where you let the Rope slide through the device and while my curiosity started with these two questions I actually discovered way more including some peculiar cases how lightweight blayer can cause harder catch when a heavier blay so let's begin now the problem of making such studies is a sheer number of variables every fall is different we have different weights of the climber and the Blair the position of the climber before the fall fall height and the friction and also the Rope might get stiffer over multiple fs and of course the big one is how the Blair will handle the catch so so I thought okay challenge accepted I'm going to put a force measuring device on the climber and do as many different faults as needed to see the patterns and off we went measuring and measuring and measuring hundred hundreds of Falls and I was building a huge database of results and after a lot of work I understood something and oh [ __ ] moment happened what we were actually measuring was the peak Force to the climber's harness which happens around this moment of the Fall however this moment is not a problem for the climber what is the problem however is how hard the climber will hit the wall I always felt sorry for these lightweight climbers who are slammed into the walls and end up with broken or sprained ankles so let's fix that now while the peak forces should have a correlation with how hard the climber will hit the wall I needed to find a way to prove it and here I was mounting a camera to the wall with the hope to calculate the speed at which the climber would hit the wall based on slow motion footage and here was a tricky part due to perspective Distortion objects that are further away look smaller and in addition to that every camera lens introduced extra Distortion so I really needed to mount the camera as perpendicular to the climber's falling plane as possible and it's not like I can just float the camera anywhere in space I want but after a bit of root searching and then a lot of object tracking combined with a lot of custom code I wrote I got these beautiful velocity and acceleration graphs and now we can do hundreds of more fults and make sense of them all right let's begin with the question how does different amount of slack affect the fall what we did was a series of incremental Falls where the Blair does nothing basically causing a hard catch the first fall was with zero slack and even though it's a small fall I was swung towards the wall really hard for the second fall we used about half of arm of slack and despite the fall being a little bit bigger this time the peak horizontal velocity was lower now of course on such overhanging routes the more the Climber Falls the further the wall gets and that's why I was measuring horizontal speed and the peak of that speed usually happens at the bottom of the pendulum and it's a very good indicator of what would happen if the wall would not be overhanging all right let's try with even bigger Falls Charlie was clearly enjoying this yeah subscribe and the result was interesting the horizontal speed was nearly identical to the previous fall however the peak acceleration was bigger which means that the climber would reach the peak speed faster so based on this it seems that having a little bit of slack was better than no slack but having even more was questionable however despite us trying to Mim Mig hard catches these faults weren't that hard The Faults were relatively small and the blayer was still pulled up a lot and the reason I'm saying this is that in the past I have done similar tests under this bridge where I have discovered that once the fall is hard enough it exceeds the rope's ability to absorb the impact and the climber experiences a bounce back effect and this causes harder false for the climber however when we tried the same with soft catches there was no bounce back and the swing was lower so back to real Rock let's leave the hard catches for the reference and see how the soft catches will compare starting with zero slack we can see that the trajectory of the Fall is more gradual and that the horizontal speed and acceleration was lower significantly lower next fall was with half arm of slack and despite the climber falling more horizontal speed was actually almost identical so let's try bigger okay one two oh okay let's go o that was soft don't you think I I was too scared to think so despite nearly pulling my Blair into the first bolt and colliding with him the horizontal speed again was nearly identical so at least in this test case scenario falling more combined with soft catch had no benefits but as they say one test is no test and that's why I was rigging another one in the spot where we will be able to do even bigger Falls falling hardish so we started with zero amount of slack and Charlie giving the softest catch he can however the fall was described as hard dish ready yeah one two three falling softer and this time adding a little bit of slack felt softer for the climber and also did reduce the horizontal speed by a little bit so let's see what happens with even bigger Falls you good whenever you want one two three falling take a big pop very soft very soft and if we look into the graphs the horizontal speed was even lower this time so we went even bigger to 1 and 1 half M of slack which is quite a lot one two three falling woo that was soft but there was this kind of D yeah yeah I I noticed it myself so this time the climber felt more jerk on the initial impact of the Rope however the horizontal speed was further reduced and looking into all of these faults we can clearly see correlation how increasing the amount of slack decrease reles the horizontal speed into the wall and since that was contradicting with our previous findings we had to do more Falls and in this scenario falling more was also better you can even see the visual difference and here is one more example this time the climber was falling from lower position and we had less friction once again falling more had softer impact with the wall so a summary of this segment is that the swing or the pendulum into the wall can be reduced by extra slack however if you exceed R's ability to absorb the impact the Rope will bounce the climber back into the wall and then things might be even worse and obviously falling more gets you closer to exceeding that limit but more importantly hard catch can get you there very quickly so for example here is one of the most common mistakes where the bler simply throws a ton of slack but no effort in making a soft catch okay and here is another one first a soft catch and now a hard one that okay we had the same amount of slack but the difference was massive you can clearly see the bounceback effect how the climber is being pulled back up what was your impressions one elbow versus two elbows versus three elbows no elbows between one elbow and two you'll have to measure that mass masso menos more or less what it's going to be but I think that's The Sweet Spot how was no slack at all difficult to give the soft catch it's difficult to give the soft catch yeah with no slag is really hard to hit the timing perfectly yeah so what we all noticed is that with zero slack it's really hard to give a soft catch because you don't have enough time to go down and jump up maybe with the exception If the fall is really big then the climber is falling for quite a while and then you have time but on very very small Falls you would have to have some cat reflexes and go like super fast but in general the most comfortable was between half to full arm of slack and that caused the softest catches for the climbers and more than that is very very rarely beneficial and simp simply asking for some collisions or dragging the blayer into the first bolt or simply a bunch of extra Pull-Ups for the climber after the fall and uh the bigger ones like three elbows like I say between one and two elbows is The Sweet Spot like one and two is more or less the same for me personally three is also softer Anna says but just a little bit harder to judge again but it's harder to judge when to jump mhm the EAS the climber is falling faster already exactly exactly now I can see how lightweight blers are probably already typing no slack for me I fly up anyway so we actually did testing on that and we got some interesting results but before that I just wanted to quickly say thank you for all my friends and supporters who helped in creating all of this study it's been the biggest project I've ever tried both in terms of time and energy and money so it would definitely not be possible without all of you so huge thank you and now back to lightweight blers so we started with zero slack wa that looked harder yeah visually and we can already see something interesting once the robe gets tight the speed of the climber starts to drop however as soon as the blay is pulled off the ground the speed of the climber starts to increase again the climber experiences a double fall effect okay let's increase the amount of slack we still get this double fall effect but the horizontal speed is reduced so let's go bigger and here we have the same pattern a double fall but the horizontal speed is even further reduced so let's try even bigger with crazy one and a half arms of slack you ready yeah three two one soft catch and here the double fall effect is very visible but same as in previous experiments we see a strong correlation that the bigger the fall the slower the horizontal speed for the climber so the softer impact with the wall and while that wasn't a surprise what was however a surprise is when we swapped her and me naturally I was expecting that the heavier Blair should cause a harder catch for the climber but if we compare Anna's no slack versus mine you can see that my catch was significantly softer and here is Anna's half arm of slack compared to mine and same results my catch was softer again and to be fair we were asking her to give a soft catch one two and give a soft catch you ready yeah soft catch on three 2 1 and finally Anna's full arm of slack versus mine and to my surprise I was giving softer catches for the climber than the lighter belayer however I think this has more to do with the fact that lighter blers usually fly up anyway so they don't have enough practice to give soft catches but let me give you another example so this experiment was slightly different 118 here Me and Charlie did a bunch of soft catches but this time we measured the forces to the climber this was the average line of Charlie's catches this was mine and this was the average of averages and we also did some hard catches for the reference that was much harder all right and now let's compare this to a light Blair no no and the first catch was really bad in fact as hard as our heart catches you jumped way too soon you've got to wait till she sucks you you're down here and when you can feel her sucking you you push up with her look at her once she starts falling you go down up I am getting scared come on no now the second catch was much better but still not what we were expecting so we did some practicing oh that was super soft falling and then this happened that look quite nice 12 121 so as you can see experience plays a bigger role than being lighter and although lighter blares very rarely cause hard catches for climbers however with enough friction light Blair becomes heavy and actually recently I saw one really nasty fall where a bler was a light girl a climber was relatively light girl a lot of friction and a huge slam into the wall and then a poor girl had to get assistance to get back to the car and I'm curious did you ever got unexpectedly hard catch from a light blayer write down in the comments I want to see how often that happens all right so we have seen how both slack and soft catch has a big effect on the fall but there is something even more important here is a hard catch with no slack and here is a soft catch with a little bit of slack so we can see the best and the worst case scenarios but now check what happens when the Climber Falls from slightly different position I simply changed my legs but I was not pushing away from the wall [Music] [Laughter] [Music] I anticipa a bit too much there that's why you wear a helmet that would have been a what was it a trip straight to the yard a trip straight to the yard that would be go but if we look into the graphs we can see that this new fall had harder fall than the hard catch before despite Charlie trying to give it a soft catch with his head so as you can see how the Climber Falls can be more important than the amount of slack or a soft catch and here sometimes you can see beginners pushing away from the wall during the fall and combine that with another inexperienced delayer and a hard catch and that's a good recipe for sprained ankles so so do not push it's very rarely beneficial to push away unless you're clearing some kind of slab but otherwise do not push now in the second part of this study I wanted to figure out which blay method is the best so we compared jumping up versus stepping forward and also does that change if the player is heavier or there is a lot of friction in the system but since all of this is already SL slly different topic I'm going to split all of this in a part two of this video but before you go I wanted to share something with you that you might find beneficial in order to create these nice charts that you have seen in this video I needed to understand how to take my messy experimental data and perform a polom fitting this allows to obtain a smooth graph that don't lose important points and chances are if you're like me math and physics might not be our main career path and our abilities to understand such topics either never existed or are already fading away since the last time we sat in calculus or physics class and that's why I've been really enjoying brilliant.org it's the best way to learn math data science and computer science interactively in general I see two problems of learning Advanced topics the first one is not having enough building blocks that lead into more advanced subjects that's why I really love their new feature of learning paths where the platform progressively guides you from the very Basics to more and more complicated and interesting topics personally I'm nearly done with foundational math and now I feel more than ready to dive into data science and physics that's my two recent interests and the second reason which stops us from taking on such learnings is that it might feel like oh it might take forever to understand these topics however just 15 to 20 minutes a day equals to 100 hours a year and in 100 hours you can learn a lot of things and greatly expand your Curiosity on life so if you're curious you can try brilliant.org completely for free for 30 days by visiting brilliant.org Hardis easy or by clicking the link in the description and the first 200 of you can also get 20% of their premium annual subscriptions so thank you brilliant.org team for making curious humans and supporting my mega researchers and thank you curious human for watching my mega researches see you in the next one