WEBVTT 00:00:15.716 --> 00:00:21.003 Good afternoon! Are we having a transformative afternoon so far? 00:00:21.264 --> 00:00:26.480 Well, I am here today to talk about a lie. 00:00:26.665 --> 00:00:29.576 In specific, a sexy lie. I know there are lots of lies, 00:00:29.600 --> 00:00:32.270 some of them are sexy, some of them are very unsexy. 00:00:32.293 --> 00:00:36.683 But I'd like to talk specifically about the lie or the idea that 00:00:36.707 --> 00:00:39.438 being a sex object is empowering. 00:00:39.462 --> 00:00:42.623 And I'd like to convince you that it is not empowering. 00:00:42.647 --> 00:00:46.326 First by talking about what sexual objectification is 00:00:46.350 --> 00:00:51.519 and then moving on to theoretical and data driven analysis of why it's damaging, 00:00:51.543 --> 00:00:54.852 and, lastly, provide you a plan of action 00:00:54.876 --> 00:00:58.149 so you can both navigate objectification culture 00:00:58.173 --> 00:01:00.374 and change objectification culture. 00:01:00.398 --> 00:01:04.578 So let's jump right in- what is sexual objectification? 00:01:04.602 --> 00:01:08.988 It's the process of representing or treating a person like a sex object 00:01:09.012 --> 00:01:12.268 one that serves another's sexual pleasure. 00:01:12.292 --> 00:01:14.936 What's so interesting about sexual objectification 00:01:14.960 --> 00:01:17.063 is that we used to have a vocabulary for it. 00:01:17.087 --> 00:01:20.794 In the 60s and 70s, we were concerned about sexual objectification 00:01:20.818 --> 00:01:23.018 and its harm on girls and women. 00:01:23.042 --> 00:01:26.734 In the 80s, 90s and today, we've actually been relatively quiet 00:01:26.758 --> 00:01:28.735 when it comes to public discourse. 00:01:28.759 --> 00:01:33.473 And so even though our sexual objectification culture is more amplified 00:01:33.497 --> 00:01:36.516 we see more images, and 96% of them are female, 00:01:36.540 --> 00:01:39.559 of sexually objectified bodies, 00:01:39.583 --> 00:01:42.602 we don't have a vocabulary to talk about it. 00:01:42.626 --> 00:01:47.602 And young people have even mostly lost the ability to identify it. 00:01:47.626 --> 00:01:50.657 As a friend of mine said, it's like being raised in a red room, 00:01:50.681 --> 00:01:54.519 pulled out of that red room and asked to described the color red. 00:01:54.543 --> 00:01:58.352 So I built on the work of others, and I put together a sex object test, 00:01:58.376 --> 00:02:02.069 and if the answer is "yes" to any of these 7 questions 00:02:02.093 --> 00:02:05.142 then you are looking at a sexual objectifying image. 00:02:05.166 --> 00:02:09.809 First, does the image show only parts of a sexualized person's body? 00:02:09.833 --> 00:02:12.579 In other words, does a part stand in for the whole? 00:02:12.603 --> 00:02:16.052 This woman's derrière, for example, in this advertisement. 00:02:16.076 --> 00:02:20.350 Does the image show a sexualized person as a stand in for an object? 00:02:20.374 --> 00:02:24.159 In this image a woman becomes a table. 00:02:24.183 --> 00:02:27.495 Does the image show the sexualized person as interchangeable? 00:02:27.519 --> 00:02:31.353 That is, as one of many items that can just be swapped out. 00:02:31.377 --> 00:02:34.280 Does the image affirm the idea of violating 00:02:34.304 --> 00:02:37.003 the bodily integrity of a sexualized person 00:02:37.027 --> 00:02:38.932 and that person can't consent? 00:02:38.956 --> 00:02:41.264 In other words, is that person being acted upon 00:02:41.288 --> 00:02:43.633 as though she is a sexual object? 00:02:43.657 --> 00:02:47.549 Does the image suggest that the sexual availability of the person 00:02:47.573 --> 00:02:50.269 is the defining characteristic of that person? 00:02:50.293 --> 00:02:52.548 The text for this ad reads: 00:02:52.572 --> 00:02:55.890 "You know you're not her first, but do you really care?" 00:02:55.914 --> 00:03:02.852 And it's being used to sell pre-owned vehicles. 00:03:02.876 --> 00:03:05.901 Does the image show a sexualized person as a commodity? 00:03:05.925 --> 00:03:07.970 Something that can be bought and sold? 00:03:07.994 --> 00:03:11.352 In this advertisement, you see women in a vending machine 00:03:11.376 --> 00:03:15.841 and a man is choosing a woman and this is to sell men's shoes. 00:03:15.865 --> 00:03:19.979 And, lastly, does the image treat the sexualized person's body as a canvas? 00:03:20.003 --> 00:03:23.852 And I'm not talking about inking or tattooing that a person decides 00:03:23.876 --> 00:03:28.855 but rather marketers using the body as a specific type of canvas. 00:03:28.879 --> 00:03:32.267 New objectification culture has emerged in the past ten years 00:03:32.291 --> 00:03:34.351 and it's marked by two things. 00:03:34.375 --> 00:03:39.234 One is an increase in the number of sexually objectifying ads and television, 00:03:39.258 --> 00:03:43.302 movies, video games, music videos, magazines and other mediums. 00:03:43.326 --> 00:03:45.935 And the second advertising component, 00:03:45.959 --> 00:03:50.599 is that the images have become more extreme, more hypersexualized. 00:03:50.623 --> 00:03:53.288 So, why are we experiencing this now? 00:03:53.312 --> 00:03:55.683 It can really be boiled down to technology. 00:03:55.707 --> 00:03:59.435 New technology has increased the sheer number of images 00:03:59.459 --> 00:04:01.435 that you are exposed to every day. 00:04:01.459 --> 00:04:04.160 So in the 70s we saw about 500 ads a day. 00:04:04.184 --> 00:04:07.826 Now we see about 5,000 ads a day 00:04:07.850 --> 00:04:13.236 and children ages 8 to 18 spend an average of 8 hours a day 00:04:13.260 --> 00:04:16.851 hooked up to devices where advertisers can reach them. 00:04:16.875 --> 00:04:20.634 So what do advertisers do? They cut through the clutter 00:04:20.658 --> 00:04:25.684 with increased emphasis on violence, hyperviolence and hypersexualization. 00:04:25.708 --> 00:04:28.687 So how is this not empowering? 00:04:28.711 --> 00:04:31.518 I want to make an appeal first to logic. 00:04:31.542 --> 00:04:36.019 When we're talking about sex objects, we're talking about dichotomies. 00:04:36.043 --> 00:04:38.901 In Western thinking, we think of black and white, yes and no. 00:04:38.925 --> 00:04:41.019 Two opposing categories. 00:04:41.043 --> 00:04:43.805 When we're thinking about sex objects, we're thinking about 00:04:43.819 --> 00:04:46.500 the object-subject dichotomy. 00:04:46.524 --> 00:04:50.300 Subjects act, objects are acted upon. 00:04:50.324 --> 00:04:53.306 So even if you become the perfect object, 00:04:53.330 --> 00:04:55.374 the perfect sex object, 00:04:55.398 --> 00:05:00.979 you are perfectly subordinate because that position will always be acted on. 00:05:01.003 --> 00:05:05.101 So there's not power in being a sex object when you think about it logically. 00:05:05.125 --> 00:05:09.557 But beyond that this idea that sex sells- I'd like to challenge that directly 00:05:09.581 --> 00:05:14.294 because the fact is, if sex sold, most women are heterosexual 00:05:14.318 --> 00:05:16.295 and we are sexual beings 00:05:16.319 --> 00:05:19.319 so why wouldn't we see half naked men everywhere in advertising? 00:05:19.343 --> 00:05:21.574 (Cheers and laughter) 00:05:21.598 --> 00:05:23.259 I would like to propose... 00:05:23.283 --> 00:05:26.857 (Laughter) 00:05:26.881 --> 00:05:30.457 I would like to propose something else is being sold here. 00:05:30.734 --> 00:05:36.017 To men, they are being sold this idea constantly that they are sexual subjects. 00:05:36.041 --> 00:05:37.851 They are in the driver's seat. 00:05:37.875 --> 00:05:41.990 It makes them feel powerful to see images of objectified women everywhere. 00:05:42.014 --> 00:05:44.150 And for women, we are being sold 00:05:44.174 --> 00:05:46.174 this idea that this is how we get our value 00:05:46.198 --> 00:05:49.102 and this is the way to become the ideal sex object. 00:05:49.126 --> 00:05:51.579 Which is why, instead of sex selling, 00:05:51.603 --> 00:05:55.435 these ideas of subjectivity and objectivity are being sold. 00:05:55.459 --> 00:05:58.519 So we see men's magazines with scantily clad women 00:05:58.543 --> 00:06:03.434 and we see women's magazines with scantily clad women. 00:06:03.458 --> 00:06:05.065 Moving now to the research. 00:06:05.089 --> 00:06:07.381 Self-objectification is a phenomenon 00:06:07.405 --> 00:06:11.434 where we, girls and women, view our bodies as sex objects. 00:06:11.458 --> 00:06:14.323 And all of us do to a greater or lesser extent. 00:06:14.347 --> 00:06:18.326 This varies somewhat by sexuality and somewhat by ethnicity 00:06:18.350 --> 00:06:21.797 but, by and large, all women face this in the US. 00:06:21.821 --> 00:06:25.019 So self-objectification, 10 years of research, 00:06:25.043 --> 00:06:26.852 mostly done by psychologists. 00:06:26.876 --> 00:06:29.268 We know that it has some pretty severe effects. 00:06:29.292 --> 00:06:30.864 I'm going to run through the list 00:06:30.888 --> 00:06:33.460 but I want to concentrate on just a few of these items. 00:06:33.484 --> 00:06:35.328 First, the more we think of ourselves 00:06:35.352 --> 00:06:37.829 and internalize this idea of being sex objects, 00:06:37.853 --> 00:06:39.852 the higher our rates of depression. 00:06:39.876 --> 00:06:42.102 We also engage in habitual body monitoring 00:06:42.126 --> 00:06:45.721 much more when we view ourselves as sex objects. 00:06:45.745 --> 00:06:47.723 What is habitual body monitoring? 00:06:47.747 --> 00:06:50.224 The men in the audience, this might be news to you. 00:06:50.248 --> 00:06:52.391 It is not news to the women in the audience. 00:06:52.415 --> 00:06:55.662 We think about the positioning of our legs, our hair, 00:06:55.686 --> 00:06:57.351 where the light is falling, 00:06:57.375 --> 00:06:59.471 Who's looking at us? Who's not looking at us. 00:06:59.489 --> 00:07:02.644 In fact in the 5 minutes I've been giving this talk, 00:07:02.668 --> 00:07:04.643 on average the women in this audience 00:07:04.667 --> 00:07:07.272 have engaged in habitual body monitoring 10 times. 00:07:07.296 --> 00:07:10.675 That is, every 30 seconds. 00:07:11.116 --> 00:07:13.371 Eating disorders are much more prevalent 00:07:13.395 --> 00:07:15.491 with those who see themselves as sex objects, 00:07:15.515 --> 00:07:17.051 as well as body shame. 00:07:17.075 --> 00:07:19.153 And depressed cognitive functioning. 00:07:19.177 --> 00:07:21.769 If we're engaging in habitual body monitoring, 00:07:21.793 --> 00:07:24.008 it simply takes up more mental space 00:07:24.032 --> 00:07:27.018 that could be better used completing math tests 00:07:27.042 --> 00:07:30.777 completing your homework. It just sucks our cognitive functioning. 00:07:30.801 --> 00:07:32.699 Also sexual dysfunction. 00:07:32.723 --> 00:07:34.435 So this idea that sex sells. 00:07:34.459 --> 00:07:37.494 Isn't it strange that if you think of yourself as a sex object, 00:07:37.518 --> 00:07:39.269 and we're raised in a society 00:07:39.293 --> 00:07:41.389 that raises little girls to view their bodies 00:07:41.413 --> 00:07:43.432 as projects to work on and be sex objects 00:07:43.456 --> 00:07:46.017 that it actually gets in the way of good sex. 00:07:46.041 --> 00:07:51.483 So what tends to happen is that women who are high self-objectifiers 00:07:51.507 --> 00:07:54.851 actually engage in what's called "spectatoring" during sex acts. 00:07:54.875 --> 00:07:58.585 So instead of being involved and engaged in the pleasure and what's happening 00:07:58.609 --> 00:08:01.284 you tend to view yourself from a third party perspective, 00:08:01.306 --> 00:08:02.963 a spectator's perspective 00:08:02.987 --> 00:08:05.416 where you're worried about rolls of fat hanging out, 00:08:05.440 --> 00:08:07.406 what that leg looks like. 00:08:07.430 --> 00:08:09.805 So, again, it gets in the way of sexual pleasure. 00:08:09.829 --> 00:08:12.972 So if there is anything I can pitch to you about why you don't want 00:08:12.996 --> 00:08:15.309 to live in a culture that sexually objectifies 00:08:15.333 --> 00:08:17.511 it diminishes your sexual pleasure. 00:08:17.535 --> 00:08:21.315 It also lowers self esteem, it lowers GPAs 00:08:21.339 --> 00:08:25.019 and it's not negligible the difference that I found in my research. 00:08:25.043 --> 00:08:27.520 It is the difference between going to graduate school 00:08:27.544 --> 00:08:30.269 and not going to graduate school for college women. 00:08:30.293 --> 00:08:34.395 It also lowers political efficacy or the belief you have a voice in politics. 00:08:34.419 --> 00:08:38.186 And it lowers your ability to get along with other women. 00:08:38.210 --> 00:08:40.268 We engage in female competition. 00:08:40.292 --> 00:08:44.102 We see male attention as the holy grail of our existence 00:08:44.126 --> 00:08:48.829 and so we compete with other women for our own self esteem, 00:08:48.853 --> 00:08:53.435 because we see it as this finite resource, this cherished finite resource. 00:08:53.459 --> 00:08:54.656 So we go into parties 00:08:54.680 --> 00:08:57.347 and we know where we are in the pretty girl pecking order 00:08:57.371 --> 00:09:00.269 And when another woman is valued for being a sex object, 00:09:00.293 --> 00:09:03.435 it actually makes us feel bad about ourself. 00:09:03.459 --> 00:09:06.351 What can we do about this- a plan of action. 00:09:06.375 --> 00:09:08.678 First I'd like to propose some personal actions. 00:09:08.702 --> 00:09:13.349 Because what sexual objectification does is actually set up a sexy ceiling 00:09:13.373 --> 00:09:16.091 that damages or harms women 00:09:16.115 --> 00:09:18.115 personally, politically and professionally. 00:09:18.139 --> 00:09:19.974 I want to focus on the personal here. 00:09:19.998 --> 00:09:21.376 What can we do? 00:09:21.400 --> 00:09:24.310 We can stop consuming damaging materials - girls, women, 00:09:24.334 --> 00:09:27.763 because we know within the first 3 minutes that our self esteem goes down 00:09:27.771 --> 00:09:29.852 when we're looking at fashion magazines. 00:09:29.876 --> 00:09:32.352 We can stop competing with other girls and women. 00:09:32.376 --> 00:09:34.853 When we see a woman who is getting attention for this 00:09:34.877 --> 00:09:37.121 we can understand that she is part of a system 00:09:37.145 --> 00:09:39.459 where the rules are stacked against us 00:09:39.483 --> 00:09:43.629 She is not a problem, she is a symptom of a problem. 00:09:43.653 --> 00:09:46.520 And we can stop seeking attention for our bodies. 00:09:46.544 --> 00:09:48.640 We raise our little boys to view their bodies 00:09:48.664 --> 00:09:50.602 as tools to master their environment, 00:09:50.626 --> 00:09:52.841 We raise our little girls to view their bodies 00:09:52.865 --> 00:09:55.043 as projects to constantly be improved. 00:09:55.067 --> 00:09:57.467 What if women started to view their bodies 00:09:57.491 --> 00:09:59.379 as tools to master their environment? 00:09:59.403 --> 00:10:02.220 As tools to get you from one place to the next. 00:10:02.244 --> 00:10:06.990 As these amazing vehicles for moving through the world in a new way. 00:10:07.014 --> 00:10:09.185 And for boys, be a supportive ally, 00:10:09.209 --> 00:10:11.019 understand what's happening around you, 00:10:11.043 --> 00:10:13.792 What's going on in the minds of the women around you. 00:10:13.816 --> 00:10:17.187 Don't evaluate girls and women based upon how they look 00:10:17.211 --> 00:10:20.031 evaluate them for what they say and what they do. 00:10:20.055 --> 00:10:23.683 Finally, use your position of privilege strategically 00:10:23.707 --> 00:10:26.185 to speak out against objectification. 00:10:26.209 --> 00:10:28.875 So moving beyond the personal to the political, 00:10:28.899 --> 00:10:31.522 You can boycott, you can simply refuse 00:10:31.546 --> 00:10:35.517 to consume materials that sexually objectify girls and women. 00:10:35.541 --> 00:10:39.219 You can contact media producers when something is offensive to you. 00:10:39.243 --> 00:10:41.075 You can produce your own media. 00:10:41.099 --> 00:10:42.184 Get behind the camera! 00:10:42.208 --> 00:10:44.822 Write! Act! Direct! 00:10:44.846 --> 00:10:47.519 And you can also engage in new media activism. 00:10:47.543 --> 00:10:49.824 There's an incredible world at your disposal 00:10:49.848 --> 00:10:51.373 to bring about political change. 00:10:51.397 --> 00:10:53.350 And I want to provide just a few examples. 00:10:53.374 --> 00:10:57.769 First, Sociological Images, a blog run by Dr. Lisa Wade 00:10:57.793 --> 00:11:02.374 worked with students to pull Abercrombie & Fitch's padded bras 00:11:02.398 --> 00:11:05.934 or padded swimsuits for toddlers. 00:11:05.958 --> 00:11:08.683 And they ran a campaign where they blogged about it, 00:11:08.707 --> 00:11:11.652 it got some press coverage. There were some petitions 00:11:11.676 --> 00:11:15.602 and they pulled the product nationally from their stores. 00:11:15.626 --> 00:11:18.323 This is my hero. Her name is Julia. 00:11:18.347 --> 00:11:21.795 She's a 14 year old who got change.org to put a petition together- 00:11:21.819 --> 00:11:25.568 85,000 signatures, and she went to New York 00:11:25.592 --> 00:11:27.371 and Seventeen magazine agreed 00:11:27.395 --> 00:11:32.142 that they would not Photoshop any of their models from here on out. 00:11:32.166 --> 00:11:36.840 So, lastly, I'll leave you with this idea of imagining a different world. 00:11:41.128 --> 00:11:44.351 I'd like you to imagine a world where girls and women 00:11:44.375 --> 00:11:47.186 don't spend an hour every morning 00:11:47.210 --> 00:11:51.457 putting on their makeup and doing their hair. 00:11:51.481 --> 00:11:53.660 I'd like you to imagine a world, 00:11:53.684 --> 00:11:57.019 where women are valued for what they say and what they do, 00:11:57.043 --> 00:11:59.852 rather than the way they look. 00:11:59.876 --> 00:12:06.374 I'd like you to imagine a world where instead of spending time on appearance 00:12:06.398 --> 00:12:10.185 we actually directed our energies to dealing with serious problems. 00:12:10.209 --> 00:12:13.681 Like human trafficking, sexualized 00:12:13.705 --> 00:12:16.721 violence, homophobia, poverty, hunger. 00:12:16.745 --> 00:12:20.769 And, lastly, because you are the architects of your future. 00:12:20.793 --> 00:12:25.793 I would like to remind you that sometimes architects have to demolish paradigms 00:12:25.817 --> 00:12:28.269 in order to build a better world. 00:12:28.293 --> 00:12:33.401 So my question for you is: what better world will you build? 00:12:33.425 --> 00:12:34.940 Thank you. 00:12:34.964 --> 00:12:37.964 (Applause)