Return to Video

34C3 - Ecstasy 10x yellow Twitter 120mg Mdma

  • 0:07 - 0:33
    Carmen: Hi. We're Mediengruppe Bitnik,
    this is Doma, my name is Carmen. We're
  • 0:33 - 0:41
    really happy to be here; thanks for having
    us. And we'd like to show you a series of
  • 0:41 - 0:47
    works. We don't quite know how many; we've
    been kind of changing the slides, so we'll
  • 0:47 - 0:56
    have to see what fits. I think... just 2
    words about Mediengruppe Bitnik: We're
  • 0:56 - 1:03
    from Zurich originally. We're based in
    Berlin now... have been based for 1 and a
  • 1:03 - 1:10
    half years and we work on the digital, but
    usually our works also affect physical
  • 1:10 - 1:15
    spaces, as you'll see in a minute. And
    we'd like to talk about recent works
  • 1:15 - 1:28
    around bots remote code glitch. So, the
    first work is called "random darknet
  • 1:28 - 1:36
    shopper". We produced this work in 2014
    together with Kunst Halle Sankt Gallen.
  • 1:36 - 1:42
    This was after the Snowden revelations in
    2013, where we kind of felt that, as
  • 1:42 - 1:50
    artists, we needed to re-assess our
    cultural "heimat", the internet. As a kind
  • 1:50 - 1:56
    of it was this mass surveillance thing and
    we kind of felt we couldn't work there
  • 1:56 - 2:04
    anymore or that many of our works were too
    naive and so together with Kunst Halle
  • 2:04 - 2:10
    Sankt Gallen, which is an art space in
    Switzerland, we put together a show around
  • 2:10 - 2:17
    darknet, because we felt that by looking
    at internet subculture, we could kind of
  • 2:17 - 2:30
    question ideas around anonymity, intimacy,
    identity, trust... And in this show we had
  • 2:30 - 2:37
    12 works by various artists around these
    topics and our work was "random darknet
  • 2:37 - 2:39
    shopper".
    Doma: So, basically the random darknet
  • 2:39 - 2:50
    shopper is a piece of software... is a
    small bot, which we started in autumn
  • 2:50 - 2:59
    2014. We started with the interest in the
    question of trust: "How do you gain trust
  • 2:59 - 3:05
    in encrypted networks, where you don't
    know to whom you're speaking to?", "How
  • 3:05 - 3:10
    does those trust mechanism work when
    everything is kind of obfuscated and
  • 3:10 - 3:17
    encrypted?" And we wanted to challenge
    this question, basically, on the darknet
  • 3:17 - 3:25
    markets, which were kind of a big topic, a
    controversial topic, after the Silk Road
  • 3:25 - 3:34
    raid. And we thought that it might be good
    to evaluate these questions with a bot,
  • 3:34 - 3:39
    questioning also "How does trust-building
    work when you have goods, which are
  • 3:39 - 3:46
    shipped from all over the world to the
    buyers?" and so we wrote this part which
  • 3:46 - 3:54
    was called the "random darknet shopper",
    which had $100 weekly budget, based in
  • 3:54 - 4:00
    bitcoins, and the idea was that the bot
    would log in to the deep webs and go to
  • 4:00 - 4:07
    the biggest dark net market at that time,
    it was called agora I think, and randomly
  • 4:07 - 4:14
    select an item and then buy it and
    directly send it to the exhibition space,
  • 4:14 - 4:21
    without our interference. So the idea was
    that in the exhibition, we had 12 of those
  • 4:21 - 4:28
    vitrines -- they were empty -- basically
    waited to be filled over 12 weeks of the
  • 4:28 - 4:35
    duration of the exhibition.
    Carmen: So we basically connected the very
  • 4:35 - 4:42
    dark markets of the darknet with the very
    visible space of the art gallery.
  • 4:42 - 4:50
    Doma: Technically it was pretty simple: It
    was basically a small python script which
  • 4:50 - 4:56
    remote-controlled a Firefox and basically
    logged in to the darknet markets through
  • 4:56 - 5:05
    Tor and then just clicked around to choose
    a random category, get all the items below
  • 5:05 - 5:12
    $100, randomly choose one, hit the buy
    button, send an encrypted message to the
  • 5:12 - 5:18
    seller to send it directly to the
    exhibition space, and pay the fee or the
  • 5:18 - 5:28
    things in bitcoins.
    Carmen: So, over time we wanted to have a
  • 5:28 - 5:33
    whole landscape of goods from the
    darknets. There was also a lot of talk in
  • 5:33 - 5:37
    the media at the time -- well, there still
    is -- about the darknets and what you can
  • 5:37 - 5:42
    buy there and we didn't believe what they
    were telling us; we really wanted to see
  • 5:42 - 5:52
    what we would randomly get from the
    darknet. And the first item was called
  • 5:52 - 6:03
    "fire brigade masterkey set", which the
    seller said was a set of keys usually
  • 6:03 - 6:08
    owned by the fire brigade in the UK to
    open storage...
  • 6:08 - 6:14
    Doma: ...public gates in public spaces,
    stuff they need access to, so...
  • 6:14 - 6:16
    Carmen: We have no idea whether it's true
    or not.
  • 6:16 - 6:21
    Doma: But we still really like that
    object, because it has that potential of
  • 6:21 - 6:24
    opening doors in the UK.
    laughter
  • 6:24 - 6:33
    Carmen: The second item was cigarettes
    from the Ukraine. So basically, in very
  • 6:33 - 6:42
    good darknet fashion, circumventing the
    taxation on tobacco in the European Union.
  • 6:42 - 6:47
    Doma:I think, it was about $35 at that
    time.
  • 6:47 - 6:51
    Carmen: Yeah.
    Doma: Third week, we had this Louis
  • 6:51 - 6:57
    Vuitton Trevi handbag for $95. And
    actually, if we speak about trust, this
  • 6:57 - 7:03
    was the only item which wasn't delivered,
    but the seller was kind enough to send the
  • 7:03 - 7:10
    bitcoins back, because he knew he couldn't
    deliver. So, also here, it kind of worked.
  • 7:10 - 7:20
    Carmen: Then, we received the Lord of the
    Rings collection by JRR Tolkien in PDF
  • 7:20 - 7:29
    format, which, for $1, which we printed .
    Doma: It's several thousand pages. Then,
  • 7:29 - 7:35
    the first or ... second super-digital
    item: It was called Visa.
  • 7:35 - 7:48
    Carmen: Visa Platinum top card, sent from
    Torland for $35. Apparently this was a
  • 7:48 - 7:59
    Visa prepaid. We received a visa, so the
    visa number, the expiry date, the name and
  • 7:59 - 8:04
    the little number you have on the back.
    Doma: And we didn't dare to use it.
  • 8:04 - 8:14
    Carmen: Then, sixth week the random
    darknet shopper selected 10 yellow ecstasy
  • 8:14 - 8:19
    pills with a Twitter logo on them...
    giggling in the audience
  • 8:19 - 8:26
    Carmen: ... sent from Germany for $48 to
    Switzerland; they actually arrived. We
  • 8:26 - 8:34
    took them as a title for the talk also,
    because we really liked the description.
  • 8:34 - 8:40
    We displayed them like the rest.
    Doma: They came in this stealth packaging,
  • 8:40 - 8:45
    pretending to be a DVD in this alufoil and
    then vacuumed again.
  • 8:45 - 8:55
    Carmen: Yes and around about this time,
    also the press started picking up on the
  • 8:55 - 9:01
    work, because they kind of felt that this
    random darknet shopper was questioning or
  • 9:01 - 9:10
    posing questions around who's responsible
    if a bot commits something illegal. So,
  • 9:10 - 9:16
    "What happens when a software box goes on
    the darknet shopping spree?", the Guardian
  • 9:16 - 9:26
    asked. Who is responsible when a bot
    randomly shops for ecstasy in the darknet?
  • 9:26 - 9:32
    Is it the person who programmed it, is it
    the person who executes it, can a robot or
  • 9:32 - 9:35
    a piece of software be jailed if it
    commits a crime?
  • 9:35 - 9:37
    giggling in the audience
    Doma: And also what happens if the code is
  • 9:37 - 9:42
    open source and written by many people,
    like if you have an algorithm which goes
  • 9:42 - 9:47
    wild?
    Carmen: But the random darknet shopper
  • 9:47 - 9:57
    just continued shopping and it bought some
    Nike Air Yeezy 2 limited edition trainers
  • 9:57 - 10:02
    for $75.
    Doma: If you convert the bitcoins into
  • 10:02 - 10:04
    nowadays' value, it would be around $3000.
    laughter
  • 10:04 - 10:13
    Doma: It costed $75 at the time.
    Carmen: Then, we received a cap with a
  • 10:13 - 10:24
    built-in camera that little... that's
    where the camera is, from the US for $99.
  • 10:24 - 10:29
    Doma: Then a thing I really liked, it's
    called the decoy first class letter. So,
  • 10:29 - 10:35
    it's basically a plain letter you receive,
    like a service and it came from Australia,
  • 10:35 - 10:42
    addressed to our exhibition space in
    Switzerland. It's basically an empty
  • 10:42 - 10:51
    letter, just to basically traceroute your
    postal system, to check if the system is
  • 10:51 - 10:55
    ok, if you can receive mails...
    giggling in the audience
  • 10:55 - 11:01
    Doma: ...if it's... maybe somebody opens
    it. So, the idea by buying stuff in the
  • 11:01 - 11:10
    deep webs is basically also to anonymize
    somehow your postal box and to test that
  • 11:10 - 11:14
    you can basically send yourself a letter
    and see if something happens. It's also
  • 11:14 - 11:19
    good tactics, basically, if you want to
    introduce a new address somewhere, start
  • 11:19 - 11:29
    sending letters there and the post office,
    the post person, the delivery person, will
  • 11:29 - 11:37
    get used to it and basically...
    Carmen: Yeah. The next item was a Sprite
  • 11:37 - 11:45
    stash can. You probably know this, this is
    an empty soda can, constructed to weigh
  • 11:45 - 11:51
    the same as a full one and you can screw
    the top on, so you can place whatever you
  • 11:51 - 11:58
    want inside and it's hidden away
    Doma: Then, the next one: These Diesel man
  • 11:58 - 12:08
    jeans replica from Hong Kong for $79.
    Carmen: And the last item we received was
  • 12:08 - 12:20
    a high quality scan of a Hungarian
    passport for online verification. So, here
  • 12:20 - 12:28
    you see, this is basically how we
    displayed the items and this all went
  • 12:28 - 12:35
    really well, until we took down the
    exhibition in January 2015 and the day
  • 12:35 - 12:43
    after the exhibition closed, the public
    prosecutor of St. Gallen in Switzerland
  • 12:43 - 12:51
    basically seized the whole work and we
    were a bit confused.
  • 12:51 - 12:59
    laughter
    applause
  • 12:59 - 13:11
    Carmen: So, we were a bit confused in the
    first moment, because of the timing. So,
  • 13:11 - 13:19
    after the exhibition closed, they seized
    the whole work, but it turned out, that
  • 13:19 - 13:24
    for them it was mostly about the drugs the
    random darknet shopper had bought. We were
  • 13:24 - 13:33
    kind of worried about the passport and the
    visa card as well, which they felt was
  • 13:33 - 13:35
    totally okay.
    laughter
  • 13:35 - 13:41
    Doma: And in the first moment, the
    question also by the public prosecutor was
  • 13:41 - 13:46
    raised, it was about responsibility: Who
    is responsible in this specific moment? Is
  • 13:46 - 13:53
    it the artists who wrote the code? Is it
    the museum who basically hosts the show?
  • 13:53 - 13:58
    Is it the curator? Is it the people who
    work there? Because me and Carmen, we have
  • 13:58 - 14:03
    never touched those drugs; we have not,
    basically... it was all done somehow
  • 14:03 - 14:12
    automatically. Or is it the bot himself
    who is somehow its own legal entity and
  • 14:12 - 14:19
    could be punished? So, in order to somehow
    also protect the staff of the museum and
  • 14:19 - 14:26
    to also to get our items back, we thought
    "The stuff is ours; we want the things
  • 14:26 - 14:31
    back.", we raised our hands and said "No;
    I think, if you want to charge somebody,
  • 14:31 - 14:38
    you should charge us."
    Carmen: And we were summoned for an
  • 14:38 - 14:43
    interrogation, which was really
    interesting. There we learned that the
  • 14:43 - 14:49
    drugs actually contained MDMA, so the
    police had tested them and confirmed that
  • 14:49 - 14:53
    they did.
    Doma: I mean, we knew through the ratings
  • 14:53 - 14:57
    on the drugs on the darknet markets, that
    this stuff was good.
  • 14:57 - 15:00
    laughter
    Carmen: But then we kind of had to
  • 15:00 - 15:09
    discuss. We tried to explain what we
    were... that we were trying to raise these
  • 15:09 - 15:16
    questions in public through publicly
    accessible art piece, because we felt it
  • 15:16 - 15:22
    very important that we talk about these
    things. Nevertheless, the public
  • 15:22 - 15:28
    prosecutor decided to destroy the drugs,
    which was very unfortunate. We, of cause,
  • 15:28 - 15:31
    claimed they were an art piece.
    Doma: So, you're destroying an art piece
  • 15:31 - 15:37
    here and our lawyer was also referencing
    all other artworks which involved drug
  • 15:37 - 15:43
    from the whole history.
    Carmen: Yeah, but we did receive the whole
  • 15:43 - 15:48
    work back in the end, except for the
    drugs, and all charges were dropped
  • 15:48 - 15:59
    against us and the public prosecutor wrote
    a very nice letter, saying that we
  • 15:59 - 16:05
    actually were allowed to break certain
    laws to raise certain questions within
  • 16:05 - 16:10
    society. Without specifically naming
    freedom of art.
  • 16:10 - 16:17
    Doma: So, our understanding of why they
    seized the whole thing, is that they were
  • 16:17 - 16:23
    afraid what the next artist would do. So,
    the first one buys it, the second one
  • 16:23 - 16:28
    takes it as a performative act and the
    third one gives it to the audience and
  • 16:28 - 16:42
    it's kind of clear that they need to draw
    a line. So, the question about
  • 16:42 - 16:52
    responsibility was not solved.
    Carmen: No, we still have it. We then
  • 16:52 - 17:06
    continued with this question of bots and
    the mechanical gaze... Oh, okay. You're
  • 17:06 - 17:17
    jumping, sorry, wrong introduction... The
    same year, we were asked to do a public
  • 17:17 - 17:23
    art piece, which is always the case in
    Switzerland when public buildings are
  • 17:23 - 17:32
    built, part of the money has to go into an
    art piece and usually that art piece is
  • 17:32 - 17:36
    sculptural: It can be a sculpture in the
    lobby o...
  • 17:36 - 17:41
    Doma: ... a sculpture in public space. It
    should... there're different kind of
  • 17:41 - 17:48
    things you need to address; the public art
    piece should work for 30 years, should be
  • 17:48 - 17:52
    sustainable, so it's mostly made out of
    stone.
  • 17:52 - 18:00
    Carmen: So, for us as digital artists,
    this was a very interesting question, also
  • 18:00 - 18:06
    because the building is the house for
    Electronic Arts in Basel, also
  • 18:06 - 18:14
    Switzerland. So, for us the question was
    "How can we talk about digital topics, but
  • 18:14 - 18:20
    not using digital media?"
    Doma: And we asked ourself "Is there a way
  • 18:20 - 18:25
    of... I mean we thought a lot about
    architecture and software and how
  • 18:25 - 18:35
    basically the software you use is also
    infecting the architecture which is built
  • 18:35 - 18:42
    and since this is all software, what we
    have never seen is a software error. So,
  • 18:42 - 18:51
    we ask ourself "Is it possible to build or
    is it funny to build a software error into
  • 18:51 - 18:56
    stone?" and...
    Carmen: We kind of had to try that.
  • 18:56 - 19:03
    Doma: We had to try that, so we took a
    picture of the place, of this house, and
  • 19:03 - 19:14
    basically glitched it through a small
    script and told them to rebuild it and
  • 19:14 - 19:17
    this is how it looks now.
    Carmen: This is what the building looks
  • 19:17 - 19:28
    like today. So, they... You can see it.
    They...
  • 19:28 - 19:39
    applause
    Carmen: And when you stand there it kind
  • 19:39 - 19:45
    of gives you a surreal feeling: There's a
    square in front of this facade and you
  • 19:45 - 19:52
    you're not sure, whether your eyes are
    wrong or the building is wrong, and then,
  • 19:52 - 19:55
    when you come closer, you then, of course,
    see.
  • 19:55 - 20:02
    Doma: And also here, the glitch reveals
    stuff, like... People came to us and asked
  • 20:02 - 20:05
    "How does the piping system work?"
    giggling
  • 20:05 - 20:10
    Doma: "Is it still here?" And this is
    something which we like about software
  • 20:10 - 20:17
    glitches. That you sometimes you get an
    understanding how a system works only of
  • 20:17 - 20:26
    breaking it or by forcing it to throw
    errors.
  • 20:26 - 20:36
    Carmen: Then we...
    *the 2 lecturers discuss something,
  • 20:36 - 20:39
    whispering*
    Carmen: Sorry.
  • 20:39 - 20:45
    Doma: We need to discuss what we are
    speaking about.
  • 20:45 - 20:49
    laughter
    Doma Okay, so we'll skip another project,
  • 20:49 - 20:56
    because we are running out of the time.
    Carmen: I think the last piece we'd like
  • 20:56 - 21:08
    to just quickly show you is very recent.
    We're still kind of amazed at this. So,
  • 21:08 - 21:21
    this year, we were asked to do a book on
    our work and we felt... This was really
  • 21:21 - 21:26
    difficult for us, because usually we do
    websites and you can change websites and
  • 21:26 - 21:31
    then you do a book and you kind of... it's
    printed and then it's there and that
  • 21:31 - 21:37
    really... it was very hard for us, but
    once we decided to do this, we kept
  • 21:37 - 21:44
    thinking about "How can we break this very
    static print format of the book?" and
  • 21:44 - 21:51
    together with the 2 designers of the book,
    Konrad Renner (???) and Christoph Knurz
  • 21:51 - 21:57
    (???), we thought about... we said "Well,
    the title should be code, because maybe
  • 21:57 - 22:06
    through the title, you could inject code
    into various websites, because books,
  • 22:06 - 22:15
    they're online, you can buy them online.
    And we decided to go
  • 22:15 - 22:19
    for as its title.
  • 22:19 - 22:26
    Dona: JavaScript, which normally, like
    YAML, you can't write JavaScript into a
  • 22:26 - 22:31
    commentary field on Facebook, because
    these things is parsed out and so the
  • 22:31 - 22:35
    browser does not execute that code, so
    they check it, but we thought "Maybe if
  • 22:35 - 22:40
    it's so deep in the databases, like the
    ISBN databases, the national
  • 22:40 - 22:46
    bibliographies and whatever, it might pop
    up somewhere."
  • 22:46 - 22:47
    laughter
    applause
  • 22:47 - 23:03
    Carmen:And the book came out in September
    and then in October we realized that on
  • 23:03 - 23:16
    Walther Kรถnig, which is a big art
    bookseller with a big online website, it
  • 23:16 - 23:22
    worked, so when you search for
    "!Mediangruppe Bitnik" on the website...
  • 23:22 - 23:28
    Hope this works... And you go to the
    catalog...
  • 23:28 - 23:35
    laughter
    applause
  • 23:35 - 23:46
    Doma: So, this one this one is pretty
    okay. I mean, normally if you... on other
  • 23:46 - 23:50
    website it breaks the "buy" button, which
    is not in our interest, but...
  • 23:50 - 23:53
    laughter
    Doma: So, you can still buy it on
  • 23:53 - 23:59
    Buchhandlung Walther Kรถnig. Just click
    "okay" and then it's okay. So, here's just
  • 23:59 - 24:07
    a small collection of 10, 12, which are
    popping up. It's like... everyday we get
  • 24:07 - 24:16
    more. And we can show you a small video of
    2, 3 pieces.
  • 24:16 - 24:26
    Carmen: Don't know what we're going to see
    now. I think eBay.
  • 24:26 - 24:35
    Doma: I don't know.
    Carmen: Okay. This is eBay.
  • 24:35 - 24:41
    Doma: So, ebay.co.uk.
    smartphone notification sound
  • 24:41 - 24:48
    Doma: BAM! And this only worked on or...
    they already fixed it, so somebody made a
  • 24:48 - 24:52
    bug report. I like this one.
    smartphone notification sound
  • 24:52 - 24:55
    laughter
    smartphone notification sound
  • 24:55 - 24:57
    laughter
    smartphone notification sound
  • 24:57 - 25:00
    laughter
    smartphone notification sound
  • 25:00 - 25:03
    laughter
    smartphone notification sound
  • 25:03 - 25:05
    laughter
    smartphone notification sound
  • 25:05 - 25:09
    laughter
    different smartphone notification sound
  • 25:09 - 25:12
    laughter
    Doma: So, thank you!
  • 25:12 - 25:14
    Carmen: Thanks.
    applause
  • 25:14 - 25:19
    herald speaks, but it is unintelligible
    due to technical problems
  • 25:19 - 25:48
    Herald: We have 5 minutes for a very short
    Q&A if there are already people lying out
  • 25:48 - 25:52
    (???). Please, number 2.
    M2: Very cool talk, thanks. I'm from
  • 25:52 - 25:58
    Switzerland, so I wonder, you were lucky
    that you got dropped off the charges. How
  • 25:58 - 26:04
    much would it got for the charges if you
    would not drop them? Do you know?
  • 26:04 - 26:09
    Doma: I don't you know. I mean, it was
    basically or here it was about drug
  • 26:09 - 26:18
    possession and 10 ecstasy pills and we
    were totally okay to take this fine. We
  • 26:18 - 26:22
    don't know it, but it was kind of...
    Carmen: It would have been fine, because
  • 26:22 - 26:28
    in Switzerland, according to our lawyer,
    it would have been for personal use. I
  • 26:28 - 26:34
    mean, this is not the amount you carry
    around, apparently, if you're selling, so
  • 26:34 - 26:40
    we would have gotten away with a fine.
    M2: So and I... Thanks very much that you
  • 26:40 - 26:47
    said that actually writing the code and
    then the program buys it makes you
  • 26:47 - 26:56
    actually responsible, right? So, would
    you... At the end you said, it was your...
  • 26:56 - 27:00
    "I would take the charge", because you
    were writing the code...
  • 27:00 - 27:09
    Carmen: Yes, the problem was that usually,
    at least in Swiss law, possession of drugs
  • 27:09 - 27:15
    needs to mean that the drugs were either
    found on your person or in a space that
  • 27:15 - 27:22
    can be... that definitely belongs to you.
    And the problem was that it was clear from
  • 27:22 - 27:27
    the process that we hadn't touched the
    drugs and we didn't want somebody else to
  • 27:27 - 27:32
    get fined for drug possession ; that would
    have made no sense. We wanted to also
  • 27:32 - 27:41
    publicly discuss this... having to step up
    and say "No, it was us."
  • 27:41 - 27:45
    M2: Thanks.
    Herald: Okay, final one.
  • 27:45 - 27:51
    Microphone x: Hi. Sorry... thanks for the
    talk. I have to ask: Does the plumbing
  • 27:51 - 27:57
    work?
    Carmen: Yeah. It works, because... so the
  • 27:57 - 28:07
    pillars were... I'll try to explain
    briefly. So, architecturally this building
  • 28:07 - 28:15
    was a storage for dry goods and the
    pillars used to support the building, but
  • 28:15 - 28:21
    when they turned it into a museum, they
    actually filled the space between the
  • 28:21 - 28:27
    pillars with insulation, so the pillars
    were gone. And then the architects didn't
  • 28:27 - 28:32
    like it. They thought, the pillars should
    be there, because the building didn't look
  • 28:32 - 28:40
    good, so they actually put fake pillars
    onto the facade again and so we could just
  • 28:40 - 28:46
    take the empty pillars and cut them up and
    put the plumbing inside. So, now the
  • 28:46 - 28:52
    visible plumbing is fake, but the real
    plumbing is inside the pillars; that's how
  • 28:52 - 28:54
    it works.
    applause
  • 28:54 - 29:09
    Herald: Amazing work. One final, big round
    of applause for Mediengruppe Bitnik and
  • 29:09 - 29:22
    thanks for being here!
    Carmen: Thank you; thanks.
  • 29:22 - 29:25
    Doma: Thank you.
    applause
  • 29:25 - 29:30
    [Music]
  • 29:30 - 29:34
    Subtitles created by c3subtitles.de
    in the year 2021. Join, and help us!
Title:
34C3 - Ecstasy 10x yellow Twitter 120mg Mdma
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
29:34

English subtitles

Incomplete

Revisions