[Script Info]
Title: 
[Events]
Format: Layer, Start, End, Style, Name, MarginL, MarginR, MarginV, Effect, Text
Dialogue: 0,0:00:00.00,0:00:00.57,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,
Dialogue: 0,0:00:00.57,0:00:03.58,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,There's been a lot of talk very\Nrecently, or definitely
Dialogue: 0,0:00:03.58,0:00:05.94,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,over the last several years,\Nabout the idea of intelligent
Dialogue: 0,0:00:05.94,0:00:10.97,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,design and how it compares\Nto evolution.
Dialogue: 0,0:00:10.97,0:00:14.58,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And my goal in this video\Nisn't to enter into that
Dialogue: 0,0:00:14.58,0:00:17.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,discussion, or it's actually\Nturned into an argument in
Dialogue: 0,0:00:17.95,0:00:21.50,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,most circles, but really to make\Nmy best attempt to kind
Dialogue: 0,0:00:21.50,0:00:25.71,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,of reconcile the notions.
Dialogue: 0,0:00:25.71,0:00:28.11,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So the idea behind intelligent\Ndesign is really that there
Dialogue: 0,0:00:28.11,0:00:31.25,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,are some things that we see in\Nour world that are just so
Dialogue: 0,0:00:31.25,0:00:35.56,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,amazing that it seems hard to\Nbelieve that it could be the
Dialogue: 0,0:00:35.56,0:00:39.39,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,product of a set of\Nrandom processes.
Dialogue: 0,0:00:39.39,0:00:42.13,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And the example that tends to\Nbe given is the human eye,
Dialogue: 0,0:00:42.13,0:00:45.63,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,which truly is an awe-inspiring\Ndevice.
Dialogue: 0,0:00:45.63,0:00:47.20,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,You can call it an organ\Nor a machine.
Dialogue: 0,0:00:47.20,0:00:48.82,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Whatever you want to call\Nit, it does all of
Dialogue: 0,0:00:48.82,0:00:49.68,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,these amazing things.
Dialogue: 0,0:00:49.68,0:00:51.90,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It can focus at different\Nlengths.
Dialogue: 0,0:00:51.90,0:00:55.74,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It brings the light into focus\Nat just the right spot, and
Dialogue: 0,0:00:55.74,0:00:59.42,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,then you have your retinal\Nnerves and you have two eyes
Dialogue: 0,0:00:59.42,0:01:01.26,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,so can see in stereoscopic\Nvision.
Dialogue: 0,0:01:01.26,0:01:03.85,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,You can see in colors, and then\Nyou can adjust to light
Dialogue: 0,0:01:03.85,0:01:06.50,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and dark, so the human eye\Ntruly is awe inspiring.
Dialogue: 0,0:01:06.50,0:01:09.02,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And the argument tends to go\Nthat, look, how can this be
Dialogue: 0,0:01:09.02,0:01:10.46,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,created from random processes?
Dialogue: 0,0:01:10.46,0:01:13.51,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And the goal of this isn't to\Ntrace the evolution of the
Dialogue: 0,0:01:13.51,0:01:17.05,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,eye, but I'll do a little side\Nnote here that evolution is--
Dialogue: 0,0:01:17.05,0:01:19.14,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and natural selection, and\NI like the word natural
Dialogue: 0,0:01:19.14,0:01:20.68,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,selection more because\Nit's not talking
Dialogue: 0,0:01:20.68,0:01:22.92,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,about an active process.
Dialogue: 0,0:01:22.92,0:01:26.71,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Natural selection is acting over\Neons and eons of time,
Dialogue: 0,0:01:26.71,0:01:31.37,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,and we do see evidence in our\Nworld of a progression of
Dialogue: 0,0:01:31.37,0:01:32.46,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,different types of eyes.
Dialogue: 0,0:01:32.46,0:01:36.94,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,In fact, all evidence shows\Nthat the human eye is not
Dialogue: 0,0:01:36.94,0:01:42.97,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,perfect, and that there\Nis variation.
Dialogue: 0,0:01:42.97,0:01:45.23,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I mean, we all know some of us\Nare nearsighted, some are
Dialogue: 0,0:01:45.23,0:01:45.90,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,farsighted.
Dialogue: 0,0:01:45.90,0:01:48.62,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We have astigmatisms. It\Ndegenerates over time.
Dialogue: 0,0:01:48.62,0:01:51.75,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,People generate cataracts, so\Nthere's a whole set of things
Dialogue: 0,0:01:51.75,0:01:53.48,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that can go wrong with\Nthe human eye.
Dialogue: 0,0:01:53.48,0:01:56.07,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I'm not using that as a\Nrebuttal, but I'm just showing
Dialogue: 0,0:01:56.07,0:02:00.85,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,you that there is variation,\Neven in what I believe is
Dialogue: 0,0:02:00.85,0:02:04.32,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,truly an amazing piece\Nof biology.
Dialogue: 0,0:02:04.32,0:02:07.49,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And even if you go outside of\Nthe human world, there's
Dialogue: 0,0:02:07.49,0:02:09.14,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,obviously a huge spectrum\Nof eyes.
Dialogue: 0,0:02:09.14,0:02:13.57,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,You have fish at the bottom of\Nthe ocean that have eyes that
Dialogue: 0,0:02:13.57,0:02:16.41,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,are really just light sensors,\Nthat barely can maybe tell
Dialogue: 0,0:02:16.41,0:02:18.78,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,you-- and some insects are like\Nthis-- whether there's
Dialogue: 0,0:02:18.78,0:02:20.76,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,some light or some heat\Naround, nothing
Dialogue: 0,0:02:20.76,0:02:21.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,really more than that.
Dialogue: 0,0:02:21.95,0:02:23.85,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And at the other end of the\Nspectrum, far better than
Dialogue: 0,0:02:23.85,0:02:26.93,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,humans, you have certain birds\Nand a certain type of
Dialogue: 0,0:02:26.93,0:02:29.65,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,nocturnal creatures where they\Ncan see in the dark.
Dialogue: 0,0:02:29.65,0:02:34.33,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,You know, maybe you have a\Ncertain-- actually, all cats
Dialogue: 0,0:02:34.33,0:02:37.08,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,have this reflective material in\Ntheir eye that allows them
Dialogue: 0,0:02:37.08,0:02:39.57,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,much better night vision, so in\Nthat way they're superior
Dialogue: 0,0:02:39.57,0:02:41.71,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,to humans, and they can see just\Nas good as humans during
Dialogue: 0,0:02:41.71,0:02:43.09,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,the daytime.
Dialogue: 0,0:02:43.09,0:02:47.07,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,You have certain birds who can\Nsee with far more visual
Dialogue: 0,0:02:47.07,0:02:49.75,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,clarity at far better distances\Nthan humans can, so
Dialogue: 0,0:02:49.75,0:02:51.49,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,there is no perfect eye.
Dialogue: 0,0:02:51.49,0:02:53.75,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So I'll go into a little bit\Nof a theological argument
Dialogue: 0,0:02:53.75,0:02:55.80,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,here, and for those of you who\Nwatch my videos, you know that
Dialogue: 0,0:02:55.80,0:02:58.38,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I'm one to stray away from\Ntheological arguments,
Dialogue: 0,0:02:58.38,0:03:01.64,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,although I might eventually do\Na whole philosophy playlist,
Dialogue: 0,0:03:01.64,0:03:05.52,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,but I want to be very careful\Nnot to offend anyone's
Dialogue: 0,0:03:05.52,0:03:07.33,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,sensibilities, because\Nthat truly, truly,
Dialogue: 0,0:03:07.33,0:03:10.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,truly is not my intention.
Dialogue: 0,0:03:10.10,0:03:13.44,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But the whole point I want to\Nmake is that, look, if you
Dialogue: 0,0:03:13.44,0:03:16.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,believe in a God, and I won't\Ntake sides on that argument in
Dialogue: 0,0:03:16.31,0:03:23.03,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,this video right here, it's to\Nsome degree, I would say,
Dialogue: 0,0:03:23.03,0:03:26.64,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,almost disparaging of an\Nall-powerful being to say that
Dialogue: 0,0:03:26.64,0:03:30.85,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,this human eye, it kind of gives\Ntoo much importance to
Dialogue: 0,0:03:30.85,0:03:32.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,us as individuals.
Dialogue: 0,0:03:32.10,0:03:37.43,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I always think that religion--\Nand actually science.
Dialogue: 0,0:03:37.43,0:03:38.53,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Or actually everything.
Dialogue: 0,0:03:38.53,0:03:41.48,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I mean, we should be humble in\Nour lives, and there should be
Dialogue: 0,0:03:41.48,0:03:44.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,the realization that we, as\Nhumans, really-- this isn't
Dialogue: 0,0:03:44.95,0:03:51.05,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,perfection, and to imply that\Nthis is the best that a
Dialogue: 0,0:03:51.05,0:03:54.22,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,perfect entity or an\Nall-powerful entity could
Dialogue: 0,0:03:54.22,0:03:57.33,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,produce I think is a little\Nactually disparaging of it.
Dialogue: 0,0:03:57.33,0:03:58.96,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I'll give you another example.
Dialogue: 0,0:03:58.96,0:04:01.60,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I give you another example, and\NI'll put my engineering
Dialogue: 0,0:04:01.60,0:04:02.46,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,hat on here.
Dialogue: 0,0:04:02.46,0:04:03.67,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And once again, I want\Nto be very clear.
Dialogue: 0,0:04:03.67,0:04:07.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,My goal isn't in this video to\Nsay, oh, you know, look, hey,
Dialogue: 0,0:04:07.95,0:04:11.13,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,evolution, random processes,\Nthat by itself, there is no
Dialogue: 0,0:04:11.13,0:04:12.85,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,God, and you just have\Nto live with it.
Dialogue: 0,0:04:12.85,0:04:13.82,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,No, that's not my point.
Dialogue: 0,0:04:13.82,0:04:18.16,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I'm actually making the opposite\Nargument, that a
Dialogue: 0,0:04:18.16,0:04:23.37,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,belief in God would not point\Nto a God who-- a belief in a
Dialogue: 0,0:04:23.37,0:04:27.30,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,universal, all-powerful God\Nwould not point to a God who
Dialogue: 0,0:04:27.30,0:04:31.51,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,designs the particular, who\Ndesigns each particular.
Dialogue: 0,0:04:31.51,0:04:33.64,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And even more, the imperfections\Nthat we see
Dialogue: 0,0:04:33.64,0:04:36.79,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,around us would-- and especially\Nbecause we see
Dialogue: 0,0:04:36.79,0:04:38.42,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,variation and they're being\Nselected for it.
Dialogue: 0,0:04:38.42,0:04:39.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I mean, we can't just\Nfocus on the eye.
Dialogue: 0,0:04:39.95,0:04:42.16,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We would have to focus on\Nviruses and cancers, and it
Dialogue: 0,0:04:42.16,0:04:46.46,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,would have to speak to a God\Nthat is designing one off
Dialogue: 0,0:04:46.46,0:04:50.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,every version of every sequence\Nof DNA that we see,
Dialogue: 0,0:04:50.99,0:04:54.79,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,because if someone talks about\Ndesigning an eye, we know that
Dialogue: 0,0:04:54.79,0:04:59.22,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,the eye is the byproduct of DNA,\Nand we know the DNA is a
Dialogue: 0,0:04:59.22,0:05:04.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,sequence of base pairs, you\Nknow, ATG, C, A, and, you
Dialogue: 0,0:05:04.95,0:05:07.24,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,know, billions and\Nbillions of them.
Dialogue: 0,0:05:07.24,0:05:09.97,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And so when we talk about\Ndesign, we would be talking
Dialogue: 0,0:05:09.97,0:05:12.55,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,literally about designing\Nthe sequence.
Dialogue: 0,0:05:12.55,0:05:14.49,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And we even know that a lot of\Nthe sequence, there's some
Dialogue: 0,0:05:14.49,0:05:15.23,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,noise in there.
Dialogue: 0,0:05:15.23,0:05:18.21,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,We know that a lot of it comes\Nfrom primitive viruses deep in
Dialogue: 0,0:05:18.21,0:05:18.89,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,our past.
Dialogue: 0,0:05:18.89,0:05:22.80,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So the argument I'm making here\Nis that in order to give
Dialogue: 0,0:05:22.80,0:05:30.38,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,credit to the all powerful, at\Nleast to my mind, a system
Dialogue: 0,0:05:30.38,0:05:44.41,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that comes from very simple and\Nelegant basic ideas like
Dialogue: 0,0:05:44.41,0:05:50.05,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,natural selection and\Nvariations, that in our DNA,
Dialogue: 0,0:05:50.05,0:05:53.35,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,we call those mutations, in\Nthe laws of physics and
Dialogue: 0,0:05:53.35,0:05:58.09,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,chemistry, and those, from that\Nsimple and elegant basic
Dialogue: 0,0:05:58.09,0:06:03.35,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,ideas, for complexity\Nto emerge.
Dialogue: 0,0:06:03.35,0:06:05.54,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So this is one idea and this\Nis what really evolution
Dialogue: 0,0:06:05.54,0:06:10.70,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,speaks to, that, look, our\Nuniverse is this profound
Dialogue: 0,0:06:10.70,0:06:14.56,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,world, this profound\Nenvironment, where from these
Dialogue: 0,0:06:14.56,0:06:18.75,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,very basic, simple, beautiful\Nideas, we have this complexity
Dialogue: 0,0:06:18.75,0:06:20.73,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,in the structure that is truly,
Dialogue: 0,0:06:20.73,0:06:23.06,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,truly, truly awe inspiring.
Dialogue: 0,0:06:23.06,0:06:26.03,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,This is, in my mind, what\Nevolution speaks to.
Dialogue: 0,0:06:26.03,0:06:30.07,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And in my mind, even as an\Nengineer, this speaks to a
Dialogue: 0,0:06:30.07,0:06:31.93,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,higher form of design.
Dialogue: 0,0:06:31.93,0:06:34.16,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,This speak to a more\Nprofound design.
Dialogue: 0,0:06:34.16,0:06:37.62,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,
Dialogue: 0,0:06:37.62,0:06:43.33,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So this whole video, the whole\Nargument, is that if one does
Dialogue: 0,0:06:43.33,0:06:46.21,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,believe in a God, and, you know,\NI'm not going to take
Dialogue: 0,0:06:46.21,0:06:51.86,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,sides in that in this video,\Nand a God that speaks to
Dialogue: 0,0:06:51.86,0:06:58.06,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,beauty and elegance and is\Ninfinitely powerful, then this
Dialogue: 0,0:06:58.06,0:07:01.67,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,idea of the laws of physics\Nand chemistry and natural
Dialogue: 0,0:07:01.67,0:07:03.91,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,selection, which is really-- I\Nmean, you know, when I talked
Dialogue: 0,0:07:03.91,0:07:05.80,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,about natural selection in the\Nlast video, it was really-- I
Dialogue: 0,0:07:05.80,0:07:08.90,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,think you would find it was\Na bit of common sense.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:08.90,0:07:14.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,That this is a very profound\Ndesign and it speaks to the
Dialogue: 0,0:07:14.29,0:07:19.16,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,art of the designer as opposed\Nto designing each of these
Dialogue: 0,0:07:19.16,0:07:20.15,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,entities one off.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:20.15,0:07:22.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And what's even more profound\Nabout the design
Dialogue: 0,0:07:22.10,0:07:24.97,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,is that it's adaptive.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:24.97,0:07:29.07,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,If there's environmental\Nstress, then the other
Dialogue: 0,0:07:29.07,0:07:32.42,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,variations survive\Nmore frequently.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:32.42,0:07:35.93,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And so it's never changing,\Nthat perfection, that no
Dialogue: 0,0:07:35.93,0:07:40.14,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,instance can ever be pointed to\Nand say this is the highest
Dialogue: 0,0:07:40.14,0:07:41.83,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,point that this design\Ncan reach.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:41.83,0:07:44.48,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,That is always-- I don't want\Nto say getting better.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:44.48,0:07:47.65,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It's always getting more suited\Nto its environment as
Dialogue: 0,0:07:47.65,0:07:50.84,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,it changes, and that to\Nme is a better design.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:50.84,0:07:53.25,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Now, just following\Nup on that, and I
Dialogue: 0,0:07:53.25,0:07:53.97,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,want to be very clear.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:53.97,0:07:57.46,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,This whole idea is to kind of\Nraise the standard of what we
Dialogue: 0,0:07:57.46,0:07:59.23,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,expect out of design.
Dialogue: 0,0:07:59.23,0:08:02.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It's to kind of show other\Npoints or other places in the
Dialogue: 0,0:08:02.29,0:08:05.31,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,scientific or mathematical world\Nwhere this does emerge.
Dialogue: 0,0:08:05.31,0:08:08.90,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And the best example I see\Nof that is with fractals.
Dialogue: 0,0:08:08.90,0:08:11.85,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,A lot of you-all might have\Nseen-- this is the Mandelbrot
Dialogue: 0,0:08:11.85,0:08:14.61,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,set, a very famous\Nset of fractals.
Dialogue: 0,0:08:14.61,0:08:16.23,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It's immensely complex.
Dialogue: 0,0:08:16.23,0:08:20.58,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,In fact, you can keep zooming\Nin on the Mandelbrot set at
Dialogue: 0,0:08:20.58,0:08:23.37,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,any point, and when you zoom it\Nout, it becomes infinitely
Dialogue: 0,0:08:23.37,0:08:26.94,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,complex, and you can explore\Nit indefinitely.
Dialogue: 0,0:08:26.94,0:08:30.87,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But the beauty of it, the true\Nbeauty of it, is all of this
Dialogue: 0,0:08:30.87,0:08:34.36,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,can be described by one\Nequation, one almost
Dialogue: 0,0:08:34.36,0:08:40.41,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,shockingly simple equation, and\Nthat's this: The next z is
Dialogue: 0,0:08:40.41,0:08:45.34,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,equal to the z before\Nit squared plus 1.
Dialogue: 0,0:08:45.34,0:08:47.08,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And you're like you know, Sal,\Nyou started talking about
Dialogue: 0,0:08:47.08,0:08:50.07,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,intelligent design and evolution\Nand all of that.
Dialogue: 0,0:08:50.07,0:08:52.50,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Why are you all of a sudden\Nbreaking into fractals?
Dialogue: 0,0:08:52.50,0:08:57.34,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And the point I'm trying to make\Nhere is that if I had two
Dialogue: 0,0:08:57.34,0:09:01.28,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,designers and one set out to\Ngo and paint this exact
Dialogue: 0,0:09:01.28,0:09:03.71,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,particular fractal and say,\Noh, you know, I'm going to
Dialogue: 0,0:09:03.71,0:09:05.62,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,make this brown and I'm going\Nto make this blue and I'm
Dialogue: 0,0:09:05.62,0:09:07.95,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,going to make this a circle\Nwith other circles, you'd
Dialogue: 0,0:09:07.95,0:09:10.43,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,think this is an amazing\Npainter.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:10.43,0:09:15.59,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,For example, if you were to go\Nto someone 300 years ago and
Dialogue: 0,0:09:15.59,0:09:17.92,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,you were to show them this, they\Nwould say that this is
Dialogue: 0,0:09:17.92,0:09:21.38,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,the finest design that anyone\Nmight have ever been able to
Dialogue: 0,0:09:21.38,0:09:23.78,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,devise, because it's so\Ninfinitely complex.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:23.78,0:09:27.15,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But now we know that this can\Nbe completely described by
Dialogue: 0,0:09:27.15,0:09:29.88,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,this simple equation,\Nliterally.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:29.88,0:09:32.02,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,For those of you are interested,\Nall they're doing,
Dialogue: 0,0:09:32.02,0:09:37.17,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,this is a complex plane, and\Nthey're starting at zero--
Dialogue: 0,0:09:37.17,0:09:39.89,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,excuse me, not plus 1, plus c.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:39.89,0:09:41.02,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Let me make that very clear.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:41.02,0:09:43.17,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,This is the equation plus c.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:43.17,0:09:45.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So for every point on the\Ncomplex plane, you put that
Dialogue: 0,0:09:45.99,0:09:50.85,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,point in for c, and then you\Nstart with zero, and you keep
Dialogue: 0,0:09:50.85,0:09:51.36,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,doing this.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:51.36,0:09:53.86,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So you say zero squared plus\Nthat number, that complex
Dialogue: 0,0:09:53.86,0:09:55.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,number, is equal to that.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:55.10,0:09:57.23,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Then you put that in here, and\Nthen you do that number
Dialogue: 0,0:09:57.23,0:09:59.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,squared plus that complex\Nnumber, and you do it again.
Dialogue: 0,0:09:59.29,0:10:01.05,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,You do it over and\Nover and over.
Dialogue: 0,0:10:01.05,0:10:05.11,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So turns out that some numbers\Ndon't go to infinity and those
Dialogue: 0,0:10:05.11,0:10:06.52,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,numbers are in black.
Dialogue: 0,0:10:06.52,0:10:08.86,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,They're considered part\Nof the Mandelbrot set.
Dialogue: 0,0:10:08.86,0:10:12.79,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And then the numbers that do go\Nto infinity, as you iterate
Dialogue: 0,0:10:12.79,0:10:16.13,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,on this formula, you color it\Nbased on how fast it goes to
Dialogue: 0,0:10:16.13,0:10:20.80,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,infinity, and it creates this\Ninfinitely beautiful and
Dialogue: 0,0:10:20.80,0:10:22.64,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,complex pattern.
Dialogue: 0,0:10:22.64,0:10:26.19,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Now, if you were to say what is\Na more profound design, and
Dialogue: 0,0:10:26.19,0:10:29.64,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,you can ask any engineer this,\Nin my mind, this is the most
Dialogue: 0,0:10:29.64,0:10:30.84,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,profound design.
Dialogue: 0,0:10:30.84,0:10:34.61,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Because it's simple and elegant,\Nbut it describes
Dialogue: 0,0:10:34.61,0:10:38.10,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,something of infinite\Ncomplexity.
Dialogue: 0,0:10:38.10,0:10:40.58,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It's not just focused on the\Nparticular, it's focused on
Dialogue: 0,0:10:40.58,0:10:42.00,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,kind of the metalevel.
Dialogue: 0,0:10:42.00,0:10:47.28,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It's focused on creating just\Nthe idea of which this is just
Dialogue: 0,0:10:47.28,0:10:48.27,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,an example.
Dialogue: 0,0:10:48.27,0:10:55.68,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So anyway, this is probably my\Nvideo where I steer most away
Dialogue: 0,0:10:55.68,0:10:59.69,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,from the science of it all and\Nmaybe I focus a little bit
Dialogue: 0,0:10:59.69,0:11:01.26,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,more on the slightly
Dialogue: 0,0:11:01.26,0:11:03.61,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,metaphysical or the awe inspiring.
Dialogue: 0,0:11:03.61,0:11:06.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But my whole point here is to\Nreally throw out my little
Dialogue: 0,0:11:06.29,0:11:08.44,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,idea of how you can reconcile\Nthese notions.
Dialogue: 0,0:11:08.44,0:11:13.35,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,That evolution, the randomness\Nof it, does not speak to a
Dialogue: 0,0:11:13.35,0:11:15.28,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Godless universe, although\NI'm not going to
Dialogue: 0,0:11:15.28,0:11:16.29,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,take sides on that.
Dialogue: 0,0:11:16.29,0:11:20.93,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It speaks to a more profound\NGod, in my mind.
Dialogue: 0,0:11:20.93,0:11:27.17,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So anyway, forgive me for taking\Nmy liberties, and I
Dialogue: 0,0:11:27.17,0:11:29.71,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,want to make it very clear, I\Ndon't want to offend anyone's
Dialogue: 0,0:11:29.71,0:11:31.91,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,sensibilities, but I really\Njust wanted to throw
Dialogue: 0,0:11:31.91,0:11:33.70,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,this idea out there.
Dialogue: 0,0:11:33.70,0:11:35.44,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,See you in the next video.