WEBVTT

00:00:04.170 --> 00:00:08.120
international telecommunications and
union and it's an agency of the united

00:00:08.120 --> 00:00:11.680
nations the meeting next week to
negotiate a treaty on internet

00:00:11.680 --> 00:00:14.899
regulation to discuss policies ranging
from cyber security

00:00:14.899 --> 00:00:16.139
online fraud

00:00:16.139 --> 00:00:19.970
but did the right script to criticize
the push for so-called internet central

00:00:19.970 --> 00:00:20.839
government

00:00:20.839 --> 00:00:24.159
and insist that the international treaty
that includes the influence of countries

00:00:24.159 --> 00:00:25.319
like china

00:00:25.319 --> 00:00:28.849
russia and authors could lead to greater
online censorship

00:00:28.849 --> 00:00:30.359
and i to you says

00:00:30.359 --> 00:00:33.969
its main objective is to increase
internet access to underserved

00:00:33.969 --> 00:00:35.290
communities

00:00:35.290 --> 00:00:38.990
which sent the school be achieved
through international regulations

00:00:38.990 --> 00:00:42.060
and cannot be done without harming
internet freedoms

00:00:42.060 --> 00:00:46.250
we've seen leaked proposals that clearly
and look at the internet that way you

00:00:46.250 --> 00:00:46.830
know that

00:00:46.830 --> 00:00:51.830
with the goal of the improving cyber
security whatever that means different

00:00:51.830 --> 00:00:53.530
things different countries

00:00:53.530 --> 00:00:57.960
could limit people's privacy in by you
know to be able to identify at

00:00:57.960 --> 00:01:01.180
communication anywhere in the network

00:01:01.180 --> 00:01:02.570
another proposal

00:01:02.570 --> 00:01:04.879
waved limit free expression by

00:01:04.879 --> 00:01:09.010
authorizing governments to shut down
communication networks for you know

00:01:09.010 --> 00:01:11.250
in the name of national security

00:01:11.250 --> 00:01:15.350
from your view as someone who buys to
protect civil liberties online

00:01:15.350 --> 00:01:19.110
how much of a realistic threat do you
see in cyber security and cyber were and

00:01:19.110 --> 00:01:23.800
how much do you see that being used as
kind of a used for booking them

00:01:23.800 --> 00:01:28.920
i think it cyber security is such a
subjective concept that it's almost i

00:01:28.920 --> 00:01:31.020
don't think it's useful

00:01:31.020 --> 00:01:33.630
really use the term

00:01:33.630 --> 00:01:36.610
that issue transparency that's coming up
soon she says

00:01:36.610 --> 00:01:39.560
there's no transparency and all
individual governments have tried and

00:01:39.560 --> 00:01:41.780
failed and now they want to use the you
win

00:01:41.780 --> 00:01:45.240
to push for their big another from
muhammad who says governments will

00:01:45.240 --> 00:01:48.729
basically use censorship to their
advantage crushing and suppressing all

00:01:48.729 --> 00:01:52.920
voices in well how do you respond to the
critics who say that there's been a lack

00:01:52.920 --> 00:01:57.520
of transparency in your process

00:01:57.520 --> 00:02:01.580
will we have that on skype outside city
in a way to you at the hospital

00:02:01.580 --> 00:02:02.450
initially

00:02:02.450 --> 00:02:06.240
to have national consultations in many
countries have done so and hated the

00:02:06.240 --> 00:02:12.129
press that item to send delegations that
to continue to explain what data about

00:02:12.129 --> 00:02:14.680
and some conditioned on done so

00:02:14.680 --> 00:02:19.329
if the country for once anyone who once
information can conduct his national

00:02:19.329 --> 00:02:21.769
uh... government to get the information

00:02:21.769 --> 00:02:24.120
and that the idea of trying to get

00:02:24.120 --> 00:02:27.100
all one hundred ninety six inches
together

00:02:27.100 --> 00:02:27.980
to agree

00:02:27.980 --> 00:02:29.760
by consensus on

00:02:29.760 --> 00:02:34.180
policies related to anything anything
related to content really

00:02:34.180 --> 00:02:35.519
that alone

00:02:35.519 --> 00:02:39.310
it's very difficult to imagine how you
could come to consensus that

00:02:39.310 --> 00:02:41.819
would be acceptable to all players

00:02:41.819 --> 00:02:46.260
general question about how much should
government's be able to watch what users

00:02:46.260 --> 00:02:50.400
are doing online and what are their
motives there visit in

00:02:50.400 --> 00:02:53.949
you know pursuing real criminals

00:02:53.949 --> 00:02:59.429
in some normative sense or is it trying
to control people who might the engaged

00:02:59.429 --> 00:03:02.039
in some kind of activism the government
doesn't like

00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:05.269
seen reports that the internet has been
shut down inferior

00:03:05.269 --> 00:03:08.509
and decode facts to say that there isn't
jamming today a look at what syria has

00:03:08.509 --> 00:03:12.159
done to their internet it uses the
control arty exist

00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:15.739
and there's a peaceful comments from now
means that is in fact dozens of

00:03:15.739 --> 00:03:19.469
countries including china russia and
some arab states already restrict

00:03:19.469 --> 00:03:23.079
internet access within their own borders
if these governments have greater

00:03:23.079 --> 00:03:26.549
leverage over internet content service
providers if changes are made