-
Titolo:
Covid-19: the psychology of conspiracy theories
-
Descrizione:
-
[Music]
Intro: The Guardian
-
Welcome to Science Weekly.
-
We're following the Covid-19 outbreak and
-
exploring some of the scientific questions
that have come out of it.
-
In today's episode, we are looking
at conspiracy theories:
-
Now, many people are getting
their information about coronavirus
-
through social media.
-
But not everything that's shared online
can be trusted.
-
5G mast on fire. **** the 5G!
Yeah!
-
It lowers your immunity
and runs people down!
-
The coronavirus pandemic is opening up
weird new horizons
-
for online conspiracy theorists.
-
The virus was bio-engineered in a lab
by scientists, to be used as a weapon
-
or a form of population control.
-
Hi guys, do you know
what you're doing now?
-
You're laying 5G. Yes.
So, you know that kills people?
-
It absorbs oxygen.
That's just nonsense!
-
Dangerous nonsense as well.
-
5G was a favourite target
of conspiracy theorists,
-
long before the new coronavirus appeared.
And now,
-
the myths have just been
tweaked a bit.
-
It's not merely an opinion
or an interesting conspiracy,
-
it's just bollocks.
-
So what is it about conspiracy theories
that makes them so appealing
-
in a time of crisis?
-
And how can we best combat them?
-
I'm Ian Sample, the science editor
at The Guardian,
-
and this is Science Weekly.
-
I'm Dr Daniel Jolley.
-
I'm a senior lecturer in psychology
based at Northumbria University
-
in Newcastle in the UK and my expertise is
in the psychology of conspiracy theories.
-
Hi Dan, how are you doing?
-
I'm doing well
thanks so much for having me here.
-
So Dan, let's start with the basics,
-
what is a conspiracy theory,
as opposed to misinformation, say?
-
So the whole difference
with a conspiracy theory is the idea
-
that there is a powerful group plotting
something secret for their own gain.
-
So something can just be fake, that
there is no hidden motive behind it.
-
I mean there is a cardinal difference,
-
it's pointing the finger
at a group of people
-
and blaming them for their wrongdoings,
blaming them for the virus, for example.
-
What is it about conspiracy theories,
generally,
-
that makes them so appealing to us?
-
Well, conspiracy theories in general
have been shown to arise
-
in moments of crisis, when we have the
need to feel in control, to feel certain.
-
And in these kind of rapid crises
we feel threatened,
-
we feel unsure of what is happening,
-
which is exactly what is happening
with Covid-19
-
I always thought that believing
in conspiracy theories
-
would make people feel more anxious,
but it sounds like, actually,
-
they have the opposite effect.
-
Well, it's a really interesting
point there.
-
People who have this need to feel
in control,
-
the influence on them actually may
just be quite temporal.
-
They may seem appealing,
but they're not satisfying.
-
Could be shown that people who are
exposed to conspiracy theories
-
actually have further mistrust
of those around them.
-
It actually increases their feeling
of anxiety.
-
Often it is because if you don't subscribe
to one conspiracy belief,
-
you then start questioning other things,
-
which means its kind of ramping up
your mistrust,
-
and you kind of feel a feeling of
uncertainty of you living in your society.
-
So when they emerge in times of crisis,
they may temporarily
-
make us feel more secure
but that will not be long-lasting.
-
This must be
a bit of a boom time for you,
-
as someone who studies conspiracy theories
I mean, we've seen,
-
you know, a bunch of them around recently,
from 5G masts,
-
man-made viruses coming out of
Chinese labs. I mean,
-
what is it about a pandemic
that seems to drive so many?
-
Covid-19 is not unique in regards to
having conspiracy theories bloom about it.
-
Thinking back to Zika, 2015,
-
there were conspiracy theories suggesting
Zika was a man-made weapon.
-
Zika is a mosquito-transmitted virus
that has led to travel warnings
-
in South America and Caribbean countries.
-
Is Zika caused by
genetically modified mosquitoes?
-
We're fact-checking this conspiracy theory
making the rounds on Facebook.
-
It's fair that the conspiracy now to
emerge,
-
when people are talking about extreme
uncertainty.
-
So when they felt uncertain, they now (??)
conspiracy theories was more blooming.
-
And the same thing is happening with
COVID-19.
-
The Trump administration has repeatedly
pushed the narrative that the Coronavirus
-
may have escaped from a Chinese laboratory
in Wuhan, rather than originating with an
-
animal in a seafood market in Wuhan, which
is the leading medical theory.
-
Because the world is definitely chaotic,
and it offers some kind of tangible
-
personal group to blame for
what is happening.
-
It sounds like, then, that it's
pretty typical to see conspiracy theories
-
spring up around any big event.
-
Do you think we're just seeing more now or
we're aware of more now, because they're
-
spreading through social media?
-
There's no hard data that
demonstrates that today with the
-
internet, conspiracy theories are more
popular. So it may just be us assuming
-
they are. I think it's important, though,
to really look into this, and to see the
-
peril that social media can have. Thinking
about the 5G conspiracy, it seemed to
-
emerge from social media, where the
algorithms and Facebook picked up chatter
-
with regards to 5G, and brought it into
the trending. And then, during videos
-
people in the comments were talking about
the masts and how one way to stop COVID is
-
by the masts and pulling them down, etc.
So that's something that's potentially
-
quite novel in that that fast interaction
may have actually sped up the kind of
-
insurgence of the conspiracy.
It's a real
-
interesting problem
-
with regards to
-
Facebook and
-
social media
-
in general, and how they deal with
conspiracy theories, because someone's conspiracy
-
theory is someone's truth, in essence. So
it's how do we define what a conspiracy
-
theory is. And indeed, by banning, for
example, conspiracy theories on platforms
-
will just reaffirm the suspicions that
people have, that they're trying to hide
-
something. So you may actually increase
people's conspiracy theorizing, because
-
they are being silenced. So it's that
balance of insuring there's a space and a
-
platform for people to have free speech,
to be able to discuss issues, and to, you
-
know, question things, which I think is
important that we question, but then the
-
balance comes by that things aren't made
into the trending pages that are not based
-
on truth. So right now, Facebook and etc.,
are taking down content that they see to
-
be inciting violence, and that can
actually be a hinder to curbing COVID-19,
-
which is think is a positive first step,
but it's not going to fix the issue as a
-
broad issue in the future.
¶
-
So maybe,
thinking about the individual as well,
-
and insuring the individual has the skill
sets to really ask the questions, but also
-
evaluate the evidence. So we know those
people who lack critical thinking
-
abilities are more likely to believe in
conspiracy theories, and we also know that
-
people who in believe in conspiracies is
because they want to understand
¶
-
the world, but they're struggling to
evaluate the evidence. So potentially us
-
trying to instil those skill sets, may
mean that they're able to resist the
¶
-
conspiracy narrative. Let's talk a bit
more about the psychology of people who
¶
-
believe in conspiracy theories or tend to
believe in them. Are there characteristics
-
or personality traits that make people
maybe more susceptible to these kinds of
-
theories than others?
-
There are a range of different needs
that are met by conspiracy theories,
-
while there's also kind of a social
element whereby we want to affirm
-
ourselves and also the groups that we
belong in. And interestingly, research in
-
America has found that in regards to
politics, the conspiracy theories switch
-
depending on who is in power. So it's very
much a prophecies in play here, where
-
you're just affirming your identity, the
others, those are the ones who are
-
conspiring, and that can change depending
on the context.
-
It sounds like some other sort of
traits might come into play as well,
-
around how people see themselves, their
social self-image, but also whether
-
people have been sort of marginalized in
the past?
-
Absolutely. So, research has found that
being a narcissist is more predictively
-
believing in conspiracy theories,
and also, it has been shown that people
-
who are from disadvantaged groups,
-
because if you have received
discrimination in the past,
-
you may be more likely to perceive
that people are out to get you.
-
Because once upon a time, maybe they were.
-
So prior experiences may also play a role
in making you more susceptible.
-
And then, when you're in an environment
that increases your uncertainty,
-
increases your threat, like COVID-19,
-
you may be more susceptible
to subscribe to these conspiracy theories.
-
And indeed, a consistent finding
in the literature is
-
that if you believe in one conspiracy,
you believe in many others.
-
Also, interestingly,
researchers find that
-
you can believe in mutually exclusive
conspiracy theories. Because, it's all
-
based around this world view that
conspiracy theories in the world. So that
-
means that someone may believe that the
virus was human-made, but also believing
-
it is caused by 5G. Whilst these two
things can't necessarily happen at the
-
same time, it's in this process if you
feel distrust, of society, of people who
-
we see to be in power, you can subscribe
to these ideas. [Music]
-
When I've seen conspiracy theorists
talking about their beliefs, it's clear
-
that there's a real urge to pull together
strands of evidence, and to collect
-
evidence, and say, pull together these
sort of desperate things, and many of them
-
seem to see themselves as like, the real
critical thinkers, but I'm wondering what
-
kind of biases are coming into play there,
that are actually within those people, to
-
make them believe these kinds of theories.
-
(DJ) One of the biases is confirmation
bias, that we're all susceptible to.
-
This is the idea that we only really
listen to evidence that supports our prior
-
beliefs. Things that go against it, that
discredit our beliefs, we ignore.
-
There's also biases based around
personality bias, with COVID-19, it's such
-
a large event, worldwide, to explain this
as something from animals doesn't really
-
make sense. But to explain this as a
conspiracy where it was human-made,
-
the proportionality matches the cause,
it all kind of fits together.
-
So, we can, in situations where these
events arise, be more drawn to conspiracy
-
narratives. We then stay in our echo
chambers in our online world.
-
It can be tough debating and arguing
with people who believe in conspiracy
-
theories, and okay, some of them are
harmless, but some of them really aren't.
-
I mean, as someone who really studies
them, do you have a sense of how best
-
we can combat them, the ones that are
dangerous?
-
Interventions are really challenging,
but of course, as you say, they're really
-
important, so potentially targeting the
general population, and targeting those
-
who are hardened conspiracy theorists,
may be slightly different.
-
So for example, we know that using counter
arguments, giving people facts, can reduce
-
belief in conspiracy theories. But, if you
harbor a conspiracy belief, and you see
-
some counter material from the government,
you are going to discredit that, because
-
of your confirmation bias. So indeed, for
others, it may be having people become
-
trusted messengers, where you're not
aggressive, but instead, talk to them
-
about their beliefs, get them to really
kind of think hard about the evidence
-
that they are, you know, really kind of
suggesting is the be and end all, and
-
that maybe that kind of thinking process
and get them to re-evaluate may start
-
changing their beliefs. Of course, this
I'm sure would work for the general
-
population as well, so I think with
ensuring that the landscape on Twitter, on
-
Facebook is full of facts is really
important, but then still acknowledging
-
that those who are on the hardened end
of the conspiracy theorizing may distrust
-
that straight away. So it's definitely a
challenge, but I think it's important to
-
really evaluate.
-
Dan, finally, how do you think you
fair in all of this? I mean, do you feel
-
you're immune to conspiracy theories that
you can tell pretty much on contact
-
whether something's real or BS?
-
It's really difficult to tell the
truth from the untruthful, from the fake
-
news, but the conspiracy's always based
around pointing the finger at those in
-
authority, and suggesting that they are
conspiring. I try and have trust in the
-
gatekeepers, where I also trust the
journalists, to ask the questions, and
-
the conspiracy theories that have been
proven to be true, have always been driven
-
by journalism. So, having the trust in our
society that if a conspiracy is occuring,
-
it will come out by these natural
processes.
-
Wonderful stuff. Dan, thank you so
much for joining us.
-
Pleasure, thank you so much.
-
Thanks to Dan for joining me this
week. As we continue to follow the
-
COVID-19 outbreak, we'd love to keep
hearing your questions. You can send them
-
in via the form we've set up, just head
over to theguardian.com/covid19questions,
-
that's all one word.
And also thank those who support
-
as listeners.
-
In times like this, trusted news is more
important than ever, and here at the
-
Guardian we are 100% committed to
accurate and reliable news, but in order
-
to help us do that, we need your support.
To find out more, please go to
-
theguardian.com/supportpodcast, again
all one word.
-
Look after yourselves and stay well,
see you back here soon.
-
[Outro]
For more great podcasts from the Guardian,
-
just go to theguardian.com/podcasts.