Money can buy happiness: Michael Norton at TEDxCambridge
-
0:12 - 0:14I want to talk today
about money and happiness, -
0:14 - 0:18which are two things that a lot of us
spend a lot of our time thinking about. -
0:18 - 0:21Either trying to earn them
or trying to increase them. -
0:21 - 0:23And a lot of us resonate with this phrase,
-
0:23 - 0:25so we see it in religions
and self-help books, -
0:25 - 0:27that money can't buy happiness.
-
0:27 - 0:30And I want to suggest today
that in fact that's wrong. -
0:30 - 0:32(Laughter)
-
0:32 - 0:35I'm at a business school,
so that's what we do. So that's wrong. -
0:35 - 0:40And in fact, it's not so much
that money can't buy happiness. -
0:40 - 0:42(Laughter)
(Applause) -
0:45 - 0:48It is not so much that
money can't buy happiness, -
0:48 - 0:51it's that If you think that,
you're just not spending it right. -
0:51 - 0:54So that instead of spending it
the way you usually spend it, -
0:54 - 0:58maybe if you spent it differently
that might work a little bit better. -
0:58 - 1:01Before I tell you the ways that you can
spend it that will make you happier, -
1:01 - 1:03let's think about the ways
we usually spend it -
1:03 - 1:05that don't in fact make us happier.
-
1:05 - 1:07We had a little natural experiment.
-
1:07 - 1:10CNN a little while ago,
wrote this interesting article -
1:10 - 1:12on what happens to people
when they win the lottery. -
1:12 - 1:16People think when they win the lottery,
their lives are going to be amazing. -
1:16 - 1:18This article is about
how their lives get ruined. -
1:18 - 1:21So, what happens
when people win the lottery: -
1:21 - 1:231) They spend all the money
and go into debt -
1:23 - 1:252) All of their friends and everyone
they've ever met, -
1:25 - 1:28find them and bug them for money.
-
1:28 - 1:30It ruins their social relationships in fact.
-
1:30 - 1:34They have more debt and worse friendships
than they had before they won the lottery. -
1:34 - 1:37What was interesting,
people started commenting -
1:37 - 1:39on the article, readers of the thing.
-
1:39 - 1:42Instead of talking about
how it had made them realize -
1:42 - 1:44money doesn't lead to happiness,
-
1:44 - 1:46everyone was saying: "You know
what I would do if I won the lottery?", -
1:46 - 1:48fantasizing about what they'd do.
-
1:48 - 1:52Here are just two of the ones we saw,
that are interesting to think about. -
1:52 - 1:55One person wrote: "When I win
I'm going to buy my own little mountain -
1:55 - 1:57and have a little house on top".
-
1:57 - 1:59(Laughter)
-
1:59 - 2:01Another person wrote:
-
2:01 - 2:02"I would fill a bath tub
with money and get in the tub -
2:02 - 2:04while smoking a big fat cigar
-
2:04 - 2:07and sipping a glass of champagne".
This is even worse now. -
2:07 - 2:10"Then I'd have a picture taken
and dozens of glossies made. -
2:10 - 2:12Anyone begging for money
or trying to extort from me -
2:12 - 2:15would received a copy of the picture
and nothing else". -
2:15 - 2:17(Laughter)
-
2:18 - 2:20And so many of the comments
were exactly of this type. -
2:20 - 2:23Where people got money and
in fact it made them antisocial. -
2:23 - 2:27I told you that it ruins people's lives
and that their friends bug them, -
2:27 - 2:31it also makes us feel very selfish
and we do things only for ourselves. -
2:31 - 2:33Maybe the reason why
money doesn't make us happy -
2:33 - 2:35is that we're always spending it
on the wrong things. -
2:35 - 2:38In particular, we're always
spending it on ourselves. -
2:38 - 2:40And we thought, what would happen
-
2:40 - 2:42if we made people spend more money
on other people? -
2:42 - 2:44So, instead of being antisocial
with your money -
2:44 - 2:47what if you're a bit more prosocial
with your money -
2:47 - 2:50and we thought let's make people do it
and see what happens. -
2:50 - 2:51Let's have some people do
what they usually do -
2:51 - 2:53and spend money on themselves,
-
2:53 - 2:55and let's make some people
give money away, -
2:55 - 2:58measure their happiness
and see if in fact they get happier. -
2:58 - 3:01The first way we did this,
on one Vancouver morning, -
3:01 - 3:04we went on a campus
at University of British Columbia. -
3:04 - 3:07We approached people and said:
"Do you want to be in an experiment?" -
3:07 - 3:09If they said yes, we asked them
how happy they were, -
3:09 - 3:11and then we gave them an envelope.
-
3:11 - 3:14One of the envelopes had things in it
that said: -
3:14 - 3:17"By 5 p.m. today
spend this money on yourself". -
3:17 - 3:19We gave some examples
of what you can spend it on. -
3:19 - 3:22Other people in the morning
got a slip of paper that said -
3:22 - 3:25by 5 p.m. today to spend
this money on somebody else. -
3:25 - 3:29Also, inside the envelope was money.
We manipulated how much we gave them. -
3:29 - 3:32So, some people got
this slip of paper and 5 dollars. -
3:32 - 3:34Some people got
the slip of paper and 20 dollars. -
3:34 - 3:38We let them go about their day.
They did whatever they wanted to do. -
3:38 - 3:41We found out that they did spend it
the way we asked them to. -
3:41 - 3:43We called them up at night and asked:
-
3:43 - 3:45"What did you spend it on
and how happy do you feel now?" -
3:45 - 3:49Well, these are college undergrads,
a lot of what they spent it on for themselves -
3:49 - 3:53was things like earrings and make up.
Apparently, some of them were women. -
3:53 - 3:55What about for other people?
Very different things. -
3:55 - 3:58One woman said she bought
a stuffed animal for her niece. -
3:58 - 4:00People gave money to homeless people.
-
4:00 - 4:03Huge effect here of Starbucks.
-
4:03 - 4:05(Laughter)
-
4:05 - 4:08If you give undergraduates 5 dollars,
it looks like coffee to them -
4:08 - 4:11and they run over to Starbucks
and spend it as fast as they can. -
4:11 - 4:13Some people bought
a coffee for themselves, -
4:13 - 4:15the way they usually would,
-
4:15 - 4:17but other people said that they bought
a coffee for somebody else. -
4:17 - 4:19So, the very same purchase,
-
4:19 - 4:22just targeted towards yourself
or towards somebody else. -
4:22 - 4:24What did we find when we called them back
at the end of the day? -
4:24 - 4:26People who spent money
on others got happier. -
4:26 - 4:29People who spent it on themselves,
nothing happened. -
4:29 - 4:32It didn't make them less happy,
it just didn't do much for them. -
4:32 - 4:35The other thing we saw, is that
the amount of money doesn't matter much. -
4:35 - 4:38So, people thought that 20$
would be way better than 5$. -
4:38 - 4:40In fact, it doesn't matter
how much money you spend, -
4:40 - 4:44what really matters is that you spend it
on somebody else rather than on yourself. -
4:44 - 4:47We see this again and again
when we give people money -
4:47 - 4:49to spend on other people
instead of on themselves. -
4:49 - 4:52These are undergraduates in Canada -
-
4:52 - 4:54not the world's
most representative population. -
4:54 - 4:57They're also fairly wealthy, affluent
and all these sorts of things. -
4:57 - 4:59We wanted to see if this holds true
everywhere in the world -
4:59 - 5:01or just among wealthy countries.
-
5:01 - 5:04So we went to Uganda
and ran a very similar experiment. -
5:04 - 5:08Imagine instead of being in Canada,
where we would say to people: -
5:08 - 5:12"Name the last time you spent money
on yourself or other people? -
5:12 - 5:13Describe it, how happy did it make you?"
-
5:13 - 5:16Or in Uganda:
"Name the last time you spent money -
5:16 - 5:18on yourself or other people
and describe that". -
5:18 - 5:19Then we ask them how happy they are.
-
5:19 - 5:23Again, what we see is amazing
because there are human universals -
5:23 - 5:24on what you do with your money,
-
5:24 - 5:27and real cultural differences
on what you do, as well. -
5:27 - 5:29For example,
these are some similarities. -
5:29 - 5:32These are two gentlemen
from Canada and Uganda. -
5:32 - 5:35Here is one guy from Uganda,
who says this. -
5:35 - 5:38We said: "Name a time you spent money
on somebody else." -
5:38 - 5:41Men frequently talk about spending
money on women, as it turns out. -
5:41 - 5:43He said: "I called a girl
I wished to love." -
5:43 - 5:46I think he means romantically love,
though it's unclear -
5:46 - 5:48if he means physical love.
-
5:48 - 5:50"We went out on a date...".
-
5:50 - 5:53At the end he says
that he didn't achieve her until now. -
5:53 - 5:57Here is a guy from Canada,
very similar thing. -
5:57 - 6:01"I took my girlfriend out for dinner.
We went to a movie. We left early. -
6:01 - 6:05Then went back to her room
for only cake". -
6:05 - 6:06(Laughter)
-
6:06 - 6:09Human universal: you spend money
on other people, -
6:09 - 6:10you're being nice to them.
-
6:10 - 6:12Maybe you've something in mind,
maybe not. -
6:12 - 6:14But then we see these similarities,
-
6:14 - 6:15but also extraordinary differences.
-
6:15 - 6:18Look at these two.
This is a woman from Canada. -
6:18 - 6:20We say: "Name a time when you spent money
on somebody else". -
6:20 - 6:23She says: "I bought a present for my mom.
-
6:23 - 6:25I drove to the mall, bought a present
and gave it to my mom". -
6:25 - 6:29Perfectly nice thing to do. It's good
to get gifts for people you know. -
6:29 - 6:31Compare that to this woman from Uganda.
-
6:31 - 6:35"I was walking and met a long time friend
whose son was sick with malaria. -
6:35 - 6:39They had no money. They went to a clinic
and I gave her this money". -
6:39 - 6:43This isn't 10000$, it's the local currency.
It is a very small amount of money, in fact. -
6:43 - 6:45Enormously different motivations.
-
6:45 - 6:48This is a real medical need,
literally a life-saving donation. -
6:48 - 6:51Above, it's just kind of,
"I bought a gift for my mother". -
6:51 - 6:55What we see again is that the specific way
that you spend on other people -
6:55 - 6:58isn't nearly as important as the fact
that you spend on other people -
6:58 - 7:02in order to make yourself happy,
which is really quite important. -
7:02 - 7:06You don't have to do amazing things
with your money to make yourself happy. -
7:06 - 7:10You can do small trivial things
and yet still get benefits from doing this. -
7:10 - 7:11These are only two countries.
-
7:11 - 7:14We wanted to go broader and look
at every country in the world if we could, -
7:14 - 7:18to see what the relationship is
between money and happiness. -
7:18 - 7:21I'll show you a world map in a second.
We got data from the Gallup Organization, -
7:21 - 7:25which you know from the political polls
that have been happening lately. -
7:25 - 7:27They ask people: "Did you donate money
to charity recently?" -
7:27 - 7:29"How happy are you
with your life in general?" -
7:29 - 7:32We can see what the relationship is
between those two things. -
7:32 - 7:33Are they positively correlated?
-
7:33 - 7:36Giving money makes you happy?
Or, they're negatively correlated? -
7:36 - 7:39On this map, green means
they're positively correlated, -
7:39 - 7:41red means they're negatively correlated.
-
7:41 - 7:44You can see the world is crazily green.
-
7:44 - 7:47In almost every country in the world,
where we have this data, -
7:47 - 7:50people who would give money to charity,
are happier than people -
7:50 - 7:52who don't give money to charity.
-
7:52 - 7:54I know you're all looking
at that red country in the middle. -
7:54 - 7:58I'd be a jerk and not tell you what it is.
It's Central African Republic. -
7:58 - 8:01You can make up stories, maybe
it's different there for some reason. -
8:01 - 8:04Just below that to the right
is Rwanda which is amazingly green. -
8:04 - 8:07So, almost everywhere we look,
we see that giving money away -
8:07 - 8:10makes you happier
than keeping it for yourself. -
8:10 - 8:12Across the world
we see this in your everyday life -
8:12 - 8:16that this is the impact of spending
money on others rather than yourself. -
8:16 - 8:19But this is your own everyday life,
and sometimes you personal life. -
8:19 - 8:22What about our work life,
where we spend all the rest of our time -
8:22 - 8:24when we're not with the people we know.
-
8:24 - 8:26We decided to infiltrate companies
and do a very similar thing. -
8:26 - 8:30These are sales teams in Belgium.
They work in teams, -
8:30 - 8:34they go out and sell to doctors
and try to get them to buy drugs. -
8:34 - 8:38We can look at how well they sell things
as a function of being a member of a team. -
8:38 - 8:41For some teams we give people
some money for themselves, -
8:41 - 8:43and say: "Spend it
however you want on yourself". -
8:43 - 8:46Just like we did
with the undergrads in Canada. -
8:46 - 8:48But to other teams we say:
"Here's 15 euros. -
8:48 - 8:49Spend it on one of your teammates.
-
8:49 - 8:52Buy them something as a present
and give it to them. -
8:52 - 8:55Now we got teams
that spend on themselves -
8:55 - 8:57and we have these prosocial teams
who we give money -
8:57 - 8:59to make the team a little better.
-
8:59 - 9:00The reason I have a ridiculous pinata there,
-
9:00 - 9:03is one of the teams pooled
their money and bought a pinata. -
9:03 - 9:06They got together, smashed the pinata
and all the candy fell out. -
9:06 - 9:08A very silly and trivial thing to do,
-
9:08 - 9:11but think of the difference on the team
that didn't do that at all -
9:11 - 9:14that got 15 euro, put it in their pocket,
maybe bought themselves a coffee. -
9:14 - 9:17Or teams which had this
prosocial experience -
9:17 - 9:20where they all bonded together
to buy something and do a group activity. -
9:20 - 9:23What we see is that the teams
that are prosocial sell more stuff -
9:23 - 9:26than the teams that only got
money for themselves. -
9:26 - 9:28One way to think about it
is for every 15 euro -
9:28 - 9:30you give people for themselves,
-
9:30 - 9:33they put it in their pocket and don't do
anything different than before. -
9:33 - 9:35You don't get any money from that.
You actually lose money -
9:35 - 9:37because it doesn't motivate them
to perform better. -
9:37 - 9:39But when you give them 15 euro
to spend on teammates, -
9:39 - 9:43they do so much better on their teams
that you get a huge win -
9:43 - 9:44on investing this kind of money.
-
9:44 - 9:48You're probably thinking to yourselves,
"This is all fine, but there is a context, -
9:48 - 9:51that is incredibly important
for public policy, -
9:51 - 9:53and I can't imagine it would work there."
-
9:53 - 9:55Basically, "If he doesn't show me
that it works here, -
9:55 - 9:57I don't believe in anything he said."
-
9:57 - 9:59What you're all thinking about
are dodgeball teams. -
9:59 - 10:01(Laughter)
-
10:01 - 10:03This was a huge criticism we got.
-
10:03 - 10:06To say "If you can't show
a dodgeball team, this is all stupid". -
10:06 - 10:10We went out and found these
dodgeball teams and infiltrated them. -
10:10 - 10:12We did the exact same thing as before.
-
10:12 - 10:15We give some teams money
to spend on themselves. -
10:15 - 10:18Other teams, we give them money to spend
on their dodgeball teammates. -
10:18 - 10:20The teams that spend money on themselves,
-
10:20 - 10:23were just at the same winning percentages
as they were before. -
10:23 - 10:26The teams we give money to spend
on each other, they become different teams -
10:26 - 10:29and in fact dominate the league
by the time they're done. -
10:29 - 10:32Across all these different contexts:
your personal life, your work life, -
10:32 - 10:35and even silly things
like intramural sports. -
10:35 - 10:38We see that spending on other people
has a bigger return for you -
10:38 - 10:40than spending on yourself.
-
10:40 - 10:43So if you think money can't buy happiness,
you're not spending it right. -
10:43 - 10:47The implication is not you should buy
this product instead of that product -
10:47 - 10:50and that's the way
to make yourself happier. -
10:50 - 10:53In fact, you should stop thinking
of which product to buy for yourself -
10:53 - 10:56and try giving some of it
to other people instead. -
10:56 - 11:00We luckily have an opportunity for you
to give money away today. -
11:00 - 11:04If you look on the back your name badge,
at the very bottom of your badge - -
11:04 - 11:07look now, as I actually
want you to do this later, -
11:07 - 11:10you'll see DonorsChoose.org
is a non-profit, -
11:10 - 11:13mainly for public school teachers
in low-income schools. -
11:13 - 11:16They post projects, like: "I want to teach
Huckleberry Finn to my class -
11:16 - 11:17and we don't have the books"
-
11:17 - 11:19or "I want a microscope to teach
my students science, -
11:19 - 11:21and we don't have one".
-
11:21 - 11:23You and I can go on and buy it for them.
-
11:23 - 11:26The teacher writes you a thank you note,
the kids write you too, -
11:26 - 11:28sometimes they send you pictures
of them using the microscope. -
11:28 - 11:30It is an extraordinary thing.
-
11:30 - 11:35That code at the bottom of your name badge
is actually a voucher, -
11:35 - 11:38a gift voucher,
with free money to donate to charity. -
11:38 - 11:40Go to the website, enter that in.
-
11:40 - 11:43I'd encourage you not to just give
the money that's on the voucher. -
11:43 - 11:45But actually give some of your own
-
11:45 - 11:50and start the process of thinking less
about "how can I spend money on myself", -
11:50 - 11:53and more about,
"If I've got 5 or 15 dollars, -
11:53 - 11:55what can I do to benefit other people?"
-
11:55 - 11:56Because ultimately when you do that,
-
11:56 - 11:58you find out you'll benefit yourself
much more. -
11:58 - 11:59Thank you.
-
11:59 - 12:01(Applause)
- Title:
- Money can buy happiness: Michael Norton at TEDxCambridge
- Description:
-
Harvard Business School professor Michael Norton's counterintuitive talk challenges the way we think about money. If you think money can't buy happiness, maybe you're not spending it right.
- Video Language:
- English
- Team:
- closed TED
- Project:
- TEDxTalks
- Duration:
- 12:10
Ivana Korom edited English subtitles for TEDxCambridge - Michael Norton: Money can buy happiness | ||
Ivana Korom edited English subtitles for TEDxCambridge - Michael Norton: Money can buy happiness | ||
Helene Batt commented on English subtitles for TEDxCambridge - Michael Norton: Money can buy happiness | ||
Helene Batt commented on English subtitles for TEDxCambridge - Michael Norton: Money can buy happiness | ||
Helene Batt edited English subtitles for TEDxCambridge - Michael Norton: Money can buy happiness | ||
Helene Batt edited English subtitles for TEDxCambridge - Michael Norton: Money can buy happiness | ||
Helene Batt edited English subtitles for TEDxCambridge - Michael Norton: Money can buy happiness | ||
Helene Batt approved English subtitles for TEDxCambridge - Michael Norton: Money can buy happiness |
Chryssa R. Takahashi
Many words missing - some subs were too long.
Helene Batt
Hey, great job! There were barely any typos. However, there were still quite a lot of long lines/subtitles. Please note, that subtitles over 42-44 characters should be broken into two lines, and the break should be after a "linguistic whole". This means that adjectives should not be separated from the nouns they modify, verbs should not be separated from objects, etc. Subtitles ended incorrectly are more difficult to follow in the original. How to fix: Redistribute text between subtitles so that "wholes" stay together as much as possible. Here are a few examples from the transcript. INCORRECT: "we see that giving money away makes you </br> happier than keeping it for yourself." CORRECT: we see that giving money away </br> makes you happier than keeping it for yourself." INCORRECT: "Again, what we see is amazing because </br> there are human universals." CORRECT: " Again, what we see is amazing </br> because there are human universals."
I also corrected the reading speed throughout the entire transcript. The reading speed of a subtitle must allow the viewer to read it while it's on the screen. The optimum reading speed for Latin script-based languages is 13-15 characters. The maximum reading speed is about 21-22 characters (here I tried to keep it under 24). Please note, that if a subtitle's reading speed is above 22 ch/s, a lot of people won't be able to read it in time. In translation, the subtitle length will often be longer than in English. A subtitle displaying at 24 ch/s can grow to 30 ch/s in the translation. How to fix: Most often, it's enough to extend the duration of the subtitle a small amount over the next subtitle. The next subtitle won't begin exactly when the speaker starts speaking, but the previous subtitle won't disappear before people can read it. At other times, the subtitle can be merged with the previous or next subtitle, if the resulting reading speed is better. Another solution in certain cases is to slightly rephrase a text or to leave out a word (e.g. repetitions, filler words, etc.). However, this should only be done when necessary, of course.
Helene Batt
For more info you can check here: http://translations.ted.org/wiki/How_to_break_lines