Return to Video

Make the Internet Neutral Again (33c3)

  • Not Synced
    33C3 preroll music
  • Not Synced
    Herald: "On the internet
    you decide what you do, right?"
  • Not Synced
    This is a question that I found on
    your website respectmynet.eu
  • Not Synced
    and well, I don't know what you
    think, it sounds quite plausible.
  • Not Synced
    But the answer that they give is:
    "Maybe not!" So, who that is,
  • Not Synced
    who actually decides what
    you do on the internet and
  • Not Synced
    what consequences that has,
    and what you can do against that -
  • Not Synced
    these two men will tell you now.
    They are Thomas Lohninger
  • Not Synced
    who fought against data retention
    in Austria, and successfully,
  • Not Synced
    and he has been very active
    in that politics ever scince.
  • Not Synced
    He is here with Christopher Talib
    Campaign Manager for LaQuadratureDeNet,
  • Not Synced
    the French NGO fighting
    for civil rights. Welcome!
  • Not Synced
    Together they say: Make the Internet
    neutral again! Please give them
  • Not Synced
    a warm applause!
  • Not Synced
    applause
  • Not Synced
    Thomas Lohninger: Thanks, everyone!
    Is the microphone working? Yeah, great.
  • Not Synced
    So, first I have to say something for that
    title - if the slides could come up?
  • Not Synced
    ... Okay, we don't have slides so far.
  • Not Synced
    Talib: Yes we do!
  • Not Synced
    Lohninger: So. "Make the internet neutral
    again". When we decided to have this title
  • Not Synced
    for our talk, this was of course
    before Donald Trump became elected.
  • Not Synced
    Most of our talk will be about how to
    enforce net neutrality, how to really
  • Not Synced
    keep the internet free and open. But
    of course, we also have to talk about
  • Not Synced
    what will happen in the US. We both work
    on the savetheinternet.eu cmpaign.
  • Not Synced
    This common effort of various NGOs
    around Europe started three years ago
  • Not Synced
    whe the Commission proposed a very
    disasterous law on net neutrality
  • Not Synced
    that would basically abandon the
    principle. And we followed this law
  • Not Synced
    throughout the legislative process on
    all stages and then even through
  • Not Synced
    with the regulatory implementation. And
    this... you can all see on savetheinternet.eu
  • Not Synced
    there's now an archive page. Because...
    let's talk a little bit more about
  • Not Synced
    this campaign. What is unique here is that
    we really open-sourced every line of code
  • Not Synced
    that we wrote for this campaign. Including
    the tools that we used for contacting
  • Not Synced
    your representatives, the members of
    the European Parliament as well as
  • Not Synced
    the regulatory agencies. And here you see
    the traffic graph because we also have
  • Not Synced
    visitor statistics from pivik (?) throughout
    these three years. And there you can see
  • Not Synced
    that we had huge success from
    various players around Europe.
  • Not Synced
    From the Netherlands, from huchara (?)
    to the Reddit community. They were awesome.
  • Not Synced
    And also change.org, netzpolitik.org, and
    Alexander Lehmann (?) helped us a lot.
  • Not Synced
    As well as Firefox which ran a snippet
    for savetheinternet in the last part
  • Not Synced
    of the campaign. And in the final stages
    of this fight for net neutrality in Europe
  • Not Synced
    we really brought the protests to the
    streets. There were demonstrations
  • Not Synced
    in Barcelona, Riga, Bonn, Brussels and
    Vienna. And this was really a group effort.
  • Not Synced
    At the end this coalition grew more and
    more, and we had 23 NGOs from 14 countries
  • Not Synced
    that joined us in this. And, ultimatively,
    we achieved almost half a million
  • Not Synced
    submissions to BEREC, the "Body of
    European Regulators for Electronic
  • Not Synced
    Communcations". And this is really
    a historic number. Because all previous
  • Not Synced
    consultations of the regulators in Europe
    had a maximum of around 100 comments,
  • Not Synced
    so, so inordered (?) process they had so much
    public interest and engagement.
  • Not Synced
    And this really changed the landscape
    within the regulators because suddenly
  • Not Synced
    they were observed by the public, and
    before that they were basically hiding
  • Not Synced
    behind some processes, and not really
    having to engage with at their own
  • Not Synced
    constituency (?). If you look at the
    submissions by country you can see
  • Not Synced
    that Germany has the largest share.
    This is of course because the debate
  • Not Synced
    here in Germany is a little bit
    more nuanced and widespread
  • Not Synced
    than in other countries. But still we also
    had the UK and France, and Spain and Italy
  • Not Synced
    that contributed a lot through this
    campaign. But I also, being an Austrian,
  • Not Synced
    want to point out that a few small
    countries disproportionately contributed
  • Not Synced
    with submissions. Austria, Sweden, Denmark
    and Belgium really kicked ass, and that's
  • Not Synced
    probably because they had very good NGOs
    that, although most of them only run
  • Not Synced
    with volunteers could really mobilize in
    their local language to get the word out,
  • Not Synced
    and get people engaged for net neutrality.
    So. We now have this law.
  • Not Synced
    And we also have the regulatory
    implementation. So what does it
  • Not Synced
    actually say? What type of net neutrality
    do we have now in Europe,
  • Not Synced
    for half a Billion people? It is
    no longer possible to just
  • Not Synced
    block or censor content based on
    commercial reasons. So you can
  • Not Synced
    no longer prohibit users the use of
    VOIP, or messaging, or file sharing
  • Not Synced
    in the Terms of Services. There can still
    be blocking for legal reasons. If you have
  • Not Synced
    a law, if you have a Court order. But an
    ISP can not arbitrarily start blocking
  • Not Synced
    parts of the internet. This is clearly
    prohibited. We have a new right.
  • Not Synced
    We have a 'device freedom' now. That means
    that you can connect any type of device
  • Not Synced
    to your internet connection. And your ISP
    can no longer charge you e.g. for using
  • Not Synced
    your phone's internet on your laptop,
    tethering. That's really cleared (?) and
  • Not Synced
    absolutely clear. Also on "specialized
    services". I'm particularly happy
  • Not Synced
    that we reached this result because this
    was maybe 60% of the whole debate
  • Not Synced
    in the European Parliament and throughout
    the legislative process: what should we do
  • Not Synced
    with "specialized services"? And
    originally, they were intended to be
  • Not Synced
    the loophole for net neutrality, to
    circumvent the whole net neutrality
  • Not Synced
    by just making some service
    a specialized service. But now we really
  • Not Synced
    limited this danger to something that is
    handleable, and now a specialized service
  • Not Synced
    can only be something which could
    technically not work over the open internet.
  • Not Synced
    And you can see this clear here, I mean,
    that's a picture from the video
  • Not Synced
    that Facebook shows you when you have
    your birthday. And I found this so telling,
  • Not Synced
    because this power plug with a Facebook
    sign is exactly what a specialized service
  • Not Synced
    in the bad reading would be. It is
    no longer a universal connection
  • Not Synced
    that allows you to use every device
    with this network. Instead, it's just
  • Not Synced
    for one service. And if we go down that
    road we lose the universal character
  • Not Synced
    of the internet which allows us to do
    everything with it. Every invention,
  • Not Synced
    every idea on equal footing (?).
    With this model it is one Facebook plug,
  • Not Synced
    one Google plug and so forth. Another
    important issue that's still ongoing,
  • Not Synced
    and not as clear as the previous ones is
    Zero-Rating. A Zero-Rating is the practice
  • Not Synced
    of excempting certain services from
    your data cap. So you have your 2 GB
  • Not Synced
    but Whatsapp does not count towards
    those 2 GB. The new rules say this
  • Not Synced
    has to be handled on a case-by-case basis.
    So it's quite dubious to see how this
  • Not Synced
    will play out. We have a few rulings now,
    from Austria, Sweden and one from Hungary
  • Not Synced
    but this is really an ongoing process.
    What is clear is that you can not
  • Not Synced
    technically discriminate stuff with
    Zero-Rating so you cannot, say,
  • Not Synced
    after you used up your data cap and
    the rest of the internet is blocked,
  • Not Synced
    you can still use the zero-rated
    application. This is clearly prohibited.
  • Not Synced
    But about the Zero-Rating itself
    - it's an ongoing process.
  • Not Synced
    Traffic Management - the last issue -
    is the day-by-day operations of a network.
  • Not Synced
    So what do you do when you have a
    congestion, when there is too much traffic
  • Not Synced
    and the pipe is not big enough, how do you
    handle these? And we have a principle
  • Not Synced
    that says Traffic Management has to be
    application-agnostic, so everything
  • Not Synced
    has to be treated the same, but you
    can have exceptions, for class-based
  • Not Synced
    traffic management, based on Quality-of-Service
    characteristics. But the burden of proof
  • Not Synced
    here lies with the ISPs. If the ISP wants
    to manage their traffic they have to
  • Not Synced
    really have a justification why this is
    necessary and in line with the new law.
  • Not Synced
    And we will closely monitor how ISPs
    make this transparent and how NRAs
  • Not Synced
    will handle this. We're not really
    happy about the result on this one,
  • Not Synced
    but it's still a workable text. And now
    I'm gonna hand over to colleague.
  • Not Synced
    Christopher Talib: You hear me well? Okay.
    Basically, respectmynet is a grassroot tool
  • Not Synced
    we use for campaigning for net neutrality.
    It was built to try to see what kind of
  • Not Synced
    infraction (?) and violation you could
    see on net neutrality. It's an old tool,
  • Not Synced
    it has already a few years. We rebooted
    it for the last campaign for the BEREC
  • Not Synced
    that Thomas told you about. And, basically,
    what it does... we will use it now is
  • Not Synced
    to try to see how ISPs and operators
    are going to implement net neutrality
  • Not Synced
    reagulation in Europe. So you know what
    we have (?), we have, as Thomas could say,
  • Not Synced
    different concepts that allows good things
    and also bad things. However, the question
  • Not Synced
    is that, to know how those things
    are going to be implemented.
  • Not Synced
    So what it is now we (?) crowdsource
    the search for net neutrality violation.
  • Not Synced
    Basically, this tool allows you to input
    and to see if there are net neutrality
  • Not Synced
    violations, or in your country,
    or in your operator.
  • Not Synced
    It could have crowdsourced documents
    of all types, of net neutrality violation
  • Not Synced
    in Europe. And also it could be... we have
    a "Me, too!" button that allows you to say
  • Not Synced
    if you experienced this as well. And
    so you don't feel alone in front of your
  • Not Synced
    internet connection, having problems and
    wondering if this is your connection,
  • Not Synced
    or if this is a contract-based or general
    complication from the operator.
  • Not Synced
    You could see that if other
    people already have it.
  • Not Synced
    But cowdsourcing most of the net
    neutrality violations is not enough.
  • Not Synced
    What you'll do if all those violations,
    when you just (?) say: "Ah, they're doing
  • Not Synced
    bad stuff, well." As you say in
    French: "That makes a good leg."
  • Not Synced
    But yeah, that joke, that cannot
    be translated, really. laughs
  • Not Synced
    Basically, we will be using that to fix
    those violations. And to arouse people
  • Not Synced
    to actually see... that's... pinpointing
    and to notice all types of violations
  • Not Synced
    with our laws (?) and to fix them. When
    the BEREC will review the regulation
  • Not Synced
    on net neutrality, and he will do that,
    periodically. We can go and arrive
  • Not Synced
    with huge documents, saying, there are
    problems here.. here.. here and there.
  • Not Synced
    So, I wanna (?) in front of my clicking
    'Next Slide'. And it's a huge documentation
  • Not Synced
    and in our activist world of internet where
    everything is very, very quick, and we are
  • Not Synced
    very quick on new information, it's hugely
    important to have good documentation
  • Not Synced
    and to remember what happened before,
    and so it does not happen again.
  • Not Synced
    Especially on net neutrality, as this
    campaign has been on going for
  • Not Synced
    several years now. The second thing
    that's interesting for that type of tools
  • Not Synced
    is to allow telecom regulators to be
    accountable. So e.g. French National
  • Not Synced
    Regulation Agency really likes this tool
    because they can see what private companies
  • Not Synced
    are doing more or less behind their back.
    To give an example: Belgium Telecom
  • Not Synced
    operators, e.g. Belgacom or Proximus (?)
    waited for the publication of the
  • Not Synced
    net neutrality regulation. And when they
    saw that Zero-Rating was more-or-less
  • Not Synced
    accepted but only will be blocked on
    a case-by-case decision they published
  • Not Synced
    and they issued a lot of new contracts on
    subscription with Zero-Rating. So e.g.
  • Not Synced
    you have that one also in Germany,
    if I recall well, that you can use your
  • Not Synced
    data caps on your mobile device until
    a certain amount. But when you reach
  • Not Synced
    that amount averything is down-speed
    except Whatsapp. And that's seen
  • Not Synced
    as a net neutrality violation. And
    that's a really good example of
  • Not Synced
    what Zero-Rating is. And that actually
    should be illegal. And that's why we have
  • Not Synced
    RespectMyNet. It's fairly easy to use and
    very low cost of time because when you see
  • Not Synced
    what issues you have on your computer
    and you can check it out if you have
  • Not Synced
    a violation. Usually you can see that
    already in your contract. And that's why
  • Not Synced
    we create a fairly easy form. As you could
    understand this is very complicated issue
  • Not Synced
    and that involves a lot of different
    elements, especially when there are
  • Not Synced
    elements from law, there are elements from
    telecom regualtion... But we try to make it
  • Not Synced
    as simple as possible. And so you can
    see the different points on country,
  • Not Synced
    type of operator, the contract you have,
    is it a fixed or mobile line you have,
  • Not Synced
    and also the type of discrimination you
    can see. Here you have just Zero-Rating
  • Not Synced
    because that would be the biggest type
    of discrimination we will experience
  • Not Synced
    in the next years. However, you still have
    throttling, class-based, contract-based etc.
  • Not Synced
    When you input that kind of discrimination
    on RespectMyNet.eu, behind the scene
  • Not Synced
    on the backstage we have a team that
    will review cases, and to see if there is
  • Not Synced
    enough information to use that as
    a good case. E.g. if you just tell us:
  • Not Synced
    "My internet is low", that is not enough,
    That's why we try to make enough questions,
  • Not Synced
    enough place for you to describe, to give
    as much information as you could
  • Not Synced
    to develop that. And that (?)(?)(?)(?)(?)(?)
    on the web page. And after that we gathered
  • Not Synced
    all that information which is no personal
    identification information, that were just
  • Not Synced
    identification on the type of cases.
    RespectMyNet.eu is a tool that has been
  • Not Synced
    ongoing development because we're
    trying to use it for something that
  • Not Synced
    it has not been programmed for. And now
    we're using thee (?) to be fixed. E.g.
  • Not Synced
    to have a fixed type of sign flag, let's
    say. On that it is searching a violation (?).
  • Not Synced
    We are going to develop linguistic admin
    groups because e.g. I don't speak German,
  • Not Synced
    and when you have an input from a German-
    speaking it's difficult to understand
  • Not Synced
    what it is. Especially when it's linked to
    the countract. And we're trying to develop
  • Not Synced
    visualization of cases, so if you are
    a graphic designer or data visualizator (?)
  • Not Synced
    you're welcome to help us. Basically,
    RespectMyNet, as everything... most of us do
  • Not Synced
    it's free like in Free Speech and
    like in free beer. It's easy to use,
  • Not Synced
    it's crowd-sourced database. So if you
    like databases come play with us
  • Not Synced
    and really get involved with that because
    there is a tremendous amount of work
  • Not Synced
    on a subject that does not involve
    terrorism which lately very scares.
  • Not Synced
    We have everything of the information on
    our Git lab. You have the address here
  • Not Synced
    at git.laquadrature.net. You'll have,
    anyway, that on the front page
  • Not Synced
    and you have information on our wiki,
    it's wiki.laquadrature.net. Now, we'll
  • Not Synced
    speak now on the future thing,
    and I'll let... steam (?) to Thomas.
  • Not Synced
    Thomas: Thank you Chris. So, how can we
    use this tool? How can we use RespectMyNet
  • Not Synced
    because we now enter a stage on net
    neutrality as well as with the new
  • Not Synced
    general data retention regulation in
    Europe where we have quite good laws
  • Not Synced
    but now we have to deliver them to the
    people because it's now of much value
  • Not Synced
    if you have privacy in principle but your
    data actually is in the hands of someone
  • Not Synced
    else. And the same with net neutrality:
    it doesn't matter if you are not allowed
  • Not Synced
    to block services when, in fact, your
    internet is restricted by your ISP.
  • Not Synced
    And what we will do, particularly as
    epicentworks (?) is our organization
  • Not Synced
    we have the high priority to really work
    on delivering net neutrality to the people.
  • Not Synced
    There is this concept of strategic levigation (?)
    which is well in place in the U.S.
  • Not Synced
    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
    as well as the ELectronic Frontier Foundation
  • Not Synced
    pick their cases really litigate for
    fundamental rights in a strategic way.
  • Not Synced
    And we want to apply these concepts now to
    net neutrality. And we've already done that
  • Not Synced
    in one case. We looked at the violation of
    an Austrian mobile operator, FreeHutchinson(?)
  • Not Synced
    and dated exactly this type of zero-rating
    that I explained earlier as clearly prohibited
  • Not Synced
    where you have this one graph [curve],
    which is the violet one, which is
  • Not Synced
    the public broadcaster in Austria,
    and when you reach the data cap,
  • Not Synced
    the 2130 seconds, it goes down to
    a flat line. But free mobile TV service,
  • Not Synced
    their inhouse television service,
    continues to run without interference.
  • Not Synced
    So that's a classical technical
    discrimination between applications
  • Not Synced
    which is clearly prohibited. We submitted
    a case, it was successful, they cancelled
  • Not Synced
    this type of violation for all new
    contracts and they changed the landscape
  • Not Synced
    of all their contracts. Because they could
    no longer give their own services
  • Not Synced
    a competitive advantage, they quadrupled
    up to 17x the amount of volume that you
  • Not Synced
    can buy with this operator. And this is
    not a singular phenomenon. We have
  • Not Synced
    similar cases in the Netherlands as well
    as with Slovenija. Once, an ISP
  • Not Synced
    is no longer allowed to give preferential
    treatment to their own service
  • Not Synced
    they start giving more volume to all
    their subscribers which is, of course,
  • Not Synced
    a really good thing. But, as I said,
    zero-rating is one of the biggest problems
  • Not Synced
    that we have and if you want to put it in
    numbers: ca. 40% of all internet providers
  • Not Synced
    in Europe currently zero-rate at least
    one application. So this is really
  • Not Synced
    an endemic problem that you can find
    in almost every network and country,
  • Not Synced
    and so we really have to do something
    about it. Because there are drastic scenarios
  • Not Synced
    that are in front of us. Mark Suckerberg
    announced two times already that he wants
  • Not Synced
    to bring his walled garden, called 'Free
    Basic', previously 'internet.org',
  • Not Synced
    also to Europe. He recently also announced
    that he wants to bring Free Basic to the U.S.
  • Not Synced
    and in the U.S. we have quite a hard time
    ahead. Donald Trump is not really
  • Not Synced
    a fan of net neutrality, from the few
    comments that we could analyze so far
  • Not Synced
    and if you look at the three people that
    he appointed to his Transition Team
  • Not Synced
    for the regulator, the FCC in the U.S.
    there is a quite horrible outlook.
  • Not Synced
    Jeffrey Eisenach as well as Mark Jameson
    and Russell Laten are hardcore telecom
  • Not Synced
    lobbyists. And you can really get a picture
    of what's coming in the U.S. if you look
  • Not Synced
    at the paper beyond net neutrality from
    Mar Jameson and Russell Laten
  • Not Synced
    from June of this year. What they
    propose here is to basically replace
  • Not Synced
    all net neutrality rules with a multi
    stakeholder concept. But they have
  • Not Synced
    a very unique interpretation what 'multi
    stakeholder' means. They only limit
  • Not Synced
    this multi stakeholder group to the 20
    biggest industry players. They explicitly
  • Not Synced
    say: "No civil society, no consumer
    protection, no scientists". So it's
  • Not Synced
    basically the industry making their own
    rules. They also propose new barriers
  • Not Synced
    for every type of ex ante regulation (?)
    of the FCC. So that's basically
  • Not Synced
    putting net neutrality in the bin
    in the U.S. which would also risk
  • Not Synced
    their competitive advantage that the U.S.
    has right now as the power house
  • Not Synced
    of all startup innovation. If this really
    comes through then only the startups
  • Not Synced
    that partner up with existing monopolies
    have a chance to cempete.
  • Not Synced
    In Europe we also have a quite worrying
    proposal. Part of the legacy of Guenther
  • Not Synced
    Oettinger. He proposed in September of
    this year a new regulation for BEREC.
  • Not Synced
    Who here knows what BEREC is?
    Hands up!
  • Not Synced
    Oh! Actually quite a few, that's good.
    BEREC is the umbrella above the European
  • Not Synced
    regulators for the internet. And it's an
    agency that has done quite a good job
  • Not Synced
    on various occasions. They are voice of
    reason, they have quite a good model
  • Not Synced
    to really incorporate different views and
    what the Commission is proposing
  • Not Synced
    with this new law is basically replacing
    this agency, making it into an independent
  • Not Synced
    legal personality, and having that complete
    control on all levels from the Commission.
  • Not Synced
    So in this law you can find the Commission
    writing itself into this independent agency
  • Not Synced
    on many, many occasions. And
    the most obscure outcome of this is
  • Not Synced
    the Executive Director as well as the
    quite powerful Board of Appeals
  • Not Synced
    they will be chosen by regulators, but only
    from a list precompiled by the European
  • Not Synced
    Commission. And that's quite a communistic
    tradition of democracy. And we have
  • Not Synced
    to follow this dossier (?) closely. It is
    now entering the legislative process
  • Not Synced
    in the EU and if this would go through as
    it was proposed this would basically mean
  • Not Synced
    that the agencies in task of enforcing net
    neutrality are under complete power grab (?)
  • Not Synced
    of the European Commission which has
    proven, times and times again, that
  • Not Synced
    it is mostly interested in industry policy
    but not really in the citizen's interest.
  • Not Synced
    For all of that we need you to put the
    violations that you come across
  • Not Synced
    in your daily internet experience into
    RespectMyNet.eu as well as write to
  • Not Synced
    team@epicenter.works because we are
    also very interested in learning about
  • Not Synced
    the violations that are out there.
    And about really finding partners
  • Not Synced
    in various countries before we can submit
    cases to the regulators in that country
  • Not Synced
    and really keep the internet free
    and open. You can put it like that:
  • Not Synced
    With this new net neutrality law we
    now have a tool box to really keep
  • Not Synced
    the internet open. And with RespectMyNet
    we have a crowd-sourced todo list
  • Not Synced
    of all the violations that we have to get
    rid of. Thanks for your attention!
  • Not Synced
    And the last word: we were previously THIS
    organization, now we are THIS organization,
  • Not Synced
    we changed our name. Thanks!
  • Not Synced
    applause
  • Not Synced
    Herald: I think we have time for a few
    more questions. So please step up
  • Not Synced
    to the microphones if you have
    one and I'll call your number.
  • Not Synced
    Nobody so far, is there a question
    from the internet?
  • Not Synced
    Also not. So you answered all open
    questions exhaustively. That is great.
  • Not Synced
    Chris: No, there's a question there...
    Herald: There is a question?
  • Not Synced
    Oh, up there! Well, number 5.
    Please, go ahead!
  • Not Synced
    Question: Hi, my question as an IT guy is:
    do you think about automating the process
  • Not Synced
    to file these complaints? So, I'm thinking
    about people who run out [of] their quota
  • Not Synced
    per month and, say, can easily start an app
    which checks about 50 different services
  • Not Synced
    to see which service is performing good,
    and which not, and automatically do
  • Not Synced
    a complaint on your side?
    Something like that?
  • Not Synced
    Chris: If I understand well your question
    that if we are planning to automate
  • Not Synced
    the system of inputting subscriptions...
    input in[to] RespectMyNet?
  • Not Synced
    Question: Yeah!
  • Not Synced
    Chris: The thing is that that would only
    cover a certain type of violation.
  • Not Synced
    It won't e.g. - don't think in what
    I understood - it won't be able to cover
  • Not Synced
    e.g. contract-based violations.
    But that could be an idea, why not.
  • Not Synced
    Thomas: Maybe, if you go to RespectMyNet.eu
    you'll find a list of the measurement tools
  • Not Synced
    that are out there right now. The software
    that you can use on your own computer
  • Not Synced
    to test if your internet connection is
    open and neutral. But most of the software
  • Not Synced
    is abandonware. Sadly, it has not been
    updated in quite a few years. And then
  • Not Synced
    we need more developers to actively engage
    in those software tools. And I hope now
  • Not Synced
    that more people will do that because
    the threat in the U.S. is quite real and
  • Not Synced
    we need better software. Automated testing
    happens as part of some Bittorrent clients
  • Not Synced
    e.g. which upload their data to
    measurement lab. And there are
  • Not Synced
    some programs like that but
    none really on wide scale.
  • Not Synced
    Herald: Okay. So, the next one is the
    personon microphone no. 3, please.
  • Not Synced
    Question: Yes, have a question regarding
    the regulation to reform BEREC.
  • Not Synced
    Are you planning to fight this regulation,
    and if so, and if not, are there any ways
  • Not Synced
    to fight it for the rest of us?
  • Not Synced
    Thomas: Thanks for being eager! Yes,
    we are now... this is just the beginning
  • Not Synced
    of this dossier. So it has been proposed
    September 14, 2016. And now the Parliament
  • Not Synced
    and the Counsil are just slowly starting
    to work on it and it's part of
  • Not Synced
    a much bigger package of legislation
    called the telecom call (?). And we are
  • Not Synced
    in ongoing conversations with the
    legislators, so, the various
  • Not Synced
    political parties, to see what is the best
    strategy. And if we think that there is
  • Not Synced
    a reason to really have a compatant
    we will have one. But right now it is
  • Not Synced
    too early to say.
    Question: Thanks!
  • Not Synced
    Herald: Okay, thank you very much! And
    the next person on microphone no.3!
  • Not Synced
    Question: Thank you very much for
    an excellent talk. For Savetheinternet
  • Not Synced
    there was a lot of national NGOs active.
    And with this proposed power grab of BEREC
  • Not Synced
    how can we at a national level help
    support the telecom (?) regulators nationally
  • Not Synced
    to save the net neutrality?
  • Not Synced
    Thomas: The best thing to do right now
    would be to speak with your telecom
  • Not Synced
    infrastructure ministry, whoever is
    responsible of this in the European Counsil
  • Not Synced
    because they are the ones that are now
    forming their opinion. And I know from
  • Not Synced
    quite a few countries where this is really
    an open situation, so they are welcoming
  • Not Synced
    input from citizens. And they, of course,
    speak with the members of the European
  • Not Synced
    Parliament from your country. They are
    the ones ultimatively voting on this.
  • Not Synced
    I'm not aware if we already have
    a Rapporteur on that but there will be one
  • Not Synced
    soon, and...
    Christopher: On the telecom package?
  • Not Synced
    Thomas: Yeah!
    Christopher: (?) del Castillo.
  • Not Synced
    Thomas: Del... Oh my god. laughs
    The worst Rapporteur that we could
  • Not Synced
    possibly have. It's the same that
    we had for the net neutrality law.
  • Not Synced
    But speak with your local ministry and
    your Members of the European Parliament.
  • Not Synced
    That's the right answer for that. And
    I hope that also a few countries and
  • Not Synced
    as well as the regulators will see this
    power grab as what it is. Because the
  • Not Synced
    Commission is not really in the position
    to insert itself on all levels of government.
  • Not Synced
    That's just the wrong approach.
  • Not Synced
    Herald: Okay, there's time for one last
    question. Please, a short one! No.4.
  • Not Synced
    Question: Thank you very much for the
    talk. I was wondering, do you think
  • Not Synced
    it's possible to actually convince telecom
    companies to be on our side, so to say,
  • Not Synced
    and to get rid of all of those Zerorating
    things, and convince them that
  • Not Synced
    net neutrality can be a good argument for
    customers. Or do you think the only way
  • Not Synced
    is through litigations (?) and (?)?
  • Not Synced
    Christopher: I think, both. The problem
    with telecom operators is
  • Not Synced
    that you go against their business model.
    Zerorating can increase their sales,
  • Not Synced
    (?) percentage etc. and net neutrality
    can not, or at least not in the way
  • Not Synced
    they see it. There is two things: on one
    hand you have customer protection,
  • Not Synced
    on the other hand you have private
    profits. So I think we'll be very welcoming
  • Not Synced
    any type of arguments of (?) I see
    that could link both, and saying
  • Not Synced
    that we're making a better world, but
    also we're contributing to capitalism.
  • Not Synced
    So, that's a tricky one. But,
    you know, we can discuss it.
  • Not Synced
    Thomas: But it's doable. I mean there
    are a few ISPs that are fees(?)
  • Not Synced
    pro-net neutrality advocates. Because
    they've realized that net neutrality
  • Not Synced
    is good for their business model. Because
    this open platform creates the demand
  • Not Synced
    for the only product they really have,
    which is internet access.
  • Not Synced
    About
Title:
Make the Internet Neutral Again (33c3)
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
32:00

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions