-
Three planes, 25 hours, 10,000 miles.
-
My dad gets off a flight from Australia
with one thing in mind
-
and it's not a snack or a shower or a nap.
-
It's November 2016
-
and Dad is here to talk to Americans
about the election.
-
Now, Dad's a news fiend, but for him,
-
this is not just red or blue,
swing states or party platforms.
-
He has some really specific intentions.
-
He wants to listen,
be heard and understand.
-
And over two weeks,
he has hundreds of conversations
-
with Americans from
New Hampshire to Miami.
-
Some of them are tough conversations,
-
complete differences of opinions,
-
wildly different worldviews,
-
radically opposite life experiences.
-
But in all of those interactions,
-
Dad walks away
with a big smile on his face
-
and so does the other person.
-
You can see one of them here.
-
And in those interactions,
-
he's having a version
of what it seems like we have less of,
-
but want more of --
-
a constructive conversation.
-
We have more ways than ever to connect.
-
And yet, politically, ideologically,
-
it feels like we are further
and further apart.
-
We tell pollsters that we want
politicians who are open-minded.
-
And yet when they change
their point of view,
-
we say that they lacked conviction.
-
For us, when we're confronted
with information
-
that challenges an existing worldview,
-
our tendency is not to open up,
it's to double down.
-
We even have a term for it
in social psychology.
-
It's called belief perseverance.
-
And boy, do some people's beliefs
seem to persevere.
-
I'm no stranger to tough conversations.
-
I got my start in what I now call
productive disagreement
-
in high school debate.
-
I even went on to win
-
the World Schools Debate
Championship three times.
-
I've been in a lot of arguments,
is what I'm saying,
-
but it took watching my dad
on the streets of the US
-
to understand
that we need to figure out
-
how we go into conversations.
-
Not looking for the victory,
but the progress.
-
And so since November 2016,
that's what I've been doing.
-
Working with governments,
foundations, corporations, families,
-
to uncover the tools and techniques
-
that allow us to talk when it feels
like the divide is unbridgeable.
-
And constructive conversations
that really move the dialogue forward
-
have these same three essential features.
-
First, at least one party
in the conversation
-
is willing to choose curiosity over clash.
-
They're open to the idea
that the discussion is a climbing wall,
-
not a cage fight,
-
that they'll make progress over time
-
and are able to anchor all of that
in purpose of the discussion.
-
For someone trained in formal debate,
-
it is so tempting to run headlong
at the disagreement.
-
In fact, we call that clash
-
and in formal argumentation,
-
it's a punishable offense
if there's not enough of it.
-
But I've noticed,
you've probably noticed, too,
-
that in real life that tends
to make people shut down,
-
not just from the conversation,
-
but even from the relationship.
-
It's actually one of the causes
of unfriending, online and off.
-
So instead, you might consider a technique
-
made popular by the Hollywood
producer Brian Grazer,
-
the curiosity conversation.
-
And the whole point
of a curiosity conversation
-
is to understand
the other person's perspective,
-
to see what's on their side of the fence.
-
And so the next time
-
that someone says something
you instinctively disagree with,
-
that you react violently to,
-
you only need one sentence
and one question:
-
“I never thought about it
exactly that way before.
-
What can you share
that would help me see what you see?”
-
What's remarkable
about curiosity conversations
-
is that the people you are curious about
tend to become curious about you.
-
Whether it's a friendly
Australian gentleman,
-
a political foe or a corporate rival,
-
they begin to wonder
what it is that you see
-
and whether they could see it to.
-
Constructive conversations
aren't a one-shot deal.
-
If you go into an encounter
expecting everyone to walk out
-
with the same point of view
that you walked in with,
-
there's really no chance for progress.
-
Instead, we need to think
about conversations as a climbing wall
-
to do a variant of what
my dad did during this trip,
-
pocketing a little nugget
of information here,
-
adapting his approach there.
-
That's actually a technique
borrowed from formal debate
-
where you present an idea,
-
it's attacked and you adapt
and re-explain,
-
it's attacked again,
-
you adapt and re-explain.
-
The whole expectation
is that your idea gets better
-
through challenge and criticism.
-
And the evidence from really high-stakes
international negotiations
-
suggests that that's what successful
negotiators do as well.
-
They go into conversations
-
expecting to learn from the challenges
that they will receive
-
to use objections to make their ideas
and proposals better.
-
Development is in some way a service
that we can do for others
-
and that others can do for us.
-
It makes the ideas sharper,
-
but the relationships warmer.
-
Curiosity can be relationship magic
-
and development can be
rocket fuel for your ideas.
-
But there are some situations
-
where it just feels
like it's not worth the bother.
-
And in those cases
-
it can be because the purpose
of the discussion isn't clear.
-
I think back to how my dad
went into those conversations
-
with a really clear sense of purpose.
-
He was there to learn, to listen,
to share his point of view.
-
And once that purpose
is understood by both parties,
-
then you can begin to move on.
-
Lay out our vision for the future.
-
Make a decision.
-
Get funding.
-
Then you can move on to principles.
-
When people shared with my dad
their hopes for America,
-
that's where they started
with the big picture,
-
not with personality
or politics or policies.
-
Because inadvertently
they were doing something
-
that we do naturally with outsiders
-
and find it really difficult sometimes
to do with insiders.
-
They painted in broad strokes
-
before digging into the details.
-
But maybe you live in the same
zip code or the same house
-
and it feels like none
of that common ground is there today.
-
Then you might consider a version
of disagreement time travel,
-
asking your counterpart to articulate
what kind of neighborhood, country,
-
world, community,
-
they want a year from now,
-
a decade from now.
-
It is very tempting
to dwell in present tensions
-
and get bogged down in practicalities.
-
Inviting people to inhabit
a future possibility
-
opens up the chance
of a conversation with purpose.
-
Earlier in my career,
-
I worked for the deputy
prime minister of New Zealand
-
who practiced a version of this technique.
-
New Zealand's electoral system
is designed for unlikely friendships,
-
coalitions, alliances,
-
memoranda of understanding
are almost inevitable.
-
And this particular government set-up
had some of almost everything --
-
small government conservatives, liberals,
-
the Indigenous people's party,
the Green Party.
-
And I recently asked him,
-
what does it take to bring
a group like that together
-
but hold them together?
-
He said, "Someone, you,
has to take responsibility
-
for reminding them
of their shared purpose:
-
caring for people.”
-
If we are more focused
on what makes us different than the same,
-
then every debate is a fight.
-
If we put our challenges
and our problems before us,
-
then every potential ally
becomes an adversary.
-
But as my dad packed his bags
for the three flights, 25 hours,
-
10,000 miles back to Australia,
-
he was also packing a collection
of new perspectives,
-
a new way of navigating conversations,
-
and a whole set of new stories
and experiences to share.
-
But he was also leaving those behind
-
with everyone that he'd interacted with.
-
We love unlikely friendships
when they look like this.
-
We've just forgotten how to make them.
-
And amid the cacophony of cable news
-
and the awkwardness of family dinners,
-
and the hostility of corporate meetings,
-
each of us has this --
-
the opportunity
to walk into every encounter,
-
like my dad walked off that plane,
-
to choose curiosity over clash,
-
to expect development
of your ideas through discussion
-
and to anchor in common purpose.
-
That's what really
world-class persuaders do
-
to build constructive conversations
-
and move them forward.
-
It's how our world will move forward too.
-
Thank you.