0:00:00.531,0:00:03.180 ♪ [music] ♪ 0:00:09.288,0:00:10.459 - [Tyler] In the next two videos, 0:00:10.459,0:00:13.698 we'll turn our attention [br]to price floors and their effects. 0:00:13.698,0:00:16.100 In this video, we'll look at [br]the first two effects 0:00:16.100,0:00:18.777 and cover one of the most [br]well-known price floors: 0:00:18.777,0:00:20.119 the minimum wage. 0:00:20.119,0:00:22.529 Let's get started. 0:00:25.500,0:00:29.219 A price floor is a minimum price [br]allowed by law. 0:00:29.219,0:00:32.478 That is, it is a price [br]below which it is illegal 0:00:32.478,0:00:34.110 to buy or sell -- 0:00:34.110,0:00:39.201 called a price floor [br]because you cannot go below the floor. 0:00:39.526,0:00:41.309 We're going to show [br]that price floors create 0:00:41.309,0:00:42.637 four significant effects: 0:00:42.637,0:00:49.636 surpluses, lost gains from trade, [br]wasteful increases in quality, 0:00:49.636,0:00:51.697 and a misallocation of resources. 0:00:51.697,0:00:53.168 We're going to go through [br]these each in turn. 0:00:53.168,0:00:57.093 Before we do so, however, [br]it's worthwhile asking this question: 0:00:57.093,0:01:01.071 price floors are less common [br]than price ceilings -- 0:01:01.071,0:01:02.430 why is this? 0:01:02.430,0:01:05.940 That is it's more common [br]to see a price being held 0:01:05.940,0:01:09.339 below the market price, 0:01:09.339,0:01:15.269 than it is to see a price [br]being held above the market price. 0:01:15.269,0:01:17.039 Why? 0:01:17.308,0:01:19.479 One reason may be political. 0:01:19.479,0:01:23.940 That is, there are typically[br]more buyers of goods 0:01:23.940,0:01:27.062 than there are sellers of goods. 0:01:27.062,0:01:30.768 So when you hold a price [br]below the market price, 0:01:30.768,0:01:33.789 you may benefit, or at least [br]appear to benefit, 0:01:33.789,0:01:37.681 more buyers,[br]more people, more voters 0:01:37.681,0:01:42.219 than when you hold a price [br]above the market price, 0:01:42.219,0:01:45.352 which would appear to harm buyers. 0:01:45.352,0:01:47.999 Now interestingly, the paradigmatic, 0:01:47.999,0:01:50.438 the classic case of a price floor 0:01:50.438,0:01:53.359 is the exception[br]which proves the rule. 0:01:53.359,0:01:56.968 Because the classic case [br]of a price floor is a good 0:01:56.968,0:02:01.879 for which there are more sellers [br]than there are buyers. 0:02:01.879,0:02:06.620 So here's the case where the price [br]is kept above the market price, 0:02:06.620,0:02:10.460 and it make sense politically [br]because there are lots of sellers 0:02:10.460,0:02:12.218 compared to buyers. 0:02:12.218,0:02:16.468 So, what is this good, [br]for which price floor is common, 0:02:16.468,0:02:19.379 and for which sellers exceed buyers? 0:02:19.379,0:02:21.469 We'll get to that in just a moment. 0:02:21.469,0:02:22.800 Think about it. 0:02:22.800,0:02:24.688 So one of the things [br]which a price floor does 0:02:24.688,0:02:26.708 is it creates surpluses. 0:02:26.708,0:02:28.199 Okay. Now, have you thought[br]of the good 0:02:28.199,0:02:30.549 which a price floor is common, 0:02:30.549,0:02:32.829 and it's a good for which [br]the number of suppliers 0:02:32.829,0:02:35.831 exceeds the number of buyers? 0:02:35.831,0:02:39.129 Well, the minimum wage [br]is a price floor. 0:02:39.129,0:02:44.401 The minimum wage is a price [br]below which you cannot sell labor, 0:02:44.401,0:02:48.079 and the suppliers of labor [br]exceed the buyers of labor. 0:02:48.079,0:02:50.430 So it's not surprising[br]that a minimum wage 0:02:50.430,0:02:52.998 is often politically successful. 0:02:52.998,0:02:55.170 Now, who will the minimum wage affect? 0:02:55.170,0:02:57.980 Workers with very high productivity [br]who are already earning 0:02:57.980,0:02:59.070 more than the minimum wage – 0:02:59.070,0:03:02.183 they are not going to be affected [br]by the minimum wage perhaps at all. 0:03:02.183,0:03:04.573 Instead, it will affect [br]the least experienced, 0:03:04.573,0:03:07.490 least educated, least trained workers. 0:03:07.490,0:03:11.291 Low-skilled teenagers, for example, [br]are most likely to be affected 0:03:11.291,0:03:13.089 by the minimum wage. 0:03:13.089,0:03:16.682 Now, I said that a price floor[br]creates surpluses. 0:03:16.682,0:03:18.542 The minimum wage is a price floor, 0:03:18.542,0:03:20.351 so it's going to create a surplus. 0:03:20.351,0:03:23.464 A surplus of labor we call what? 0:03:23.464,0:03:25.054 We say a gaggle of geese? 0:03:25.054,0:03:26.731 Say pride of lions? 0:03:26.731,0:03:30.632 A surplus of labor[br]is called unemployment. 0:03:30.632,0:03:32.425 So let's look with our model 0:03:32.425,0:03:36.300 to understand how a minimum wage[br]can create unemployment, 0:03:36.300,0:03:39.654 particularly among[br]the least skilled workers. 0:03:39.654,0:03:41.325 Okay. Here's our standard diagram, 0:03:41.325,0:03:43.201 except we're going to put [br]the quantity of labor, 0:03:43.201,0:03:46.201 especially unskilled labor,[br]on the horizontal axis. 0:03:46.201,0:03:49.130 The wage or the price of labor [br]on the vertical axis -- 0:03:49.130,0:03:50.471 there's our supply curve. 0:03:50.471,0:03:52.668 There's our demand curve[br]with the market wage 0:03:52.668,0:03:55.321 and the market employment level. 0:03:55.321,0:03:56.957 Now we're going to add[br]the minimum wage. 0:03:56.957,0:03:58.241 This is a price floor 0:03:58.241,0:04:03.541 below which it is illegal to buy [br]or sell this good: labor. 0:04:03.541,0:04:07.350 Now, we just read the consequences [br]of the price floor of the diagram. 0:04:07.350,0:04:08.658 So we read, for example, 0:04:08.658,0:04:13.511 that at the minimum wage, [br]the quantity of labor demanded 0:04:13.511,0:04:15.259 is read off the demand curve. 0:04:15.259,0:04:17.521 Remember, this is[br]the demand for labor. 0:04:17.521,0:04:20.237 So, this is the quantity[br]of labor demanded, 0:04:20.237,0:04:23.541 and at the minimum wage, [br]the quantity of labor supplied 0:04:23.541,0:04:24.773 is read off the supply curve. 0:04:25.798,0:04:28.750 Let's put that point on,[br]that's "Qs." 0:04:28.750,0:04:32.020 So we have Qs units[br]of labor supplied, 0:04:32.020,0:04:34.859 "Qd" units of labor demanded. 0:04:34.859,0:04:37.141 Qs is bigger than Qd, 0:04:37.141,0:04:41.940 so, the difference between them [br]is a surplus of labor, 0:04:41.940,0:04:46.029 also known as unemployment. 0:04:47.089,0:04:49.082 Now the minimum wage[br]is a controversial 0:04:49.082,0:04:51.472 and hotly debated issue. 0:04:51.472,0:04:53.581 Some academic results indicate 0:04:53.581,0:04:56.320 that the unemployment effect [br]of a modest increase 0:04:56.320,0:04:57.494 in the minimum wage 0:04:57.494,0:04:59.832 would not be substantial. 0:04:59.832,0:05:02.652 At the same time, however, [br]we also have to recognize 0:05:02.652,0:05:05.082 that a modest increase[br]in the minimum wage 0:05:05.082,0:05:07.544 would not have big benefits either. 0:05:07.544,0:05:09.500 First, only a small percentage[br]of workers 0:05:09.500,0:05:11.624 are going to be affected[br]by the minimum wage. 0:05:11.624,0:05:14.963 97% or so of workers already earn [br]more than the minimum wage. 0:05:14.963,0:05:19.341 In fact, even among young workers, 0:05:19.341,0:05:22.722 94% or so less than 25 years of age, 0:05:22.722,0:05:25.272 they already earn[br]more than the minimum wage. 0:05:25.272,0:05:28.262 At best, the minimum wage [br]will raise the wages 0:05:28.262,0:05:30.382 of some low-skilled[br]and young workers, 0:05:30.382,0:05:33.582 most of whose wages [br]would have increased anyway 0:05:33.582,0:05:36.142 as they became more skilled. 0:05:36.142,0:05:37.531 At worst, the minimum wage 0:05:37.531,0:05:39.440 will increase the price[br]of a hamburger, 0:05:39.440,0:05:41.722 create some unemployment, 0:05:41.722,0:05:45.612 and/or keep some teenagers [br]in school for a bit longer -- 0:05:45.612,0:05:48.882 mot all necessarily bad things. 0:05:48.882,0:05:49.792 What, however, 0:05:49.792,0:05:53.302 about a larger increase [br]in the minimum wage? 0:05:53.613,0:05:54.603 Few economists doubt 0:05:54.603,0:05:56.552 that a large increase[br]in the minimum wage 0:05:56.552,0:05:59.494 would cause serious unemployment. 0:05:59.494,0:06:03.342 After all, we could[br]not create prosperity 0:06:03.342,0:06:05.892 by raising the minimum wage [br]higher and higher. 0:06:05.892,0:06:08.564 If a minimum wage of $10[br]an hour is a good idea, 0:06:08.564,0:06:09.782 what about 15? 0:06:09.782,0:06:12.092 What about 20, 25, $100? 0:06:12.092,0:06:13.953 $500 an hour? 0:06:13.953,0:06:15.863 Would we all be rich at that point? 0:06:15.863,0:06:19.061 Would we all be receiving wages [br]of $500 an hour? 0:06:19.061,0:06:20.124 Of course not. 0:06:20.124,0:06:22.761 Most of us would be unemployed. 0:06:22.761,0:06:24.961 So a large increase[br]in the minimum wage 0:06:24.961,0:06:26.415 is going to cause[br]serious unemployment, 0:06:26.415,0:06:30.043 and the good example of this [br]is Puerto Rico in 1938. 0:06:30.043,0:06:33.033 Congress actually set [br]the first minimum wage at this time 0:06:33.033,0:06:35.384 at 25 cents an hour. 0:06:35.384,0:06:37.185 Now, that may seem low,[br]but that's at a time 0:06:37.185,0:06:39.574 when the average wage[br]in the United States 0:06:39.574,0:06:41.593 was still less than[br]a dollar an hour, 0:06:41.593,0:06:44.403 was 62 and a half cents an hour. 0:06:44.403,0:06:47.683 Congress, however,[br]forgot to exempt Puerto Rico. 0:06:47.683,0:06:50.483 When the average wages [br]in Puerto Rico at that time 0:06:50.483,0:06:53.826 were much lower than in the rest [br]of the United States, 0:06:53.826,0:06:56.324 only three cents[br]to four cents an hour. 0:06:56.324,0:06:59.634 So this modest increase [br]in the minimum wage 0:06:59.634,0:07:02.133 for the continental United States 0:07:02.133,0:07:05.686 was a huge increase[br]in the minimum wage for Puerto Rico. 0:07:05.686,0:07:08.666 And lots of Puerto Rican firms[br]went bankrupt, 0:07:08.666,0:07:10.851 it created devastating unemployment. 0:07:10.851,0:07:14.425 In fact, Puerto Rican politicians [br]came to Washington 0:07:14.425,0:07:19.044 to beg for an exemption [br]to get them out of the minimum wage. 0:07:19.044,0:07:21.263 So, a large increase[br]in the minimum wage 0:07:21.263,0:07:26.043 would certainly cause substantial [br]and serious unemployment. 0:07:26.043,0:07:28.493 We do see higher minimum wages [br]in other countries. 0:07:28.493,0:07:31.413 The minimum wage in France [br]is higher than the U.S., 0:07:31.413,0:07:34.404 relative to average wages [br]in those two countries. 0:07:34.404,0:07:36.344 In addition, labor laws in France 0:07:36.344,0:07:38.734 make it very difficult[br]to fire workers 0:07:38.734,0:07:40.755 once they have been hired. 0:07:40.755,0:07:42.336 As a result, firms in France 0:07:42.336,0:07:45.955 are very reluctant[br]to hire new workers. 0:07:45.955,0:07:48.306 Younger workers[br]are especially affected 0:07:48.306,0:07:50.165 because they are less productive, 0:07:50.165,0:07:52.924 and also they are[br]less known commodities. 0:07:52.924,0:07:55.715 So, the risk[br]of hiring them is greater. 0:07:55.715,0:07:59.007 As a result, unemployment[br]among young workers 0:07:59.007,0:08:00.566 is very high in France. 0:08:00.566,0:08:03.726 It was 23% in 2005, 0:08:03.726,0:08:06.755 and that was long before [br]the economic crisis, 0:08:06.755,0:08:09.783 the financial crisis [br]affecting the entire world. 0:08:09.783,0:08:11.566 So even during good times, 0:08:11.566,0:08:15.817 unemployment in France [br]among young workers is very high, 0:08:15.817,0:08:17.433 because the minimum wage is high, 0:08:17.433,0:08:19.918 and because firms[br]don't want to hire, 0:08:19.918,0:08:23.418 given how difficult it is [br]to fire workers. 0:08:23.418,0:08:25.417 Okay. Let's also show[br]that the minimum wage 0:08:25.417,0:08:27.197 creates lost gains from trade -- 0:08:27.197,0:08:29.509 this ought to be[br]fairly familiar by now. 0:08:29.509,0:08:32.227 At the minimum wage, [br]the quantity of labor demanded 0:08:32.227,0:08:34.347 is given by Qd. 0:08:34.347,0:08:38.256 That is less than the quantity [br]of labor which would be traded 0:08:38.256,0:08:41.768 given the market wage,[br]this market employment. 0:08:41.768,0:08:46.928 Key point is that [br]there are buyers of labor 0:08:46.928,0:08:51.467 who are willing to buy labor [br]at a price below the minimum wage, 0:08:51.467,0:08:53.810 and there are suppliers of labor, 0:08:53.810,0:08:57.834 workers who are willing [br]to work below the minimum wage. 0:08:57.834,0:09:00.918 These deals would be[br]mutually profitable, 0:09:00.918,0:09:03.100 but they are illegal. 0:09:03.100,0:09:05.840 So, there are buyers of labor 0:09:05.840,0:09:07.878 who are willing to buy below [br]the minimum wage, 0:09:07.878,0:09:09.648 there are sellers willing to sell. 0:09:09.648,0:09:12.040 These deals would be[br]mutually profitable, 0:09:12.040,0:09:13.970 but they are illegal,[br]they are not made. 0:09:13.970,0:09:16.659 Because of that, there are lost[br]gains from trade 0:09:16.659,0:09:18.851 or a deadweight loss. 0:09:18.851,0:09:21.880 Okay. So, we have covered [br]the first two effects of price floors, 0:09:21.880,0:09:25.169 namely surpluses [br]and lost grains from trade. 0:09:25.169,0:09:27.989 In the next lecture, we will use [br]a slightly different example 0:09:27.989,0:09:30.370 to look at wasteful[br]increases in quality 0:09:30.370,0:09:33.560 and a misallocation of resources. 0:09:33.560,0:09:35.140 - [Narrator] If you want to test yourself, 0:09:35.140,0:09:36.786 click "Practice Questions." 0:09:36.786,0:09:40.960 Or, if you're ready to move on, [br]just click "Next Video." 0:09:40.960,0:09:42.924 ♪ [music] ♪