9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 So imagine that you had[br]your smartphone minituarized 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and hooked up directly to your brain. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 If you had this sort of brain chip, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 you'd be able to upload and download[br]to the Internet at the speed of thought. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Accessing social media or Wikipedia[br]would be a lot like -- 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 well, from the inside at least -- 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 like consulting your own memory. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It would be as easy[br]and as intimate as thinking. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But would it make it easier[br]for you to know what's true? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Just because a way[br]of accessing information is faster 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 doesn't mean it's[br]more reliable of course, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and it doesn't mean that we would all[br]interpret it the same way. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It doesn't mean that you would be[br]any better at evaluating it, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 in fact you might even we worse 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 because, you know, more data,[br]less time for evaluation. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Something like this is already[br]happening to us right now. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We already carry a world of information[br]around in our pockets, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 but it seems as if the more information[br]that we share and access online, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the more difficult it can be 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 for us to tell the difference between[br]what's real and what's fake. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It's as if we know more[br]but understand less. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Now, it's a feature of modern like, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 I supposed, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that large swaths of the public [br]live in isolated information bubbles. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We're polarized not just over values[br]but over the facts, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and one reason for that[br] 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 is that the data analytics[br]that drive the Internet 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 get us not just more information[br]but more of the information that we want. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Our online life is personalized, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 everything from the ads we read 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to the news that comes down[br]our Facebook feed 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 is tailored to satisfy our preferences. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And so while we get more information, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 a lot of that information ends up[br]reflecting ourselves 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 as much as it does reality. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It ends up, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 I suppose, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 inflating our bubbles rather[br]than bursting them. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And so maybe it's not surprise 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that we're in a situation -- 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 a paradoxical situation -- 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 thinking that we know so much more 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and yet not agreeing[br]on what it is we know.