Return to Video

Robin Pike: From the Stacks to the Future of Research: Building a Scalable, Sustainable Digitization Program at the University o

  • 0:00 - 0:02
    (Trevor) And it's
    my great pleasure today
  • 0:02 - 0:05
    to introduce our
    Digital Dialogue speaker, Robin Pike,
  • 0:05 - 0:09
    with the Digital Collections Library here
    at the University of Maryland libraries,
  • 0:09 - 0:11
    and also the head of the
    Digital Conversion
  • 0:11 - 0:14
    and Media Reformatting Unit,
    the digitization center upstairs
  • 0:14 - 0:17
    in this building,
    and she's going to talk to us today
  • 0:17 - 0:20
    about building a scalable, sustainable
    digitization program:*
  • 0:20 - 0:22
    From the Stacks to the Future of Research
  • 0:22 - 0:23
    so welcome Robin.
  • 0:23 - 0:24
    Thank you.
  • 0:24 - 0:26
    Good afternoon everybody,
    I am Robin Pike,
  • 0:26 - 0:29
    as Trevor said, the Manager of
    Digital Conversion and Media Reformatting.
  • 0:31 - 0:33
    Thank you all for coming
    on such a lovely afternoon,
  • 0:33 - 0:35
    I know I'd rather be outside,
    so I appreciate you coming here
  • 0:35 - 0:37
    to a dark room.
  • 0:38 - 0:43
    So, as Trevor said,
    we're the digitization center
  • 0:43 - 0:46
    but we're also more than that.
  • 0:46 - 0:50
    We're involved in many aspects
    of digitization projects
  • 0:50 - 0:54
    in the libraries.
    As I will discuss today,
  • 0:54 - 0:57
    we play an integral role
    in digital projects and
  • 0:57 - 1:00
    digital curation projects,
    leading to wider use of
  • 1:00 - 1:02
    libraries' unique collections.
  • 1:03 - 1:04
    But first, a little history.
  • 1:06 - 1:10
    So, digitization at the
    University of Maryland libraries
  • 1:10 - 1:14
    has a genesis similar to many other
    academic library digitization programs.
  • 1:15 - 1:18
    In the early 2000's,
    several discrete digitization requests
  • 1:18 - 1:23
    and projects were performed,
    usually based on patron requests
  • 1:23 - 1:25
    or librarian projects
    to showcase collections.
  • 1:27 - 1:29
    Digital images were
    stored on computers
  • 1:29 - 1:32
    and later network drives,
    with little to no metadata.
  • 1:34 - 1:36
    It was thus difficult
    to search the digital objects,
  • 1:36 - 1:41
    and frequently images were rescanned ,
    due to lack of finding,
  • 1:41 - 1:43
    the frequently requested objects.
  • 1:43 - 1:46
    Later, some metadata was collected
    in an Access database
  • 1:46 - 1:49
    for the digital objects,
    so that the more frequently requested
  • 1:49 - 1:52
    items can be tracked and used
    more efficiently.
  • 1:55 - 1:58
    In 2005, the Office of
    Digital Collections and Research
  • 1:58 - 2:01
    was founded under the
    Dean of the libraries,
  • 2:01 - 2:03
    to bring control over
    digital objects,
  • 2:03 - 2:06
    and to build the digitization program.
  • 2:06 - 2:08
    It was staffed to five
    full-time librarians,
  • 2:08 - 2:13
    including an Assistant Dean,
    two digital librarians,
  • 2:13 - 2:17
    one databases administrator,
    one user interface specialist,
  • 2:17 - 2:20
    and also included
    two graduate assistants,
  • 2:20 - 2:24
    and other part-time assistants,
    from a developer systems librarian
  • 2:24 - 2:25
    and metadata librarian.
  • 2:27 - 2:29
    These people developed
    the policies that governed
  • 2:29 - 2:33
    collections of the
    University of Maryland libraries,
  • 2:33 - 2:36
    including document governing
    the best practices for
  • 2:36 - 2:39
    digital collections,
    and a home-grown
  • 2:39 - 2:41
    metadata schema,
    which incorporated many
  • 2:41 - 2:44
    of the current needs
    of the library's curators.
  • 2:44 - 2:48
    They also developed
    the digital collections repository
  • 2:48 - 2:51
    and the systems that
    manage the digital objects.
  • 2:52 - 2:55
    In addition to creating new,
    discrete digital projects,
  • 2:55 - 2:59
    previously scanned digital objects
    were ingested into the repository
  • 2:59 - 3:01
    with appropriate metadata.
  • 3:02 - 3:05
    Over the next few years,
    development on the repository
  • 3:05 - 3:09
    and the user interface continued,
    patron requests
  • 3:09 - 3:13
    were ingested individually
    into the repository
  • 3:13 - 3:15
    to grow collections,
    and changing staff
  • 3:15 - 3:18
    worked primarily with
    Special Collections
  • 3:18 - 3:20
    to create and develop
    digital projects
  • 3:20 - 3:23
    that are still highlighted
    with their own portals,
  • 3:23 - 3:25
    through digital collections.
  • 3:26 - 3:30
    In 2007 and 2008,
    University of Maryland libraries
  • 3:30 - 3:33
    was affected by the recession,
    and many of the staff left
  • 3:33 - 3:37
    as funding was cut,
    some by their own choice,
  • 3:37 - 3:40
    some... were just not renewed.
  • 3:41 - 3:44
    In 2009, the Office of
    Digital Collections and Research
  • 3:44 - 3:47
    was dissolved because
    Collection Management and
  • 3:47 - 3:51
    Special Collections
    primary used the digital collections
  • 3:51 - 3:54
    repository, some of the staff
    who were left were incorporated
  • 3:54 - 3:58
    into the new
    Digital Collections Unit
  • 3:58 - 4:01
    under Collection Management and
    Special Collections
  • 4:01 - 4:04
    and others were redistributed
    to other parts of the library.
  • 4:05 - 4:08
    Like many other academic libraries,
    University of Maryland's libraries
  • 4:08 - 4:12
    had made the decision
    to scale back digitization
  • 4:12 - 4:16
    because it was an added bonus
    to collections and was not
  • 4:16 - 4:18
    an essential service
    at the time.
  • 4:19 - 4:22
    Some of the flexibility
    of the office was lost,
  • 4:22 - 4:24
    and little development
    on the repository
  • 4:24 - 4:25
    was able to continue.
  • 4:25 - 4:31
    This reorganization led to the
    creation of a small digitization center,
  • 4:31 - 4:35
    to better serve daily functions
    of image digitization,
  • 4:35 - 4:38
    requests, and the slow addition
    of these requests
  • 4:38 - 4:40
    to existing digital collections.
  • 4:41 - 4:44
    New procedures for creating
    digital collections
  • 4:44 - 4:48
    and exhibits of these digital objects,
    and procedures for
  • 4:48 - 4:50
    digitization requests
    were also developed at this time.
  • 4:51 - 4:54
    Two of our complete
    [flatbed] scanners were purchased
  • 4:54 - 4:57
    in addition to other
    smaller scanners available.
  • 4:58 - 5:01
    While resources were limited
    to acquire scanning hardware,
  • 5:01 - 5:07
    we began to use standarized
    image capture and image editing software
  • 5:07 - 5:10
    to create digital images
    under the same diagrams.
  • 5:10 - 5:13
    Importers operated the scanners
    under the direction of a librarian.
  • 5:22 - 5:26
    Over the next two years,
    the digitization center
  • 5:27 - 5:30
    gradually grew based on
    the continued demand for digital.
  • 5:31 - 5:34
    Best practice documentation
    was updated to include
  • 5:34 - 5:40
    developing digital imaging
    federal guidelines.
  • 5:43 - 5:48
    Digital exhibitions were created
    to complement the large, annual
  • 5:48 - 5:50
    Special Collections exhibit.
  • 5:50 - 5:53
    Several collaborative projects
    between departments began,
  • 5:53 - 5:56
    such as the digitization
    of a small sample
  • 5:56 - 6:00
    of Katherine Anne Porter's letters
    and the creation of TEI
  • 6:00 - 6:02
    for those documents.
  • 6:02 - 6:05
    Two long-term in-house
    digitization projects,
  • 6:05 - 6:08
    commenced digitization
    of public domain posters
  • 6:08 - 6:11
    from the government
    documents collect unit,
  • 6:11 - 6:14
    and the National Trust
    for historic preservation poster collection.
  • 6:16 - 6:20
    Other external digitization projects
    began, including the relationship
  • 6:20 - 6:23
    with the Lyrasis Mass Digitization
    collaborative project
  • 6:23 - 6:26
    through the Internet Archive,
    which allowed efficient
  • 6:26 - 6:29
    and cost-effective mass digitization
    of bound monographs and serials.
  • 6:35 - 6:40
    In 2011, additional scanners
    and a digital SLR camera
  • 6:40 - 6:43
    were purchased and
    additional students were hired
  • 6:43 - 6:46
    to meet the increasing
    patron and librarians' need
  • 6:46 - 6:48
    of digitized collections material.
  • 6:49 - 6:53
    Digitization was becoming an
    integral and expected function
  • 6:53 - 6:55
    of many events within the library.
  • 6:55 - 6:58
    Patrons expected to receive
    digital images for image requests.
  • 6:59 - 7:03
    Librarians expected to be able to
    put more of their content online,
  • 7:03 - 7:05
    for patron access
    and for outreach.
  • 7:06 - 7:11
    The infrastructure of the repository
    had not changed in about four years
  • 7:11 - 7:15
    despite the rapidly changing technology,
    and not all departments and units
  • 7:15 - 7:20
    had used the digitization center
    for their digital projects,
  • 7:20 - 7:23
    for various internal reasons
    through its existence,
  • 7:23 - 7:25
    the result of which
    were digital files,
  • 7:25 - 7:28
    of varying formats,
    stored on a variety of external media
  • 7:28 - 7:31
    in those collections
    and not in the repository.
  • 7:33 - 7:36
    At this time,
    University of Maryland libraries
  • 7:36 - 7:39
    was reexamining
    the digital collections infrastructure
  • 7:39 - 7:42
    and how to grow the operation
    to best suit the changing needs
  • 7:42 - 7:45
    of librarians and demands for patrons.
  • 7:45 - 7:48
    Supported by vested librarians
    and Collection Management's
  • 7:48 - 7:51
    Special Collections,
    and the new Associate Dean
  • 7:51 - 7:56
    of the Information Technology division,
    Special Collections was reorganized.
  • 7:56 - 7:59
    Part of this process
    resulted in Digital Collections
  • 7:59 - 8:03
    moving under ITD
    in December 2011,
  • 8:07 - 8:10
    and then later being split into
    two units in early 2012:
  • 8:10 - 8:14
    Digital Stewardship and
    Digital Conversion and Media Reformatting.
  • 8:14 - 8:18
    At their most basic levels,
    Digital Stewardship would manage
  • 8:18 - 8:22
    large digital projects and initiatives
    such as digital preservation
  • 8:22 - 8:25
    and the repository development,
    and Digital Conversion
  • 8:25 - 8:29
    and Media Refomatting
    would manage the digitization center
  • 8:29 - 8:32
    and growth of the capabilities
    for in-house digitization
  • 8:32 - 8:35
    and management of digitization
    projects for vendors.
  • 8:36 - 8:39
    The creation of these units
    solidified the University of Maryland
  • 8:39 - 8:43
    libraries' commitment to
    digitization and digital preservation.
  • 8:45 - 8:48
    In February 2012, I was hired
    to manage Digital Conversion
  • 8:48 - 8:52
    and Media Reformatting,
    hereafter referred to as DCMR.
  • 8:53 - 8:57
    I began by examining
    previous policies and capabilities,
  • 8:57 - 9:00
    consolidating disparate
    digitized materials
  • 9:00 - 9:04
    outside of the repository,
    surveying available equipment
  • 9:04 - 9:07
    and the space for expansion,
    and surveying stakeholders
  • 9:07 - 9:09
    throughout the libraries
    for collection needs
  • 9:09 - 9:11
    and digitization priorities.
  • 9:11 - 9:15
    During the personnel surveys,
    it was evident that there was
  • 9:15 - 9:20
    still confusion about what DCMR
    would be doing beyond digitization.
  • 9:20 - 9:24
    I created a goals statement
    of which the new unit
  • 9:24 - 9:26
    could perform for the libraries
  • 9:26 - 9:29
    to better define its
    duties and services.
  • 9:29 - 9:33
    The statement was the backbone
    of new policies developed
  • 9:33 - 9:38
    around the existing and new services,
    in justification for new staff.
  • 9:48 - 9:52
    Principally, DCMR would handle
    the production of digital objects
  • 9:52 - 9:57
    including textual, photographic,
    audio and video for patrons
  • 9:57 - 10:01
    and Digital Collections,
    primarily for permanent retention
  • 10:01 - 10:05
    and use outside of course reserves,
    excluding the materials
  • 10:05 - 10:09
    digitized for reserves
    for public services,
  • 10:09 - 10:11
    which may be performed in-house
    or through a vendor,
  • 10:11 - 10:13
    depending on the nature
    of the material
  • 10:13 - 10:15
    and the timeline
    in which it is needed.
  • 10:16 - 10:18
    It will also coordinate
    digitization projects
  • 10:18 - 10:21
    through vendors, for librarians
    and library staff,
  • 10:21 - 10:26
    and coordinate cooperation
    from other libraries' units when needed,
  • 10:26 - 10:30
    such as when preservation work is
    needed in Preservation and Conservation.
  • 10:32 - 10:36
    The project managers in DCMR
    will also coordinate with other units
  • 10:36 - 10:40
    and University of Maryland departments
    on digital projects,
  • 10:40 - 10:44
    such as Digital Stewardship or MITH,
  • 10:44 - 10:47
    where it will serve as the
    Manager of Digitization
  • 10:47 - 10:49
    or the liaison
    with digitization vendors.
  • 10:50 - 10:53
    Additionally, the unit would also evaluate
  • 10:53 - 10:55
    and set or revise digitization standards
  • 10:55 - 10:57
    and workloads as needed.
  • 11:00 - 11:02
    We would be including
    audio-visual digitization
  • 11:02 - 11:04
    and the new suite
    of in-house services
  • 11:04 - 11:06
    offered by the Digitization Center,
  • 11:06 - 11:09
    however, the limited space
    in the current setup
  • 11:09 - 11:12
    of five scanners
    would not allow for...
  • 11:19 - 11:21
    additional audio-visual
    digitization stations.
  • 11:21 - 11:24
    We moved the Digitization Center
    from the second floor
  • 11:24 - 11:30
    Hornbake library
    to the fourth floor Hornbake library
  • 11:31 - 11:35
    in an unused space,
    which included slightly more space
  • 11:35 - 11:39
    for photo and text digitization,
    space for three audio and video
  • 11:39 - 11:42
    digitization stations,
    and additional dedicated staff space.
  • 11:44 - 11:46
    It was also essential
    to build meaningful relationships
  • 11:46 - 11:50
    during the first several months,
    so that library staff would feel
  • 11:50 - 11:53
    more invested in this new iteration
    of the Digitization Center.
  • 11:54 - 11:57
    Moving the Digitization Center
    required the most amount of
  • 11:57 - 11:59
    communication so that
    we would not disappoint
  • 11:59 - 12:04
    or frustrate frequent users
    with necessary downtime
  • 12:04 - 12:06
    and operational changes.
  • 12:07 - 12:09
    At the same time,
    we were also able to integrate
  • 12:09 - 12:14
    an additional new scanner,
    increasing our digitization capabilities.
  • 12:15 - 12:20
    Soon after, we started to integrate
    a new, long-term digitization projectS
  • 12:20 - 12:22
    with a hiring of additional students.
  • 12:24 - 12:28
    During this planning and move,
    we also hired two full-time library staff:
  • 12:29 - 12:33
    a broadcast media digitization librarian,
    who'd be researching
  • 12:33 - 12:37
    and setting up two audio
    digitization stations in the first year,
  • 12:37 - 12:42
    and a digital reformatting specialist,
    who would be managing students
  • 12:42 - 12:43
    in the Digitization Center.
  • 12:43 - 12:46
    Requests and long-term
    digitization projects
  • 12:46 - 12:51
    and performing quality assurance
    on digital objects and metadata.
  • 12:52 - 12:56
    By October 2012, the Digitization Center
    was functional in its new location.
  • 13:01 - 13:05
    In February 2012, we were able to
    digitize flat items,
  • 13:06 - 13:11
    including photographs, prints,
    manuscripts, slides, negatives and maps
  • 13:11 - 13:15
    up to 11 by 17 inches,
    and we were also able to digitize
  • 13:15 - 13:19
    books, journals, newspapers
    and other flat or bound materials
  • 13:19 - 13:21
    up to 18 by 25 inches.
  • 13:22 - 13:25
    We also provide
    a digital photography service,
  • 13:25 - 13:28
    and we were able to provide
    all of these digital objects
  • 13:28 - 13:32
    not only within the repository
    when it justified it,
  • 13:32 - 13:39
    but also provide the materials
    to requesters on various optical disks,
  • 13:39 - 13:42
    local area networks or FTP,
    depending on the preference
  • 13:42 - 13:43
    for each requester.
  • 13:46 - 13:49
    At present, we can also perform
    the following audio digitization services:
  • 13:50 - 13:55
    digital reformatting or conversion,
    quarter inch audio open-reel tapes,
  • 13:56 - 14:00
    audio cassettes, and [?]
    to archival and access digital audio files.
  • 14:00 - 14:05
    We can also batch convert audio files
    to archival and access formats.
  • 14:06 - 14:09
    With about 90 hours
    of student labor per week,
  • 14:09 - 14:12
    photo and document digitization requests
    are performed within a 10 day
  • 14:12 - 14:17
    working day period,
    though they are usually
  • 14:17 - 14:19
    completed much faster.
  • 14:20 - 14:24
    These requests are integrated
    into the long-term project workload,
  • 14:24 - 14:28
    for each student is assigned
    a part or a single long-term
  • 14:28 - 14:31
    photo or textual digitization project.
  • 14:32 - 14:36
    Extensive procedural documentation
    is now created for long-term projects
  • 14:36 - 14:39
    so that students are
    more quickly trained on their tasks
  • 14:39 - 14:43
    and have references
    for standardized metadata.
  • 14:46 - 14:50
    At the beginning of April 2013,
    the University libraries
  • 14:50 - 14:56
    have created almost 17,000
    descriptive metadata records,
  • 14:56 - 15:00
    including over 10,000
    digital image records,
  • 15:00 - 15:07
    about 3400 books in the repository,
    about 3400 books in the Internet Archive,
  • 15:08 - 15:13
    and about 1600 moving image
    and audio records,
  • 15:13 - 15:16
    mostly moving image --
    we're just starting with audio.
  • 15:20 - 15:23
    The percentages of images
    and metadata records
  • 15:23 - 15:26
    created in the repository
    has increased over the last year,
  • 15:26 - 15:28
    with these developments
    in the workflow.
  • 15:28 - 15:31
    Between new requests
    and librarian projects,
  • 15:31 - 15:33
    digital objects continue
    to be added to
  • 15:33 - 15:36
    existing digital collections
    such as the University album.
  • 15:37 - 15:40
    We are also in the process of
    creating new digital collections
  • 15:40 - 15:44
    to be representative
    as separate entities in the near future,
  • 15:44 - 15:48
    such as the Preston family papers,
    a collection of correspondence,
  • 15:48 - 15:49
    diaries and other papers,
  • 15:49 - 15:51
    primarily written by
    a mother and daughter,
  • 15:51 - 15:57
    from about 1820 to 1894,
    about domestic life in Maryland,
  • 15:57 - 16:00
    the Catholic Church,
    global politics,
  • 16:00 - 16:05
    weather and national disasters,
    slavery, and domestic abuse,
  • 16:05 - 16:09
    the beginnings of which
    are now searchable in Digital Collections.
  • 16:10 - 16:15
    This project was initiated by
    our historical manuscripts curator.
  • 16:17 - 16:19
    We also continued to maintain
    a digitization contract
  • 16:19 - 16:23
    with the Lyrasis Mass Digitization Project,
    to scan books and other mass volumes.
  • 16:24 - 16:27
    We have also started
    several other large contracts
  • 16:27 - 16:29
    with digitization vendors
    for rare formats,
  • 16:29 - 16:33
    or projects with preservation concerns
    that are more cost-effective
  • 16:33 - 16:35
    to handle up in the
    Digitization Center.
  • 16:36 - 16:40
    The Preston Family Papers project
    is an example of a project
  • 16:40 - 16:44
    that we are both insourcing
    and outsourcing,
  • 16:44 - 16:46
    as the diaries are fragile
    and need preservation work
  • 16:46 - 16:49
    before a specialized vendor
    will digitize them.
  • 16:52 - 16:55
    We are currently refining
    our audio digitization workflow
  • 16:55 - 16:56
    to improve its efficiency.
  • 16:57 - 17:00
    Though the time it takes
    to digitize audio depends on the format,
  • 17:00 - 17:03
    the labeling of the
    original recording settings
  • 17:03 - 17:07
    and the material's condition,
    most current audio requests
  • 17:07 - 17:11
    are short and long-term projects,
    so we have flexible timelines
  • 17:11 - 17:13
    in which to complete them.
  • 17:13 - 17:15
    The leading pilot project
    for developing
  • 17:15 - 17:20
    audio digitization work stations
    and workflows was
  • 17:20 - 17:22
    the WMUC Archives recording project.
  • 17:23 - 17:27
    It has progressed from
    digitizing select open-reel tapes
  • 17:27 - 17:31
    to digitizing these tapes
    and ADATs in a production environment
  • 17:31 - 17:35
    to complete the digitization
    of at least 100 recordings
  • 17:35 - 17:38
    for the special collections WMUC
    exhibit opening this fall.
  • 17:39 - 17:44
    While the broadcasting media digitization
    librarians handle the difficult formats,
  • 17:44 - 17:48
    several students have now been trained
    to digitize easier audio formats
  • 17:48 - 17:51
    such as cassette tapes,
    decreasing the overall cost
  • 17:51 - 17:54
    of digitization and increasing
    our capacity to complete
  • 17:54 - 17:56
    audio digitization requests.
  • 17:57 - 17:59
    Beyond the production
    of digital objects,
  • 17:59 - 18:03
    DCMR will play a leading role
    in collaboration with units
  • 18:03 - 18:07
    that hold and manage collections
    within the seven campus libraries
  • 18:07 - 18:09
    and units that provide services
    for these collections.
  • 18:10 - 18:13
    Subject librarians and content managers
  • 18:13 - 18:16
    know their collections and
    users better, and are able to
  • 18:16 - 18:20
    prioritize these projects and provide
    guidance for the resulting products.
  • 18:24 - 18:27
    DCMR directs materials
    into the workflow
  • 18:27 - 18:30
    based on the librarian's request
    and their user's needs.
  • 18:30 - 18:34
    For example, if we wished
    to digitize a serial set for access,
  • 18:34 - 18:39
    because it is deteriorating,
    it is not known to exist elsewhere online,
  • 18:39 - 18:43
    and it's in the public domain,
    we suggest that these volumes
  • 18:43 - 18:46
    be sent to the Internet Archive
    for inclusion in that project
  • 18:46 - 18:48
    and access through that portal.
  • 18:49 - 18:52
    The Internet Archive makes volumes
    searchable, via search engines
  • 18:52 - 18:58
    and their sites, and provides
    a well-known and wider portal
  • 18:58 - 19:00
    to deliver books and serials
    to researchers.
  • 19:01 - 19:04
    This workflow also provides
    a two to three-month turnaround time
  • 19:04 - 19:08
    which provides faster access
    to these lengthier materials
  • 19:08 - 19:11
    that we then provide in house.
  • 19:12 - 19:17
    One of the deteriorating serial sets
    that we have created access to
  • 19:17 - 19:22
    in this manner is Sponsor,
    a broadcasting journal,
  • 19:22 - 19:26
    searchable through the Internet Archive
    gateway and Digital Collections.
  • 19:28 - 19:31
    We're also involved
    in the multifaceted partnership
  • 19:31 - 19:34
    to digitize Special Collections'
    French Pamphlet collection
  • 19:34 - 19:37
    also searchable through
    the Internet Archive gateway
  • 19:37 - 19:38
    and Digital Collections.
  • 19:39 - 19:41
    After the French department
    approached one of our
  • 19:41 - 19:44
    language and literature
    subject librarians,
  • 19:44 - 19:46
    a partnership was formed
  • 19:46 - 19:50
    with Special Collections and DCMR
    to digitize and make available
  • 19:50 - 19:55
    700 to 1000 of the 12000
    French pamphlets
  • 19:55 - 19:57
    that we hold in Special Collections.
  • 19:59 - 20:04
    The 700 to 1000 set
    was selected because
  • 20:04 - 20:08
    they have been previously cataloged
    and were not required
  • 20:08 - 20:10
    further description work.
  • 20:10 - 20:13
    Future cases of this project
    will require partnering
  • 20:13 - 20:17
    with the Technical Services division
    and students in the French department
  • 20:17 - 20:21
    to ensure that the remaining materials
    are cataloged before they are digitized.
  • 20:22 - 20:26
    After digitization, these materials
    can be more easily used
  • 20:26 - 20:29
    in University of Maryland classrooms
    and in classrooms around the world.
  • 20:31 - 20:34
    A similar project is actually underway
    at the University of Florida
  • 20:34 - 20:36
    Digital Collections;
    they have digitized
  • 20:36 - 20:41
    166 pamphlets, of which there is
    little to no overlap with our collection.
  • 20:42 - 20:46
    The University of Florida
    Digital Collections search interface is
  • 20:46 - 20:49
    a bit more advanced than the one
    provided through the Internet Archive,
  • 20:49 - 20:53
    but the resources are available
    via search engine as well,
  • 20:53 - 20:57
    which is currently the primary
    and initial discovery point
  • 20:57 - 20:59
    for most online users.
  • 21:00 - 21:02
    These collections will complement
    each other, and we hope that
  • 21:02 - 21:05
    there is some cross usage between
    the institutions' collections.
  • 21:07 - 21:09
    Other Internet Archive
    digitization projects
  • 21:09 - 21:14
    continue to be a collaboration
    between the content holders and DCMR.
  • 21:16 - 21:19
    Another major undertaking
    has been the digitization of
  • 21:19 - 21:22
    the Preston Family Papers
    that I previously mentioned.
  • 21:23 - 21:27
    This is a combined effort between
    the historical manuscripts curator,
  • 21:27 - 21:30
    our Preservation and Conservation unit
    and DCMR.
  • 21:31 - 21:34
    After consulting with the curator,
    we decided to divide this project
  • 21:34 - 21:39
    into two parts: flat materials including
    letters, photographs and documents
  • 21:39 - 21:41
    and the diaries.
  • 21:42 - 21:45
    The flat materials could be
    digitized in house, and
  • 21:45 - 21:48
    a Procedures Guide was created
    for the students performing
  • 21:48 - 21:52
    at digitization, which included
    diagrams on how to scan the letters,
  • 21:52 - 21:55
    some of which have odd
    folding and numbering,
  • 21:55 - 21:58
    and metadata to use
    across the collection.
  • 21:59 - 22:02
    The diaries had tight bindings,
    and were very delicate,
  • 22:02 - 22:05
    so after consulting with
    Preservation and Conservation,
  • 22:05 - 22:08
    these materials were sent to a vendor,
    who will be performing
  • 22:08 - 22:12
    stabilization procedures
    before digitizing the small bound volumes.
  • 22:13 - 22:17
    Both parts of the project
    are progressing in tandem,
  • 22:17 - 22:20
    and several of the folders of letters
    are already finished and
  • 22:20 - 22:21
    available through Digital Collections.
  • 22:23 - 22:26
    After a significant portion
    of the collection is digitized,
  • 22:26 - 22:29
    these handwritten materials
    will make an ideal transcription
  • 22:29 - 22:33
    or TEI project for field study students
    in Special Collections,
  • 22:33 - 22:36
    another opportunity for collaboration.
  • 22:37 - 22:42
    The most intricate project
    that DCMR has undertaken so far
  • 22:42 - 22:45
    has been the digitization
    of the WMUC Archive,
  • 22:45 - 22:48
    the records and recordings
    of the University of Maryland's
  • 22:48 - 22:52
    student radio station, for the annual
    Special Collections exhibit
  • 22:52 - 22:53
    opening this fall.
  • 22:54 - 22:57
    This project was the reason
    for taking a rapid approach
  • 22:57 - 23:01
    to creating a functional and developing
    audio digitization workstation.
  • 23:01 - 23:04
    While we did not have
    all the best equipment at first,
  • 23:04 - 23:09
    we were able to start digitizing
    quarter-inch open-reel audio tapes
  • 23:09 - 23:12
    to archival standards,
    by using and fixing
  • 23:12 - 23:13
    what legacy equipment
    was available.
  • 23:14 - 23:17
    After the pilot digitization phase
    of the project,
  • 23:17 - 23:19
    we had received our ideal equipment,
  • 23:19 - 23:22
    which was integrated
    into the digitization stations.
  • 23:22 - 23:26
    We were then able to expand
    the formats we were digitizing,
  • 23:26 - 23:29
    in the production phase of the project,
    to include ADATs and cassette tapes.
  • 23:30 - 23:33
    Beyond the digitization
    of audio recordings,
  • 23:33 - 23:34
    we are also digitizing photos
  • 23:34 - 23:37
    and documents, for the physical
    and online exhibits.
  • 23:38 - 23:41
    These requests have been integrated
    into our existing textual
  • 23:41 - 23:44
    and photographic project workflows.
  • 23:45 - 23:48
    The main collaborative effort
    that has influenced the work of DCMR
  • 23:48 - 23:51
    has been its collaboration
    with Digital Stewardship.
  • 23:51 - 23:54
    Digital Stewardship is guiding
    the development
  • 23:54 - 23:57
    of the Digital Collections repository,
    including another phase
  • 23:57 - 23:59
    of the WMUC pilot project.
  • 24:00 - 24:02
    Several of the staff
    have developed new functionalities
  • 24:02 - 24:06
    for the repository,
    from linking newly created audio files
  • 24:06 - 24:09
    from the WMUC pilot project
    and other audio requests
  • 24:09 - 24:11
    to metadata records
    for their access.
  • 24:12 - 24:15
    While these recordings are
    not yet publicly available,
  • 24:15 - 24:18
    they will be going live
    with the opening of the exhibit.
  • 24:19 - 24:21
    Digital Stewardship has also
    developed the workflow
  • 24:21 - 24:25
    for ingesting three types of audio files:
    the archival master,
  • 24:25 - 24:28
    the high quality user file
    and the stringing file,
  • 24:28 - 24:31
    and coordinated the different
    storage locations for each file.
  • 24:33 - 24:36
    We are also courting efforts
    on other multi-tiered projects
  • 24:36 - 24:39
    where digitization is
    one of many stages.
  • 24:43 - 24:47
    One such project, benefiting from
    cross-unit collaboration,
  • 24:47 - 24:50
    is the Katherine Anne Porter
    Digital Scholar and Media Edition project,
  • 24:50 - 24:54
    which will digitize approximately
    4300 letters of which we have copyright.
  • 24:55 - 24:58
    While librarians and staff
    from Special Collections
  • 24:58 - 25:02
    manage the description of materials since
    they have knowledge of the materials,
  • 25:02 - 25:06
    DCMR is coordinating with
    an external digitization vendor
  • 25:06 - 25:09
    so that the letters can be
    digitized in a shorter timeline
  • 25:09 - 25:12
    than we would have been able to
    complete in house.
  • 25:13 - 25:16
    Digital Stewardship is managing
    the ingest and preservation
  • 25:16 - 25:19
    of digital objects,
    and coordinating with MITH,
  • 25:19 - 25:22
    to later encode the letters in TEI,
    to make them more accessible
  • 25:22 - 25:25
    to researchers
    for digital curation projects.
  • 25:26 - 25:29
    This is the first such project
    involving so many parties,
  • 25:29 - 25:32
    so we are using a web-based
    project management application,
  • 25:32 - 25:37
    Basecamp, to track
    conversations, files, due dates,
  • 25:37 - 25:38
    and overall progress.
  • 25:40 - 25:42
    Another collaborative project
  • 25:42 - 25:44
    that has been in progress
    over the past year
  • 25:44 - 25:47
    is the Arthur Godfrey
    Wire Recording digitization project.
  • 25:48 - 25:53
    These recordings are a small part
    of the Arthur Godfrey collection,
  • 25:53 - 25:55
    held by Special Collections'
    Mass Media and Culture,
  • 25:55 - 25:59
    and cannot be played on site,
    due to the problem of maintaining
  • 25:59 - 26:01
    the wire player
    and the fragility of the materials.
  • 26:02 - 26:05
    Because the wire recordings
    are rare, fragile,
  • 26:05 - 26:08
    and have a number of preservation
    and playback issues,
  • 26:08 - 26:11
    we collaborated with
    Preservation and Conservation
  • 26:11 - 26:13
    to send these recordings
    to a specialized vendor
  • 26:13 - 26:15
    with the equipment to
    digitize wire recordings.
  • 26:16 - 26:20
    DCMR guided and assisted
    MMC with the creation of
  • 26:20 - 26:23
    basic tracking metadata
    for the recordings,
  • 26:23 - 26:25
    prior to sending the recordings
    to the vendor.
  • 26:26 - 26:29
    DCMR also solidified
    standards and workflow
  • 26:29 - 26:32
    for this first, large-scale
    audio digitization project
  • 26:32 - 26:35
    performed by a vendor,
    during the first two pilot projects.
  • 26:36 - 26:40
    Having received over 100
    digitized recordings to date,
  • 26:40 - 26:44
    we are currently working on the second
    production batch of these recordings.
  • 26:45 - 26:48
    DCMR and Digital Stewardship
    plan to use the processes
  • 26:48 - 26:53
    developed in the WMUC Archives project,
    to ingest the metadata
  • 26:53 - 26:57
    and digital objects into their
    respective storage locations,
  • 26:57 - 27:00
    and plan to make the recordings
    available on campus,
  • 27:00 - 27:01
    due to copyright issues.
  • 27:02 - 27:05
    Once the recordings are digitized,
    they will be listenable
  • 27:05 - 27:10
    for the first time in many decades,
    and also to a much larger audience.
  • 27:10 - 27:15
    While the content on the recordings
    is of popular, entertainment radio shows,
  • 27:15 - 27:21
    they document pop culture and cultural
    trends in the 1940s, 50's and 60's.
  • 27:22 - 27:24
    Many potential new patrons
    may be drawn to this collection
  • 27:24 - 27:26
    of digitized recordings.
  • 27:27 - 27:30
    Once we document the success
    of this part of the collection,
  • 27:30 - 27:35
    we may continue to digitize
    other series, including
  • 27:35 - 27:39
    film and television show,
    and documents and photographs
  • 27:39 - 27:41
    surrounding these productions.
  • 27:44 - 27:47
    With the success of these
    multiple collaborative efforts
  • 27:47 - 27:51
    over the past year,
    DCMR has solidified its role
  • 27:51 - 27:54
    in digitization and the production
    of Digital Collections
  • 27:54 - 27:56
    in the University of Maryland libraries.
  • 27:57 - 28:02
    Unlike its previous iterations,
    its role is introducing digitized content
  • 28:02 - 28:06
    and serving as a leader
    in managing digitization projects
  • 28:06 - 28:09
    is now an integral part
    of library operations.
  • 28:09 - 28:12
    DCMR has proven that
    we are not only capable of
  • 28:12 - 28:17
    handling digitization projects but guiding
    the development of digital curation projects.
  • 28:18 - 28:23
    As our successes grow,
    we predict that our services and staff
  • 28:23 - 28:27
    will also grow to meet needs of patrons
    and library content managers.
  • 28:28 - 28:32
    With the success of internal partnerships,
    we also plan to look for partnerships
  • 28:32 - 28:37
    outside of the university,
    potentially within USMAI institutions,
  • 28:37 - 28:40
    other partners
    in the Center for Library Initiatives,
  • 28:40 - 28:46
    or other academic and federal institutions
    to either digitize or collaborate
  • 28:46 - 28:48
    on digitization projects,
  • 28:48 - 28:51
    as our unique collections
    take on a more prominent role
  • 28:51 - 28:53
    in the research community.
  • 28:53 - 28:54
    Thank you.
  • 28:54 - 28:56
    (applause)
Title:
Robin Pike: From the Stacks to the Future of Research: Building a Scalable, Sustainable Digitization Program at the University o
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
MITH Captions (Amara)
Project:
BATCH 1
  • Please try not to leave prepositions at the end of the line, especially the word "and." This rule also applies to the definite article "the."

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions