-
タイトル:
Why you should get paid for your data
-
概説:
The world's most valuable tech companies profit from the personal data you generate. So why aren't you getting paid for it? In this eye-opening talk, entrepreneur and technologist Jennifer Zhu Scott makes the case for private data ownership -- which would empower you to donate, destroy or sell your data as you see fit -- and shows how this growing movement could put power (and cash) back into the hands of people.
-
話者:
Jennifer Zhu Scott
-
I grew up in the late '70s in rural China
-
during the final years of my country's
pursuit of absolute equality
-
at the expense of liberty.
-
At that time, everybody had a job,
-
but everyone was struggling.
-
In the early '80s,
my dad was an electrician,
-
and my mom worked two shifts
in the local hospital.
-
But still, we didn't have enough food,
-
and our living conditions were dismal.
-
We were undoubtedly equal --
-
we were equally poor.
-
The state owned everything.
-
We owned nothing.
-
The story I'm going to share with you
is about my struggles
-
of overcoming adversity
-
with my resilience, grit
and sheer determination.
-
No, I'm just kidding,
I'm not going to do that to you.
-
-
Instead, I'm going to tell you,
¶
-
what I'm going to talk about today
is about a new form of collective poverty
-
that many of us don't recognize
-
and that urgently needs to be understood.
-
I'm sure you've noticed
that in the past 20 years,
¶
-
that asset has emerged.
-
It's been generating wealth
at a breakneck pace.
-
As a tool, it has brought businesses
deep customer insights,
-
operational efficiency
-
and enormous top-line growth.
-
But for some,
-
it has also provided a device
to manipulate a democratic election
-
or perform surveillance
for profit or political purposes.
-
What is this miracle asset?
-
You've guessed it: it's data.
-
Seven out of the top 10 most valuable
companies in the world are tech companies
¶
-
that either directly generate
profit from data
-
or are empowered by data from the core.
-
Multiple surveys show
-
that the vast majority
of business decision makers
-
regard data as an essential
asset for success.
-
We have all experienced how data
is shifting this major paradigm shift
-
for our personal, economic
and political lives.
-
Whoever owns the data owns the future.
-
But who's producing the data?
¶
-
I assume everyone in this room
has a smartphone,
-
several social media accounts
-
and has done a Google search
or two in the past week.
-
We are all producing data. Yes.
-
It is estimated that by 2030,
10 years from now,
¶
-
there will be about 125 billion
connected devices in the world.
-
That's an average of about
15 devices per person.
-
We are already producing data every day.
-
We'll be producing exponentially more.
-
Google, Facebook and Tencent's
combined revenue in 2018
-
was 236 billion US dollars.
-
Now, how many of you
have received payment from them
-
for the data you generate for them?
-
None, right?
-
Data has immense value
but is centrally controlled and owned.
-
You are all walking raw materials
for those large data companies,
-
but none of you are paid.
-
-
you're not even considered
as part of this equation for income.
-
So once again,
-
we are undoubtedly equal:
-
we're equally poor.
-
Somebody else owns everything,
and we own nothing.
-
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
-
-
There might be some clues
in how my life turned out
-
after that difficult start.
-
Things began to look up
for my family in the '80s.
-
The system evolved,
-
and people began to be allowed
to own a piece of what we created.
-
"People diving into the ocean,"
-
or "xia hai," the Chinese term,
-
described those who left
state-owned enterprise jobs
-
and started their own businesses.
-
Private ownership of a business
-
became personal ownership of cars,
-
properties, food, clothes and things.
-
The economic machine started rolling,
-
and people's lives began to improve.
-
For the first time,
-
to get rich was glorious.
-
So in the '90s, when I went
to study in Chengdu in west China,
-
many young individuals like myself
-
were well-positioned
to take advantage of the new system.
-
After I graduated from my university,
-
I cofounded my first business
and moved to Shenzhen,
-
the brand-new special economic zone
that used to be a fishing village.
-
Twenty years later,
-
Shenzhen has become
a global innovation powerhouse.
-
Private ownership was a form of liberty
we didn't have before.
¶
-
It created unprecedented opportunities
for our generations,
-
motivating us to work
and study incredibly hard.
-
The result was that more than
850 million people rose out of poverty.
-
According to the World Bank,
-
China's extreme poverty rate in 1981,
when I was a little kid, was 88 percent.
-
By 2015, 0.7 percent.
-
I am a product of that success,
-
and I am very happy to share that today,
I have my own AI business,
-
and I lead a very worldly
and dynamic life,
-
a path that was unimaginable
when I was a kid in west China.
-
Of course, this prosperity
came with a trade-off,
¶
-
with equality,
the environment and freedom.
-
And obviously I'm not here to argue
that China has it all figured out.
-
We haven't.
-
Nor that data is fully comparable
to physical assets.
-
It is not.
-
But my life experience allowed me
to see what's hiding in plain sight.
-
Currently, the public discourse
-
is so focused on the regulatory
and privacy issue
-
when it comes to data ownership.
-
But I want to ask:
-
What if we look at data ownership
in completely different ways?
-
What if data ownership is, in fact,
-
a personal, individual and economic issue?
-
What if, in the new digital economy,
-
we are allowed to own
a piece of what we create
-
and give people the liberty
of private data ownership?
-
The legal concept of ownership
is when you can possess,
¶
-
use, gift, pass on, destroy
-
or trade it or sell your asset
-
at a price accepted by you.
-
What if we give that same definition
to individuals' data,
-
so individuals can use or destroy our data
-
or we trade it at our chosen price?
-
Now, I know some of you might say,
¶
-
"I would never, ever trade my data
for any amount of money."
-
But that, let me remind you,
is exactly what you're doing now,
-
except you're giving
your data away for free.
-
Plus, privacy is a very personal
and nuanced issue.
-
You might have the privilege
to prioritize your privacy over money,
-
but for millions of small
business owners in China
-
who can't get bank loans easily,
-
using their data to gain rapid loan
approval from AI-powered lenders
-
can answer their more pressing needs.
-
What's private to you
-
is different from
what's private to others.
-
What's private to you now
-
is different from what was private
when you were in college.
-
Or, at least, I hope so.
-
-
We are always,
although often subconsciously,
¶
-
making such trade-offs
-
based on our diverse personal beliefs
and life priorities.
-
That is why data ownership
would be incomplete
-
without a pricing power.
-
By assigning pricing power to individuals,
¶
-
we gain a tool to reflect
our personal and nuanced preferences.
-
So, for example, you could choose
to donate your data for free
-
if a contribution
to a particular medical research
-
is very meaningful for you.
-
Or, if we had the tools
to set our behavior data
-
at a price of, say,
100,000 US dollars,
-
I doubt any political group
would be able to target
-
or manipulate your vote.
-
You control. You decide.
-
Now, I know this sounds
probably implausible,
¶
-
but trends are already pointing to
-
a growing and very powerful
individual data ownership movement.
-
First, start-ups
are already creating tools
-
to allow us to take back some control.
-
A new browser called Brave
-
empowers users with "Brave Shields" --
they literally call it that --
-
by aggressively blocking
data-grabbing ads and trackers,
-
and avoid leaking data
like other browsers.
-
In return, users can take back
some bargaining and pricing power.
-
When users opt in to accept ads,
-
Brave rewards users
with "basic attention tokens"
-
that can redeem content
behind paywalls from publishers.
-
And I've been using Brave
for a few months.
-
It has already blocked
more than 200,000 ads and trackers
-
and saved hours of my time.
-
Now, I know some of you
interact with your browser
-
more than with your partners, so --
-
-
you should at least find one that doesn't
waste your time and is not creepy.
-
-
Do you think Google is indispensable?
¶
-
Think again.
-
A search engine is indispensable.
-
Google just has the monopoly --
-
for now.
-
A search engine called DuckDuckGo
doesn't store your personal information
-
or follow you around with ads
-
or track your personal browsing history.
-
Instead, it gives all users
the same search results
-
instead of based on
your personal browsing records.
-
In London, a company called digi.me
¶
-
offers an app you can download
on your smartphone
-
that helps to import and consolidate
your data generated by you
-
from your Fitbit, Spotify,
-
social media accounts ...
-
And you can choose
where to store your data,
-
and digi.me will help you
to make your data work for you
-
by providing insights that used
to be exclusively accessible
-
by large data companies.
-
In DC, a new initiative
called UBDI, U-B-D-I,
¶
-
Universal Basic Data Income,
-
helps people to make money
-
by sharing anonymous insights
through their data
-
for companies that can use them
for market research.
-
And whenever a company purchases a study,
-
users get paid in cash and UBDI points
to track their contribution,
-
potentially as much
as 1,000 US dollars per year
-
per their estimation.
-
UBDI could be a very feasible path
for universal basic income
-
in the AI economy.
-
Further, individual awareness
of privacy and data ownership
¶
-
is growing fast
-
as we all become aware of this monster
we have unleashed in our pocket.
-
I'm a mother of two preteen girls,
-
and trust me,
-
the single biggest source of stress
and anxiety as a parent,
-
for me, is my children's
relationship with technology.
-
This is a three-page agreement
my husband and I make them sign
-
before they receive
their first [mobile phone].
-
-
We want to help them to become
¶
-
digital citizens,
-
but only if we can make them
become smart and responsible ones.
-
I help them to understand
what kind of data should never be shared.
-
So if you Google me,
-
in fact -- actually, sorry --
if you DuckDuckGo me,
-
you will find maybe a lot
about me and my work,
-
but you may find no information
about my daughters.
-
When they grow up,
-
if they want to put themselves out there,
it's their choice, not mine,
-
despite that I insist
they're the most beautiful,
-
smartest and most extraordinary
kids in the world, of course.
-
And I know many people
are having similar conversations
-
and making similar decisions,
-
which gives me hope
-
that a truly smart data-rich future
will be here soon.
-
But I want to highlight
the Clause 6 of this agreement.
¶
-
It says, "I will never, ever search
for any information online
-
if I would be embarrassed
if seen by Grandma Dawnie."
-
-
Try it. It's really effective.
¶
-
-
-
there has always been a trade-off
between liberty and equality
-
in the pursuit of prosperity.
-
The world has constantly been going
through the circle of wealth accumulation
-
to wealth redistribution.
-
As the tension between
the haves and have-nots
-
is breaking so many countries,
-
it is in everyone's interest,
-
including the large data companies,
-
to prevent this new form of inequality.
-
Of course, individual data ownership
is not the perfect nor the complete answer
¶
-
to this profoundly complex question
-
of what makes a good digital society.
-
But according to McKinsey,
-
AI will add 13 trillion US dollars
of economic output in the next 10 years.
-
Data generated by individuals
will no doubt contribute
-
to this enormous growth.
-
Shouldn't we at least consider
an economic model
-
that empowers the people?
-
And if private ownership helped
to lift more than 850 million people
-
out of poverty,
-
it is our duty
-
and we owe it to future generations
-
to create a more inclusive AI economy
-
that will empower the people
in addition to businesses.
-
-