WEBVTT 00:00:02.784 --> 00:00:04.561 ♪ [music] ♪ 00:00:05.799 --> 00:00:08.413 - [Tyler] Once you master the economic way of thinking, 00:00:08.413 --> 00:00:10.770 you'll see the world in a very different way. 00:00:11.743 --> 00:00:14.884 Two fundamental economic concepts are everywhere you look: 00:00:16.397 --> 00:00:17.960 opportunity cost 00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:21.408 and tradeoffs. 00:00:24.588 --> 00:00:27.032 Let's start with opportunity cost. 00:00:27.688 --> 00:00:29.405 At this busy coffee shop, 00:00:30.210 --> 00:00:33.088 opportunity costs lie behind every decision. 00:00:34.281 --> 00:00:38.008 Like for Jenny -- she's here for her third date with Adam. 00:00:41.257 --> 00:00:42.887 Was that a good decision? 00:00:42.887 --> 00:00:43.897 After all, 00:00:43.897 --> 00:00:46.681 economics is all about studying decisions. 00:00:46.681 --> 00:00:49.780 Making a good decision is about comparing the benefits 00:00:49.780 --> 00:00:51.965 of that decision to the costs. 00:00:52.255 --> 00:00:54.918 The obvious costs for this date, for Jenny, 00:00:54.918 --> 00:00:57.403 were the Uber ride she paid for to get here 00:00:58.259 --> 00:01:01.483 and her grande chai tea latte with whole milk. 00:01:01.829 --> 00:01:03.094 But what's missing? 00:01:03.094 --> 00:01:04.664 Her opportunity cost. 00:01:05.465 --> 00:01:09.667 Opportunity cost means the value of the next best alternative. 00:01:09.667 --> 00:01:13.300 For instance, instead of going on her third date with Adam, 00:01:13.300 --> 00:01:16.475 Jenny could've been binge watching her favorite TV show. 00:01:16.949 --> 00:01:19.249 She might have been on a first date instead, 00:01:19.249 --> 00:01:20.782 with Roman. 00:01:20.782 --> 00:01:22.739 Or she might have been having breakfast 00:01:22.739 --> 00:01:24.423 with her very sweet sister. 00:01:25.892 --> 00:01:27.616 Let's say her next best option 00:01:27.616 --> 00:01:29.800 would have been breakfast with her sister. 00:01:30.325 --> 00:01:32.765 Does the benefit of this third date with Adam 00:01:32.765 --> 00:01:34.733 outweigh the opportunity cost? 00:01:35.265 --> 00:01:38.382 It might seem strange to think this way about romance, 00:01:38.382 --> 00:01:39.389 and it doesn't mean 00:01:39.389 --> 00:01:42.093 that it's about calculating every decision 00:01:42.093 --> 00:01:43.884 down to the last penny. 00:01:43.884 --> 00:01:47.113 Nonetheless, Jenny's time, attention, and energy -- 00:01:47.113 --> 00:01:48.329 those are scarce. 00:01:51.252 --> 00:01:53.941 And if she doesn't consider the alternatives at all, 00:01:53.941 --> 00:01:55.923 she might be wasting parts of her life. 00:01:58.792 --> 00:02:02.838 There's another fundamental related concept from economics: 00:02:02.838 --> 00:02:03.901 tradeoffs. 00:02:04.585 --> 00:02:06.939 Take these sprinklers in the ceiling of the coffee shop, 00:02:06.939 --> 00:02:08.004 for example. 00:02:09.273 --> 00:02:12.214 Adding sprinklers can make it safer during a fire, 00:02:12.214 --> 00:02:15.080 but they also can cost a lot of money to install. 00:02:16.685 --> 00:02:19.986 How much cheaper would the coffee be without them? 00:02:20.700 --> 00:02:24.456 In a world of scarce resources, one typically has to choose. 00:02:25.066 --> 00:02:26.209 There's a tradeoff -- 00:02:26.209 --> 00:02:28.135 safer buildings cost more, 00:02:28.135 --> 00:02:30.910 but that means the coffee can be more expensive. 00:02:38.221 --> 00:02:40.796 Hmm, the line is at the door here. 00:02:41.984 --> 00:02:45.635 Perhaps the owner has considered opening a second location. 00:02:47.643 --> 00:02:50.383 As the building code, however, becomes more stringent, 00:02:50.383 --> 00:02:53.419 the cost of opening an additional location goes up. 00:02:54.355 --> 00:02:57.399 It's not just the direct monetary costs 00:02:57.399 --> 00:02:59.713 of paying for things like sprinklers, 00:02:59.713 --> 00:03:03.739 it's also the opportunity costs of the extra time and effort 00:03:03.739 --> 00:03:07.738 to file permits, manage the work, and schedule inspections. 00:03:09.804 --> 00:03:13.142 A more stringent building code means a higher cost 00:03:13.142 --> 00:03:14.973 for opening up new businesses. 00:03:18.763 --> 00:03:21.020 And in turn, that higher cost can mean 00:03:21.412 --> 00:03:23.512 that fewer new businesses get opened. 00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:33.496 What's the right tradeoff between making buildings safer... 00:03:38.284 --> 00:03:40.928 and making it easier to launch new businesses? 00:03:44.986 --> 00:03:46.645 Once you see these tradeoffs, 00:03:46.645 --> 00:03:48.496 you'll find them everywhere you look: 00:03:49.257 --> 00:03:50.342 healthcare, 00:03:55.130 --> 00:03:56.132 food, 00:04:02.015 --> 00:04:03.248 the environment, 00:04:08.747 --> 00:04:09.882 education. 00:04:14.976 --> 00:04:16.776 One more decision to consider: 00:04:17.160 --> 00:04:18.309 if you're a teacher, 00:04:18.309 --> 00:04:20.773 should you spice up your economics class 00:04:20.773 --> 00:04:22.775 by checking out our free unit plan 00:04:22.775 --> 00:04:24.424 that uses this video? 00:04:24.991 --> 00:04:28.373 If you're a learner, should you watch another MRU video? 00:04:28.837 --> 00:04:31.295 Well, YouTube is full of entertaining videos, 00:04:31.295 --> 00:04:32.300 [cat meows] 00:04:32.300 --> 00:04:35.225 but please, of course, consider the opportunity costs. 00:04:35.593 --> 00:04:37.045 ♪ [music] ♪