WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.000 Hi, this is Najib, 00:00:02.000 --> 00:00:03.350 this video is about a Cheikh 00:00:03.350 --> 00:00:05.800 claiming that the Earth is fix and not moving. NOTE Paragraph 00:00:05.800 --> 00:00:07.000 Why, because, 00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:09.000 if the Earth was moving, 00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:11.000 and a plane wanted to go from Ashariqa (KSA) to China; 00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:12.000 if this plane kept static in the sky, 00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:14.000 it is China that would come to it ! (as earth is turning) 00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:16.000 let’s watch the video: 00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:18.000 (Cheikh) “So the earth is static, not moving 00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:19.000 The logical arguments, God bless you, NOTE Paragraph 00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:21.000 we go to the Ashariqa airport, 00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:23.000 we want to go to China, 00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:24.000 on the plane, 00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:24.000 clear? 00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:27.000 stay focused: 00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:29.000 this is earth, if you say that it is spinning, 00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:32.000 if we take off from Ashariqa, 00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:34.000 in an international frlight to China, 00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:36.000 the earth is spinning, right? 00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:37.000 Ok, if the plane stopped in the sky, 00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:40.000 wouldn’t China come to it !? 00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:41.000 Right or not, 00:00:41.000 --> 00:00:43.000 China would come or not !? 00:00:43.000 --> 00:00:46.000 Now if earth is spinning this way (like the cup of water in his hands), 00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:49.000 whatever the plane is doing to reach china it will never catch it, 00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:53.000 as China would be also following the earth in its spinning movement. 00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:56.000 So how would you reach China !? 00:00:56.000 --> 00:00:57.000 (Najib) The video is longer than that, 00:00:57.000 --> 00:00:59.000 and contained another type of arguments, 00:00:59.000 --> 00:01:01.640 mixing up Science and religious texts. 00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:04.440 And this is a whole issue, 00:01:04.440 --> 00:01:05.420 but in this video, 00:01:05.420 --> 00:01:07.000 I would like to tackle this particular part of his video. 00:01:07.000 --> 00:01:11.000 And by the way I take the opportunity to congratulate the Cheikh for his methodology ! 00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:13.000 The cheikh is using Nature observation, 00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:16.000 to extract general rules of Nature. 00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:19.000 This is at the core of Natural Sciences. 00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:23.000 The idea this Cheikh is putting here belongs the greek scientist Aristotle, 00:01:23.000 --> 00:01:25.000 who lived in the fourth century BC, 00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:30.000 and was among the natural scientist and philosophers with the highest influence on the old world. 00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:34.000 (map showing Alexander The great empire, Aristotle’s student, expanding) 00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:39.000 And it is completely normal that his ideas end up in muslim scholars’ texts in the middle ages, 00:01:39.000 --> 00:01:43.000 which have probably been used by our Cheikh. 00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:46.000 Aristotle said that it is impossible for the Earth to be spinning, 00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:47.000 Why ? 00:01:47.000 --> 00:01:49.000 because if it was doing so, 00:01:49.000 --> 00:01:52.000 and if we consider someone throwing an arrow vertically, 00:01:52.000 --> 00:02:01.000 than the arrow wouldn't be back to the same place because, Earth would have moved in between. 00:02:01.000 --> 00:02:02.000 The idea sounds reasonable, 00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:04.000 and we can’t blame aristotle, 00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:05.000 nor the old muslim scholars 00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:08.000 or not even this Cheikh to think about it. 00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:09.000 But the question is: 00:02:09.000 --> 00:02:14.000 is this idea corresponding to the reality of our world? 00:02:14.000 --> 00:02:18.000 Aristotle ideas remained accepted for centuries all around the region, 00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:24.000 and the first one to challenge it and verify it was Galileo. 00:02:24.000 --> 00:02:28.000 Galileo lived in the 17th century, in Italy. 00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:31.000 He explained the error done by Aristotle in a book he wrote in the late days of his life, 00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:34.000 the book sparked a revolution in natural science. 00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:40.000 The book was named “Discourses and Mathematical Demonstrations Relating to Two New Sciences”. 00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:43.000 Or simply put: “Two New Sciences”. 00:02:43.000 --> 00:02:45.000 In this book, Galileo described the following experiment: 00:02:45.000 --> 00:02:47.000 if we are on a moving ship 00:02:47.000 --> 00:02:48.000 and went up to the top of the mast 00:02:48.000 --> 00:02:51.000 to let down a pebble from above. 00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:52.000 If Aristotle was right, 00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:55.000 the pebble shouldn’t fall vertically to the bottom of the mast, 00:02:55.000 --> 00:02:59.000 but should be left behind while the boat is moving forward. 00:02:59.000 --> 00:03:00.000 Let’s figure out this by ourselves ! 00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:07.000 Today we have a ship that moves way faster than boats of Italy in that period. 00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:08.000 This ship is named: 00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:09.000 ... 00:03:09.000 --> 00:03:10.000 the car ! 00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:14.000 I’m on the highway now driving at 120km/h, 00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:15.000 if Aristotle was right, 00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:18.000 this pebble, if thrown from the roof of the car, 00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:21.000 while falling, the back of the car should “catch up with it”. 00:03:21.000 --> 00:03:25.000 The pebble should either end up on the back seats, or even break the rear windows of the car. 00:03:25.000 --> 00:03:30.000 Let’s try ! 00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:34.000 The pebble is falling vertically in the car, 00:03:34.000 --> 00:03:36.000 this proves that Aristotle was wrong. 00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:40.000 Galileo proved this in detail using the concept of reference frame. 00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:43.000 The reference frame is the place where we situate rigorously a phenomenon before studying its mechanics. 00:03:43.000 --> 00:03:45.000 In the reference frame of the car, 00:03:45.000 --> 00:03:47.000 this pebble is static, 00:03:47.000 --> 00:03:48.000 its speed is zero, 00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:55.000 while earth and the trees outside are moving with the speed of 120km/h in the opposite way. 00:03:55.000 --> 00:03:58.000 While for a tree outside: 00:03:58.000 --> 00:04:03.000 BOTH the car and the pebble are moving with a speed of 120km/h 00:04:03.000 --> 00:04:05.000 If my car was convertible, 00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:08.000 I would have been able to throw my pebble up higher in the air, 00:04:08.000 --> 00:04:13.000 the movement of the pebble in the reference frame of the car would still be vertical, 00:04:13.000 --> 00:04:15.000 while in the reference frame of the tree, 00:04:15.000 --> 00:04:23.000 the pebble would have a horizontale movement with a 120km/h velocity, 00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:25.000 Seem from the latter reference frame, 00:04:25.000 --> 00:04:27.000 its movement resembles that of a projectile, 00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:32.000 going up and then reaching the car back. 00:04:32.000 --> 00:04:33.000 The error made by Aristotle, 00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:37.000 is that he was not fixing the reference frame where he was studying the movement. 00:04:37.000 --> 00:04:40.000 As soon as we have a clear idea in which reference frame we are talking, 00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:42.000 things become clear. 00:04:42.000 --> 00:04:44.000 The plane of our Cheikh is like a butterfly, 00:04:44.000 --> 00:04:46.000 going from the front seat (Ashariqa), 00:04:46.000 --> 00:04:48.000 to the back seat (China). 00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:50.000 In the reference frame of the car, 00:04:50.000 --> 00:04:53.000 the rear seat is fix, 00:04:53.000 --> 00:04:55.000 it is not “coming” to the butterfly. 00:04:55.000 --> 00:04:56.000 In the reference frame of the tree, 00:04:56.000 --> 00:05:00.000 the butterfly has already a velocity of 120km/h, 00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:07.000 decreasing a little bit while the butterfly os going to the rear seat. 00:05:07.000 --> 00:05:10.000 All of this is true since the car has a constant velocity. 00:05:10.000 --> 00:05:15.000 In this case, we say that the reference frame of the car is a Galilean reference frame. 00:05:15.000 --> 00:05:16.000 If the velocity of the car suddenly changed, 00:05:16.000 --> 00:05:19.000 for example if I push on my breaks, 00:05:19.000 --> 00:05:20.000 it is no longer a Galilean reference frame, 00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:23.000 and the poor butterfly will hit the front window. 00:05:23.000 --> 00:05:24.000 If Earth did the same (suddenly stopped rotating), 00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:28.000 the american scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson explains in this video what would happen. 00:05:28.000 --> 00:05:31.000 I can tell you that it wouldn’t be a happy event. 00:05:31.000 --> 00:05:34.000 Now the conclusion I can draw from this story, 00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:38.000 is that our intuition can sometimes lead us in mistake, 00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:39.000 just like it did to Aristotle. 00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:42.000 Intuition sometimes works, sometimes not. 00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:47.000 The only way to figure out is to do the experiment, 00:05:47.000 --> 00:05:49.000 just like Galileo did. 00:05:49.000 --> 00:05:53.000 If the experimental result is not agreeing with our initial idea, 00:05:53.000 --> 00:05:55.000 we should accept changing our point view. 00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:57.000 This is the scientific method ! 00:05:57.000 --> 00:05:59.000 The scientific method, 00:05:59.000 --> 00:06:02.000 with readiness to change one’s mind in its core principles, 00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:08.000 in which Arab scholars and philosophers played a key role to make it precise and rigorous, 00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:12.000 would later spark the scientific revolution in Europe, 00:06:12.000 --> 00:06:16.000 the same scientific revolution that is still happening all over the world. 00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:19.000 This is it, happy experimenting, and good bye.