-
- Bourgie, bourgie, bourgie.
-
America, you and me have seen
some shit this last year.
-
And, you know what,
-
I mean that both
figuratively and literally.
-
Back in May you ate too
much at Chili's one time
-
and you looked in the bowl afterwards,
-
and there's never been
an election like this.
-
There's never been a reason to think
-
there would ever be an election like this.
-
Is this an election, or is this dancer?
-
Or is this an elaborate
simulation that none of us opted
-
into and have no way of getting out of?
-
Is this the Matrix?
-
Is this Tron?
-
Is this Sword Art Online,
-
but without the weird incesty stuff?
-
Oh, wait, there's weird
incesty stuff, sorry.
-
I forgot.
-
Why is it the time that
everybody understands
-
that establishment in politics
are the mechanism by which
-
the status quo, which is
not beneficial for anyone
-
but the richest of the
rich, is perpetuated,
-
is the election where we're presented
-
with a significantly worse alternative?
-
You know what?
-
All these Transformers movies have sucked.
-
I'm not gonna go see another one.
-
This is the last straw.
-
Well, what movie do you wanna go see, man?
-
You know what, imaginary Tommy Chong,
-
let's go see Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
-
Four minutes into the film.
-
Fuck!
-
So, here we are, Teenage Mutant Ninja,
-
I mean, the worst election ever.
-
Now, I'm not gonna tell you
you have a moral obligation
-
to do the same thing that
I'm doing, because you don't,
-
but I'm also the one who gets to be very
-
smug when everything goes to hell,
-
which, by the way, will be
of very little consolation.
-
Anyhoo.
-
In this corner, we have the challenger.
-
Donald
-
Justice
-
Trump!
-
(gagging)
-
And, in this corner, we
have the defending champion
-
by virtue of being an
incumbent political party,
-
Hillary
-
Dennis Rodman
-
Clinton!
-
(gagging)
-
Don't blame me for this, I
voted for Bernie Sanders.
-
He had a fucking bird land on him.
-
Also, he talked about policy all
-
the time and had good ideas.
-
But he had a bird land on him.
-
Oh well, I guess hindsight is 2020.
-
(intense rock music)
-
But that's anti-establishment
with both a brain and a heart.
-
We aren't dealing with that.
-
We are dealing, however,
with Donald J. Trump.
-
He started his campaign at
the top of an escalator,
-
rode it down in perhaps the
worst executed symbolism
-
of all time, and said that
Mexicans need to be walled out
-
of the country because they're rapists.
-
That was essentially the main takeaway
-
of his announcement speech.
-
Over the following year,
he managed to say something
-
bad about pretty much every group,
-
except for straight, white cis men.
-
Donald Trump has done
and said so many shitty
-
things over the last
year that I'm not even
-
worried about trying to list them.
-
I'm more worried about trying
to even remember all of them.
-
It's a fool's errand and that
was part of the strategy.
-
Be a dizzying force of shittiness.
-
But in all honesty, those
things are symptomatic
-
of what Donald Trump actually is.
-
Donald Trump is totalitarian.
-
He's riding around on his big boy dictator
-
bicycle with training wheels on it.
-
Did you just say fascism?
-
Well, no, but I'm definitely gonna.
-
So there's an absolute
load of people who support
-
fascism that also support Donald Trump.
-
And I didn't just say load to be obscene.
-
I actually meant there's
just a lot of people.
-
But you have a dirty mind
and you thought it anyway.
-
I actually meant it that way.
-
Whether they're KKK leaders
who believe that it should
-
be legal to discriminate
against some citizens,
-
denying them rights, and
indeed not treating them
-
like people, to actual
out fascists and dictators
-
from convicted neo-Nazi
terrorist Don Black
-
to Russian fascist Aleksandr Dugin
-
to even North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un
-
whom, contrary to popular belief,
-
Seth Rogen has not actually killed.
-
There's a swath of actual
fascists and dictators
-
that endorse Donald Trump,
but those are endorsements.
-
What about Trump himself?
-
Does he endorse Donald Trump?
-
(laughs)
-
I'm sorry, I couldn't resist that one.
-
Well, he's not only praised Saddam Hussein
-
who was in charge of gassing
hundreds of thousands
-
of his own citizens, he
likes to retweet quotes
-
from Italian dictator, Benito Mussolini,
-
he picked a neo-Nazi white
supremacist leader as a delegate,
-
he said the following on torture.
-
- We're gonna have to get
much tougher as a country.
-
We're gonna have to be a lot sharper
-
and we're gonna have to do
things that are unthinkable.
-
- And I quote, "Even if it doesn't work,
-
"they probably deserved
it anyway," end quote.
-
He thinks the Geneva
Convention is a problem
-
and needs to be changed, and hell,
-
let's just go all the way back to 1989,
-
back when Donald Trump
bought full page ads
-
in all the most prominent
New York newspapers
-
in an attempt to get four Black kids,
-
age 13 to 16 sentenced
to the death penalty
-
because he watched the tapes
of police coercing them
-
into confessions and just thought, uh,
-
I can take this at face value,
-
in fact, I'm gonna take this at face value
-
despite the fact that DNA evidence came
-
out and exonerated all of them.
-
All of them.
-
The actual rapist was
caught, but as recently
-
as a few weeks ago, Donald
Trump implied he still
-
thinks these people are
guilty and should have
-
been sentenced the death penalty.
-
That's not on evidence.
-
That's just on suspicion.
-
If you watch the tapes of
these kids quote unquote
-
confessing to these crimes,
and to be very clear,
-
I have, they were clearly coerced.
-
But you know what?
-
They're Black kids.
-
And not, like, middle class Black kids.
-
They had tough lives.
-
They didn't have the ability to fight back
-
either monetarily or quote
unquote social capital-wise.
-
And although he had no
stake in the situation,
-
Donald Trump saw an opportunity
to look tough on crime.
-
For a real estate developer
who needs a reputation
-
to be constantly allowed to
build and build and build
-
and have officials look the
other way as he exploits
-
undocumented immigrants
for labor, well, it helps.
-
Look at this upstanding
member of the community.
-
Look how little he tolerates rape.
-
It's terrible when our
white women get raped.
-
Did I say white women?
-
I just meant women.
-
(laughs) There's no racial element here.
-
Stop implying there is.
-
Well, I'm so sorry white ass bourgie,
-
but racism and fascism go hand in hand.
-
And so does yelling about keeping
-
people safe with law and order.
-
Hmm, Donald Trump would
take legal action against
-
people that he thinks did
something that he doesn't like.
-
It doesn't matter if there's
evidence that exonerates them,
-
he deems them guilty and he
is the arbiter of justice.
-
Tell me that's not fascist.
-
Go ahead.
-
And while Donald Trump
exploits the white ass bourgie,
-
Hillary Clinton is the white ass bourgie.
-
♫ Bourgie, bourgie, bourgie can't you see
-
♫ You white assholes elect Hillary
-
Yeah, I know that's a
little confrontational
-
and I am actually white myself.
-
But it wasn't wrong, was it?
-
Neoliberal capitalism is
the application of the free
-
market, not only to economic constructs,
-
but social constructs as well.
-
I did an entire very important documentary
-
on the marketplace of ideas
and how it's very literally
-
applying neoliberal capitalism
to how we societally agree
-
on what ideas are valid and what aren't.
-
Here's the problem with that.
-
We don't live in a situation
where everybody is represented
-
equally, and in order for
a marketplace of ideas
-
to reach consensus that actually
represents all viewpoints,
-
that would have to be the case.
-
Framing the determination
of validity of concepts
-
and ideology through a free
market metaphor makes us look
-
at it as a monetary
transaction that dehumanizes
-
and gamifies social interaction
and it creates a currency.
-
That currency is not validity.
-
It's attention.
-
We pay attention and we gotta stop.
-
But let's put aside the fact
that lopsided representation
-
means whatever gets most
attention is considered
-
valid and assume that it actually works
-
the way it purports itself to.
-
Even a legitimately reached
consensus is not the most
-
efficient means of social
or economic progress.
-
Just because we all agreed it was time
-
to finally give gay
people rights doesn't mean
-
that was the right time
to give them rights.
-
I'm thinking maybe it
should have happened before.
-
You know, because gay
people, like other humans
-
who have human rights, are human.
-
Other humans that had to
fight for their rights,
-
Black people who were awarded personhood,
-
which, yeah, that's not absurd,
giving people personhood,
-
and then for another century had
-
to fight for their own human rights.
-
Despite a supposed conclusion to that,
-
they are still required
to fight for their rights
-
because consensus hasn't been reached.
-
If we societally decide
this shit via a marketplace
-
of ideas, consensus is
always the deciding factor
-
whether it's reached
in some sort of magical
-
fairway, or the way we actually reach it,
-
which is whoever gets the most attention.
-
There's no process,
there's no methodology.
-
Just a big ol' aggregate of all opinions.
-
When the middle finally
aligns with, hey, you know,
-
these people ought to have rights,
-
gee golly gosh, then they have rights.
-
And there is no more powerful politician
-
at the moment who more deeply believes
-
in these ideals right
now than Hillary Clinton.
-
To bring up gay rights once again,
-
Hillary Clinton waited until
2013 to support gay marriage,
-
long after consensus had been reached.
-
In 2011, a consensus believed
that marriage equality
-
should be the law of the land,
and that majority has been
-
maintained in every single year following.
-
She had to make sure that
consensus was gonna stick.
-
And that's probably one of
the easiest ones to point out,
-
but there's more than a few others.
-
There's the Trans-Pacific Partnership,
-
the Keystone XL Pipeline,
-
whether or not the Simpsons
should be renewed again.
-
OK, that's not up to her.
-
Various environment issues,
-
yada yada, goes on and on.
-
The specifics don't matter
as much as the ideology,
-
which is that framing
everything monetarily,
-
despite the fact that it
shouldn't be, is fine.
-
In fact, it's not just fine.
-
It's how everything is
and should never change.
-
I'm not going to tread on
anything that could be construed
-
as even vaguely conspiratorial
about Hillary Clinton.
-
I'm just going to say that on
a deep philosophical level,
-
I completely disagree with
Hillary Clinton's ideology.
-
It may reach some of the same
conclusions that I would.
-
For instance, I believe
that reproductive rights
-
are massively important and women
-
should always have the right to choose.
-
And if I said that around Hillary Clinton,
-
I would not get in an argument.
-
And I'm not going to question
that ideological conviction.
-
I am going to say that a
large portion of the time
-
these conclusions are
reached because it's mutually
-
beneficial for people
as well as corporations,
-
or at least non-controversial
to corporate donors.
-
Now, we could get into
pinkwashing and probably talk
-
about abortion for a very long time,
-
but Hillary Clinton has been pretty
-
consistent on that issue at very least.
-
And while her conclusion
on reproductive rights
-
has remained pretty steadfast
throughout the years,
-
the conclusions that she's come
to on various other topics,
-
from healthcare to fracking
to marriage equality,
-
maybe you get where I'm going with this,
-
but they don't always stick.
-
See the originally had a
public option Obamacare.
-
And if your convictions depend
on a marketplace of ideas
-
which does not discount anybody's opinion,
-
it just enters it into an aggregate,
-
which is done if working as stated,
-
averaged out to create
a societal consensus,
-
well, then the worst parts
of that enable people
-
like Donald Trump who know
how to exploit a system
-
that is based entirely
on who gets attention.
-
Who gets attention
better than Donald Trump?
-
No one.
-
My center belief that
gives me so much beef with
-
neoliberal capitalism is that
I don't think money should
-
be what drives society and
I don't think you do either.
-
So obviously the solution is
to vote third-party, right?
-
Gary Johnson, Jill Stein,
they're both against that stuff.
-
Wait, Gary Johnson wants
to defund public schools
-
and completely disband
all entitlement programs
-
entirely dissolving even the
idea of a social safety net.
-
If you have no money, fuck you.
-
It's your fault.
-
Go die in an alley.
-
But Jill Stein's a progressive, right?
-
She wouldn't do that.
-
Oh, right, the way she
says that vaccines are good
-
is in the vaguest possible
way as to leave the door open
-
for anti-vaccers, which most
likely make up the majority
-
of the California voters
that put the Green Party
-
on school boards in California,
-
which by the way are the
vast majority of the hundred
-
offices that the Green
Party holds nationwide.
-
School boards in California.
-
At least you know there would
be a Congress completely
-
filled with Green Party
electees that would be.
-
Oh wait, no wait,
actually, all the electees
-
would just be in California
on school boards.
-
It'd just be Republicans
and Democrats in Congress
-
who would likely determine
as their best interest
-
to undermine any third-party president.
-
Not that I want anybody
who is even vaguely vague
-
on vaccinations in the oval office.
-
But hey man, a vote for the third-party's
-
a vote against the system.
-
♫ Dee do dee do dee dee do dee do dee dee
-
♫ Dee do dee do do do dee do do dee do
-
♫ Do do do do do do
-
Well,
-
no.
-
Third-party votes are not
votes against the system.
-
They are votes that the
system is designed to devalue.
-
To get a presidency, a
candidate has to get 270
-
votes in the electoral college.
-
In a two-way split,
that's essentially getting
-
the majority of votes,
except you can't really have
-
a two-way split in a three party race.
-
The first time a third-party
reaches a majority of votes
-
in the United States is going
to be a three-way split.
-
And the second time and the third time
-
and the fourth time and
probably as many times
-
as it takes to realize that
simply having the popular vote
-
doesn't mean getting the third-party in.
-
But in a three-way
split, most likely nobody
-
will get to 270 electoral votes.
-
The only way that could
happen is if the third-party
-
gets more votes than
the other two combined
-
and that's not going to happen.
-
There are way too may
registered GOP and DNC voters.
-
And since nobody's getting to 270,
-
our Constitution says that
the House of Representatives
-
votes on who becomes president.
-
And do you think the
Republican controlled house
-
is going to vote for Jill
Stein or Gary Johnson?
-
Oh yeah, I'm sure they're gonna shake up
-
the political binary
they both benefit from.
-
The fact of the matter is
they have been given the right
-
not to elect those people
by our founding fathers.
-
Do you want to know what
I think needs to happen
-
in order for a third-party
vote not to be a waste?
-
Well, I'm saying it anyway.
-
We need to abolish the Electoral College
-
and there's numerous organizations
-
out there dedicated specifically to this.
-
But I don't think an
organization is the answer.
-
I think a progressive political
party with a main agenda
-
of abolishing the electoral
college and implementing
-
a new voting system, like
instant-runoff voting
-
or ranked voting, both
of which have been proven
-
to create more democratic
results, needs to run
-
and be elected to congressional
seats in large numbers.
-
Large enough to start
pushing Electoral College
-
abolition amendments to the Constitution,
-
which doesn't necessarily mean a majority,
-
just enough people to create
a mandate that members
-
of the other political
parties also have to follow.
-
To just ram somebody into the Oval Office
-
would essentially require a large,
-
impossible majority of people to give up
-
the way things have been
done their entire lives
-
and if you went with the
current third-parties,
-
either vote for a party that wants to slip
-
the social safety net out from under you,
-
or a party of ant-vacs
parents in California.
-
No, I kind of think we
need a new third-party,
-
and let's face it, that's not gonna
-
happen before November 8th.
-
In fact, this binary is going to be valid
-
for at least this presidential election.
-
And if you're watching
this after the election,
-
hey, wasn't I right?
-
Didn't we elect one of them?
-
Look, if you're that
emotionally attached to
-
the Electoral College, I
might still have an idea.
-
But it still involves
amending the Constitution,
-
so you're not getting out of that.
-
But we could index the total
number of necessary votes
-
based on how many candidates are viable.
-
Like, just say there's three candidates
-
and they're all within striking distance
-
of each other in the polls consistently.
-
There's 538 total electoral votes.
-
And in a binary, you need 270 to win.
-
What if we set that majority at 185?
-
I mean, it'd have to be
based on scientific polling
-
that consistently put us in a situation
-
where this was a likely popular vote.
-
But I'd accept that.
-
Certainly it's not perfect,
but still it's something.
-
I haven't really heard
a whole lot of ideas
-
as to how to do this if I'm
gonna be completely honest.
-
Whenever anybody says we
need a third-party in,
-
all they do is just tell people
to vote for a third-party.
-
It's been designed not
to work like that, OK?
-
We literally can't have
a third-party president
-
until we amend the
Constitution to make a system
-
that accommodates a third-party candidate.
-
That's what I want to do, OK?
-
So just to be crystal clear
-
I'm not advocating against
third-party candidates.
-
I'm actually advocating that we do that.
-
But let me say something that isn't nice.
-
It's a hard truth and it sucks.
-
We're not going to be able to do that
-
before the 2016 presidential election.
-
No, our choice, if we could
really call it a choice,
-
is between Donald Trump
and Hillary Clinton.
-
People have been telling me to vote
-
my conscience since early 2015.
-
And in 2016, I did.
-
I voted for Bernie Sanders because
-
I think he was the best candidate.
-
I think he gave a shit
about regular people.
-
And when I say regular people,
-
I don't mean straight, white, cis dudes.
-
There's one major party
candidate that in 2016
-
is associated with the
nation's first major party
-
transgender candidate for the U.S. Senate,
-
and it's not Hillary Clinton.
-
And we know it's not Donald Trump.
-
But Bernie Sanders'
post-campaign organization
-
called Our Revolution is
spending time and money
-
to get Misty K. Snow elected
in Utah of all states.
-
No, at this point I'm not
going to vote my conscience.
-
I'm voting pragmatically.
-
Sorry.
-
Between an orange fascist in training
-
and the literal symbol for
the economic and social system
-
that hasn't just destroyed
this country's economy,
-
but also our trust in people.
-
It's not that it's made folks
greedy or selfish or awful.
-
It's not that we chose to make every
-
conversation we have into a job interview.
-
It's that if you don't act that
way, you can't get anywhere.
-
And I hate that.
-
But I still picked the
neoliberal capitalist.
-
And it's not because I think
she's gonna do a great job.
-
It's not because I think she's
going to pull a Pope Francis
-
and end up being a stealth progressive
-
like Michael Moore seems
to think that she might.
-
I don't entertain that.
-
I'm voting for Hillary
Clinton for the same reason
-
scammers want old people to
continue using Windows 95.
-
Because the status quo is exploitable.
-
Donald Trump proved that.
-
Progressives need to realize that
-
neoliberal capitalism is Windows 95.
-
And where Trump was the scammer,
-
progressives could be the
kid that comes in and says,
-
"Grandma, holy shit, we
really need to upgrade this.
-
"This is not safe.
-
"Like, how is this still running?
-
"Seriously, I'm looking at this.
-
"How is this running?
-
"Nothing should be working.
-
"This is terrible.
-
"No, don't worry, I got some time.
-
"I'll upgrade it for you."
-
But what Donald Trump will become if he
-
is given power is not exploitable.
-
You don't Donald Trump totalitarianism.
-
Whoever's in power already did.
-
I'm not gonna tell you how to vote.
-
I'm tired of being told
how to vote myself.
-
But I am gonna say that this system
-
compensates for any action that isn't
-
for either Donald Trump
or Hillary Clinton.
-
No matter what you do,
you're helping one of them.
-
But what this system is not
set up to compensate for,
-
I believe, is the kind of
person that Donald Trump is.
-
I don't think checks and balances
-
are going to work with him.
-
He's too good at getting people
-
to do what he wants them to do.
-
And Hillary Clinton is not.
-
If you think Hillary Clinton's
ideology or methodology
-
are dangerous or destructive
or just not correct,
-
wouldn't you rather have
the person who had trouble
-
beating Donald Trump, ineffectively trying
-
to apply that ideology and methodology?
-
If you're a progressive,
wouldn't you rather have an in
-
because you won't have
an in with Donald Trump.
-
Instead, you'll get the best wall,
-
a huge wall, an amazing wall,
-
a luxurious wall.
-
I mean, I hope you like walls.
-
He does.
-
(rhythmic hip hop music)