WEBVTT 00:00:01.341 --> 00:00:05.327 Right now, there's a lot happening with the Moon. 00:00:05.351 --> 00:00:09.162 China has announced plans for an inhabited South Pole station 00:00:09.186 --> 00:00:11.041 by the 2030s, 00:00:11.065 --> 00:00:13.652 and the United States has an official road map 00:00:13.676 --> 00:00:18.473 seeking an increasing number of people living and working in space. 00:00:18.497 --> 00:00:20.949 This will start with NASA's Artemis program, 00:00:20.973 --> 00:00:24.926 an international program to send the first woman and the next man 00:00:24.950 --> 00:00:26.854 to the Moon this decade. 00:00:26.878 --> 00:00:29.576 Billionaires and the private sector are getting involved 00:00:29.600 --> 00:00:31.367 in unprecedented ways. 00:00:31.852 --> 00:00:35.244 There are over a hundred launch companies around the world 00:00:35.268 --> 00:00:38.919 and roughly a dozen private lunar transportation companies 00:00:38.943 --> 00:00:41.905 readying robotic missions to the lunar surface. 00:00:42.754 --> 00:00:46.619 We have reusable rockets for the first time in human history. 00:00:47.167 --> 00:00:49.716 This will enable the development of infrastructure 00:00:49.740 --> 00:00:51.707 and utilization of resources. 00:00:52.227 --> 00:00:54.767 While estimates vary, scientists think 00:00:54.791 --> 00:00:58.902 there could be up to a billion metric tons of water ice on the Moon. 00:00:58.926 --> 00:01:01.354 That's greater than the size of Lake Erie, 00:01:01.378 --> 00:01:05.351 and enough water to support perhaps hundreds of thousands of people 00:01:05.375 --> 00:01:07.505 living and working on the Moon. 00:01:08.092 --> 00:01:11.099 So although official plans are always evolving, 00:01:11.123 --> 00:01:13.738 there's real reason to think that we could see people 00:01:13.762 --> 00:01:15.555 starting to live and work on the Moon 00:01:15.579 --> 00:01:16.789 in the next decade. 00:01:17.559 --> 00:01:22.148 However, the Moon is roughly the size of the continent of Africa, 00:01:22.172 --> 00:01:24.934 and we're starting to see that the key resources 00:01:24.958 --> 00:01:27.232 may be concentrated in small areas 00:01:27.256 --> 00:01:28.562 near the poles. 00:01:29.053 --> 00:01:34.062 This raises important questions about coordinating access to scarce resources. 00:01:34.872 --> 00:01:38.670 And there are also legitimate questions about going to the Moon: 00:01:38.694 --> 00:01:40.672 colonialism, cultural heritage 00:01:40.696 --> 00:01:44.723 and reproducing the systemic inequalities of today's capitalism. 00:01:45.442 --> 00:01:47.268 And more to the point: 00:01:47.292 --> 00:01:50.051 Don't we have enough big challenges here on Earth? 00:01:50.433 --> 00:01:54.787 Internet governance, pandemics, terrorism and, perhaps most importantly, 00:01:54.811 --> 00:01:57.500 climate crisis and biodiversity loss. 00:01:58.519 --> 00:01:59.686 In some senses, 00:01:59.710 --> 00:02:03.165 the idea of the Moon as just a destination 00:02:03.189 --> 00:02:05.997 embodies these problematic qualities. 00:02:06.021 --> 00:02:08.119 It conjures a frontier attitude 00:02:08.143 --> 00:02:09.537 of conquest, 00:02:09.561 --> 00:02:11.913 big rockets and expensive projects, 00:02:11.937 --> 00:02:13.812 competition and winning. NOTE Paragraph 00:02:14.671 --> 00:02:17.305 But what's most interesting about the Moon 00:02:17.329 --> 00:02:19.870 isn't the billionaires with their rockets 00:02:19.894 --> 00:02:22.927 or the same old power struggle between states. 00:02:23.495 --> 00:02:26.140 In fact, it's not the hardware at all. 00:02:26.837 --> 00:02:28.700 It's the software. 00:02:28.724 --> 00:02:31.244 It's the norms, customs and laws. 00:02:31.268 --> 00:02:33.497 It's our social technologies. 00:02:33.902 --> 00:02:37.668 And it's the opportunity to update our democratic institutions 00:02:37.692 --> 00:02:39.521 and the rule of law 00:02:39.545 --> 00:02:43.559 to respond to a new era of planetary-scale challenges. 00:02:44.439 --> 00:02:47.660 I'm going to tell you about how the Moon can be a canvas 00:02:47.684 --> 00:02:50.915 for solving some of our biggest challenges here on Earth. NOTE Paragraph 00:02:51.550 --> 00:02:56.522 I've been kind of obsessed with this topic since I was a teenager. 00:02:56.546 --> 00:03:01.294 I've spent the last two decades working on international space policy, 00:03:01.318 --> 00:03:05.608 but also on small community projects with bottom-up governance design. NOTE Paragraph 00:03:06.462 --> 00:03:07.870 When I was 17, 00:03:07.894 --> 00:03:11.206 I went to a UN conference on the peaceful uses of outer space 00:03:11.230 --> 00:03:12.403 in Vienna. 00:03:13.002 --> 00:03:17.429 Over two weeks, 160 young people from over 60 countries 00:03:17.453 --> 00:03:20.861 were crammed into a big hotel next to the UN building. 00:03:21.405 --> 00:03:23.412 We were invited to make recommendations 00:03:23.436 --> 00:03:24.603 to Member States 00:03:24.627 --> 00:03:27.565 about the role of space in humanity's future. NOTE Paragraph 00:03:28.452 --> 00:03:29.834 After the conference, 00:03:29.858 --> 00:03:31.553 some of us were so inspired 00:03:31.577 --> 00:03:34.416 that we actually decided to keep living together. 00:03:34.779 --> 00:03:39.130 Now, living with 20 people might sound kind of crazy, 00:03:39.154 --> 00:03:44.665 but over the years, it enabled us to create a high-trust group 00:03:44.689 --> 00:03:49.228 that allowed us to experiment with these social technologies. 00:03:49.252 --> 00:03:53.273 We designed governance systems ranging from assigning a CEO 00:03:53.297 --> 00:03:55.409 to using a jury process. 00:03:55.941 --> 00:03:58.420 And as we grew into our careers, 00:03:58.444 --> 00:04:01.883 and we moved from DC think tanks to working for NASA 00:04:01.907 --> 00:04:04.400 to starting our own companies, 00:04:04.424 --> 00:04:06.952 these experiments enabled us to see 00:04:06.976 --> 00:04:09.980 how even small groups could be a petri dish 00:04:10.004 --> 00:04:13.732 for important societal questions such as representation, 00:04:13.756 --> 00:04:16.016 sustainability or opportunity. 00:04:16.993 --> 00:04:20.741 People often talk about the Moon as a petri dish 00:04:20.765 --> 00:04:22.610 or even a blank slate. 00:04:23.506 --> 00:04:27.797 But because of the legal agreements that govern the Moon, 00:04:27.821 --> 00:04:30.989 it actually has something very important in common 00:04:31.013 --> 00:04:33.608 with our global challenges here on Earth. 00:04:34.343 --> 00:04:40.538 They both involve issues that require us to think beyond territory and borders, 00:04:40.562 --> 00:04:43.166 meaning the Moon is actually more of a template 00:04:43.190 --> 00:04:44.778 than a blank slate. NOTE Paragraph 00:04:45.922 --> 00:04:51.288 Signed in 1967, the Outer Space Treaty is the defining treaty 00:04:51.312 --> 00:04:53.466 governing activities in outer space, 00:04:53.490 --> 00:04:54.829 including the Moon. 00:04:55.645 --> 00:04:57.804 And it has two key ingredients 00:04:57.828 --> 00:05:02.357 that radically alter the basis on which laws can be constructed. 00:05:02.904 --> 00:05:08.966 The first is a requirement for free access to all areas of a celestial body. 00:05:09.935 --> 00:05:13.951 And the second is that the Moon and other celestial bodies 00:05:13.975 --> 00:05:17.598 are not subject to national appropriation. 00:05:17.622 --> 00:05:20.406 Now, this is crazy, 00:05:20.430 --> 00:05:24.168 because the entire earthly international system -- 00:05:24.192 --> 00:05:25.418 the United Nations, 00:05:25.442 --> 00:05:28.294 the system of treaties and international agreements -- 00:05:28.318 --> 00:05:31.588 is built on the idea of state sovereignty, 00:05:31.612 --> 00:05:34.919 on the appropriation of land and resources within borders 00:05:34.943 --> 00:05:38.744 and the autonomy to control free access within those borders. 00:05:39.618 --> 00:05:41.839 By doing away with both of these, 00:05:41.863 --> 00:05:45.132 we create the conditions for what are called the "commons." NOTE Paragraph 00:05:45.719 --> 00:05:49.912 Based on the work of Nobel Prize-winning economist Elinor Ostrom, 00:05:49.936 --> 00:05:53.743 global commons are those resources that we all share 00:05:53.767 --> 00:05:56.645 that require us to work together to manage and protect 00:05:56.669 --> 00:06:00.551 important aspects of our survival and well-being, 00:06:00.575 --> 00:06:02.970 like climate or the oceans. 00:06:03.414 --> 00:06:07.748 Commons-based approaches offer a greenfield for institution design 00:06:07.772 --> 00:06:09.581 that's only beginning to be explored 00:06:09.605 --> 00:06:12.741 at the global and interplanetary level. 00:06:12.765 --> 00:06:14.445 What do property rights look like? 00:06:14.469 --> 00:06:16.208 And how do we manage resources 00:06:16.232 --> 00:06:20.668 when the traditional tools of external authority and private property 00:06:20.692 --> 00:06:21.902 don't apply? NOTE Paragraph 00:06:22.429 --> 00:06:24.687 Though we don't have all the answers, 00:06:24.711 --> 00:06:27.822 climate, internet governance, authoritarianism -- 00:06:27.846 --> 00:06:30.593 these are all deeply existential threats 00:06:30.617 --> 00:06:33.665 that we have failed to address with our current ways of thinking. 00:06:34.486 --> 00:06:38.580 Successful paths forward will require us to develop new tools. NOTE Paragraph 00:06:39.143 --> 00:06:43.014 So how do we incorporate commons-based logic 00:06:43.038 --> 00:06:46.399 into our global and space institutions? 00:06:47.088 --> 00:06:51.862 Well, here's one attempt that came from an unlikely source. 00:06:51.886 --> 00:06:54.810 As a young activist in World War II, 00:06:54.834 --> 00:06:58.134 Arvid Pardo was arrested for anti-fascist organizing 00:06:58.158 --> 00:07:01.340 and held under death sentence by the Gestapo. 00:07:01.856 --> 00:07:03.105 After the war, 00:07:03.129 --> 00:07:06.092 he worked his way into the diplomatic corps, 00:07:06.116 --> 00:07:09.779 eventually becoming the first permanent representative of Malta 00:07:09.803 --> 00:07:11.528 to the United Nations. 00:07:11.552 --> 00:07:15.197 Pardo saw that international law did not have the tools 00:07:15.221 --> 00:07:18.248 to address management of shared global resources, 00:07:18.272 --> 00:07:19.976 such as the high seas. 00:07:20.683 --> 00:07:25.796 He also saw an opportunity to advocate for equitable sharing between nations. NOTE Paragraph 00:07:26.156 --> 00:07:31.310 In 1967, Pardo gave a famous speech to the United Nations, 00:07:31.334 --> 00:07:32.959 introducing the idea 00:07:32.983 --> 00:07:38.706 that the oceans and their resources were the "common heritage of mankind." 00:07:38.730 --> 00:07:43.071 The phrase was eventually adopted as part of the Law of the Sea Treaty, 00:07:43.095 --> 00:07:46.243 probably the most sophisticated commons-management regime 00:07:46.267 --> 00:07:47.665 on the planet today. 00:07:48.070 --> 00:07:50.603 It was seen as a watershed moment, 00:07:50.627 --> 00:07:53.125 a constitution for the seas. 00:07:53.760 --> 00:07:56.749 But the language proved so controversial 00:07:56.773 --> 00:07:59.729 that it took over 12 years to gain enough signatures 00:07:59.753 --> 00:08:01.889 for the treaty to enter into force, 00:08:01.913 --> 00:08:05.064 and some states still refuse to sign it. 00:08:06.208 --> 00:08:10.145 The objection was not so much about sharing per se, 00:08:10.169 --> 00:08:12.370 but the obligation to share. 00:08:13.124 --> 00:08:18.314 States felt that the principle of equality undermined their autonomy 00:08:18.338 --> 00:08:20.719 and state sovereignty, 00:08:20.743 --> 00:08:25.615 the same autonomy and state sovereignty that underpins international law. 00:08:26.631 --> 00:08:29.030 So in many ways, 00:08:29.054 --> 00:08:31.622 the story of the common heritage principle 00:08:31.646 --> 00:08:32.930 is a tragedy. 00:08:33.819 --> 00:08:36.788 But it's powerful because it makes plain 00:08:36.812 --> 00:08:42.433 the ways in which the current world order will put up antibodies and defenses 00:08:42.457 --> 00:08:45.378 and resist attempts at structural reform. NOTE Paragraph 00:08:46.870 --> 00:08:49.087 But here's the thing: 00:08:49.111 --> 00:08:53.015 the Outer Space Treaty has already made these structural reforms. 00:08:53.832 --> 00:08:55.426 At the height of the Cold War, 00:08:55.450 --> 00:08:58.241 terrified that each would get to the Moon first, 00:08:58.265 --> 00:09:00.476 the United States and the USSR 00:09:00.500 --> 00:09:04.099 made the Westphalian equivalent of a deal with the devil. 00:09:04.613 --> 00:09:09.373 By requiring free access and preventing territorial appropriation, 00:09:09.397 --> 00:09:13.403 we are required to redesign our most basic institutions, 00:09:13.427 --> 00:09:15.197 and perhaps in doing so, 00:09:15.221 --> 00:09:18.024 learn something new we can apply here on Earth. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:18.808 --> 00:09:22.865 So although the Moon might seem a little far away sometimes, 00:09:22.889 --> 00:09:25.358 how we answer basic questions now 00:09:25.382 --> 00:09:28.500 will set precedent for who has a seat at the table 00:09:28.524 --> 00:09:30.316 and what consent looks like. 00:09:30.928 --> 00:09:33.751 And these are questions of social technology, 00:09:33.775 --> 00:09:35.789 not rockets and hardware. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:36.703 --> 00:09:40.818 In fact, these conversations are starting to happen right now. 00:09:41.381 --> 00:09:44.589 The space community is discussing basic shared agreements, 00:09:44.613 --> 00:09:49.264 such as how do we designate lunar areas as heritage sites, 00:09:49.288 --> 00:09:52.184 and how do we get permission for where to land 00:09:52.208 --> 00:09:54.456 when traditional external authority 00:09:54.480 --> 00:09:56.098 doesn't apply? 00:09:56.122 --> 00:09:59.096 How do we enforce requirements for coordination 00:09:59.120 --> 00:10:02.197 when it's against the rules to tell people where to go? 00:10:02.727 --> 00:10:06.338 And how do we manage access to scarce resources 00:10:06.362 --> 00:10:08.706 such as water, minerals, 00:10:08.730 --> 00:10:12.015 or even the peaks of eternal light -- 00:10:12.039 --> 00:10:14.668 craters that sit at just the right latitude 00:10:14.692 --> 00:10:17.355 to receive near-constant exposure to sunlight -- 00:10:17.379 --> 00:10:19.127 and therefore, power? NOTE Paragraph 00:10:19.151 --> 00:10:23.151 Now, some people think that the lack of rules on the Moon 00:10:23.175 --> 00:10:24.738 is terrifying. 00:10:24.762 --> 00:10:28.794 And there are legitimately some terrifying elements of it. 00:10:29.961 --> 00:10:31.821 If there are no rules on the Moon, 00:10:31.845 --> 00:10:35.737 then won't we end up in a first-come, first-served situation? 00:10:36.451 --> 00:10:38.464 And we might, 00:10:38.488 --> 00:10:40.700 if we dismiss this moment. 00:10:41.470 --> 00:10:45.732 But not if we're willing to be bold and to engage the challenge. 00:10:46.826 --> 00:10:49.538 As we learned in our communities of self-governance, 00:10:49.562 --> 00:10:54.099 it's easier to create something new than trying to dismantle the old. 00:10:54.821 --> 00:10:56.681 And where else but the Moon 00:10:56.705 --> 00:11:00.900 can we prototype new institutions at global scale 00:11:00.924 --> 00:11:04.903 in a self-contained environment with the exact design constraints needed 00:11:04.927 --> 00:11:07.721 for our biggest challenges here on Earth? 00:11:09.197 --> 00:11:11.042 Back in 1999, 00:11:11.066 --> 00:11:14.546 the United Nations taught a group of young space geeks 00:11:14.570 --> 00:11:16.731 that we could think bigger, 00:11:16.755 --> 00:11:19.899 that we could impact nations if we chose to. 00:11:20.645 --> 00:11:24.340 Today, the stage is set for the next step: 00:11:24.364 --> 00:11:28.340 to envision what comes after territory and borders. NOTE Paragraph 00:11:29.227 --> 00:11:30.379 Thank you.