0:00:02.250,0:00:04.833
>> Vance Stevens: We're live!
0:00:04.833,0:00:08.256
Hello, everybody. Somehow my video disappeared.
0:00:08.256,0:00:12.643
It's there, but that's my - it's just an avatar format.
0:00:12.643,0:00:13.201
[missed words]
0:00:13.201,0:00:17.335
OK, well anyway, this is Vance Stevens in Abu Dhab... sorry, in L.A.
0:00:17.335,0:00:20.140
I'm living in L.A. now, if you want to know where I'm living.
0:00:20.140,0:00:21.533
Today is the 8th of December.
0:00:21.533,0:00:25.155
They move me around so much, you know.
0:00:25.155,0:00:30.064
And, anyway, it's the 8th of December 2013.
0:00:30.064,0:00:33.420
We're talking with a good friend of mine, Phil Hubbard,
0:00:33.420,0:00:38.039
from Stanford University in Palo Alto, California.
0:00:38.039,0:00:44.940
And he's been doing some really neat stuff in Cal.
0:00:44.940,0:00:48.606
I've known him for a long time in the Cal intersection Tea [missed words]
0:00:48.606,0:00:50.243
>> Phil Hubbard: Since we were kids.
0:00:50.243,0:00:53.546
>> Stevens: We were, 20 years ago[br][Hubbard laughs]
0:00:53.546,0:00:57.998
>> Hubbard: reaching 30 [check][br][background voice]
0:00:57.998,0:01:03.036
>> Stevens: Someone has a -- someone needs to have a headset on.
0:01:03.036,0:01:04.814
[missed words] is muted.
0:01:04.814,0:01:10.499
Errh not sure: it could be someone listening to the stream.
0:01:10.499,0:01:11.918
Yeah, if you're listening to the stream -- OK.
0:01:11.918,0:01:13.499
Their call has gone away [check]
0:01:13.499,0:01:15.047
Someone has corrected it, that's good.
0:01:15.047,0:01:23.371
All right, well, OK. Someone has announced in the stream chat that they're listening to it there.
0:01:23.371,0:01:25.999
So that's good, everything seems to be working.
0:01:25.999,0:01:28.499
We're doing a Hangout on Air, as we often do.
0:01:28.499,0:01:32.271
We're streaming it on webheadsinaction.org/live
0:01:32.271,0:01:36.495
At the moment we have six people in the hangout,
0:01:36.495,0:01:37.752
there's room for four more.
0:01:37.752,0:01:41.914
So if anyone is listening on the stream and would like to join us, they can.
0:01:41.914,0:01:47.998
And right now we've got Claire Siskin and Jim Buckingham, Rita Zeinstejer and
0:01:47.998,0:01:59.105
let's see, and also Rob, Rob is there, and me, Vance Stevens. Rob Permanus, is that correct?
0:01:59.105,0:02:05.665
Correct me if I'm wrong. Permanus, Permanus - how do you pronounce your name?
0:02:05.665,0:02:09.245
>> Hubbard: You have to unmute him chuckles
0:02:09.245,0:02:17.438
>> Stevens: it's Perhamus -- Perhamus, OK, Good, I'll never forget that again, all right.
0:02:17.438,0:02:23.162
Thank you very much, Rob. Rob is an occasional participant in our hangouts.
0:02:23.162,0:02:28.379
Well Phil, take it away and anybody who wants to --
0:02:28.379,0:02:31.826
by the way, you're all muted by default when you come into the hangout.
0:02:31.826,0:02:33.777
You can unmute yourself.
0:02:33.777,0:02:39.071
If you're going to unmute yourself and talk, please mute yourself again,
0:02:39.071,0:02:43.199
so we don't get keyboard noises and things like that.
0:02:43.199,0:02:48.005
And there's Elizabeth Anne, also shown up from Grenoble in France.
0:02:48.005,0:02:53.204
And Halima [check] in Tashkent has also joined us, I see.
0:02:53.204,0:02:55.367
>> Hubbard [check] I think we're great, well, hello, everybody.
0:02:55.367,0:02:59.136
It's Good Morning for me, a little early in the morning,
0:02:59.136,0:03:04.035
but the sun is beginning to show through the back window here.
0:03:04.035,0:03:08.669
Thank you all for being here from all over the world.
0:03:08.669,0:03:18.079
What I wanted to do today is talk about largely an idea and a project that I've been working on
0:03:18.079,0:03:21.585
for the last couple of years, very sporadically.
0:03:21.585,0:03:25.410
Unfortunately I get interrupted easily, as I'm sure all of you do,
0:03:25.410,0:03:35.897
so what started out as a -- what I hoped was going to be a much more robust collection of materials
0:03:35.897,0:03:39.579
has turned out to be a little more anemic
0:03:39.579,0:03:44.415
but I still think that I have enough here that I can demonstrate the idea
0:03:44.415,0:03:48.710
and especially share my thoughts about how to go
0:03:48.710,0:03:55.746
about dealing with this relatively new notion of curation,
0:03:55.746,0:04:01.083
although in some ways, maybe it's just a label for an old notion that we've had for quite some time.
0:04:01.083,0:04:06.463
So, let me give you a little bit of the background,
0:04:06.463,0:04:10.592
like several of the things I've worked on in the last few years,
0:04:10.592,0:04:12.663
like learner training.
0:04:12.663,0:04:17.979
This is something that has emerged out of my classroom experience
0:04:17.979,0:04:21.939
with an advanced listening and vocabulary class,
0:04:21.939,0:04:27.321
and I see Vance is showing some of the slides now.
0:04:27.321,0:04:36.856
The class is for graduate students at Stanford
0:04:36.856,0:04:42.469
and it's a really nice sandbox for playing with ideas,
0:04:42.469,0:04:48.099
because these are -- well, they're all in graduate school already,
0:04:48.099,0:04:57.270
they're, for the most part, in the high 90's onwards to the 100s in the TOEFL iBT
0:04:57.270,0:04:59.100
so they really are advanced in that sense.
0:04:59.100,0:05:06.054
And many of them are taking the course because we require them to do it.
0:05:06.054,0:05:08.050
So they're kind of a captive audience
0:05:08.050,0:05:12.065
but it's also a small course: we have a maximum 14 students in it
0:05:12.065,0:05:22.370
and it allows me to not only play around with ideas, but get a chance to talk to the students afterward,
0:05:22.370,0:05:29.890
not usually with formal research, but just informally as part of our normal tutorial sessions
0:05:29.890,0:05:35.036
and find out what they thought about them and what I can do to make them work a little better. [5:35]
0:05:37.512,0:05:42.645
So, the problem that I noticed - an important part of this class
0:05:42.645,0:05:45.288
is that students do independent projects
0:05:45.795,0:05:52.906
and those independent projects are supposed to be for a minimum of three hours a week.
0:05:54.443,0:05:59.941
Sounds like I am getting some echo in the background, but I will keep pushing through here..
0:06:00.510,0:06:03.404
Uhh.. those projects are for three hours a week
0:06:03.404,0:06:09.411
and they are responsible for doing the selection of the material
0:06:09.411,0:06:14.913
with my help and with my guidance both before and after.
0:06:16.528,0:06:23.328
And over the years, I have discovered that they are actually not really good at that.
0:06:23.328,0:06:27.032
What they are good at is finding material that is interesting to them.
0:06:27.385,0:06:31.478
But, they are not necessarily good at finding material that helps them.
0:06:32.585,0:06:38.933
They discover that on their own a little bit down the road
0:06:38.933,0:06:41.643
and often it doesn't become clear to both of us
0:06:41.643,0:06:46.655
because I have a very slow learning curve and quickly forget things.
0:06:46.655,0:06:50.816
So, I get to the end of the class and then I go
0:06:50.816,0:06:53.945
"Oh, I should have provided them with a little more guidance.".
0:06:53.945,0:06:56.410
So, about 2 years ago, I started doing this
0:06:56.410,0:06:59.926
and it came as a juxtaposition of a couple of things.
0:06:59.926,0:07:05.399
First of all, just my own general interest in the development of autonomy had been growing
0:07:06.275,0:07:11.533
and as I have gone out and collected materials that I would just use in class,
0:07:12.086,0:07:16.977
it was pretty clear to me that there is a huge amount of really interesting materials out there.
0:07:17.899,0:07:20.553
And people have been collecting these for a while
0:07:20.585,0:07:24.330
and teachers have been building lessons out of them
0:07:24.899,0:07:27.055
-- sometimes pretty sophisiticated lessons --
0:07:27.516,0:07:31.749
but I needed something that students could work with on their own.
0:07:32.241,0:07:37.784
And so, I wanted to find a way to help them without just my advice
0:07:37.784,0:07:41.513
as to how to look for materials, to actually start collecting materials
0:07:41.513,0:07:44.729
in ways that would still give them quite a bit of freedom of choice
0:07:44.729,0:07:52.101
but would also make it better as a language learning experience.
0:07:53.008,0:07:58.163
As part of this course, they are also required to build vocabulary.
0:07:58.179,0:08:02.794
They have to identify at least 35 new words and phrases every week,
0:08:02.794,0:08:04.447
from the material they are using.
0:08:04.447,0:08:07.488
So, this is a bit of the backdrop.
0:08:08.714,0:08:14.115
In 2011, I came across a book, kind of independently.
0:08:14.115,0:08:17.200
It was just recommended to me, for some reason, by Amazon:
0:08:17.200,0:08:18.730
you know how that works.
0:08:19.360,0:08:22.147
And the book was called 'Curation Nation'
0:08:22.147,0:08:27.468
and there is, I think, a slide there perhaps somewhere, it's like the sixth slide.
0:08:29.268,0:08:32.835
There's a -- if you want to pop that up.
0:08:32.835,0:08:34.596
If not, it's just a picture of the book.
0:08:34.596,0:08:36.537
But it's a book it's a book by Steven Rosembaum.
0:08:36.537,0:08:38.163
>>Stevens: I will. Could I --
0:08:38.163,0:08:42.805
I am supposed to be able to mute mikes, as the owner of the chat,
0:08:42.805,0:08:45.385
but I am unable to mute Halima's for some reason
0:08:45.385,0:08:47.854
and that is where the echo is coming from.
0:08:47.854,0:08:53.118
So, Halima, could I ask if you could click on the "mute" on your mike when not speaking?
0:08:53.118,0:08:56.133
And if you want to unmute, you can always speak to us.
0:08:56.133,0:08:58.294
That is where our echo is coming from.
0:08:58.709,0:09:03.525
And okay, I will do what Phil has asked me to do and pull up 'Curation Nation'.
0:09:04.801,0:09:06.185
>> Hubbard: laughs Alright, thanks.
0:09:06.741,0:09:10.701
Anyway, this is not a book about education by any stretch,
0:09:10.701,0:09:17.721
but it did come up with this notion that we have so much material on-line now
0:09:17.721,0:09:21.692
and we are having so much difficulty in sorting out
0:09:21.692,0:09:26.891
what the good stuff is from the chaff, for any reason, for news and so on.
0:09:26.891,0:09:29.052
Now we have all these feeds:
0:09:29.990,0:09:37.173
You know, if you -- those of you on Twitter or any of the other networks that have lots of feeds,
0:09:37.173,0:09:41.142
you get the -- even Google+ -- you get feeds from your friends,
0:09:41.142,0:09:47.974
you get feeds from people that whoever runs the site thinks might be interesting to you
0:09:47.974,0:09:51.139
and you are just overwhelmed with an enormous amount of material.
0:09:51.139,0:09:53.054
Some of it's pretty cool.
0:09:53.715,0:09:59.156
Much of it is stuff you wouldn't find on your own and that's great.
0:09:59.586,0:10:03.788
But when you've got the specific target of trying to improve your language
0:10:03.788,0:10:09.074
-- and of course, the group that I work with doesn't actually do a whole lot with social media
0:10:09.074,0:10:13.669
because they don't have time as full-time graduate students --
0:10:13.669,0:10:17.406
I am lucky if I can squeeze a few hours out of them to do the work
0:10:17.406,0:10:20.241
that they need for the course that they are taking for credit from me.
0:10:20.241,0:10:28.026
So, this notion of curation is based roughly
0:10:28.026,0:10:35.591
on the idea of what people do in museums and in art galleries.
0:10:36.683,0:10:42.346
You get an expert, somebody who actually knows a fair amount about a particular area
0:10:42.346,0:10:50.067
and you have that expert create collections, add value to them in one way or another,
0:10:50.759,0:10:56.363
and then you release those collections for the consumer - whoever it might be --
0:10:56.363,0:10:59.565
to have a look at and to interact with.
0:11:00.964,0:11:06.434
So, the key difference between this and what a lot of people are doing with this material
0:11:06.434,0:11:11.308
-- you may have heard concepts like "digital curation",
0:11:11.308,0:11:14.558
which can just mean curating digital materials
0:11:14.558,0:11:18.503
but often means that computers are doing the job for you.
0:11:19.994,0:11:22.444
Google news is a really good example of that:
0:11:22.444,0:11:28.187
I find a lot of interesting stuff in there, I can even ask it to find particular categories,
0:11:28.863,0:11:32.475
but it's still being selected without any human intervention.
0:11:33.198,0:11:35.557
You compare that with something like Huffington Post,
0:11:35.557,0:11:40.208
which is material that's been brought in by people who are
0:11:40.700,0:11:45.423
-- in some cases, they're producing it, but in other cases they are aggregating it
0:11:45.423,0:11:48.129
and trying to make sense out of it for the rest of us.
0:11:49.313,0:11:57.321
So, a key point here is that curation isn't the same as aggregation, or listing, or tagging.
0:11:57.321,0:12:01.378
It's okay to use that term for that but that's not the way I am using it.
0:12:02.378,0:12:09.164
There is a really nice quote in my slide there that -- I think it's maybe --
0:12:09.164,0:12:17.368
two more slides down, Vance. One more. There you go. Past curation.. yeah, that one.
0:12:17.368,0:12:23.741
So this is - it's maybe a little mean, but I think it's right on point
0:12:23.741,0:12:28.623
that when you just get collections of things, you've just got collections of things
0:12:28.623,0:12:34.513
and its not necessarily anything other than "these are things that I liked"
0:12:34.513,0:12:36.666
or "these are things that I think you will like".
0:12:37.342,0:12:42.645
So, I prefer the next slide: you want to go to it, Vance?
0:12:44.566,0:12:46.877
This is more the way I see curation,
0:12:46.908,0:12:50.737
where you collect material, you organize it,
0:12:50.737,0:12:53.748
there is even the potentially a path, well, there is certainly a path
0:12:53.748,0:12:56.101
through the individual material groups,
0:12:56.101,0:12:57.985
and then mayble even a path through the groups,
0:12:57.985,0:13:00.631
although at the moment I haven't done that last point.
0:13:01.061,0:13:05.415
So, this is, you know, kind of captures the idea that I want to talk about today.
0:13:07.291,0:13:13.432
Curation, importantly, is not the same as creation or recreation
0:13:13.432,0:13:18.596
or adaptation or sampling, or synthesizing.
0:13:19.257,0:13:24.761
It's taking the material and adding something to it, maybe just a commentary,
0:13:24.761,0:13:31.052
maybe just collecting it into some logical framework or logical sequence.
0:13:32.175,0:13:40.250
So, when I took that idea, which I was getting through the Curation Nation book,
0:13:40.250,0:13:44.483
and thought about it with respect to the material that I was using,
0:13:45.159,0:13:49.541
I decided to experiment with that and come up
0:13:49.541,0:13:57.217
with some collections of materials from -- as you probably know from the title here and also the PDF,
0:13:57.217,0:13:59.723
if you've had a look at it -- comes from TED Talks.
0:14:00.476,0:14:04.232
And in a moment I will talk about why I think TED talks is so good for that
0:14:04.232,0:14:07.827
but at the base level, these were very popular with my students.
0:14:08.242,0:14:10.465
What the students were doing more--
0:14:10.465,0:14:14.168
they were having trouble coming up with good ones.
0:14:14.168,0:14:16.931
They would always pick what was interesting
0:14:16.931,0:14:19.268
and then often come back to me and say
0:14:19.268,0:14:24.707
"Well, this was interesting, but I had trouble understanding it because my --
0:14:24.707,0:14:29.656
the accent of the speaker was not easy for me to understand."
0:14:29.656,0:14:33.436
or "I had trouble understanding it because -- it was interesting
0:14:33.436,0:14:36.837
because I didn't know anything about it and I didn't have the background
0:14:36.837,0:14:39.431
so there was a whole bunch of new vocabulary."
0:14:40.176,0:14:42.461
So t could be interesting for all sorts of reasons,
0:14:43.261,0:14:43.261
but it wasn't interesting for the right reasons,
0:14:44.283,9:59:59.000
for what we think is good for independent language learning.
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Again, this doesn't mean that all of those collections, with the help of a teacher,
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
couldn't have been very valuable in a classroom
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and especially getting to the content for connecting discussions.
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
That's not the same thing as letting students work on their own.
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
So, I do want to emphasis that.
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
My perspective here, at least initially,
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
is getting students to be able to do these things outside of class than.. you know,
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
and then just come back and report on them
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
rather than having something we do in class
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or that everybody does the same homework assignment on.
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Alright, so that's the set-up for what I believe curation should be,
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or at least can be, within this framework.
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
So, what I think I will do is pause here and see if anybody has any questions.
9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
we're live