-
This is my favorite protest shirt.
-
It says, "Protect your people."
-
We made it in the basement
of our community center.
-
I've worn it at rallies,
-
at protests and marches,
-
at candle-light vigils,
-
with families who have lost loved ones
to police violence.
-
I've seen how this ethic
of community organizing
-
has been able to change
arresting practices,
-
hold individual officers accountable,
-
and allow families
to feel strong and supported
-
in the darkest moments of their lives.
-
But when a family would come to our center
-
and say, "My loved one
got arrested, what can we do?"
-
we didn't know how to translate
-
the power of community organizing
that we saw on the streets
-
into the courts.
-
We figured, we're not lawyers
-
and so that's not our arena
to make change.
-
And so despite our belief
in collective action,
-
we would allow people that we cared about
-
to go to court alone.
-
Nine out of ten times,
and this is true nationally,
-
they couldn't afford their own attorney,
-
and so they'd have a public defender
who is doing heroic work,
-
but was often underresourced,
-
and stretched bare with too many cases.
-
They would face prosecutors
aiming for high conviction rates,
-
mandatory minimum sentences,
-
and racial bias baked
into every stage of the process.
-
And so, facing those odds,
-
stripped away from the power of community,
-
unsure how to navigate the courts,
-
over 90 percent of people that face
a criminal charge in this country
-
will take a plea deal.
-
Meaning, they'll never have
their fabled day in court
-
that we talk about
in television shows and in movies.
-
And this is the untold part of the story
-
of mass incarceration in America.
-
How we became
the largest jailer in the world.
-
Over two million people
currently incarcerated in this country.
-
And projections that say
-
one out of three black men
will see the inside of a prison cell
-
at some point in their life
on this trajectory.
-
But we have a solution.
-
We decided to be irreverent to this idea
-
that only lawyers can impact the courts.
-
And to penetrate the judicial system
-
with the power, intellect and ingenuity
of community organizing.
-
We call the approach
"participatory defense."
-
It's a methodology
for families and communities
-
whose loved ones are facing charges
-
and how they could impact
the outcome of those cases,
-
and transform the landscape
of power in the courts.
-
How it works is,
-
families whose loved ones
are facing criminal charges
-
will come to a weekly meeting
-
and it's half support group,
-
half strategic planning session.
-
And they'll build a community
-
out of what otherwise would be
an isolating and lonely experience.
-
And they'll sit in a circle,
-
and write the names
of their loved ones on a board,
-
who they're there to support.
-
And collectively,
-
the group will find out ways
to tangibly and tactically
-
impact the outcome of that case.
-
They'll review police reports
to find out inconsistencies,
-
they'll find areas that require
-
more investigation
by the defense attorney,
-
and they'll go to court with each other,
-
for the emotional support
-
but also so that the judge knows
that the person standing before them
-
is part of a larger community
-
that is invested in their
well-being and success.
-
And the results have been remarkable.
-
We've seen charges get dismissed,
-
sentences significantly reduced,
-
acquittals won at trial,
-
and sometimes it has been
literally life-saving.
-
Like in the case of Ramon Vasquez.
-
Father of two, family man, truck driver
-
and someone who was wrongfully charged
with a gang-related murder
-
he was totally innocent of,
-
but was facing a life sentence.
-
Ramon’s family came to those meetings
-
shortly after his arrest
and his detention.
-
And the worked the model.
-
And through their hard work,
-
they found major
contradictions in the case.
-
Gaping holes in the investigation.
-
And were able to disprove
dangerous assumptions by the detectives.
-
Like that the red hat that they found
when they raided his home
-
somehow affiliated him
to a gang lifestyle.
-
Through their photos and their records
-
they were able to prove that the red hat
was from his son's Little League team
-
that Ramon coached on the weekends.
-
And they produced independent information
-
that proved that Ramon
was on the other side of town
-
at the time of the alleged incident,
-
through their phone records
-
and receipts from the stores
that they attended.
-
After seven long months
of hard work from the family,
-
Ramon staying strong inside jail,
-
they were able
to get the charge dismissed.
-
And they brought Ramon home
-
to live the life that he should
have been living all along.
-
And with each new case,
-
the families identified new ways
to flex the knowledge of the community
-
to have impact on the court system.
-
We would go to a lot
of sentencing hearings.
-
And when we would leave
the sentencing hearing,
-
and on the walk back to the parking lot
-
after someone's loved one
just got sent to prison,
-
the most common refrain we would hear
-
wasn't so much, "I hate that judge"
-
or, "I wish we had a new lawyer."
-
What they would say was,
-
"I wish they knew him like we know him."
-
And so we developed tools and vehicles
-
for families to tell the fuller story
of their loved one,
-
so they would be understood
as more than just a case file.
-
They started making what we call
social biography packets,
-
which is families making a compilation
of photos and certificates and letters
-
that show past challenges
and hardships and accomplishments,
-
and future prospects and opportunities.
-
And the social biography [packets]
were working so well in the courts,
-
that we evolved it
into social biography videos.
-
Ten-minute mini documentaries,
-
which were interviews
of people in their homes,
-
and at their churches
and at their workplace,
-
explaining who the person was
in the backdrop of their lives.
-
And it was a way for us to dissolve
the walls of the court temporarily.
-
And through the power of video
-
bring the judge out of the court
and into the community,
-
so that they would be able to understand
the fuller context of someone's life
-
that they're deciding the fate of.
-
One of the first social biography projects
that came out of our camp
-
was by Carnell.
-
He had come to the meetings
-
because he had plead
to a low-level drug charge.
-
And after years of sobriety,
-
got arrested for this one
drug possession charge.
-
But he was facing a five-year
prison sentence
-
because of the sentencing
schemes in California.
-
We knew him primarily as a dad.
-
He'd bring his daughters to the meetings
-
and then play with them
at the park across the street.
-
And he said, "Look, I could do the time,
-
but if I go in, they're
going to take my girls."
-
And so we gave him a camera
-
and said, "Just take pictures
of what's like being a father."
-
And so he took pictures
of making breakfast for his daughters
-
and taking them to school,
-
taking them to after-school programs
and doing homework.
-
And it became this photo essay
-
that he turned in to his lawyer
who used it at the sentencing hearing.
-
And that judge, who originally indicated
a five-year prison sentence,
-
understood Carnell in a whole new way.
-
And he converted
that five-year prison sentence
-
into a six-month outpatient program,
-
so that Carnell could be
with his daughters.
-
His girls would have
a father in their life.
-
And Carnell could get the treatment
that he was actually seeking.
-
We have one ceremony of sorts,
-
that we use in participatory defense.
-
And I told you earlier
that when families come to the meetings,
-
they write the names
of their loved ones on the board.
-
Those are names that we all
get to know, week in, week out,
-
through the stories of the family,
-
and we're rooting for
and praying for and hoping for.
-
And when we win a case,
-
when we get a sentence reduced,
or a charge dropped,
-
or we win an acquittal,
-
that person who's been a name on the board
-
comes to the meeting.
-
And when their name comes up,
-
they're given an eraser,
-
and they walk over to the board
-
and they erase their name.
-
And it sounds simple,
but it is a spiritual experience.
-
And people are applauding,
and they're crying.
-
And for the families that are just
starting that journey
-
and are sitting in the back of the room,
-
for them to know
that there's a finish line,
-
that one day, they too might be able
to bring their loved one home,
-
that they could erase the name,
-
is profoundly inspiring.
-
We're training organizations
all over the country now
-
in participatory defense.
-
And we have a national
network of over 20 cities.
-
And it's a church in Pennsylvania,
-
it's a parents' association in Tennessee,
-
it's a youth center in Los Angeles.
-
And the latest city that we just added
to the national network
-
to grow and deepen this practice
is Philadelphia.
-
They literally just started their first
weekly participatory defense meeting
-
last week.
-
And the person that we brought
from California to Philadelphia
-
to share their testimony,
to inspire them to know what's possible,
-
was Ramon Vasquez,
-
who went from sitting in a jail
in Santa Clara county, California,
-
to inspiring a community
about what's possible
-
through the perseverance of community
across the country.
-
And with all the hubs, we still use
one metric that we invented.
-
It's called time saved.
-
It's a saying that we actually
still say at weekly meetings.
-
And what we say when a family
comes in a meeting for the first time is,
-
"If you do nothing,
-
the system is designed to give
your loved one time served.
-
That's the language the system uses
to quantify time of incarceration.
-
But if you engage, if you participate,
-
you can turn time served into time saved.
-
That's them home with you,
living the life they should be living."
-
So, Carnell, for example, would represent
five years of time saved.
-
So when we totaled our time saved numbers
-
from all the different
participatory defense hubs,
-
through their work
in the meetings, and at court,
-
and making social biography
videos and packets,
-
we had 4,218 years of time saved
from incarceration.
-
That is parents and children's lives.
-
Young people going to college
instead of prison.
-
We're ending generational
cycles of suffering.
-
And when you consider
in my home state of California,
-
it costs 60,000 dollars to house someone
in the California prison system.
-
That means that these families
are saving their states
-
a ton of money.
-
I'm not a mathematician,
I haven't done the numbers,
-
but that is money and resources
that could be reallocated
-
to mental health services,
-
to drug treatment programs, to education.
-
And we're now wearing this shirt in courts
-
all across the country.
-
And people are wearing this shirt
-
because they want the immediacy
of protecting their people
-
in the courtroom.
-
But what we're telling them
-
is as practitioners,
they're building a new field,
-
a new movement,
-
that is going to forever change the way
justice is understood in this country.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)