1
00:00:00,917 --> 00:00:05,565
Right now, there's a lot
happening with the Moon.

2
00:00:05,565 --> 00:00:08,932
China has announced plans
for an inhabited South Pole station

3
00:00:08,932 --> 00:00:11,185
by the 2030s,

4
00:00:11,185 --> 00:00:13,912
and the United States has
an official road map

5
00:00:13,912 --> 00:00:18,598
seeking an increasing number of people
living and working in space.

6
00:00:18,598 --> 00:00:21,203
This will start with
NASA's Artemis program,

7
00:00:21,203 --> 00:00:24,745
an international program to send
the first woman and the next man

8
00:00:24,745 --> 00:00:26,829
to the Moon this decade.

9
00:00:27,030 --> 00:00:29,649
Billionaires and the private sector
are getting involved

10
00:00:29,649 --> 00:00:32,035
in unprecedented ways.

11
00:00:32,035 --> 00:00:35,450
There are over a hundred
launch companies around the world

12
00:00:35,450 --> 00:00:38,943
and roughly a dozen private
lunar transportation companies

13
00:00:38,943 --> 00:00:42,300
readying robotic missions
to the lunar surface.

14
00:00:42,600 --> 00:00:47,078
We have reusable rockets
for the first time in human history.

15
00:00:47,089 --> 00:00:49,478
This will enable the development
of infrastructure

16
00:00:49,478 --> 00:00:51,645
and utilization of resources.

17
00:00:52,442 --> 00:00:55,660
While estimates vary, scientists think

18
00:00:55,861 --> 00:00:59,221
there could be up to a billion metric tons
of water ice on the Moon.

19
00:00:59,221 --> 00:01:01,657
That's greater than the size of Lake Erie,

20
00:01:01,909 --> 00:01:05,761
and enough water to support
perhaps hundreds of thousands of people

21
00:01:05,761 --> 00:01:08,513
living and working on the Moon.

22
00:01:08,513 --> 00:01:11,306
So although official plans
are always evolving,

23
00:01:11,306 --> 00:01:15,978
there's real reason to think
that we could see people

24
00:01:15,978 --> 00:01:17,795
starting to live and work on the Moon
in the next decade.

25
00:01:17,795 --> 00:01:21,721
However, the Moon is roughly
the size of the continent of Africa,

26
00:01:22,039 --> 00:01:24,958
and we're starting to see
that the key resources

27
00:01:24,958 --> 00:01:27,432
may be concentrated in small areas

28
00:01:27,432 --> 00:01:29,219
near the poles.

29
00:01:29,219 --> 00:01:33,969
This raises important questions about
coordinating access to scarce resources,

30
00:01:34,206 --> 00:01:38,861
and there are also legitimate questions
about going to the Moon:

31
00:01:38,861 --> 00:01:41,771
colonialism, cultural heritage,

32
00:01:41,771 --> 00:01:44,991
and reproducing the systemic inequalities
of today's capitalism.

33
00:01:45,442 --> 00:01:47,292
And more to the point,

34
00:01:47,292 --> 00:01:50,051
don't we have enough
big challenges here on Earth?

35
00:01:50,735 --> 00:01:53,772
Internet governance, pandemics, terrorism,

36
00:01:53,772 --> 00:01:57,742
and, perhaps most importantly,
climate crisis and biodiversity loss.

37
00:01:58,726 --> 00:02:02,605
In some senses,

38
00:02:02,605 --> 00:02:03,437
the idea of the Moon as just a destination

39
00:02:03,437 --> 00:02:05,726
embodies these problematic qualities.

40
00:02:06,021 --> 00:02:08,507
It conjures a frontier attitude

41
00:02:08,507 --> 00:02:09,924
of conquest,

42
00:02:09,924 --> 00:02:12,277
big rockets and expensive projects,

43
00:02:12,277 --> 00:02:13,812
competition and winning.

44
00:02:14,886 --> 00:02:17,655
But what's most interesting about the Moon

45
00:02:17,655 --> 00:02:20,134
isn't the billionaires with their rockets,

46
00:02:20,134 --> 00:02:23,860
or the same old
power struggle between states.

47
00:02:23,860 --> 00:02:27,346
In fact, it's not the hardware at all.

48
00:02:27,346 --> 00:02:29,232
It's the software.

49
00:02:29,232 --> 00:02:31,309
It's the norms, customs and laws.

50
00:02:31,491 --> 00:02:33,744
It's our social technologies.

51
00:02:33,744 --> 00:02:36,505
And it's the opportunity to update

52
00:02:36,505 --> 00:02:39,940
our democratic institutions

53
00:02:39,940 --> 00:02:42,108
and the rule of law

54
00:02:42,108 --> 00:02:44,787
to respond to a new era
of planetary-scale challenges.

55
00:02:44,995 --> 00:02:47,955
I'm going to tell you about
how the Moon can be a canvass

56
00:02:47,955 --> 00:02:50,674
for solving some of our biggest
challenges here on Earth.

57
00:02:50,674 --> 00:02:55,797
I've been kind obsessed with this topic

58
00:02:55,797 --> 00:02:57,120
since I was a teenager.

59
00:02:57,120 --> 00:03:00,925
I've spent the last two decades
working on international space policy,

60
00:03:01,259 --> 00:03:05,911
but also on small community projects
with bottom-up governance design.

61
00:03:06,653 --> 00:03:08,555
When I was 17,

62
00:03:08,555 --> 00:03:11,307
I went to a UN conference

63
00:03:11,307 --> 00:03:13,741
on the peaceful uses
of outer space in Vienna.

64
00:03:13,741 --> 00:03:17,787
Over two weeks, 160 young people
from over 60 countries

65
00:03:17,787 --> 00:03:22,318
were crammed into a big hotel
next to the UN building.

66
00:03:22,318 --> 00:03:24,348
We were invited to make recommendations

67
00:03:24,348 --> 00:03:25,943
to Member States

68
00:03:25,943 --> 00:03:28,643
about the role of space
in humanity's future.

69
00:03:28,643 --> 00:03:30,048
After the conference,

70
00:03:30,048 --> 00:03:31,766
some of us were so inspired

71
00:03:31,766 --> 00:03:34,605
that we actually decided
to keep living together.

72
00:03:34,922 --> 00:03:39,766
Now, living with 20 people
might sound kind of crazy,

73
00:03:39,766 --> 00:03:44,920
but over the years it enabled us
to create a high-trust group

74
00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:49,731
that allowed us to experiment
with these social technologies.

75
00:03:49,731 --> 00:03:53,330
We designed governance systems
ranging from assigning a CEO

76
00:03:53,330 --> 00:03:55,866
to using a jury process,

77
00:03:55,866 --> 00:03:58,326
and as we grew into our careers,

78
00:03:58,326 --> 00:04:01,561
and we moved from DC think tanks
to working for NASA

79
00:04:01,561 --> 00:04:05,582
to starting our own companies,

80
00:04:05,582 --> 00:04:07,955
these experiments enabled us to see

81
00:04:07,955 --> 00:04:09,190
how even small groups

82
00:04:09,190 --> 00:04:11,685
could be a petri dish

83
00:04:11,685 --> 00:04:14,488
for important societal questions
such as representation,

84
00:04:14,488 --> 00:04:18,216
sustainability or opportunity.

85
00:04:18,216 --> 00:04:20,069
People often talk about the Moon

86
00:04:20,069 --> 00:04:22,306
as a petri dish,

87
00:04:22,306 --> 00:04:24,657
or even a blank slate,

88
00:04:24,657 --> 00:04:26,610
but because of the legal agreements

89
00:04:27,211 --> 00:04:28,512
that govern the Moon,

90
00:04:28,512 --> 00:04:31,899
it actually has something
very important in common

91
00:04:31,899 --> 00:04:34,518
with our global challenges here on Earth.

92
00:04:34,518 --> 00:04:38,478
They both involve issues

93
00:04:38,478 --> 00:04:40,465
that require us to think
beyond territory and borders,

94
00:04:40,465 --> 00:04:44,006
meaning the Moon is actually
more of a template

95
00:04:44,006 --> 00:04:46,359
than a blank slate.

96
00:04:46,359 --> 00:04:49,460
Signed in 1967,

97
00:04:49,460 --> 00:04:50,737
the Outer Space Treaty

98
00:04:50,737 --> 00:04:54,393
is the defining treaty governing
activities in outer space,

99
00:04:54,393 --> 00:04:55,756
including the Moon,

100
00:04:55,756 --> 00:04:58,343
and it has two key ingredients

101
00:04:58,343 --> 00:05:00,228
that radically alter the basis

102
00:05:00,228 --> 00:05:02,853
on which laws can be constructed.

103
00:05:03,190 --> 00:05:09,276
The first is a requirement for free access
to all areas of a celestial body.

104
00:05:09,276 --> 00:05:13,854
And the second is that the Moon
and other celestial bodies

105
00:05:13,854 --> 00:05:17,523
are not subject to national appropriation.

106
00:05:17,790 --> 00:05:20,767
Now, this is crazy,

107
00:05:20,767 --> 00:05:23,839
because the entire earthly
international system --

108
00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:25,932
the United Nations,

109
00:05:25,932 --> 00:05:28,707
the system of treaties
and international agreements,

110
00:05:28,707 --> 00:05:31,455
is built on the idea of state sovereignty,

111
00:05:31,788 --> 00:05:35,458
on the appropriation of land
and resources within borders

112
00:05:35,458 --> 00:05:38,405
and the autonomy to control free access

113
00:05:38,405 --> 00:05:39,841
within those borders.

114
00:05:39,841 --> 00:05:42,463
By doing away with both of these,

115
00:05:42,463 --> 00:05:45,333
we create the conditions
for what are called the commons.

116
00:05:45,767 --> 00:05:47,039
Based on the work

117
00:05:47,039 --> 00:05:50,142
of Nobel Prize-winning
economist Elinor Ostrom,

118
00:05:50,142 --> 00:05:54,487
global commons are those resources
that we all share,

119
00:05:54,487 --> 00:05:56,991
that require us to work together
to manage and protect

120
00:05:56,991 --> 00:06:00,717
important aspects
of our survival and wellbeing,

121
00:06:00,885 --> 00:06:03,421
like climate or the oceans.

122
00:06:03,637 --> 00:06:05,222
Commons-based approaches

123
00:06:05,222 --> 00:06:09,016
offer a greenfield for institution design

124
00:06:09,016 --> 00:06:10,636
that's only beginning to be explored

125
00:06:10,636 --> 00:06:13,071
at the global and interplanetary level.

126
00:06:13,303 --> 00:06:14,921
What do property rights look like,

127
00:06:14,921 --> 00:06:16,506
and how do we manage resources,

128
00:06:16,506 --> 00:06:19,082
when the traditional tools
of external authority

129
00:06:19,265 --> 00:06:21,901
and private property don't apply?

130
00:06:22,469 --> 00:06:24,404
Though we don't have all the answers,

131
00:06:24,404 --> 00:06:27,846
climate, internet governance,
authoritarianism,

132
00:06:27,846 --> 00:06:31,716
these are all deeply existential threats

133
00:06:31,716 --> 00:06:34,719
that we have failed to address
with our current ways of thinking.

134
00:06:34,719 --> 00:06:38,264
Successful paths forward
will require us to develop new tools.

135
00:06:39,215 --> 00:06:43,285
So how do we incorporate
commons-based logic

136
00:06:43,285 --> 00:06:46,437
into our global and space institutions?

137
00:06:46,670 --> 00:06:50,885
Well, here's one attempt

138
00:06:50,885 --> 00:06:52,787
that came from an unlikely source.

139
00:06:52,787 --> 00:06:54,707
As a young activist in World War II,

140
00:06:54,707 --> 00:06:58,976
Arvid Pardo was arrested
for anti-fascist organizing

141
00:06:58,976 --> 00:07:03,454
and held under death sentence
by the Gestapo.

142
00:07:03,454 --> 00:07:04,327
After the war,

143
00:07:04,327 --> 00:07:05,830
he worked his way
into the diplomatic corps,

144
00:07:05,830 --> 00:07:07,823
eventually becoming

145
00:07:07,823 --> 00:07:11,384
the first permanent representative
of Malta to the United Nations.

146
00:07:11,751 --> 00:07:14,654
Pardo saw that international law
did not have the tools

147
00:07:14,654 --> 00:07:18,240
to address management
of shared global resources,

148
00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:20,374
such as the high seas.

149
00:07:20,575 --> 00:07:25,571
He also saw an opportunity to advocate
for equitable sharing between nations.

150
00:07:26,156 --> 00:07:32,259
In 1967, Pardo gave a famous speech
to the United Nations

151
00:07:32,259 --> 00:07:33,678
introducing the idea

152
00:07:33,678 --> 00:07:35,512
that the oceans and their resources

153
00:07:35,512 --> 00:07:38,848
were the "common heritage of mankind."

154
00:07:39,049 --> 00:07:43,095
The phrase was eventually adopted
as part of the Law of the Sea Treaty,

155
00:07:43,095 --> 00:07:47,197
probably the most sophisticated
commons management regime

156
00:07:47,197 --> 00:07:48,816
on the planet today.

157
00:07:48,816 --> 00:07:50,934
It was seen as a watershed moment,

158
00:07:50,934 --> 00:07:53,328
a constitution for the seas.

159
00:07:53,628 --> 00:07:56,851
But the language proved so controversial

160
00:07:56,851 --> 00:08:00,571
that it took over 12 years
to gain enough signatures

161
00:08:00,571 --> 00:08:02,489
for the treaty to enter into force,

162
00:08:02,489 --> 00:08:05,064
and some states still refuse to sign it.

163
00:08:05,883 --> 00:08:10,419
The objection was not so much
about sharing per se,

164
00:08:10,419 --> 00:08:12,971
but the obligation to share.

165
00:08:12,971 --> 00:08:16,915
States felt that the principle of equality

166
00:08:16,915 --> 00:08:18,934
undermined their autonomy

167
00:08:18,934 --> 00:08:21,736
and state sovereignty,

168
00:08:21,736 --> 00:08:23,939
the same autonomy and state sovereignty

169
00:08:23,939 --> 00:08:26,365
that underpins international law.

170
00:08:26,631 --> 00:08:29,317
So in many ways,

171
00:08:29,317 --> 00:08:31,753
the story of the common heritage principle

172
00:08:31,753 --> 00:08:33,472
is a tragedy,

173
00:08:33,472 --> 00:08:38,915
but it's powerful because
it makes plain the ways

174
00:08:38,915 --> 00:08:40,470
in which the current world order

175
00:08:40,470 --> 00:08:42,518
will put up antibodies and defenses

176
00:08:42,518 --> 00:08:46,264
and resist attempts at structural reform.

177
00:08:46,264 --> 00:08:49,333
But here's the thing:

178
00:08:49,333 --> 00:08:52,869
the outer space treaty has already
made these structural reforms.

179
00:08:53,219 --> 00:08:55,550
At the height of the Cold War,

180
00:08:55,550 --> 00:08:58,519
terrified that each
would get to the Moon first,

181
00:08:58,519 --> 00:09:00,733
the United States and the USSR

182
00:09:00,733 --> 00:09:04,099
made the Westphalian equivalent
of a deal with the devil.

183
00:09:04,432 --> 00:09:09,677
By requiring free access
and preventing territorial appropriation,

184
00:09:09,677 --> 00:09:12,913
we are required to redesign
our most basic institutions

185
00:09:13,680 --> 00:09:15,309
and perhaps in doing so

186
00:09:15,309 --> 00:09:18,895
learn something new
we can apply here on Earth.

187
00:09:18,895 --> 00:09:22,889
So although the Moon might seem
a little far away sometimes,

188
00:09:22,889 --> 00:09:25,476
how we answer basic questions now

189
00:09:25,476 --> 00:09:28,795
will set precedent
for who has a seat at the table

190
00:09:28,795 --> 00:09:31,198
and what consent looks like,

191
00:09:31,198 --> 00:09:34,159
and these are questions of social technology,

192
00:09:34,159 --> 00:09:36,692
not rockets and hardware.

193
00:09:36,926 --> 00:09:40,397
In fact, these conversations
are starting to happen right now.

194
00:09:41,013 --> 00:09:44,320
The space community is discussing
basic shared agreements

195
00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:49,020
such as, how do we designate
lunar areas as heritage sites?

196
00:09:49,020 --> 00:09:52,208
And how do we get permission
for where to land

197
00:09:52,208 --> 00:09:55,409
when traditional external authority

198
00:09:55,609 --> 00:09:57,011
doesn't apply?

199
00:09:57,011 --> 00:09:59,581
How do we enforce requirements
for coordination

200
00:09:59,581 --> 00:10:02,658
when it's against the rules
to tell people where to go?

201
00:10:02,974 --> 00:10:06,560
And how do we manage
access to scarce resources

202
00:10:06,560 --> 00:10:09,129
such as water, minerals,

203
00:10:09,129 --> 00:10:12,222
or even the peaks of eternal light,

204
00:10:12,222 --> 00:10:14,732
craters that sit
at just the right latitude

205
00:10:14,732 --> 00:10:19,001
to receive near constant exposure
to sunlight, and therefore power?

206
00:10:19,261 --> 00:10:24,056
Now, some people think
that the lack of rules on the Moon

207
00:10:24,056 --> 00:10:25,174
is terrifying.

208
00:10:25,174 --> 00:10:29,594
And there are legitimately
some terrifying elements of it.

209
00:10:29,594 --> 00:10:33,273
If there are no rules on the Moon,

210
00:10:33,273 --> 00:10:36,211
then won't we end up
in a first-come, first-served situation?

211
00:10:36,408 --> 00:10:39,043
And we might,

212
00:10:39,043 --> 00:10:40,895
if we dismiss this moment.

213
00:10:41,412 --> 00:10:44,689
But not if we're willing to be bold

214
00:10:44,689 --> 00:10:46,874
and to engage the challenge.

215
00:10:46,874 --> 00:10:50,561
As we learned in our communities
of self-governance,

216
00:10:50,561 --> 00:10:54,556
it's easier to create something new
than trying to dismantle the old.

217
00:10:54,556 --> 00:10:56,644
And where else but the Moon

218
00:10:56,644 --> 00:11:01,537
can we prototype
new institutions at global scale

219
00:11:01,537 --> 00:11:05,143
in a self-contained environment
with the exact design constraints needed

220
00:11:05,143 --> 00:11:08,547
for our biggest challenges here on Earth?

221
00:11:08,814 --> 00:11:11,066
Back in 1999,

222
00:11:11,066 --> 00:11:14,570
the United Nations taught
a group of young space geeks

223
00:11:14,570 --> 00:11:16,905
that we could think bigger,

224
00:11:16,905 --> 00:11:20,331
that we could impact nations
if we chose to.

225
00:11:20,598 --> 00:11:23,708
Today, the stage is set for the next step,

226
00:11:24,586 --> 00:11:26,436
to envision what comes after

227
00:11:26,436 --> 00:11:28,561
territory and borders.

228
00:11:29,363 --> 00:11:30,515
Thank you.