WEBVTT

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
2017 was a hell of a year 
for the First Amendment.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Nowhere was more central
to this culture war

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
than the campuses and 
universities across America,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
including right here, 
at the University of Nevada, Reno.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Two UNR students became infamous 
for their speech in the past year,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
found themselves embroiled in two
of the biggest free speech controversies

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of the past couple of years.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Student, Peter Cytanovic became the face 
of white nationalism,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
when a picture of him snarling, 
holding a tiki torch

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
at the Unite the Right Rally 
in Charlottesville went viral.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
On the complete opposite end 
of the political spectrum,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
if you can call it that,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
graduate, Colin Kaepernick,
went on to the NFL

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and used his position to highlight
police brutality and racial injustice,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by taking a knee
during the National Anthem.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Both men became incredibly 
controversial for their speech.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There were calls and campaigns for both
men to be expelled for their opinions.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But regardless, whether you agree with one
of them, or both of them, or neither,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the First Amendment protects
both of those men and their opinions

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
from censorship and retaliation
by the government.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's a good thing,
and I want to tell you why.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's becoming more common for me to hear

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that we should have 
lower protections for speech,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that specifically, we should 
criminalize hate speech.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I hear this from the left a lot.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I think a lot of progressives 
envision a world where people

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
like Colin Kaepernick can take a knee
and protest of racial injustice,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
without fear of retaliation 
from the government,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
without fear that the President
will pressure the NFL to fire him.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But they also want to live in a world
where a government school like UNR

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
can expel a student like Peter Cytanovic
for his hateful views.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That is a fantasy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And more than that, it's dangerous.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm a progressive,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it's not hard for me to pick between
white nationalism and racial justice.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
One is abhorrent, one is an overdue
demand for equal rights.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But what would happen if I gave
a government the right to decide

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
which of those men
was too hateful to speak?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
President Trump 
is a pretty useful barometer.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
He called the marchers 
at Charlottesville, "very fine people,"

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
while reserving his ire for
black football players who take a knee

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as "sons of bitches."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Your hate speech may not
be the government's idea of hate speech.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I sure as hell know,
it's not mine.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But even if you happen 
to agree with Trump,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
can you be confident that
the next President, the next government

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
will agree with your world view?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You shouldn't be.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's why, above all,
I am an anti-authoritarian.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I know that the U.S. government
has a long history

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of wielding its raw power
against the vulnerable communities

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that speak truth to that power,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
against those who seek
to change the status quo.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And because I want every student
to be able to take a knee

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
without fear of government censorship,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I am a true believer 
in the First Amendment.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But even as a First Amendment attorney,
I find a lot of the common tropes

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and myths about the First Amendment
really unsatisfying.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, I wanna go through three
of these myths, dust them off,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and hopefully in the process,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we'll come up with three practical rules
for exercising your free speech rights,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
powerfully and strategically.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So the first one, is one I suspect
we all learned in Kindergarten,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
if you remember your nursery rhymes,
please feel free to join me.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Sticks and stones may break my bones
but words will never hurt me.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Does anyone, as an adult,
actually believe this?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's manifestly untrue.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm a free speech attorney precisely
because I believe that words matter,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it's ludicrous to protect free speech
by denying its very power.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, why do we lie to kids, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Why do we fabricate this thing for them?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Well, it's because humans of all ages
can be vicious, it's just true.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And when a kid is at the receiving end
of injustice, a taunt, hateful language,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we want that kid 
to be empowered, not diminished.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In February, notorious troll,
Milo Yiannopoulos,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
had a planned speech at UC Berkeley.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Students and others 
in the community went nuts.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There were protests, there were riots,
things were set on fire.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The administration cancelled his talk.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In April, there was a repeat, same thing,
except this time, it was Ann Coulter.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
She was going to speak,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
School officials said,
"There's going to be riots."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They cancelled her talk.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Those two individuals, Ann and Milo,
man, they became martyrs.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They got to take on the roll of victims
of liberal censorship.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They went on media tours,
the media ate it up.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They got more attention 
for being silenced than they ever did

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
for trying to peddle 
their actual substantive views.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, I think it's helpful to think 
of professional, provocateurs and trolls

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as we would those schoolyard bullies.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Yeah, their words can hurt, 
there's no point in denying that.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But the better question is, 
how do we respond to that, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And a troll, a provocateur
wants you to censor them.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's part of the goal,
it feeds into their power,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it gives them something to sell.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, we don't have to march to that tune.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You don't have to play that role.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And we can think of them,
like these bullies,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
yeah their words hurt, 
but, there's also power in sass.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There's power in refusing 
to be goaded into a fight

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
or to play the role of censor.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, don't do it.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But some words wound in ways
that are different from others.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Which brings us to myth number two.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I hear this one a lot, 
particularly online.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We all know that hate speech 
isn't protected by the First Amendment.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Not so.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
As that anecdote about Trump
hopefully made you think,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
hate speech can be 
in the eye of the beholder,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
ire of the behearer, I guess,
if that's a word.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Just this week in Spain,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a man was arrested for the hate crime,
this is real, of calling cops "slackers."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on Facebook.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Police are covered under 
the Spanish Hate Crime Law.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's what criticizing your government
looks like in a country

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
without a First Amendment.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But, we don't have to protect speech
just out of paranoia

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that our government will warp
what we think speech and hate speech are.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There's also an upshot.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In the late 1960's,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a KKK leader, named Charles Brandenburg,
was arrested on criminal charges

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of incitement to violence
for holding a KKK rally.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The speech was as abhorrent,
as vicious, racist as you might imagine.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But, the KKK's lawyers took it
all the way up to the Supreme Court.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And, they challenged this crime.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Said that he had a free speech right
to be a KKK member,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the Supreme Court thought about it 
and said, "You're right."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Before we allow the government
to punish you for your speech,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it has to pass such a high bar,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
there has to be an immediate 
and specific risk

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of actual physical violence
to a real person.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And this KKK rally, well, 
it was a group of white racists,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but there wasn't anyone around
that they were intending

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to actually engage in violence against.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That case, in a vacuum,
might be tough to swallow.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I think particularly 
if you're a person of color.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But it's not the end of the story.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
At about the same time,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a lion of the Civil Rights Movement
named Charles Evers,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
was giving a huge speech
to a gathering of NAACP supporters,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who had come together to boycott
white-owned racist businesses

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that didn't allow black Americans
to come into their business.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And as he's giving his speech,
Evers gets worked up and really passionate

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and he says, "I'll wring the damn neck
of anybody who breaks this boycott."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, what's he done, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
He's fantasized 
about some future violence,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it's hypothetical, 
he's not pointing at Bob there, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, the Brandenburg case has 
just come out of the Supreme Court

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the NAACP lawyers look at that
and they say, "Well, this can't be right.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
How can a KKK leader get a
'get out of jail' free card,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but our Civil Rights guy, Mr. Evers,
is being sued for incitement

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by the same white-owned businesses
that he was protesting?'

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Mr. Evers challenged these charges, too.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And he went all the way up 
to the Supreme Court.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And the Supreme Court said,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Well, I guess we're constrained
by that Brandenburg case

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to give you your free speech rights, too."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I want to be clear, by the way, 
that I don't see anything equivalent

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
between the KKK and the NAACP.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But the court is an odd place,
it's a bit stripped of context in history.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's a kind of bastion of privilege.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And all they boiled it down to was,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Is this theoretical future violence?
Or is there an immediate risk of harm

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to a real person?"

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And they said,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Well from that point of view,
these look the same."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Now, I know a lot of people 
are skeptical that in practice,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the rights that are extended to people
like a KKK leader,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
actually trickle down to somebody
like an NAACP leader.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They're not wrong to be skeptical.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Our country has always taken a while
to distribute its rights equally,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
among its citizenry, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Think of the right to vote.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Did we all get it at the same time,
regardless of sex, regardless of race?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Absolutely not.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Or even in today's world,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
do you think your constitutional rights
at arrest look the same

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
regardless of your race?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Your right to carry a gun?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Do you think that looks the same
whether you're black or you're white?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Again, no.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But is the answer to eliminate or lessen
the very constitutional protections

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that allow us to hold the government
accountable when it violates our rights?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Hell no.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Instead, making sure that constitutional 
rights are evenly distributed

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is a process, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And it's our job,
the first amendment is no different.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, when the Supreme Court,
when the powers that be,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
give that right to somebody
like Brandenburg, a KKK leader,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it's our job, Civil Rights leaders, 
those who believe in equal rights,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in justice, to ratchet everybody up
to that same level of protection

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
for constitutional rights.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And that's precisely what the NAACP did.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And that's all of our job, too.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's what I do 
as a free speech attorney.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and that's what you 
need to do as students.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You need to make sure
that these theoretical rules

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
filter down on the ground.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So are students up for it?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That brings us to our third
and final myth.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Today's students are just snowflakes."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I hear it all the time.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Usually meant as an insult, by the way,
as beautiful as snowflakes are.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, because of the First Amendment,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
public schools and universities
can not ban people from campus,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
simply because their views are hateful.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, that means that over the past year,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
black and Jewish students 
have had to leave their dorm rooms

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and walk to class passing by people
who have called for their extermination.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It means that women students 
have had to walk by speakers on campus

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who call feminism a cancer.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
LGBT students have had to walk by 
people saying,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Transgenderism is a medical disorder."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
No adult has to go to work
and walk by people saying

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
they're less than human
or that they shouldn't exist.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I don't think students are snowflakes,
I think they're badasses.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Because they bear the brunt
of that First Amendment on campus,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
where these professional
provocateurs come, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Now, when I say that silencing
you political opponents isn't the answer,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it's not because I think that's weak,
it's because I think that's unstrategic.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, if silencing your enemies
isn't an answer,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
what does empowerment look like
in the First Amendment?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Well sometimes, 
it's just sheer numbers.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The week after Charlottesville,
a group of people planned a rally

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on Boston Common that they termed,
"The Free Speech Rally."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They were alt-right folks,
and this is a week after Charlottesville.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Only a handful 
of permit-holders showed up.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But, 40,000+ members of the 
Massachusetts community

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and from across the country,
engaged in a counter protest

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
ringing Boston Common,
standing strong, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Sending a very powerful
message of resistance together.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's a blizzard of snowflakes, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There's no weakness in that.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But, sometimes, just a single person
will make a difference.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
One of my favorite stories 
from the last couple of years,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
one of my favorite free speech victories
from the last few years,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is a musician who was really appalled 
that the KKK was planning to march

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in his hometown of Charleston.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And so, using the tools at his disposal,
he got out his sousaphone.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's one of these big brass instruments,
BOM-BOM.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And he got out of the street
and he got next to the KKK

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and he just oompa, oompa,
oompa, oompa-ed along with them.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Laughter)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's amazing, you should look up 
the video, it's worth watching.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And without saying a single word,
he stripped these fascists bare.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They couldn't even bear to go on
marching, they were so humiliated.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You can't keep up 
a straight face of fascism

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with a goofy tuba line behind you,
it's just hard to do.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So look, I believe in the First Amendment
fundamentally, first and foremost,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because I know 
it's the greatest tool we have

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to keep the government out of 
regulating the conversations

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that spark every change in the world.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If you wanna keep having conversations
that change the world,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you should embrace 
this First Amendment, too,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
messiness and all.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And even though those three myths
might not be true,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I hope they started to reveal 
a few real nuggets of truth

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
about how we can strategically exercise
our powerful First Amendment rights.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Number one: Know your history.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Know that when rights are extended
to the powerful and privileged,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that it's our job to make sure 
that everybody benefits from those rights.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Understand that the same First Amendment,
that first extended to a KKK member,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
was used strategically 
by Civil Rights leaders

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to cover the NAACP leader as well.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That's a success story 
and we have to keep doing it.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Number two: Don't try to silence 
your way out of a debate.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
As we've seen from Free Speech Week,
as we've seen from the Free Speech Rally,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
people trying to co-op
the term Free speech

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
just feeds them power.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We can't let them do that.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Free Speech as a concept, its power
is in its indivisibility,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
its equal for the KKK leader
and the NAACP leader alike, right?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So don't dance to that tune.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You don't have to give the provocateur
the censorship she's desperately hoping

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that you give her.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, that brings us to number three.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Dance to your own tune.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Figure out for yourself 
when you go to a counter protest,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in numbers or alone with your tuba.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Figure out when you hold an alternative
and more loving event across campus.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Figure out when you think there are ideas
that are just fundamentally unworthy

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of debate.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And, the way that you figure out 
how to handle these conflicts,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
how to handle speech that you abhor,
can be a great guideline

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
for how you handle conflict
through out the rest of your life.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
My name is Lee Rowland.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm an unabashed progressive,
I'm a skeptic, I'm an anti-authoritarian.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
For all of those reasons,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I believe in a robust
and indivisible First Amendment.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Join me.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Thank you.