WEBVTT 00:00:23.693 --> 00:00:26.191 When the Industrial Revolution started, 00:00:26.215 --> 00:00:30.273 the amount of carbon sitting underneath Britain in the form of coal 00:00:31.108 --> 00:00:34.283 was as big as the amount of carbon sitting under Saudi Arabia 00:00:34.307 --> 00:00:35.645 in the form of oil. 00:00:36.631 --> 00:00:39.166 This carbon powered the Industrial Revolution, 00:00:39.190 --> 00:00:40.905 it put the "Great" in Great Britain, 00:00:40.929 --> 00:00:44.213 and led to Britain's temporary world domination. 00:00:45.285 --> 00:00:51.066 And then, in 1918, coal production in Britain peaked, 00:00:51.230 --> 00:00:52.997 and has declined ever since. 00:00:53.703 --> 00:00:57.756 In due course, Britain started using oil and gas from the North Sea, 00:00:57.780 --> 00:00:59.691 and in the year 2000, 00:00:59.715 --> 00:01:03.214 oil and gas production from the North Sea also peaked, 00:01:03.238 --> 00:01:05.384 and they're now on the decline. 00:01:06.836 --> 00:01:09.499 These observations about the finiteness 00:01:09.523 --> 00:01:13.390 of easily accessible, local, secure fossil fuels, 00:01:14.127 --> 00:01:17.077 is a motivation for saying, "Well, what's next? 00:01:17.438 --> 00:01:20.024 What is life after fossil fuels going to be like? 00:01:20.048 --> 00:01:23.514 Shouldn't we be thinking hard about how to get off fossil fuels?" 00:01:23.538 --> 00:01:26.502 Another motivation, of course, is climate change. 00:01:27.014 --> 00:01:29.515 And when people talk about life after fossil fuels 00:01:29.539 --> 00:01:31.410 and climate change action, 00:01:31.450 --> 00:01:33.880 I think there's a lot of fluff, 00:01:33.904 --> 00:01:36.768 a lot of greenwash, a lot of misleading advertising, 00:01:36.792 --> 00:01:41.281 and I feel a duty as a physicist to try to guide people around the claptrap 00:01:41.305 --> 00:01:45.079 and help people understand the actions that really make a difference, 00:01:45.103 --> 00:01:47.753 and to focus on ideas that do add up. 00:01:49.610 --> 00:01:51.189 Let me illustrate this 00:01:51.213 --> 00:01:54.396 with what physicists call a back-of-envelope calculation. 00:01:54.828 --> 00:01:56.673 We love back-of-envelope calculations. 00:01:56.697 --> 00:01:58.768 You ask a question, write down some numbers, 00:01:58.792 --> 00:01:59.955 and get an answer. 00:01:59.979 --> 00:02:03.179 It may not be very accurate, but it may make you say, "Hmm." 00:02:03.203 --> 00:02:04.625 So here's a question: 00:02:04.649 --> 00:02:07.852 Imagine if we said, "Oh yes, we can get off fossil fuels. 00:02:07.876 --> 00:02:09.544 We'll use biofuels. Problem solved. 00:02:09.568 --> 00:02:11.848 Transport ... We don't need oil anymore." 00:02:11.872 --> 00:02:18.306 Well, what if we grew the biofuels for a road 00:02:18.330 --> 00:02:21.104 on the grass verge at the edge of the road? 00:02:21.874 --> 00:02:26.087 How wide would the verge have to be for that to work out? 00:02:26.111 --> 00:02:27.759 OK, so let's put in some numbers. 00:02:27.783 --> 00:02:30.493 Let's have our cars go at 60 miles per hour. 00:02:30.517 --> 00:02:32.327 Let's say they do 30 miles per gallon. 00:02:32.351 --> 00:02:35.186 That's the European average for new cars. 00:02:35.539 --> 00:02:37.863 Let's say the productivity of biofuel plantations 00:02:37.887 --> 00:02:40.987 is 1,200 liters of biofuel per hectare per year. 00:02:41.011 --> 00:02:43.582 That's true of European biofuels. 00:02:43.951 --> 00:02:47.491 And let's imagine the cars are spaced 80 meters apart from each other, 00:02:47.515 --> 00:02:49.691 and they're perpetually going along this road. 00:02:49.715 --> 00:02:51.555 The length of the road doesn't matter, 00:02:51.579 --> 00:02:54.310 because the longer the road, the more biofuel plantation. 00:02:54.334 --> 00:02:55.922 What do we do with these numbers? 00:02:55.946 --> 00:02:59.975 Take the first number, divide by the other three, and get eight kilometers. 00:02:59.999 --> 00:03:01.155 And that's the answer. 00:03:01.179 --> 00:03:03.539 That's how wide the plantation would have to be, 00:03:03.563 --> 00:03:05.414 given these assumptions. 00:03:05.896 --> 00:03:08.629 And maybe that makes you say, "Hmm. 00:03:08.653 --> 00:03:11.084 Maybe this isn't going to be quite so easy." 00:03:12.830 --> 00:03:14.984 And it might make you think, 00:03:15.462 --> 00:03:17.867 perhaps there's an issue to do with areas. 00:03:17.891 --> 00:03:21.788 And in this talk, I'd like to talk about land areas, and ask: 00:03:21.812 --> 00:03:23.295 Is there an issue about areas? 00:03:23.319 --> 00:03:27.979 The answer is going to be yes, but it depends which country you are in. 00:03:28.003 --> 00:03:30.041 So let's start in the United Kingdom, 00:03:30.065 --> 00:03:32.357 since that's where we are today. 00:03:32.381 --> 00:03:34.726 The energy consumption of the United Kingdom, 00:03:34.750 --> 00:03:38.437 the total energy consumption -- not just transport, but everything -- 00:03:39.158 --> 00:03:40.964 I like to quantify it in lightbulbs. 00:03:40.988 --> 00:03:44.470 It's as if we've all got 125 lightbulbs on all the time, 00:03:44.494 --> 00:03:48.170 125 kilowatt-hours per day per person 00:03:48.194 --> 00:03:50.884 is the energy consumption of the UK. 00:03:51.288 --> 00:03:54.054 So there's 40 lightbulbs' worth for transport, 00:03:54.078 --> 00:03:55.730 40 lightbulbs' worth for heating, 00:03:55.754 --> 00:03:58.282 and 40 lightbulbs' worth for making electricity, 00:03:58.306 --> 00:04:00.220 and other things are relatively small, 00:04:00.244 --> 00:04:02.877 compared to those three big fish. 00:04:02.901 --> 00:04:05.631 It's actually a bigger footprint if we take into account 00:04:05.655 --> 00:04:09.277 the embodied energy in the stuff we import into our country as well. 00:04:09.301 --> 00:04:14.035 And 90 percent of this energy, today, still comes from fossil fuels, 00:04:14.059 --> 00:04:17.737 and 10 percent, only, from other, greener -- possibly greener -- sources, 00:04:17.761 --> 00:04:19.733 like nuclear power and renewables. 00:04:20.833 --> 00:04:22.118 So. 00:04:22.142 --> 00:04:23.399 That's the UK. 00:04:23.423 --> 00:04:28.644 The population density of the UK is 250 people per square kilometer. 00:04:28.668 --> 00:04:31.930 I'm now going to show you other countries by these same two measures. 00:04:31.954 --> 00:04:35.090 On the vertical axis, I'm going to show you how many lightbulbs -- 00:04:35.114 --> 00:04:37.554 what our energy consumption per person is. 00:04:37.578 --> 00:04:39.697 We're at 125 lightbulbs per person, 00:04:39.721 --> 00:04:43.335 and that little blue dot there is showing you the land area 00:04:43.359 --> 00:04:45.049 of the United Kingdom. 00:04:45.073 --> 00:04:47.862 The population density is on the horizontal axis, 00:04:47.886 --> 00:04:50.609 and we're 250 people per square kilometer. 00:04:50.633 --> 00:04:53.202 Let's add European countries in blue, 00:04:53.226 --> 00:04:55.727 and you can see there's quite a variety. 00:04:55.751 --> 00:04:58.828 I should emphasize, both of these axes are logarithmic; 00:04:58.852 --> 00:05:01.407 as you go from one gray bar to the next gray bar, 00:05:01.431 --> 00:05:03.186 you're going up a factor of 10. 00:05:04.147 --> 00:05:06.488 Next, let's add Asia in red, 00:05:06.512 --> 00:05:08.998 the Middle East and North Africa in green, 00:05:10.013 --> 00:05:12.406 sub-Saharan Africa in blue, 00:05:13.525 --> 00:05:15.447 black is South America, 00:05:16.994 --> 00:05:18.839 purple is Central America, 00:05:19.585 --> 00:05:22.388 and then in pukey-yellow, we have North America, 00:05:22.412 --> 00:05:24.129 Australia and New Zealand. 00:05:25.050 --> 00:05:27.950 You can see the great diversity of population densities 00:05:27.974 --> 00:05:30.561 and of per capita consumptions. 00:05:30.917 --> 00:05:33.156 Countries are different from each other. 00:05:33.180 --> 00:05:36.736 Top left, we have Canada and Australia, with enormous land areas, 00:05:36.760 --> 00:05:41.248 very high per capita consumption -- 200 or 300 lightbulbs per person -- 00:05:41.272 --> 00:05:44.109 and very low population densities. 00:05:44.930 --> 00:05:48.092 Top right: Bahrain has the same energy consumption 00:05:48.116 --> 00:05:50.099 per person, roughly, as Canada -- 00:05:50.123 --> 00:05:52.365 over 300 lightbulbs per person, 00:05:52.389 --> 00:05:55.411 but their population density is a factor of 300 times greater, 00:05:55.435 --> 00:05:57.264 1,000 people per square kilometer. 00:05:57.288 --> 00:06:02.165 Bottom right: Bangladesh has the same population density as Bahrain, 00:06:02.189 --> 00:06:05.040 but consumes 100 times less per person. 00:06:05.779 --> 00:06:08.262 Bottom left: well, there's no one. 00:06:08.286 --> 00:06:10.382 But there used to be a whole load of people. 00:06:10.406 --> 00:06:12.359 Here's another message from this diagram. 00:06:12.383 --> 00:06:15.749 I've added on little blue tails behind Sudan, Libya, 00:06:15.773 --> 00:06:17.284 China, India, Bangladesh. 00:06:17.308 --> 00:06:19.443 That's 15 years of progress. 00:06:19.467 --> 00:06:21.988 Where were they 15 years ago, and where are they now? 00:06:22.012 --> 00:06:23.170 And the message is, 00:06:23.194 --> 00:06:26.067 most countries are going to the right, and they're going up. 00:06:26.091 --> 00:06:28.238 Up and to the right: bigger population density 00:06:28.262 --> 00:06:30.202 and higher per capita consumption. 00:06:30.226 --> 00:06:34.181 So, we may be off in the top right-hand corner, slightly unusual, 00:06:34.205 --> 00:06:36.592 the United Kingdom accompanied by Germany, 00:06:36.616 --> 00:06:38.586 Japan, South Korea, the Netherlands, 00:06:38.610 --> 00:06:40.975 and a bunch of other slightly odd countries, 00:06:40.999 --> 00:06:45.304 but many other countries are coming up and to the right to join us. 00:06:45.328 --> 00:06:47.371 So we're a picture, if you like, 00:06:47.395 --> 00:06:49.370 of what the future energy consumption 00:06:49.394 --> 00:06:52.166 might be looking like in other countries, too. 00:06:53.573 --> 00:06:56.492 I've also added in this diagram now some pink lines 00:06:56.516 --> 00:06:58.405 that go down and to the right. 00:06:58.429 --> 00:07:02.270 Those are lines of equal power consumption per unit area, 00:07:02.294 --> 00:07:04.365 which I measure in watts per square meter. 00:07:04.389 --> 00:07:08.236 So, for example, the middle line there, 0.1 watts per square meter, 00:07:08.260 --> 00:07:12.112 is the energy consumption per unit area of Saudi Arabia, 00:07:12.136 --> 00:07:16.317 Norway, Mexico in purple, and Bangladesh 15 years ago. 00:07:17.337 --> 00:07:20.526 Half of the world's population lives in countries 00:07:20.550 --> 00:07:22.655 that are already above that line. 00:07:24.410 --> 00:07:29.602 The United Kingdom is consuming 1.25 watts per square meter. 00:07:29.626 --> 00:07:32.648 So is Germany, and Japan is consuming a bit more. 00:07:33.958 --> 00:07:37.888 So, let's now say why this is relevant. 00:07:37.912 --> 00:07:39.299 Why is it relevant? 00:07:39.323 --> 00:07:42.189 Well, we can measure renewables in the same units 00:07:42.213 --> 00:07:45.018 and other forms of power production in the same units. 00:07:45.328 --> 00:07:48.071 Renewables is one of the leading ideas 00:07:48.095 --> 00:07:52.069 for how we could get off our 90 percent fossil-fuel habit. 00:07:52.402 --> 00:07:53.814 So here come some renewables. 00:07:53.838 --> 00:07:56.498 Energy crops deliver half a watt per square meter 00:07:56.522 --> 00:07:57.879 in European climates. 00:07:59.309 --> 00:08:00.460 What does that mean? 00:08:00.484 --> 00:08:02.466 You might have anticipated that result, 00:08:02.490 --> 00:08:05.678 given what I told you about the biofuel plantation a moment ago. 00:08:05.702 --> 00:08:08.698 Well, we consume 1.25 watts per square meter. 00:08:08.722 --> 00:08:09.879 What this means is, 00:08:09.903 --> 00:08:13.290 even if you covered the whole of the United Kingdom with energy crops, 00:08:13.314 --> 00:08:16.122 you couldn't match today's energy consumption. 00:08:17.236 --> 00:08:21.070 Wind power produces a bit more -- 2.5 watts per square meter. 00:08:21.094 --> 00:08:25.107 But that's only twice as big as 1.25 watts per square meter. 00:08:25.643 --> 00:08:29.765 So that means if you wanted, literally, to produce total energy consumption 00:08:29.789 --> 00:08:32.020 in all forms, on average, from wind farms, 00:08:32.044 --> 00:08:34.676 you need wind farms half the area of the UK. 00:08:36.179 --> 00:08:39.600 I've got data to back up all these assertions, by the way. 00:08:40.243 --> 00:08:42.152 Next, let's look at solar power. 00:08:42.719 --> 00:08:44.737 Solar panels, when you put them on a roof, 00:08:44.761 --> 00:08:49.076 deliver about 20 watts per square meter in England. 00:08:50.500 --> 00:08:52.882 If you really want to get a lot from solar panels, 00:08:52.906 --> 00:08:55.710 you need to adopt the traditional Bavarian farming method, 00:08:55.734 --> 00:08:57.085 where you leap off the roof, 00:08:57.109 --> 00:08:59.613 and coat the countryside with solar panels, too. 00:08:59.637 --> 00:09:02.833 Solar parks, because of the gaps between the panels, deliver less. 00:09:02.857 --> 00:09:06.264 They deliver about 5 watts per square meter of land area. 00:09:06.288 --> 00:09:09.590 And here's a solar park in Vermont, with real data, 00:09:09.614 --> 00:09:12.138 delivering 4.2 watts per square meter. 00:09:12.661 --> 00:09:15.568 Remember where we are, 1.25 watts per square meter, 00:09:15.592 --> 00:09:18.643 wind farms 2.5, solar parks about five. 00:09:19.497 --> 00:09:22.927 So whichever of those renewables you pick, 00:09:22.951 --> 00:09:26.500 the message is, whatever mix of those renewables you're using, 00:09:26.524 --> 00:09:28.705 if you want to power the UK on them, 00:09:28.729 --> 00:09:30.830 you're going to need to cover something like 00:09:30.854 --> 00:09:33.712 20 percent or 25 percent of the country 00:09:33.736 --> 00:09:35.375 with those renewables. 00:09:35.750 --> 00:09:39.262 I'm not saying that's a bad idea; we just need to understand the numbers. 00:09:39.286 --> 00:09:41.858 I'm absolutely not anti-renewables. I love renewables. 00:09:41.882 --> 00:09:43.518 But I'm also pro-arithmetic. 00:09:43.542 --> 00:09:45.247 (Laughter) 00:09:45.271 --> 00:09:49.403 Concentrating solar power in deserts delivers larger powers per unit area, 00:09:49.427 --> 00:09:51.778 because you don't have the problem of clouds. 00:09:51.802 --> 00:09:55.006 So, this facility delivers 14 watts per square meter; 00:09:55.030 --> 00:09:56.741 this one 10 watts per square meter; 00:09:56.765 --> 00:09:59.521 and this one in Spain, 5 watts per square meter. 00:09:59.545 --> 00:10:01.719 Being generous to concentrating solar power, 00:10:01.743 --> 00:10:05.407 I think it's perfectly credible it could deliver 20 watts per square meter. 00:10:05.431 --> 00:10:06.597 So that's nice. 00:10:06.621 --> 00:10:09.173 Of course, Britain doesn't have any deserts. 00:10:09.555 --> 00:10:10.711 Yet. 00:10:10.735 --> 00:10:12.420 (Laughter) 00:10:12.444 --> 00:10:14.809 So here's a summary so far: 00:10:15.635 --> 00:10:18.259 All renewables, much as I love them, are diffuse. 00:10:18.283 --> 00:10:20.322 They all have a small power per unit area, 00:10:20.346 --> 00:10:22.141 and we have to live with that fact. 00:10:22.871 --> 00:10:28.163 And that means, if you do want renewables to make a substantial difference 00:10:28.187 --> 00:10:29.975 for a country like the United Kingdom 00:10:29.999 --> 00:10:32.091 on the scale of today's consumption, 00:10:32.115 --> 00:10:36.516 you need to be imagining renewable facilities that are country-sized. 00:10:36.540 --> 00:10:37.853 Not the entire country, 00:10:37.877 --> 00:10:41.244 but a fraction of the country, a substantial fraction. 00:10:42.284 --> 00:10:44.831 There are other options for generating power as well, 00:10:44.855 --> 00:10:46.539 which don't involve fossil fuels. 00:10:46.563 --> 00:10:49.718 So there's nuclear power, and on this ordinance survey map, 00:10:49.742 --> 00:10:53.481 you can see there's a Sizewell B inside a blue square kilometer. 00:10:53.505 --> 00:10:55.508 That's one gigawatt in a square kilometer, 00:10:55.532 --> 00:10:57.957 which works out to 1,000 watts per square meter. 00:10:57.981 --> 00:11:00.117 So by this particular metric, 00:11:00.141 --> 00:11:05.336 nuclear power isn't as intrusive as renewables. 00:11:05.922 --> 00:11:07.917 Of course, other metrics matter, too, 00:11:07.941 --> 00:11:10.651 and nuclear power has all sorts of popularity problems. 00:11:11.564 --> 00:11:13.601 But the same goes for renewables as well. 00:11:13.625 --> 00:11:16.453 Here's a photograph of a consultation exercise in full swing 00:11:16.477 --> 00:11:19.165 in the little town of Penicuik just outside Edinburgh, 00:11:19.189 --> 00:11:21.683 and you can see the children of Penicuik celebrating 00:11:21.707 --> 00:11:24.077 the burning of the effigy of the windmill. 00:11:24.101 --> 00:11:25.260 So -- 00:11:25.284 --> 00:11:26.334 (Laughter) 00:11:26.358 --> 00:11:27.687 People are anti-everything, 00:11:27.711 --> 00:11:30.369 and we've got to keep all the options on the table. 00:11:30.928 --> 00:11:34.567 What can a country like the UK do on the supply side? 00:11:34.591 --> 00:11:37.510 Well, the options are, I'd say, these three: 00:11:37.534 --> 00:11:38.712 power renewables, 00:11:38.736 --> 00:11:42.447 and recognizing that they need to be close to country-sized; 00:11:42.471 --> 00:11:43.717 other people's renewables, 00:11:43.741 --> 00:11:45.868 so we could go back and talk very politely 00:11:45.892 --> 00:11:48.929 to the people in the top left-hand side of the diagram and say, 00:11:48.953 --> 00:11:51.204 "Uh, we don't want renewables in our backyard, 00:11:51.228 --> 00:11:53.822 but, um, please could we put them in yours instead?" 00:11:53.846 --> 00:11:55.811 And that's a serious option. 00:11:55.835 --> 00:11:59.419 It's a way for the world to handle this issue. 00:11:59.443 --> 00:12:03.575 So countries like Australia, Russia, Libya, Kazakhstan, 00:12:03.599 --> 00:12:06.599 could be our best friends for renewable production. 00:12:07.956 --> 00:12:09.992 And a third option is nuclear power. 00:12:10.016 --> 00:12:12.232 So that's some supply-side options. 00:12:12.256 --> 00:12:15.548 In addition to the supply levers that we can push -- 00:12:15.572 --> 00:12:17.607 and remember, we need large amounts, 00:12:17.631 --> 00:12:21.158 because at the moment, we get 90 percent of our energy from fossil fuels -- 00:12:21.182 --> 00:12:22.542 in addition to those levers, 00:12:22.566 --> 00:12:25.617 we could talk about other ways of solving this issue. 00:12:25.641 --> 00:12:29.037 Namely, we could reduce demand, and that means reducing population -- 00:12:29.061 --> 00:12:30.876 I'm not sure how to do that -- 00:12:30.900 --> 00:12:33.712 or reducing per capita consumption. 00:12:33.736 --> 00:12:36.199 So let's talk about three more big levers 00:12:36.223 --> 00:12:38.549 that could really help on the consumption side. 00:12:38.573 --> 00:12:39.727 First, transport. 00:12:39.751 --> 00:12:41.294 Here are the physics principles 00:12:41.318 --> 00:12:44.368 that tell you how to reduce the energy consumption of transport. 00:12:44.392 --> 00:12:46.838 People often say, "Technology can answer everything. 00:12:46.862 --> 00:12:49.638 We can make vehicles that are 100 times more efficient." 00:12:49.662 --> 00:12:51.642 And that's almost true. Let me show you. 00:12:51.666 --> 00:12:54.134 The energy consumption of this typical tank here 00:12:54.158 --> 00:12:57.582 is 80 kilowatt hours per hundred person kilometers. 00:12:57.606 --> 00:13:01.401 That's the average European car. 00:13:01.947 --> 00:13:03.098 Eighty kilowatt hours. 00:13:03.122 --> 00:13:05.210 Can we make something 100 times better 00:13:05.234 --> 00:13:07.547 by applying the physics principles I just listed? 00:13:07.571 --> 00:13:09.214 Yes. Here it is. It's the bicycle. 00:13:09.238 --> 00:13:11.884 It's 80 times better in energy consumption, 00:13:11.908 --> 00:13:14.132 and it's powered by biofuel, by Weetabix. 00:13:14.156 --> 00:13:16.294 (Laughter) 00:13:16.318 --> 00:13:18.185 And there are other options in between, 00:13:18.209 --> 00:13:20.336 because maybe the lady in the tank would say, 00:13:20.360 --> 00:13:23.516 "No, that's a lifestyle change. Don't change my lifestyle, please." 00:13:23.540 --> 00:13:27.187 We could persuade her to take a train, still a lot more efficient than a car, 00:13:27.211 --> 00:13:28.986 but that might be a lifestyle change. 00:13:29.010 --> 00:13:30.594 Or there's the EcoCAR, top-left. 00:13:30.618 --> 00:13:34.353 It comfortably accommodates one teenager and it's shorter than a traffic cone, 00:13:34.377 --> 00:13:36.413 and it's almost as efficient as a bicycle, 00:13:36.437 --> 00:13:39.477 as long as you drive it at 15 miles per hour. 00:13:39.899 --> 00:13:42.126 In between, perhaps some more realistic options 00:13:42.150 --> 00:13:45.115 on the transport lever are electric vehicles, 00:13:45.139 --> 00:13:47.518 so electric bikes and electric cars in the middle, 00:13:47.542 --> 00:13:52.568 perhaps four times as energy efficient as the standard petrol-powered tank. 00:13:53.378 --> 00:13:55.276 Next, there's the heating lever. 00:13:55.300 --> 00:13:58.791 Heating is a third of our energy consumption in Britain, 00:13:58.815 --> 00:14:00.888 and quite a lot of that is going into homes 00:14:00.912 --> 00:14:02.295 and other buildings, 00:14:02.319 --> 00:14:04.296 doing space heating and water heating. 00:14:04.320 --> 00:14:06.604 So here's a typical crappy British house. 00:14:06.628 --> 00:14:09.347 It's my house, with a Ferrari out front. 00:14:09.371 --> 00:14:10.436 (Laughter) 00:14:10.460 --> 00:14:11.613 What can we do to it? 00:14:11.637 --> 00:14:15.298 Well, the laws of physics are written up there, 00:14:15.322 --> 00:14:20.570 which describe how the power consumption for heating 00:14:20.594 --> 00:14:22.502 is driven by the things you can control. 00:14:22.526 --> 00:14:25.420 The things you can control are the temperature difference 00:14:25.444 --> 00:14:27.127 between the inside and the outside. 00:14:27.151 --> 00:14:29.765 There's this remarkable technology called a thermostat: 00:14:29.789 --> 00:14:31.525 you grasp it, rotate it to the left, 00:14:31.549 --> 00:14:34.078 and your energy consumption in the home will decrease. 00:14:34.102 --> 00:14:37.205 I've tried it. It works. Some people call it a lifestyle change. 00:14:37.229 --> 00:14:38.313 (Laughter) 00:14:38.337 --> 00:14:41.817 You can also get the fluff men in to reduce the leakiness 00:14:41.841 --> 00:14:44.810 of your building -- put fluff in the walls, fluff in the roof, 00:14:44.834 --> 00:14:46.628 a new front door, and so forth. 00:14:48.052 --> 00:14:50.637 The sad truth is, this will save you money. 00:14:50.661 --> 00:14:52.001 That's not sad, that's good. 00:14:52.025 --> 00:14:53.203 But the sad truth is, 00:14:53.227 --> 00:14:56.426 it'll only get about 25 percent of the leakiness of your building 00:14:56.450 --> 00:14:59.145 if you do these things, which are good ideas. 00:14:59.169 --> 00:15:02.428 If you really want to get a bit closer to Swedish building standards 00:15:02.452 --> 00:15:04.102 with a crappy house like this, 00:15:04.126 --> 00:15:07.572 you need to be putting external insulation on the building, 00:15:07.596 --> 00:15:09.868 as shown by this block of flats in London. 00:15:11.252 --> 00:15:14.257 You can also deliver heat more efficiently using heat pumps, 00:15:14.281 --> 00:15:17.751 which use a smaller bit of high-grade energy like electricity 00:15:17.775 --> 00:15:20.340 to move heat from your garden into your house. 00:15:21.276 --> 00:15:23.646 The third demand-side option I want to talk about, 00:15:23.670 --> 00:15:26.816 the third way to reduce energy consumption is: read your meters. 00:15:26.840 --> 00:15:28.669 People talk a lot about smart meters, 00:15:28.693 --> 00:15:30.040 but you can do it yourself. 00:15:30.064 --> 00:15:31.989 Use your own eyes and be smart. 00:15:32.013 --> 00:15:35.676 Read your meter, and if you're anything like me, it'll change your life. 00:15:35.700 --> 00:15:37.132 Here's a graph I made. 00:15:37.156 --> 00:15:39.300 I was writing a book about sustainable energy, 00:15:39.324 --> 00:15:40.478 and a friend asked me, 00:15:40.502 --> 00:15:42.316 "How much energy do you use at home?" 00:15:42.340 --> 00:15:44.360 I was embarrassed; I didn't actually know. 00:15:44.384 --> 00:15:46.585 And so I started reading the meter every week. 00:15:46.609 --> 00:15:50.401 The old meter readings are shown in the top half of the graph, 00:15:50.425 --> 00:15:52.650 and then 2007 is shown in green at the bottom. 00:15:52.674 --> 00:15:54.996 That was when I was reading the meter every week. 00:15:55.020 --> 00:15:56.186 And my life changed, 00:15:56.210 --> 00:15:59.565 because I started doing experiments and seeing what made a difference. 00:15:59.589 --> 00:16:00.994 My gas consumption plummeted, 00:16:01.018 --> 00:16:03.237 because I started tinkering with the thermostat 00:16:03.261 --> 00:16:05.060 and the timing on the heating system, 00:16:05.084 --> 00:16:07.297 and I knocked more than half off my gas bills. 00:16:07.321 --> 00:16:10.204 There's a similar story for my electricity consumption, 00:16:10.228 --> 00:16:13.790 where switching off the DVD players, the stereos, 00:16:13.814 --> 00:16:16.608 the computer peripherals that were on all the time, 00:16:16.632 --> 00:16:18.827 and just switching them on when I needed them, 00:16:18.851 --> 00:16:21.476 knocked another third off my electricity bills, too. 00:16:22.742 --> 00:16:24.508 So we need a plan that adds up. 00:16:24.532 --> 00:16:27.122 I've described for you six big levers. 00:16:27.146 --> 00:16:28.312 We need big action, 00:16:28.336 --> 00:16:31.098 because we get 90 percent of our energy from fossil fuels, 00:16:31.122 --> 00:16:35.168 and so you need to push hard on most, if not all, of these levers. 00:16:35.888 --> 00:16:38.174 Most of these levers have popularity problems, 00:16:38.198 --> 00:16:41.864 and if there is a lever you don't like the use of, 00:16:41.888 --> 00:16:45.705 well, please do bear in mind that means you need even stronger effort 00:16:45.729 --> 00:16:47.610 on the other levers. 00:16:48.056 --> 00:16:51.207 So I'm a strong advocate of having grown-up conversations 00:16:51.231 --> 00:16:53.492 that are based on numbers and facts. 00:16:53.516 --> 00:16:57.292 And I want to close with this map that just visualizes for you 00:16:57.316 --> 00:17:00.853 the requirement of land and so forth 00:17:00.877 --> 00:17:03.941 in order to get just 16 lightbulbs per person 00:17:03.965 --> 00:17:06.653 from four of the big possible sources. 00:17:07.074 --> 00:17:10.233 So, if you wanted to get 16 lightbulbs -- 00:17:10.258 --> 00:17:14.579 remember, today our total energy consumption is 125 lightbulbs' worth -- 00:17:14.603 --> 00:17:16.826 if you wanted 16 from wind, 00:17:16.849 --> 00:17:19.676 this map visualizes a solution for the UK. 00:17:19.701 --> 00:17:23.858 It's got 160 wind farms, each 100 square kilometers in size, 00:17:23.882 --> 00:17:27.766 and that would be a twentyfold increase over today's amount of wind. 00:17:27.790 --> 00:17:30.698 Nuclear power: to get 16 lightbulbs per person, 00:17:30.722 --> 00:17:33.811 you'd need two gigawatts at each of the purple dots on the map. 00:17:33.835 --> 00:17:38.018 That's a fourfold increase over today's levels of nuclear power. 00:17:38.669 --> 00:17:41.367 Biomass: to get 16 lightbulbs per person, 00:17:41.391 --> 00:17:45.653 you'd need a land area something like three and a half Wales' worth, 00:17:46.423 --> 00:17:49.005 either in our country, or in someone else's country, 00:17:49.029 --> 00:17:51.072 possibly Ireland, possibly somewhere else. 00:17:51.096 --> 00:17:52.175 (Laughter) 00:17:52.199 --> 00:17:53.990 And a fourth supply-side option: 00:17:54.014 --> 00:17:56.731 concentrating solar power in other people's deserts. 00:17:57.154 --> 00:17:59.593 If you wanted to get 16 lightbulbs' worth, 00:17:59.617 --> 00:18:02.632 then we're talking about these eight hexagons 00:18:02.656 --> 00:18:03.967 down at the bottom right. 00:18:03.991 --> 00:18:08.216 The total area of those hexagons is two Greater London's worth 00:18:08.240 --> 00:18:10.329 of someone else's Sahara, 00:18:10.353 --> 00:18:13.360 and you'll need power lines all the way across Spain and France 00:18:13.384 --> 00:18:16.754 to bring the power from the Sahara to Surrey. 00:18:17.195 --> 00:18:18.345 (Laughter) 00:18:18.369 --> 00:18:19.963 We need a plan that adds up. 00:18:20.895 --> 00:18:23.397 We need to stop shouting and start talking. 00:18:24.809 --> 00:18:29.032 And if we can have a grown-up conversation, 00:18:29.056 --> 00:18:31.517 make a plan that adds up and get building, 00:18:31.541 --> 00:18:34.545 maybe this low-carbon revolution will actually be fun. 00:18:34.569 --> 00:18:36.307 Thank you very much for listening. 00:18:36.331 --> 00:18:38.837 (Applause)