Got a YouTube account?

New: enable viewer-created translations and captions on your YouTube channel!

English subtitles

← Our immigration conversation is broken -- here's how to have a better one

Get Embed Code
23 Languages

Showing Revision 1 created 11/01/2019 by Joseph Geni.

  1. We often hear these days
    that the immigration system is broken.
  2. I want to make the case today that
    our immigration conversation is broken
  3. and to suggest some ways that together
    we might build a better one.
  4. In order to do that, I'm going
    to propose some new questions
  5. about immigration,
  6. the United States and the world,
  7. questions that might move the borders
    of the immigration debate.
  8. I'm not going to begin with the feverish
    argument that we're currently having,

  9. even as the lives and wellbeing
    of immigrants are being put at risk
  10. at the US borders and far beyond it.
  11. Instead I'm going to begin
    with me in graduate school
  12. in New Jersey in the mid-1990s
    earnestly studying US history,
  13. which is what I currently
    teach as a professor
  14. at Vanderbilt University
    in Nashville, Tennessee.
  15. And when I wasn't studying,
  16. sometimes to avoid
    writing my dissertation,
  17. my friends and I would go into town
  18. to hand out neon-colored flyers
  19. protesting legislation
  20. that was threatening to take away
    immigrants' rights.
  21. Our flyers were sincere,
    they were well-meaning,

  22. they were factually accurate,
  23. but I realize now they were also
    kind of a problem.
  24. Here's what they said:
  25. "Don't take away immigrant rights
    to public education,
  26. to medical services,
    to the social safety net.
  27. They work hard. They pay taxes.
  28. They're law-abiding.
  29. They use social services
    less than Americans do.
  30. They're eager to learn English,
  31. and their children serve
    in the US military all over the world."
  32. Now these are of course arguments
    that we hear every day.
  33. Immigrants and their advocates use them
  34. as they confront those who would
    deny immigrants their rights
  35. or even exclude them from society.
  36. And up to a certain point,
    it makes perfect sense
  37. that these would be the kinds of claims
    that immigrants' defenders would turn to.
  38. But in the long term,
    and maybe even in the short term,

  39. I think these arguments
    can be counterproductive.
  40. Why?
  41. Because it's always an uphill battle
  42. to defend yourself
    on your opponents' terrain,
  43. and, unwittingly,
  44. the handouts that my friends
    and I were handing out
  45. and the versions of these arguments
    that we hear today,
  46. we're actually playing
    the anti-immigrants' game.
  47. We were playing that game
    in part by envisioning
  48. that immigrants were outsiders,
  49. rather than, as I'm hoping
    to suggest in a few minutes,
  50. people that are already,
    in important ways, on the inside.
  51. Not Synced
    It's those who are hostile
    to immigrants, the nativists,
  52. Not Synced
    who have succeeded
    in framing the immigration debate
  53. Not Synced
    around three main questions.
  54. Not Synced
    First, there's the question of whether
    immigrants can be useful tools.

  55. Not Synced
    How can we use immigrants?
  56. Not Synced
    Will they make us richer and stronger?
  57. Not Synced
    The nativist answer
    to this question is no,
  58. Not Synced
    immigrants have little
    or nothing to offer.
  59. Not Synced
    The second questions is whether
    immigrants are others.

  60. Not Synced
    Can immigrants become more like us?
  61. Not Synced
    Are they capable of becoming more like us?
    Are they capable of assimilating?
  62. Not Synced
    Are they willing to assimilate?
  63. Not Synced
    Here, again, the nativist answer is no,
  64. Not Synced
    immigrants and permanently
    different from us and inferior to us.
  65. Not Synced
    And the third question is whether
    immigrants are parasites.

  66. Not Synced
    Are they dangerous to us?
    And will they drain our resources?
  67. Not Synced
    Here, the nativist answer is yes and yes,
  68. Not Synced
    immigrants pose a threat
    and they sap our wealth.
  69. Not Synced
    I would suggest that these three questions
    and the nativist animus behind them
  70. Not Synced
    have succeeded in framing the larger
    contours of the immigration debate.
  71. Not Synced
    These questions are anti-immigrant
    and nativist at their core,
  72. Not Synced
    built around a kind of hierarchical
    division of insiders and outsiders,
  73. Not Synced
    us and them,
  74. Not Synced
    in which only we matter and they don't.
  75. Not Synced
    And what gives these questions
    traction and power
  76. Not Synced
    beyond the circle of committed nativists
    is the way that they tap into
  77. Not Synced
    an everyday, seemingly harmless
    sense of national belonging
  78. Not Synced
    and activate it, heighten it,
  79. Not Synced
    and inflame it.
  80. Not Synced
    Nativists commit themselves
    to making stark distinctions
  81. Not Synced
    between insiders and outsiders,
  82. Not Synced
    but the distinction itself is at the heart
    of the way nations define themselves.
  83. Not Synced
    The fissures between inside and outside,
  84. Not Synced
    which often run deepest
    along lines of race and religion,
  85. Not Synced
    are always there to be
    deepened and exploited.
  86. Not Synced
    And that potentially
    gives nativist approaches
  87. Not Synced
    far beyond those who consider
    themselves anti-immigrant,
  88. Not Synced
    and remarkably even among some
    who consider themselves pro-immigrant.
  89. Not Synced
    So, for example,
  90. Not Synced
    when immigrants act allies
  91. Not Synced
    answer these questions
    the nativists are posing,
  92. Not Synced
    they take them seriously.
  93. Not Synced
    They legitimate those questions,
    and, to some extent,
  94. Not Synced
    the anti-immigrant assumptions
    that are behind them.
  95. Not Synced
    When we take these questions seriously
    without even knowing it,
  96. Not Synced
    we're reinforcing the closed,
    exclusionary borders
  97. Not Synced
    of the immigration conversation.
  98. Not Synced
    So how did we get here?
  99. Not Synced
    How did these become the leading ways
    that we talk about immigration?
  100. Not Synced
    Here we need some backstory, which is
    where my history training comes in.
  101. Not Synced
    During the first century
  102. Not Synced
    of the US's status
    as an independent nation,
  103. Not Synced
    it did very little to restrict
    immigration at the national level.
  104. Not Synced
    In fact, many policymakers
    and employers worked hard
  105. Not Synced
    to recruit immigrants
  106. Not Synced
    to build up industry
  107. Not Synced
    and to serve as settlers,
    to seize the continent.
  108. Not Synced
    But after the Civil War,
  109. Not Synced
    nativist voices rose
    in volume and in power.
  110. Not Synced
    The Asian, Latin American,
    Caribbean and European immigrants
  111. Not Synced
    who dug Americans' canals,
  112. Not Synced
    cooked their dinners,
  113. Not Synced
    fought their wars,
  114. Not Synced
    and put their children to bed at night,
  115. Not Synced
    were met with a new and intense xenophobia
  116. Not Synced
    which cast immigrants
    as permanent outsiders
  117. Not Synced
    who should never be allowed
    to become insiders.
  118. Not Synced
    By the mid-1920s, the nativists had won,
  119. Not Synced
    erecting racist laws
  120. Not Synced
    that closed our untold numbers
    of vulnerable immigrants and refugees.
  121. Not Synced
    Immigrants and their allies
    did their best to fight back,
  122. Not Synced
    but they found themselves
    on the defensive,
  123. Not Synced
    caught in some ways
    in the nativists' frames.
  124. Not Synced
    When nativists said
    that immigrants weren't useful,
  125. Not Synced
    their allies said yes, they are.
  126. Not Synced
    When nativists accused
    immigrants of being others,
  127. Not Synced
    their allies promised
    that they would assimilate.
  128. Not Synced
    When nativists charged that immigrants
    were dangerous parasites,
  129. Not Synced
    their allies emphasized
    their loyalty, their obedience,
  130. Not Synced
    their hard work, and their thrift.
  131. Not Synced
    Even as advocates welcomed immigrants,
  132. Not Synced
    many still regarded
    immigrants as outsiders
  133. Not Synced
    to be pitied, to be rescued,
  134. Not Synced
    to be uplifted and to be tolerated,
  135. Not Synced
    but never fully brought inside
    as equals in rights and respect.
  136. Not Synced
    After World War II, and especially
    from the mid-1960s until really recently,
  137. Not Synced
    immigrants and their allies
    turned the tide,
  138. Not Synced
    overthrowing mid-20th century restriction
  139. Not Synced
    and winning instead a new system
    that prioritized family reunification,
  140. Not Synced
    the admission of refugees,
  141. Not Synced
    and the admission of those
    with special skills.
  142. Not Synced
    But even then,
  143. Not Synced
    they didn't succeed in fundamentally
    changing the terms of the debate,
  144. Not Synced
    and so that framework endured,
  145. Not Synced
    ready to be taken up again
    in our own convulsive moment.
  146. Not Synced
    That conversation is broken.
  147. Not Synced
    The old questions
    are harmful and divisive.
  148. Not Synced
    So how do we get from that conversation

  149. Not Synced
    to one that's more likely to get us
    closer to a world that is fairer,
  150. Not Synced
    that is more just,
  151. Not Synced
    that's more secure?
  152. Not Synced
    I want to suggest that what we have to do
  153. Not Synced
    is one of the hardest thing
    that any society can do:
  154. Not Synced
    to redraw the boundaries of who counts,
  155. Not Synced
    of whose life, whose rights,
  156. Not Synced
    and whose thriving matters.
  157. Not Synced
    We need to redraw the boundaries.
  158. Not Synced
    We need to redraw the borders of us.
  159. Not Synced
    In order to do that, we need to first
    take on a worldview that's widely held
  160. Not Synced
    but also seriously flawed.
  161. Not Synced
    According to that worldview,
  162. Not Synced
    there's the inside
    of the national boundaries,
  163. Not Synced
    inside the nation which is where we
    live, work and mind our own business,
  164. Not Synced
    and then there's the outside,
    there's everywhere else.
  165. Not Synced
    According to this worldview,
    when immigrants cross into the nation,
  166. Not Synced
    they're moving from
    the outside to the inside,
  167. Not Synced
    but they remain outsiders.
  168. Not Synced
    Any power or resources they receive
  169. Not Synced
    are gifts from us rather than rights.
  170. Not Synced
    Now it's not hard to see why
    this is such a commonly held worldview.
  171. Not Synced
    It's reinforced in everyday way
    that we talk and act and behave
  172. Not Synced
    down to the bordered maps
    that we hang up in our schoolrooms.
  173. Not Synced
    The problem with this worldview
    is that it just doesn't correspond
  174. Not Synced
    to the way the world actually works
    and the way it has worked in the past.
  175. Not Synced
    Of course, American workers
    have built up wealth in society,
  176. Not Synced
    but so have immigrants,
  177. Not Synced
    particularly in parts of the American
    economy that are indispensable
  178. Not Synced
    and where few Americans work,
    like agriculture.
  179. Not Synced
    Since the nation's founding,
  180. Not Synced
    Americans have been inside
    the American workforce.
  181. Not Synced
    Of course, Americans have built up
    institutions and society
  182. Not Synced
    that guaranteed rights,
  183. Not Synced
    but so have immigrants.
  184. Not Synced
    They've been there during
    every major social movement,
  185. Not Synced
    like civil rights and organized labor,
  186. Not Synced
    that have fought to expand
    rights and society for everyone.
  187. Not Synced
    So immigrants are already inside
  188. Not Synced
    the struggle for rights,
    democracy and freedom.
  189. Not Synced
    And finally, Americans
    and other citizens of the Global North

  190. Not Synced
    haven't minded their own business,
  191. Not Synced
    and they haven't stayed
    within their own borders.
  192. Not Synced
    They haven't respected
    other nations' borders.
  193. Not Synced
    They've gone out into
    the world with their armies,
  194. Not Synced
    they've taken over
    territories and resources,
  195. Not Synced
    and they've extracted enormous profits
    from many of the countries
  196. Not Synced
    that immigrants are from.
  197. Not Synced
    In this sense, many immigrants are
    actually already inside American power.
  198. Not Synced
    With this different map
    of inside and outside in mind,
  199. Not Synced
    the question isn't whether
    receiving countries
  200. Not Synced
    are going to let immigrants in.
  201. Not Synced
    They're already in.
  202. Not Synced
    The question is whether
    the United States and other countries
  203. Not Synced
    are going to give immigrants
    access to the rights and resources
  204. Not Synced
    that their work, their activism,
    and their home countries
  205. Not Synced
    have already played
    a fundamental role in creating.
  206. Not Synced
    With this new map in mind,
  207. Not Synced
    we can turn to a set of tough,
    new, urgently needed questions
  208. Not Synced
    radically different from the ones
    we've asked before,
  209. Not Synced
    questions that might change
    the borders of the immigration debate.
  210. Not Synced
    Our three questions are
    about workers' rights,
  211. Not Synced
    about responsibility
  212. Not Synced
    and about equality.
  213. Not Synced
    First, we need to be asking
    about workers' rights.

  214. Not Synced
    How do existing policies make it harder
    for immigrants to defend themselves
  215. Not Synced
    and easier for them to be exploited,
  216. Not Synced
    driving down wages, rights
    and protections for everyone?
  217. Not Synced
    When immigrants are threatened
    with roundups, detention and deportations,
  218. Not Synced
    their employers know
    that they can be abused,
  219. Not Synced
    that they can be told
  220. Not Synced
    that if they fight back,
    they'll be turned over to ICE.
  221. Not Synced
    When employers know
  222. Not Synced
    that they can terrorize an immigrant
    with his lack of papers,
  223. Not Synced
    it makes that worker hyper-exploitable,
  224. Not Synced
    and that has impacts
    not only for immigrant workers
  225. Not Synced
    but for all workers.
  226. Not Synced
    Second, we need to ask questions
    about responsibility.

  227. Not Synced
    What role have rich, powerful countries
    like the United States played
  228. Not Synced
    in making it hard or impossible
  229. Not Synced
    for immigrants to stay
    in their home countries?
  230. Not Synced
    Picking up and moving from your country
    is difficult and dangerous,
  231. Not Synced
    but many immigrants simply do not
    have the option of staying home
  232. Not Synced
    if they want to survive.
  233. Not Synced
    Wars, trade agreements,
  234. Not Synced
    and consumer habits
    rooted in the Global North
  235. Not Synced
    play a major and devastating role here.
  236. Not Synced
    What responsibilities
    do the United States,
  237. Not Synced
    the European Union, and China --
  238. Not Synced
    the world's leading carbon emitters --
  239. Not Synced
    have to the millions of people
    already uprooted by global warming?
  240. Not Synced
    And third, we need to ask
    questions about equality.

  241. Not Synced
    Global inequality is a wrenching,
    intensifying problem.
  242. Not Synced
    Income and wealth gaps
    are widening around the world.
  243. Not Synced
    Increasingly what determines
    whether you're rich or poor
  244. Not Synced
    more than anything else
    is what country you're born in,
  245. Not Synced
    which might seem great
    if you're from a prosperous country,
  246. Not Synced
    but it actually means
    a profoundly unjust distribution
  247. Not Synced
    of the chances for a long,
    healthy, fulfilling life.
  248. Not Synced
    When immigrants send money
    or goods home to their family,
  249. Not Synced
    it plays a significant role
    in narrowing these gaps,
  250. Not Synced
    if a very incomplete one.
  251. Not Synced
    It does more than all
    of the foreign aid programs
  252. Not Synced
    in the world combined.
  253. Not Synced
    We began with the nativist questions,
  254. Not Synced
    about immigrants as tools,
  255. Not Synced
    as others, and as parasites.
  256. Not Synced
    Where might these new questions
    about worker rights,
  257. Not Synced
    about responsibility,
  258. Not Synced
    and about equality,
  259. Not Synced
    take us?
  260. Not Synced
    These questions reject pity
  261. Not Synced
    and they embrace justice.
  262. Not Synced
    These questions reject
    the nativist and nationalist division
  263. Not Synced
    of us versus them.
  264. Not Synced
    They're going to help prepare us
    for problems that are coming
  265. Not Synced
    and problems like global warming
  266. Not Synced
    that are already upon us.
  267. Not Synced
    It's not going to be easy to turn away
    from the questions that we've been asking

  268. Not Synced
    towards this new set of questions.
  269. Not Synced
    It's no small challenge
  270. Not Synced
    to take on and broaden the borders of us.
  271. Not Synced
    It will take wit, inventiveness
  272. Not Synced
    and courage.
  273. Not Synced
    The old questions have been
    with us for a long time,
  274. Not Synced
    and they're not going
    to give way on their own,
  275. Not Synced
    and they're not going
    to give way overnight.
  276. Not Synced
    And even if we manage
    to change the questions,
  277. Not Synced
    the answers are going to be complicated
    and they're going to require
  278. Not Synced
    sacrifices and tradeoffs.
  279. Not Synced
    And in an unequal world, we're always
    going to have to pay attention
  280. Not Synced
    to the question of who has the power
    to join the conversation
  281. Not Synced
    and who doesn't.
  282. Not Synced
    But the borders of the immigration debate
  283. Not Synced
    can be moved.
  284. Not Synced
    It's up to all of us to move them.
  285. Not Synced
    Thank you.

  286. Not Synced