WEBVTT

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In 1905, psychologists Alfred Binet and
Théodore Simon

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
designed a test for children who were 
struggling in school in France.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Designed to determine which children
required individualized attention,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
their method formed the basis
of the IQ test.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Beginning in the late 19th century,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
researchers hypothesized that cognitive
abilities like verbal reasoning,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
working memory, and visual-spatial skills

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
reflected an underlying general 
intelligence, or g factor.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Simon and Binet designed a battery of 
tests to measure each of these abilities

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and combine the results 
into a single score.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Questions were adjusted for each 
age group,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and a child’s score reflected how they 
performed relative to others their age.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Dividing someone’s score by their age 
and multiplying the result by 100

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
yielded the intelligence quotient, or IQ.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Today, a score of 100 represents 
the average of a sample population,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with 68% of the population 
scoring within 15 points of 100.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Simon and Binet thought the skills 
their test assessed

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
would reflect general intelligence.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But both then and now,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
there’s no single agreed upon 
definition of general intelligence.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And that left the door open for people
to use the test

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in service of their own preconceived 
assumptions about intelligence.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
What started as a way to identify those
who needed academic help quickly

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
became used to sort people in other ways,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
often in service of deeply flawed ideologies.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
One of the first large-scale 
implementations

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
occurred in the United States during WWI, 
when the military used an IQ test

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to sort recruits and screen them 
for officer training.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
At that time, many people 
believed in eugenics,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the idea that desirable and 
undesirable genetic traits

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
could and should be controlled in 
humans through selective breeding.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There were many problems with 
this line of thinking,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
among them the idea that intelligence
was not only fixed and inherited,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but also linked to a person’s race.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Under the influence of eugenics,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
scientists used the results of the
military initiative

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to make erroneous claims that certain
racial groups

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
were intellectually superior to others.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Without taking into account that 
many of the recruits tested

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
were new immigrants to the United States

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who lacked formal education 
or English language exposure,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
they created an erroneous 
intelligence hierarchy of ethnic groups.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The intersection of Eugenics and IQ
testing influenced not only science,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but policy as well.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In 1924, the state of Virginia created 
policy

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
allowing for the forced sterilization of 
people with low IQ scores—

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a decision the United States 
supreme court upheld.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In Nazi Germany, the government 
authorized the murder of children

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
based on low IQ.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Following the Holocaust and the 
civil rights movement,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the discriminatory uses of IQ tests were
challenged

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on both moral and scientific grounds.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Scientists began to gather evidence 
of environmental impacts on IQ.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
For example, as IQ tests were periodically
recalibrated over the 20th century,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
new generations scored consistently
higher on old tests

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
than each previous generation.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
This phenomenon, known 
as the Flynn Effect,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
happened much too fast to be caused 
by inherited evolutionary traits.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Instead, the cause was likely 
environmental –

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
improved education, better 
healthcare, and better nutrition.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In the mid-twentieth century,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
psychologists also attempted to use 
IQ tests

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to evaluate things other than 
general intelligence,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
particularly schizophrenia, depression,
and other psychiatric conditions.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
These diagnoses relied in part on the
clinical judgment of the evaluators,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and used a subset of the tests used 
to determine IQ––

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a practice later research found does 
not yield clinically useful information.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Today, IQ tests employ many similar
design elements and types of questions

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as the early tests,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
though we have better techniques for
identifying potential bias in the test.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
They’re no longer used to diagnose
psychiatric conditions.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But a similarly problematic practice 
using subtest scores

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is still sometimes used to diagnose
learning disabilities,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
against the advice of many experts.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Psychologists around the world 
still use IQ tests

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to identify intellectual disability,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the results can be used to 
determine appropriate educational support,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
job training, and assisted living.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
IQ test results have been used 
to justify horrific policies

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and scientifically baseless ideologies.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That doesn’t mean the test itself 
is worthless—

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in fact, it does a good job of measuring
the reasoning and problem-solving skills

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it sets out to.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But that isn’t the same thing as
measuring a person’s potential.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Though there are many complicated
political, historical, scientific,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and cultural issues wrapped up 
in IQ testing,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
more and more researchers 
agree on this point,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and reject the notion that individuals
can be categorized

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by a single numerical score.