WEBVTT 00:00:00.553 --> 00:00:04.894 OK, so today I want to talk about how we talk about love. 00:00:05.302 --> 00:00:06.411 And specifically, 00:00:06.411 --> 00:00:09.846 I want to talk about what's wrong with how we talk about love. 00:00:10.753 --> 00:00:15.762 Most of us will probably fall in love a few times over the course of our lives, 00:00:15.762 --> 00:00:17.834 and in the English language, 00:00:17.834 --> 00:00:18.970 this metaphor, 00:00:18.970 --> 00:00:20.060 falling, 00:00:20.060 --> 00:00:23.074 is really the main way that we talk about that experience. 00:00:23.642 --> 00:00:24.806 I don't know about you, 00:00:24.806 --> 00:00:26.954 but when I conceptualize this metaphor, 00:00:26.954 --> 00:00:29.832 what I picture is straight out of a cartoon. 00:00:30.196 --> 00:00:31.515 Like there's a man, 00:00:31.515 --> 00:00:33.419 he's walking down the sidewalk, 00:00:33.419 --> 00:00:36.554 without realizing it he crosses over an open manhole, 00:00:36.554 --> 00:00:39.946 and he just plummets into the sewer below. 00:00:40.238 --> 00:00:44.318 And I picture it this way because falling is not jumping. 00:00:44.825 --> 00:00:47.074 Falling is accidental, 00:00:47.074 --> 00:00:48.805 it's uncontrollable. 00:00:48.805 --> 00:00:52.077 It's something that happens to us without our consent. 00:00:52.380 --> 00:00:53.694 And this -- 00:00:53.694 --> 00:00:57.261 this is the main way we talk about starting a new relationship. 00:00:58.337 --> 00:01:02.225 I am a writer and I'm also and English teacher, 00:01:02.225 --> 00:01:04.533 which means I think about words for a living. 00:01:04.533 --> 00:01:08.706 You could say that I get paid to argue that the language we use matters, 00:01:08.706 --> 00:01:12.929 and I would like to argue that many of the metaphors we use 00:01:12.929 --> 00:01:14.519 to talk about love -- 00:01:14.519 --> 00:01:16.310 maybe even most of them -- 00:01:16.310 --> 00:01:17.879 are a problem. 00:01:18.717 --> 00:01:21.350 So, in love we fall. 00:01:21.766 --> 00:01:23.588 We're struck ... 00:01:23.588 --> 00:01:25.641 we are crushed ... 00:01:25.641 --> 00:01:27.353 we swoon ... 00:01:27.353 --> 00:01:29.150 we burn with passion. 00:01:29.849 --> 00:01:31.983 Love makes us crazy, 00:01:31.983 --> 00:01:33.596 and it makes us sick. 00:01:33.868 --> 00:01:35.429 Our hearts ache, 00:01:35.429 --> 00:01:37.435 and then they break. 00:01:38.417 --> 00:01:41.584 So our metaphors equate the experience of loving someone 00:01:41.584 --> 00:01:44.260 to extreme violence or illness. 00:01:44.260 --> 00:01:45.760 (Laughter) 00:01:47.159 --> 00:01:48.164 They do. 00:01:48.164 --> 00:01:50.542 And they position us as the victims 00:01:50.542 --> 00:01:53.797 of unforeseen and totally unavoidable circumstances. 00:01:54.642 --> 00:01:57.544 My favorite one of these is "smitten," 00:01:57.544 --> 00:02:00.366 which is the past participle of the word smite. 00:02:00.366 --> 00:02:03.628 And if you look this word up in the dictionary -- 00:02:03.628 --> 00:02:04.628 (Laughter) 00:02:04.628 --> 00:02:09.045 You will see that it can be defined as both grievous affliction 00:02:09.045 --> 00:02:11.896 and to be very much in love. 00:02:13.181 --> 00:02:17.084 So, I tend to associate the word smite with a very particular context, 00:02:17.084 --> 00:02:18.816 which is the Old Testament. 00:02:19.560 --> 00:02:24.720 In the Book of Exodus alone there are 16 references to smiting, 00:02:24.720 --> 00:02:28.516 which is the word that the bible uses for the vengeance of an angry God. 00:02:29.874 --> 00:02:32.733 Here we are using the same word to talk about love 00:02:32.733 --> 00:02:35.379 that we use to explain a plague of locusts. 00:02:35.702 --> 00:02:36.703 (Laughter) 00:02:36.703 --> 00:02:37.695 Right? 00:02:37.695 --> 00:02:39.501 So, how did this happen? 00:02:39.501 --> 00:02:43.339 How have we come to associate love with great pain and suffering? 00:02:43.611 --> 00:02:47.674 And why do we talk about this ostensibly good experience 00:02:47.674 --> 00:02:49.778 as if we are victims? 00:02:50.556 --> 00:02:52.271 These are difficult questions, 00:02:52.271 --> 00:02:53.671 but I have some theories. 00:02:53.941 --> 00:02:55.199 And to think this through, 00:02:55.199 --> 00:02:58.043 I want to focus on one metaphor in particular, 00:02:58.043 --> 00:03:00.470 which is the idea of love is madness. 00:03:01.199 --> 00:03:04.028 When I first started researching romantic love, 00:03:04.028 --> 00:03:06.867 I found these madness metaphors everywhere. 00:03:06.867 --> 00:03:08.731 The history of Western culture 00:03:08.731 --> 00:03:12.942 is full of language that equates love to mental illness. 00:03:13.440 --> 00:03:15.391 These are just a few examples. 00:03:15.391 --> 00:03:16.863 William Shakespeare: 00:03:16.863 --> 00:03:18.319 "Love is merely a madness," 00:03:18.319 --> 00:03:19.786 from "As You Like It." 00:03:20.164 --> 00:03:21.573 Friedrich Nietsche, 00:03:21.573 --> 00:03:24.370 "There is always some madness in love." 00:03:24.750 --> 00:03:27.639 "Got me looking, got me looking so crazy in love -- " 00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:29.027 (Laughter) 00:03:29.648 --> 00:03:32.269 From the great philosopher, Beyoncé Knowles. 00:03:32.269 --> 00:03:33.622 (Laughter) 00:03:35.163 --> 00:03:38.020 I fell in love for the first time when I was 20, 00:03:38.020 --> 00:03:41.036 and it was a pretty turbulent relationship right from the start. 00:03:41.363 --> 00:03:44.874 And it was long distance for the first couple of years, 00:03:44.874 --> 00:03:49.470 so for me that meant very high highs and very low lows. 00:03:50.041 --> 00:03:52.742 I can remember one moment in particular; 00:03:52.742 --> 00:03:56.110 I was sitting on a bed in a hostel in South America, 00:03:56.110 --> 00:03:59.806 and I was watching the person I love walk out the door. 00:04:00.222 --> 00:04:02.045 And it was late, 00:04:02.045 --> 00:04:03.328 it was nearly midnight, 00:04:03.328 --> 00:04:05.328 we'd gotten into an argument over dinner, 00:04:05.328 --> 00:04:07.300 and when we got back to our room, 00:04:07.300 --> 00:04:10.380 he threw his things in the bag and stormed out. 00:04:11.308 --> 00:04:14.703 While I can no longer remember what that argument was about, 00:04:14.703 --> 00:04:18.758 I very clearly remember how I felt watching him leave. 00:04:19.122 --> 00:04:20.878 So I was 22, 00:04:20.878 --> 00:04:23.750 it was my first time in the developing world, 00:04:23.750 --> 00:04:25.971 and I was totally alone. 00:04:26.587 --> 00:04:30.134 I had another week until my flight home, 00:04:30.134 --> 00:04:32.525 and I knew the name of the town that I was in, 00:04:32.525 --> 00:04:36.131 and the name of the city that I needed to get to to fly out, 00:04:36.131 --> 00:04:40.057 but I had no idea how to get around, 00:04:40.057 --> 00:04:43.327 I had no guidebook and very little money, 00:04:43.327 --> 00:04:45.097 and I spoke no Spanish. 00:04:45.547 --> 00:04:47.893 So, someone more adventurous than me 00:04:47.893 --> 00:04:50.429 might have seen this as a moment of opportunity, 00:04:50.429 --> 00:04:52.259 but I just froze. 00:04:52.581 --> 00:04:54.818 I just sat there. 00:04:54.818 --> 00:04:56.974 And then I burst into tears. 00:04:57.556 --> 00:04:59.950 But despite my panic, 00:04:59.950 --> 00:05:02.543 some small voice in my head thought, 00:05:02.543 --> 00:05:04.956 "Wow, that was dramatic. 00:05:04.956 --> 00:05:07.654 I must really be doing this love thing right." 00:05:07.988 --> 00:05:09.207 (Laughter) 00:05:09.417 --> 00:05:14.084 Because some part of me wanted to feel miserable in love. 00:05:14.337 --> 00:05:16.313 And it sounds so strange to me now, 00:05:16.313 --> 00:05:17.800 but at 22, 00:05:17.800 --> 00:05:21.275 I longed to have dramatic experiences, 00:05:21.275 --> 00:05:26.216 and in that moment I was irrational and furious and devastated, 00:05:26.216 --> 00:05:27.463 and weirdly enough, 00:05:27.463 --> 00:05:30.862 I thought that this somehow legitimized the feelings I had 00:05:30.862 --> 00:05:32.907 for the guy who had just left me. 00:05:34.354 --> 00:05:38.740 I think on some level I wanted to feel a little bit crazy, 00:05:38.740 --> 00:05:42.600 because I thought that that was how loved worked. 00:05:43.332 --> 00:05:45.355 This really should not be surpsising 00:05:45.355 --> 00:05:47.697 considering that according to Wikipedia, 00:05:47.697 --> 00:05:49.953 there are eight films, 00:05:49.953 --> 00:05:51.973 14 songs, 00:05:51.973 --> 00:05:55.399 two albums and one novel with the title "Crazy Love." 00:05:56.020 --> 00:05:57.616 About half-an-hour later, 00:05:57.616 --> 00:05:59.059 he came back to our room. 00:05:59.059 --> 00:06:00.055 We made up, 00:06:00.055 --> 00:06:03.235 we spent another mostly happy week travelling together, 00:06:03.235 --> 00:06:04.690 and then when I got home, 00:06:04.690 --> 00:06:10.133 I thought, "That was so terrible and so great, 00:06:10.133 --> 00:06:12.546 this must be a real romance." 00:06:13.261 --> 00:06:15.984 I expected my first love to feel like madness, 00:06:15.984 --> 00:06:19.697 and of course it met that expectation very well. 00:06:20.116 --> 00:06:21.830 But loving someone like that -- 00:06:21.830 --> 00:06:25.978 as if my entire well-being depended on him loving me back -- 00:06:25.978 --> 00:06:28.177 was not very good for me, 00:06:28.177 --> 00:06:29.234 or for him. 00:06:29.985 --> 00:06:33.686 But I suspect this experience of love is not that unusual. 00:06:34.137 --> 00:06:38.477 Most of us do feel a bit mad in the early stages of romantic love. 00:06:38.863 --> 00:06:43.367 In fact there is research to confirm that this is somewhat normal, 00:06:43.367 --> 00:06:45.276 because neurochemically speaking, 00:06:45.276 --> 00:06:50.008 romantic love and mental illness are not that easily distinguished. 00:06:51.172 --> 00:06:52.292 This is true. 00:06:52.292 --> 00:06:56.874 So, this study from 1999 used blood tests 00:06:56.874 --> 00:07:00.071 to confirm that the serotonin levels of the newly in love 00:07:00.071 --> 00:07:02.743 very closely resemembeled the serotonin levels 00:07:02.743 --> 00:07:06.206 of people who had been diagnosed with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. 00:07:06.206 --> 00:07:07.207 (Laughter) 00:07:07.207 --> 00:07:08.205 Yes, 00:07:08.205 --> 00:07:10.116 and low levels of serotonin 00:07:10.116 --> 00:07:13.650 are also associated with Seasonal affective disorder 00:07:13.650 --> 00:07:15.107 and Depression. 00:07:15.687 --> 00:07:18.137 So, there is some evidence 00:07:18.137 --> 00:07:22.430 that love is associated with changes to our moods and our behaviors, 00:07:22.430 --> 00:07:25.388 and there are other studies 00:07:25.388 --> 00:07:30.150 to confirm that most relationships begin this way. 00:07:30.806 --> 00:07:34.992 Researchers believe that the low levels of serotonin 00:07:34.992 --> 00:07:39.225 is correlated with obsessive thinking about the object of love, 00:07:39.225 --> 00:07:43.155 which is like this feeling that someone has set up camp in your brain. 00:07:43.155 --> 00:07:46.109 And most of us feel this way when we first fall in love, 00:07:46.109 --> 00:07:49.370 but the good news is that it doesn't always last that long -- 00:07:49.370 --> 00:07:52.480 usually from a few months to a couple of years. 00:07:53.590 --> 00:07:56.332 When I got back from my trip to South America, 00:07:56.332 --> 00:07:59.932 I spent a lot of time alone in my room, 00:07:59.932 --> 00:08:01.318 checking my email, 00:08:01.318 --> 00:08:03.989 desperate to hear from the guy I loved. 00:08:04.744 --> 00:08:10.052 I decided that if my friends could not understand my grievous affliction, 00:08:10.052 --> 00:08:12.074 then I did not need their friendship. 00:08:12.074 --> 00:08:14.459 So, I stopped hanging out with most of them. 00:08:14.459 --> 00:08:19.341 And it was probably the most unhappy year of my life, 00:08:19.341 --> 00:08:23.905 but I think I felt like it was my job to be miserable, 00:08:23.905 --> 00:08:25.720 because if I could be miserable, 00:08:25.720 --> 00:08:28.595 then I would prove how much I loved him, 00:08:28.595 --> 00:08:30.503 and if I could prove it, 00:08:30.503 --> 00:08:33.868 then we would have to end up together eventually. 00:08:34.265 --> 00:08:36.376 This is the real madness, 00:08:36.376 --> 00:08:38.794 because there is no cosmic rule 00:08:38.794 --> 00:08:42.581 that says that great suffering equals great reward, 00:08:42.581 --> 00:08:46.485 but we talk about love as if this is true. 00:08:47.742 --> 00:08:51.481 Our experiences of love are both biological and cultural. 00:08:51.774 --> 00:08:54.477 Our biology tells us that love is good 00:08:54.477 --> 00:08:57.654 by activating these reward circuits in our brain, 00:08:57.654 --> 00:09:02.297 and it tells us that love is painful when after a fight or a breakup 00:09:02.297 --> 00:09:04.876 that neurochemical reward is withdrawn. 00:09:05.332 --> 00:09:06.329 And in fact -- 00:09:06.329 --> 00:09:07.848 and maybe you've heard this -- 00:09:07.848 --> 00:09:09.715 neurochemically speaking, 00:09:09.715 --> 00:09:13.866 going through a breakup is a lot like going through cocaine withdrawal, 00:09:13.866 --> 00:09:15.525 which I find reassuring -- 00:09:15.525 --> 00:09:16.534 (Laughter) 00:09:17.241 --> 00:09:20.096 And then our culture uses language 00:09:20.096 --> 00:09:22.900 to shape and reinforce these ideas about love. 00:09:22.900 --> 00:09:23.895 In this case, 00:09:23.895 --> 00:09:27.509 we're talking about metaphors about pain, and addiction, and madness. 00:09:27.826 --> 00:09:30.641 It's kind of an interesting feedback loop. 00:09:30.641 --> 00:09:34.181 Love is powerful and at times painful, 00:09:34.181 --> 00:09:37.325 and we express this in our words and stories, 00:09:37.325 --> 00:09:43.433 but then our words and stories prime us to expect love to be powerful and painful. 00:09:44.075 --> 00:09:45.577 What's interesting to me 00:09:45.577 --> 00:09:50.105 is that all of this happens in a culture that values lifelong monogamy. 00:09:50.810 --> 00:09:53.013 It seems like we want it both ways: 00:09:53.013 --> 00:09:55.838 we want love to feel like madness, 00:09:55.838 --> 00:09:58.984 and we want it to last an entire lifetime. 00:09:59.617 --> 00:10:01.179 That sounds terrible. 00:10:01.538 --> 00:10:03.067 (Laughter) 00:10:04.051 --> 00:10:05.670 To reconcile this, 00:10:05.670 --> 00:10:10.695 we need to either change our culture or change our expectations. 00:10:11.543 --> 00:10:15.438 So, imagine if we were all less passive in love. 00:10:15.786 --> 00:10:20.085 If we were more assertive, more open-mined, more generous, 00:10:20.085 --> 00:10:23.352 and instead of falling in love, 00:10:23.352 --> 00:10:25.503 we stepped into love. 00:10:26.326 --> 00:10:28.393 I know that this is asking a lot, 00:10:28.393 --> 00:10:32.158 but I'm not actually the first person to suggest this. 00:10:33.179 --> 00:10:35.764 In their book "Metaphors We Live By," 00:10:35.764 --> 00:10:40.683 linguists Mark Johnson and George Lakoff suggest a really interesting solution 00:10:40.683 --> 00:10:42.587 to this dilemna, 00:10:42.587 --> 00:10:45.374 which is to change our metaphors. 00:10:45.930 --> 00:10:51.238 They argue that metaphors really do shape the way we experience the world, 00:10:51.238 --> 00:10:54.815 and that they can even act as a guide for future actions, 00:10:54.815 --> 00:10:56.973 like self-fulfilling prophecies. 00:10:57.609 --> 00:11:02.113 Johnson and Lakoff suggest a new metaphor for love: 00:11:02.113 --> 00:11:04.553 love is a collaborative work of art. 00:11:05.000 --> 00:11:08.050 I really like this way of thinking about love. 00:11:09.171 --> 00:11:12.797 Linguists talk about metaphors as having entailments, 00:11:12.797 --> 00:11:16.616 which is essentially a way of considering all the implications of, 00:11:16.616 --> 00:11:19.546 or ideas contained within a given metaphor. 00:11:19.546 --> 00:11:22.347 And Johnson and Lakoff talk about everything 00:11:22.347 --> 00:11:25.048 that collaborating on a work of art entails: 00:11:25.048 --> 00:11:29.203 effort, compromise, patience, shared goals. 00:11:29.735 --> 00:11:33.698 These ideas align nicely with our cultural investment 00:11:33.698 --> 00:11:35.876 in long-term romantic commitment, 00:11:35.876 --> 00:11:40.211 but they also work well for other kinds of relationships -- 00:11:40.211 --> 00:11:45.774 short-term, casual, polyamorous, non-monogamous, asexual -- 00:11:45.774 --> 00:11:49.724 because this metaphor brings much more complex ideas 00:11:49.724 --> 00:11:51.895 to the experience of loving someone. 00:11:52.670 --> 00:11:57.295 So if love is a collaborative work of art, 00:11:57.295 --> 00:12:01.012 then love is an aesthetic experience. 00:12:01.676 --> 00:12:04.264 Love is unpredictable, 00:12:04.264 --> 00:12:07.089 love is creative, 00:12:07.089 --> 00:12:11.245 love requires communication and discipline, 00:12:11.245 --> 00:12:14.979 it is frustrating and emotionally demanding, 00:12:14.979 --> 00:12:18.418 and love involves both joy and pain. 00:12:18.988 --> 00:12:22.823 Ultimately, each experience of love is different. 00:12:23.854 --> 00:12:25.635 When I was younger, 00:12:25.635 --> 00:12:27.087 it never occurred to me 00:12:27.087 --> 00:12:30.385 that I was allowed to demand more from love, 00:12:30.385 --> 00:12:34.078 that I didn't have to just accept whatever love offered. 00:12:34.998 --> 00:12:38.725 When 14-year-old Juliet first meets -- 00:12:38.725 --> 00:12:42.395 when 14-year-old Juliet cannot be with Romeo, 00:12:42.395 --> 00:12:44.969 whom she has met four days ago, 00:12:44.969 --> 00:12:49.078 she does not feel disappointed or angsty -- 00:12:49.078 --> 00:12:50.527 where is she? 00:12:50.527 --> 00:12:52.334 She wants to die. 00:12:52.334 --> 00:12:53.333 Right? 00:12:53.333 --> 00:12:54.618 And just as a refesher, 00:12:54.618 --> 00:12:55.904 at this point in the play 00:12:55.904 --> 00:12:57.317 act three of five, 00:12:57.317 --> 00:12:59.745 Romeo is not dead. 00:12:59.745 --> 00:13:01.194 He's alive, 00:13:01.194 --> 00:13:02.753 he's healthy, 00:13:02.753 --> 00:13:05.193 he's just been banished from the city. 00:13:06.028 --> 00:13:12.115 I understand that sixteenth-century Verona is unlike contemporary North America, 00:13:12.115 --> 00:13:15.010 and yet when I first read this play -- 00:13:15.010 --> 00:13:17.514 also at age 14 -- 00:13:17.514 --> 00:13:20.700 Juliet's suffering made sense to me. 00:13:21.542 --> 00:13:26.907 Reframing love as something I get to create with someone I admire, 00:13:26.907 --> 00:13:31.896 rather than something that just happens to me without my conrol or consent, 00:13:31.896 --> 00:13:33.501 is empowering. 00:13:33.986 --> 00:13:35.627 It's still hard. 00:13:35.627 --> 00:13:41.073 Love still feels totally maddening and crushing some days, 00:13:41.073 --> 00:13:43.211 and when I feel really frustrated, 00:13:43.211 --> 00:13:45.146 I have to remind myself 00:13:45.146 --> 00:13:48.513 my job in this relationship is to talk to my partner 00:13:48.513 --> 00:13:50.694 about what I want to make together. 00:13:52.082 --> 00:13:55.098 This isn't easy either, 00:13:55.098 --> 00:13:58.728 but it's just so much better than the alternative, 00:13:58.728 --> 00:14:01.883 which is that thing that feels like madness. 00:14:02.958 --> 00:14:08.315 This version of love is not about winning of losing someone's affection. 00:14:08.992 --> 00:14:12.613 Instead, it requires that you trust your partner, 00:14:12.613 --> 00:14:15.826 and talk about things when trusting feels difficult, 00:14:15.826 --> 00:14:18.295 which sound so simple, 00:14:18.295 --> 00:14:22.791 but is actually a kind of revolutionary, radical act. 00:14:23.253 --> 00:14:27.397 This is because you get to stop thinking about yourself, 00:14:27.397 --> 00:14:30.656 and what you're gaining or losing in your relationship, 00:14:30.656 --> 00:14:34.417 and you get to start thinking about what you have to offer. 00:14:35.010 --> 00:14:38.438 This version of love allows us to say things like, 00:14:38.438 --> 00:14:41.768 "Hey, we're not very good collaborators, 00:14:41.768 --> 00:14:43.892 maybe this isn't for us," 00:14:43.892 --> 00:14:47.866 or, "That relationship was shorter than I had planned, 00:14:47.866 --> 00:14:50.362 but it was still kind of beautiful." 00:14:51.075 --> 00:14:53.888 The beautiful thing about the collaborative work of art 00:14:53.888 --> 00:14:56.911 is that it will not paint or draw or sculpt itself. 00:14:57.274 --> 00:15:01.033 This version of love allows us to decide what it looks like. 00:15:01.033 --> 00:15:02.079 Thank you. 00:15:02.079 --> 00:15:03.057 (Applause)