WEBVTT 00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:03.684 (upbeat piano music) 00:00:14.647 --> 00:00:16.772 Male voiceover: We're going to look at an extremely large painting 00:00:16.772 --> 00:00:19.638 by the Russian painter Wassily Kandinsky, 00:00:19.638 --> 00:00:23.172 working in Munich in 1913. 00:00:23.172 --> 00:00:25.065 This is a painting that's in Moscow now. 00:00:25.065 --> 00:00:27.504 Female voiceover: It's a year before the first world war began. 00:00:27.504 --> 00:00:31.271 Male voiceover: Exactly. This called Composition VII. 00:00:31.271 --> 00:00:36.532 Female voiceover: Kandinsky actually used a lot of really abstract titles. 00:00:36.532 --> 00:00:38.233 He painted a number of compositions. 00:00:38.233 --> 00:00:40.657 He painted a number of improvisations. 00:00:40.657 --> 00:00:41.700 Male voiceover: This is the kind of title ... 00:00:41.700 --> 00:00:42.802 Female voiceover: He's borrowing from music. 00:00:42.802 --> 00:00:44.251 Male voiceover: Yeah. This is ... 00:00:44.251 --> 00:00:45.536 Male voiceover: Right, as if this was orchestration. 00:00:45.536 --> 00:00:47.135 Female voiceover: It is orchestration for him. 00:00:47.135 --> 00:00:49.902 There are various things that are important to Kandinsky 00:00:49.902 --> 00:00:54.201 and one of them is the way that color is 00:00:54.201 --> 00:00:56.960 endurably connected to music and to other senses. 00:00:56.960 --> 00:01:00.752 We see certain sounds and we hear certain colors. 00:01:00.752 --> 00:01:03.402 Male voiceover: It's almost [unintelligible] aesthetic experience, right? 00:01:03.402 --> 00:01:04.000 Female voiceover: Yes. 00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:05.134 Male voiceover: There's a kind of alliance. 00:01:05.134 --> 00:01:09.167 There's a kind of natural pairing of color and sound, 00:01:09.167 --> 00:01:10.416 or color and shape. 00:01:10.416 --> 00:01:11.866 Female voiceover: I thought it was all the senses, 00:01:11.866 --> 00:01:12.735 a connecting of all the senses. 00:01:12.735 --> 00:01:13.434 Male voiceover: It can be. 00:01:13.434 --> 00:01:14.778 I think there are different experiences. 00:01:14.778 --> 00:01:17.110 Female voiceover: I think, like, this soup tastes blue. 00:01:17.110 --> 00:01:19.943 Male voiceover: Exactly, or the letter B is yellow. 00:01:19.943 --> 00:01:22.165 Female voiceover: I have a story about that. 00:01:22.165 --> 00:01:28.832 When I was three and I went to the doctor and my throat hurt, 00:01:28.832 --> 00:01:33.587 the doctor said, "How does your throat feel?" 00:01:33.587 --> 00:01:35.584 I said, "Red." 00:01:35.584 --> 00:01:38.197 I remember shouting, "Red." 00:01:38.197 --> 00:01:42.586 I just remember feeling that it felt the color red. 00:01:42.586 --> 00:01:43.169 Male voiceover: There it is. 00:01:43.169 --> 00:01:44.586 Female voiceover: That was my main way 00:01:44.586 --> 00:01:47.828 of expressing how my throat felt. 00:01:47.828 --> 00:01:51.286 Maybe there is this connection between the senses 00:01:51.286 --> 00:01:53.765 and maybe there is a sense ... 00:01:53.765 --> 00:01:56.453 I think Kandinsky kind of talks about this, 00:01:56.453 --> 00:01:58.669 maybe not exactly this way, 00:01:58.669 --> 00:02:03.503 but that our brain sort of ruined that. 00:02:03.503 --> 00:02:06.301 That we grow up and we understand convention, 00:02:06.301 --> 00:02:10.294 more and more disassociated from those sort of primal connections. 00:02:10.294 --> 00:02:11.930 Male voiceover: Kandinsky spent a lot of his life 00:02:11.930 --> 00:02:14.162 trying to reclaim that, though. Right? 00:02:14.162 --> 00:02:14.834 Female voiceover: Right. 00:02:14.834 --> 00:02:16.329 If we look back at the painting. 00:02:16.329 --> 00:02:18.390 I keep looking at it and then looking away, 00:02:18.390 --> 00:02:19.739 and then looking at it again 00:02:19.739 --> 00:02:20.840 and trying to make sense of it. 00:02:20.840 --> 00:02:23.225 I think one of the things that's difficult for about Kandinsky 00:02:23.225 --> 00:02:26.658 is that I don't really know what he's doing a lot of the time. 00:02:26.658 --> 00:02:29.558 Then, if I try not to think about what he's doing so much 00:02:29.558 --> 00:02:32.178 and more about what it looks like 00:02:32.178 --> 00:02:34.757 and maybe something about what it sounds like. 00:02:34.757 --> 00:02:37.885 He named his paintings Composition or Improvisation. 00:02:37.885 --> 00:02:41.884 He was also friends with one of the great early modern composers, 00:02:41.884 --> 00:02:44.117 the Viennese composer, Arnold Schoenberg. 00:02:44.117 --> 00:02:47.199 Schoenberg works with atonal sounds 00:02:47.199 --> 00:02:49.268 and atonal systems and compositions. 00:02:49.268 --> 00:02:53.766 If you listen to Schoenberg's music and you look at Kandinsky's painting, 00:02:53.766 --> 00:02:54.934 I think it makes so much more sense. 00:02:54.934 --> 00:02:56.293 Male voiceover: I think we have a little bit, right? 00:02:56.293 --> 00:02:57.185 Female voiceover: I think we do. 00:02:57.185 --> 00:03:21.083 (soft orchestra music) 00:03:21.083 --> 00:03:22.850 Male voiceover: When I listen to Schoenberg 00:03:22.850 --> 00:03:24.686 and when I listen to atonal music, 00:03:24.686 --> 00:03:29.799 I often feel like there is a real attempt to shape sound 00:03:29.799 --> 00:03:34.410 and let it exist somehow as this sort of abstract 00:03:34.410 --> 00:03:36.351 almost representation of itself. 00:03:36.351 --> 00:03:37.411 Female voiceover: Mm-hmm. (Affirmative) 00:03:37.411 --> 00:03:40.718 Male voiceover: I do see a kind of affiliation between that 00:03:40.718 --> 00:03:42.619 and what some of the artist of this period are doing, 00:03:42.619 --> 00:03:44.384 especially somebody like Kandinsky. 00:03:44.384 --> 00:03:45.493 Female voiceover: I think the separation 00:03:45.493 --> 00:03:48.744 of the representation from the natural world, 00:03:48.744 --> 00:03:53.550 whether it's sound and music separated from a narrative composition, 00:03:53.550 --> 00:03:54.743 or whether it's ... 00:03:54.743 --> 00:03:58.161 Male voiceover: But, music composition ... 00:03:58.161 --> 00:04:03.952 sort of high music, what we now call classical music, is often disassociated. 00:04:03.952 --> 00:04:06.577 There are examples, of course Beethoven sometimes, 00:04:06.577 --> 00:04:10.608 the 6th Symphony will be mimicking some sort of storm. 00:04:10.608 --> 00:04:12.743 Very often there isn't that direct narrative. 00:04:12.743 --> 00:04:14.949 There is a kind of inherent abstraction. 00:04:14.949 --> 00:04:15.661 Female voiceover: In music. 00:04:15.661 --> 00:04:16.325 Male voiceover: In music. 00:04:16.325 --> 00:04:17.950 When you get to the atonal, 00:04:17.950 --> 00:04:21.517 more conscious reference to the sound of music itself, 00:04:21.517 --> 00:04:23.743 to the representation of music, almost. 00:04:23.743 --> 00:04:25.244 Which I see is sort of more paired 00:04:25.244 --> 00:04:27.911 to this more subconscious abstraction in painting. 00:04:27.911 --> 00:04:28.744 Female voiceover: Mm-hmm. 00:04:28.744 --> 00:04:29.817 Male voiceover: But, you've just called on, I think, 00:04:29.817 --> 00:04:33.110 a really important and really significant kind of distinction 00:04:33.110 --> 00:04:34.383 between painting music, 00:04:34.383 --> 00:04:37.953 which is painting as always trying to craft something that it's not. 00:04:37.953 --> 00:04:41.740 Music, it has been much more comfortable historically, I think, 00:04:41.740 --> 00:04:43.370 with it's inherit abstraction. 00:04:43.370 --> 00:04:48.359 Female voiceover: Music, it so specifically changes mood 00:04:48.359 --> 00:04:52.119 and it allows you to sort of stay in that different space 00:04:52.119 --> 00:04:53.392 and it evokes emotion. 00:04:53.392 --> 00:04:56.620 It sort of brings you to that very particular place. 00:04:56.620 --> 00:05:01.119 Listening to the Schoenberg, it feels really uncomfortable to me, 00:05:01.119 --> 00:05:02.037 to my ears. 00:05:02.037 --> 00:05:03.214 It's not something that's pleasant. 00:05:03.214 --> 00:05:05.963 I start to feel physically discomforted. 00:05:05.963 --> 00:05:07.593 I just don't really like it, 00:05:07.593 --> 00:05:10.131 but that's part of what the idea is. 00:05:10.131 --> 00:05:13.526 Painting, at this point, the modernist, in the early 20th century, 00:05:13.526 --> 00:05:17.693 are trying to cause a kind of disruption. 00:05:17.693 --> 00:05:18.291 Male voiceover: Yeah. 00:05:18.291 --> 00:05:19.693 Female voiceover: I think that's a really interesting question. 00:05:19.693 --> 00:05:24.671 I mean, what it is about atonality or dissonance 00:05:24.671 --> 00:05:30.830 or in the Kandinsky paintings, forms that don't look so obviously harmonious? 00:05:30.830 --> 00:05:31.626 Female voiceover: Mm-hmm. 00:05:31.626 --> 00:05:35.246 Female voiceover: Like in this painting where there's shapes and lines 00:05:35.246 --> 00:05:37.459 moving in different directions, 00:05:37.459 --> 00:05:41.357 kind of a sense of parts clashing together 00:05:41.357 --> 00:05:44.246 and coming together in that kind of dissonant way. 00:05:44.246 --> 00:05:45.578 Male voiceover: Like a disruption of space. 00:05:45.578 --> 00:05:47.995 Female voiceover: What is it about modernism 00:05:47.995 --> 00:05:54.858 that sort of asks for the disruption of melody and harmonious sound 00:05:54.858 --> 00:06:01.624 and sees atonality as a more effective representation of itself? 00:06:01.624 --> 00:06:03.724 Female Voiceover: Kandinsky is really trying to evoke 00:06:03.724 --> 00:06:08.857 his particular subjective experience of a color 00:06:08.857 --> 00:06:11.124 or of a shape or of whatever else he's looking at. 00:06:11.124 --> 00:06:13.625 He's sort of creating that subjective moment, 00:06:13.625 --> 00:06:18.058 making it look specifically non referential and non naturalistic. 00:06:18.058 --> 00:06:21.126 It's not about making a bridge look like a bridge. 00:06:21.126 --> 00:06:23.725 It's about, what do you feel like when you're crossing a bridge, 00:06:23.725 --> 00:06:25.025 what does that do to you. 00:06:25.025 --> 00:06:28.328 If you look at the topic, I mean, is that a horizon line up there? 00:06:28.328 --> 00:06:28.957 I don't know. 00:06:28.957 --> 00:06:30.857 What is he ... 00:06:30.857 --> 00:06:31.857 Is this a landscape? 00:06:31.857 --> 00:06:33.332 Figure out what anything is. 00:06:33.332 --> 00:06:34.764 I think that that's his point. 00:06:34.764 --> 00:06:36.712 Male voiceover: It does feel like it's a painting about 00:06:36.712 --> 00:06:40.034 a kind of conflict of the forms themselves. Right? 00:06:40.034 --> 00:06:40.767 Female voiceover: Mm-hmm. 00:06:40.767 --> 00:06:41.878 Male voiceover: I think you're right. 00:06:41.878 --> 00:06:45.463 I think he sort of pushes past our desire to associate 00:06:45.463 --> 00:06:48.664 this will landscape or still life or some sort of representation, 00:06:48.664 --> 00:06:50.264 even if it's abstracted. 00:06:50.264 --> 00:06:51.547 We sort of get ... 00:06:51.547 --> 00:06:55.546 He's very successful, I think, in sort of pushing us to another point 00:06:55.546 --> 00:06:59.630 where we actually can take seriously this notion of form and color 00:06:59.630 --> 00:07:02.597 beginning to have conflict in and of itself. 00:07:02.597 --> 00:07:05.879 In a sense, making the abstract legitimate. 00:07:05.879 --> 00:07:08.297 Female voiceover: Read against yellow, blue with green. 00:07:08.297 --> 00:07:08.764 Female voiceover: Yeah. 00:07:08.764 --> 00:07:10.128 Male voiceover: Yeah and in someways, 00:07:10.128 --> 00:07:12.477 that's what the music that we just listened to was doing as well. 00:07:12.477 --> 00:07:15.213 The very term, atonal, is speaking of this 00:07:15.213 --> 00:07:16.463 kind of this kind conflict between sound. 00:07:16.463 --> 00:07:18.213 Female voiceover: Something about the modern world though, 00:07:18.213 --> 00:07:20.545 that doesn't feel like it matches. 00:07:20.545 --> 00:07:21.598 Male voiceover: In that part of it. 00:07:21.598 --> 00:07:22.827 Female voiceover: Right. Female voiceover: In classical music there's a narrative in it. 00:07:22.827 --> 00:07:23.516 Female voiceover: Right. There's a narrative 00:07:23.516 --> 00:07:24.488 and there's a resolution, even if it's disrupted. 00:07:24.488 --> 00:07:25.338 Male voiceover: Yes. 00:07:25.338 --> 00:07:30.933 Female voiceover: That sense of things coming of the center, not holding, right? 00:07:30.933 --> 00:07:31.616 Male voiceover: Yeah. 00:07:31.616 --> 00:07:32.960 Female voiceover: To use Yates, 00:07:32.960 --> 00:07:34.826 of things coming apart. 00:07:34.826 --> 00:07:35.326 Female voiceover: Mm-hmm. 00:07:35.326 --> 00:07:39.027 Female voiceover: Of the world not having a narrative 00:07:39.027 --> 00:07:41.292 that explains it, that makes sense, 00:07:41.292 --> 00:07:45.325 that represents human beings position in the universe anymore. 00:07:45.325 --> 00:07:47.242 Male voiceover: It's so seductive to then say, 00:07:47.242 --> 00:07:51.159 okay this is 1913, the first world war is about to break out. 00:07:51.159 --> 00:07:51.826 Female voiceover: Right. Female voiceover: Right. 00:07:51.826 --> 00:07:53.077 Male voiceover: All of those players are there. 00:07:53.077 --> 00:07:54.898 I think we have to be very careful about doing that, 00:07:54.898 --> 00:07:57.078 but never the less, this is a world that is really 00:07:57.078 --> 00:07:59.076 sort of at a moment of crisis. 00:07:59.076 --> 00:08:03.364 Female voiceover: I think the idea of apocalypse in inescapable here. 00:08:03.364 --> 00:08:04.494 We haven't talked about it, 00:08:04.494 --> 00:08:07.577 but in looking at it, it feels like Kandinsky is looking 00:08:07.577 --> 00:08:13.661 with ideas of apocalypse, that he's looking to kind of destroy and then renew, 00:08:13.661 --> 00:08:16.797 which is a really seductive idea for the artist at this time. 00:08:16.797 --> 00:08:18.189 Male voiceover: Yeah. 00:08:18.189 --> 00:08:21.325 Female: [Unintelligible] like destroy what's there. 00:08:21.325 --> 00:08:22.774 Female voiceover: What is that? 00:08:22.774 --> 00:08:24.472 Female voiceover: Because in order to make something new, 00:08:24.472 --> 00:08:25.725 you have to destroy what's already there. 00:08:25.725 --> 00:08:27.835 Male voiceover: Also this notion of just this ... 00:08:27.835 --> 00:08:28.519 Female voiceover: Wipe it all away. 00:08:28.519 --> 00:08:29.701 Female: Mm-hmm, wipe it away. 00:08:29.701 --> 00:08:31.346 Male voiceover: Absolutely, and create a utopia ... 00:08:31.346 --> 00:08:32.001 Female voiceover: Yeah. 00:08:32.001 --> 00:08:33.025 Male voiceover: ... that would replace it. 00:08:33.025 --> 00:08:35.727 Female voiceover: To me, I think, one of things that's really amazing 00:08:35.727 --> 00:08:37.794 is that this is before World War I 00:08:37.794 --> 00:08:39.460 and so much changes after World War I. 00:08:39.460 --> 00:08:42.298 I think when they realize [unintelligible]. 00:08:42.298 --> 00:08:44.083 Female voiceover: Wipe everything out is not such a good idea. 00:08:44.083 --> 00:08:48.417 Female voiceover: No, it actually doesn't do anything necessarily good. 00:08:48.417 --> 00:08:50.416 Male voiceover: Right, and now we have the technology 00:08:50.416 --> 00:08:51.859 that actually allows us to do that. 00:08:51.859 --> 00:08:52.251 Female voiceover: Yeah. 00:08:52.251 --> 00:08:53.395 Male voiceover: We have machine guns. 00:08:53.395 --> 00:08:54.159 We have ... yeah. 00:08:54.159 --> 00:08:55.084 Female voiceover: Look what happens. 00:08:55.084 --> 00:08:57.084 People are maimed and horrible disfigured 00:08:57.084 --> 00:08:58.392 and it's actually not as pretty. 00:08:58.392 --> 00:08:59.166 Female voiceover: People don't come back from war. 00:08:59.166 --> 00:08:59.726 Female voiceover: No, they don't. 00:08:59.726 --> 00:09:05.084 They don't have visions that give them access to new truths. 00:09:05.084 --> 00:09:08.909 They just sort of see, basically, how horrible people are to one another. 00:09:08.909 --> 00:09:10.195 I think this is sort of before that. 00:09:10.195 --> 00:09:13.660 There's a kind of utopian idea of what apocalypse will bring, 00:09:13.660 --> 00:09:15.410 that it will bring some kind of inner truth. 00:09:15.410 --> 00:09:16.893 Male voiceover: Is there also sort of a religious ... 00:09:16.893 --> 00:09:18.227 Female: There's a spiritual. 00:09:18.227 --> 00:09:19.230 Male voiceover: I mean, a kind of spiritual aspect here. 00:09:19.230 --> 00:09:20.053 Female voiceover: Definitely. Female voiceover: Yeah. 00:09:20.053 --> 00:09:22.659 Female voiceover: Kandinsky wrote on the spiritual in art in 1911, 00:09:22.659 --> 00:09:24.327 two years before he paints this. 00:09:24.327 --> 00:09:30.461 He evokes a lot of connection between color and art and faith and spirituality, 00:09:30.461 --> 00:09:32.577 having that core belief in something. 00:09:32.577 --> 00:09:37.160 Female voiceover: For him, the modern world has lost that spirituality, 00:09:37.160 --> 00:09:40.393 that innocence, that connection to emotion ... 00:09:40.393 --> 00:09:41.910 Female voiceover: Mm-hmm. 00:09:41.910 --> 00:09:43.660 Female voiceover: ... and sort of primal emotion 00:09:43.660 --> 00:09:48.194 and the apocalypse might restore that to human beings, ... 00:09:48.194 --> 00:09:48.960 Female voiceover: Mm-hmm, absolutely. 00:09:48.960 --> 00:09:51.402 Female voiceover: ... what culture, in a way, has stolen from us. 00:09:51.402 --> 00:09:53.280 It's a very primitivist idea. 00:09:53.280 --> 00:09:53.833 Female voiceover: Mm-hmm. 00:09:53.833 --> 00:09:56.947 Female voiceover: I find this idea, the colors, the ... 00:09:56.947 --> 00:09:57.861 Male voiceover: The movement. 00:09:57.861 --> 00:09:58.831 Female voiceover: ... the connections of everything, 00:09:58.831 --> 00:10:01.778 the things moving apart and coming together, 00:10:01.778 --> 00:10:04.279 I mean, it's ... you know. 00:10:04.279 --> 00:10:09.361 When I allow myself to have colors and lines and shapes 00:10:09.361 --> 00:10:14.006 just sort of suggest feelings and tastes and smells, 00:10:14.006 --> 00:10:16.506 then I think this painting becomes really enjoyable. 00:10:16.506 --> 00:10:19.365 Male voiceover: There's a kind of incredible freedom here 00:10:19.365 --> 00:10:20.633 that, you used the word expressionist, 00:10:20.633 --> 00:10:24.256 it's so different from later Kandinsky, where things become 00:10:24.256 --> 00:10:28.466 so much more systematized in a way, and clarified. 00:10:28.466 --> 00:10:32.669 There's a wonderful sense of invention here. 00:10:32.669 --> 00:10:34.900 Female voiceover: It's large, so it would have been really immersive. 00:10:34.900 --> 00:10:35.670 Male voiceover: Yeah. 00:10:35.670 --> 00:10:37.965 Female voiceover: One wonders at the extent to which 00:10:37.965 --> 00:10:41.148 he was trying to give us a kind grand statement of. 00:10:41.148 --> 00:10:41.927 Male voiceover: A symphony. 00:10:41.927 --> 00:10:43.765 Female voiceover: I guess the longer that I look at it, 00:10:43.765 --> 00:10:45.630 I can understand more of it, 00:10:45.630 --> 00:10:50.595 but I have a hard time really enjoying it. 00:10:50.595 --> 00:10:51.398 Male voiceover: It's a tough painting. 00:10:51.398 --> 00:10:52.293 Female: It's a tough painting. 00:10:52.293 --> 00:10:53.259 Female voiceover: It is a tough painting. 00:10:53.259 --> 00:10:54.527 Female voiceover: I think it's meant to be tough. 00:10:54.527 --> 00:10:55.360 Maybe that's ... 00:10:55.360 --> 00:10:56.398 Male voiceover: That's a tough moment. 00:10:56.398 --> 00:10:58.147 Female voiceover: It's interesting that it's still tough. 00:10:58.147 --> 00:11:00.898 Female voiceover: Duchamp and Warhol 00:11:00.898 --> 00:11:05.126 and the whole century of modernism and post modernism have passed 00:11:05.126 --> 00:11:07.409 and this is still a difficult art. 00:11:07.409 --> 00:11:08.266 Male voiceover: Schoenberg is still tough. 00:11:08.266 --> 00:11:09.300 Female voiceover: Yeah, Schoenberg is still tough. 00:11:09.300 --> 00:11:09.743 Male voiceover: Yeah. 00:11:09.743 --> 00:11:10.491 Female voiceover: That says a lot. 00:11:10.491 --> 00:11:11.159 Male voiceover: It does. 00:11:11.159 --> 00:11:12.203 Female voiceover: There's still a lot of power. 00:11:12.203 --> 00:11:16.304 (upbeat piano music)