WEBVTT 00:00:13.009 --> 00:00:14.849 Many draw back in front of affinity. 00:00:14.849 --> 00:00:18.500 It is in fact a lot easier and less demanding to sign up 00:00:18.500 --> 00:00:22.810 to something, be it an organization, a permanent assembly or 00:00:22.810 --> 00:00:27.210 an environment and to take up and reproduce formal characteristics, 00:00:27.210 --> 00:00:32.210 rather than undertaking a long and never exhausted research for comrades with whom 00:00:32.210 --> 00:00:35.670 to share ideas, analysis and eventual projects. 00:00:35.670 --> 00:00:39.710 Because affinity is exactly this: a reciprocal knowledge 00:00:39.710 --> 00:00:43.090 between comrades, shared analysis that lead to perspectives 00:00:43.090 --> 00:00:43.680 of action. 00:00:45.420 --> 00:00:49.800 Affinity is therefore directed on one hand towards theoretical 00:00:49.800 --> 00:00:54.100 deepening and on the other towards intervention in social conflictuality. 00:00:57.940 --> 00:01:00.820 It aspires to the sharing of ideas and methods, and it 00:01:00.820 --> 00:01:04.559 does not have as a goal an infinite growth. 00:01:04.559 --> 00:01:07.220 For some comrades, one of the main preoccupations, 00:01:07.220 --> 00:01:10.130 even though often well hidden, seems to remain 00:01:10.130 --> 00:01:11.450 the number. 00:01:11.450 --> 00:01:12.909 How many are we? 00:01:12.909 --> 00:01:14.690 What should we do to be more? 00:01:14.690 --> 00:01:19.860 From the polarization on such a question and from the constatation that today we aren’t 00:01:19.860 --> 00:01:23.030 many, given by the fact that many others do not 00:01:23.030 --> 00:01:25.420 share our ideas deriving the 00:01:25.420 --> 00:01:29.619 conclusion that we should, to grow numerically, avoid 00:01:29.620 --> 00:01:32.720 putting too hard of an accent on certain ideas. 00:01:35.720 --> 00:01:37.920 Affinity is not the same thing as friendship. 00:01:37.920 --> 00:01:40.040 Of course the two do not exclude each other, 00:01:40.940 --> 00:01:45.020 The search for affinity occurs on an interpersonal level. 00:01:45.030 --> 00:01:47.850 It is not a collective event, a group affair, where 00:01:47.850 --> 00:01:51.200 it is always easier to follow than to think for oneself. 00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:54.100 The deepening of affinity is evidently a matter of 00:01:54.100 --> 00:01:58.380 thought and action, but in the end affinity is not the 00:01:58.380 --> 00:02:01.520 strictly about carrying out an action together, but rather a 00:02:01.520 --> 00:02:05.100 starting point from which to then pass to action. 00:02:05.100 --> 00:02:09.050 It is true that the search and the deepening of affinity require a lot of time 00:02:09.050 --> 00:02:12.490 and energy, and that therefore it is not possible to generalize 00:02:12.490 --> 00:02:14.030 it to all comrades. 00:02:14.030 --> 00:02:19.250 The anarchist movement of a country, of a city or even of a neighbourhood cannot become 00:02:19.250 --> 00:02:20.650 one big affinity group. 00:02:20.650 --> 00:02:24.690 It is not about enlarging different affinity groups with more comrades, 00:02:24.690 --> 00:02:28.620 but to make possible the multiplication of autonomous affinity groups. 00:02:28.620 --> 00:02:33.580 The search, the elaboration and the deepening of affinity leads to small groups of 00:02:33.580 --> 00:02:37.960 comrades that know each other, share analysis and pass together to action.