Return to Video

The tyranny of merit

  • 0:01 - 0:04
    Here's a question we should all be asking:
  • 0:04 - 0:05
    What went wrong?
  • 0:05 - 0:07
    Not just with the pandemic
  • 0:07 - 0:09
    but with our civic life.
  • 0:10 - 0:14
    What brought us to this polarized,
    rancorous political moment?
  • 0:15 - 0:17
    In recent decades,
  • 0:17 - 0:21
    the divide between winners and losers
    has been deepening,
  • 0:21 - 0:23
    poisoning our politics,
  • 0:23 - 0:25
    setting us apart.
  • 0:25 - 0:29
    This divide is partly about inequality.
  • 0:30 - 0:34
    But it's also about the attitudes
    toward winning and losing
  • 0:34 - 0:36
    that have come with it.
  • 0:36 - 0:38
    Those who landed on top
  • 0:38 - 0:42
    came to believe that their success
    was their own doing,
  • 0:42 - 0:44
    a measure of their merit,
  • 0:45 - 0:49
    and that those who lost out
    had no one to blame but themselves.
  • 0:50 - 0:53
    This way of thinking about success
  • 0:53 - 0:56
    arises from a seemingly
    attractive principle.
  • 0:57 - 0:59
    If everyone has an equal chance,
  • 0:59 - 1:02
    the winners deserve their winnings.
  • 1:03 - 1:07
    This is the heart
    of the meritocratic ideal.
  • 1:08 - 1:11
    In practice, of course, we fall far short.
  • 1:13 - 1:16
    Not everybody has an equal chance to rise.
  • 1:17 - 1:22
    Children born to poor families
    tend to stay poor when they grow up.
  • 1:23 - 1:28
    Affluent parents are able to pass
    their advantages onto their kids.
  • 1:28 - 1:32
    At Ivy League universities, for example,
  • 1:32 - 1:35
    there are more students
    from the top one percent
  • 1:35 - 1:40
    than from the entire bottom half
    of the country combined.
  • 1:42 - 1:46
    But the problem isn't only
    that we fail to live up
  • 1:46 - 1:49
    to the meritocratic
    principles we proclaim.
  • 1:50 - 1:52
    The ideal itself is flawed.
  • 1:53 - 1:54
    It has a dark side.
  • 1:55 - 1:59
    Meritocracy is corrosive
    of the common good.
  • 2:00 - 2:02
    It leads to hubris among the winners
  • 2:04 - 2:07
    and humiliation among those who lose out.
  • 2:08 - 2:14
    It encourages the successful
    to inhale too deeply of their success,
  • 2:14 - 2:19
    to forget the luck and good fortune
    that helped them on their way.
  • 2:19 - 2:23
    And it leads them to look down
    on those less fortunate,
  • 2:23 - 2:26
    less credentialed than themselves.
  • 2:27 - 2:30
    This matters for politics.
  • 2:30 - 2:35
    One of the most potent sources
    of the populous backlash
  • 2:35 - 2:41
    is the sense among many working people
    that elites look down on them.
  • 2:42 - 2:44
    It's a legitimate complaint.
  • 2:45 - 2:50
    Even as globalization
    brought deepening inequality
  • 2:50 - 2:51
    and stagnant wages,
  • 2:53 - 2:57
    its proponents offered workers
    some bracing advice.
  • 2:58 - 3:02
    "If you want to compete and win
    in the global economy,
  • 3:02 - 3:03
    go to college."
  • 3:04 - 3:07
    "What you earn depends on what you learn."
  • 3:07 - 3:09
    "You can make it if you try."
  • 3:10 - 3:16
    These elites miss the insult
    implicit in this advice.
  • 3:17 - 3:19
    If you don't go to college,
  • 3:19 - 3:23
    if you don't flourish in the new economy,
  • 3:23 - 3:25
    your failure is your fault.
  • 3:26 - 3:27
    That's the implication.
  • 3:28 - 3:34
    It's no wonder many working people
    turned against meritocratic elites.
  • 3:35 - 3:36
    So what should we do?
  • 3:37 - 3:41
    We need to rethink three aspects
    of our civic life.
  • 3:41 - 3:43
    The role of college,
  • 3:43 - 3:44
    the dignity of work
  • 3:44 - 3:46
    and the meaning of success.
  • 3:47 - 3:51
    We should begin by rethinking
    the role of universities
  • 3:51 - 3:54
    as arbiters of opportunity.
  • 3:56 - 4:00
    For those of us who spend our days
    in the company of the credentialed,
  • 4:00 - 4:04
    it's easy to forget a simple fact:
  • 4:05 - 4:09
    Most people don't have
    a four-year college degree.
  • 4:09 - 4:13
    In fact, nearly two-thirds
    of Americans don't.
  • 4:14 - 4:18
    So it is folly to create an economy
  • 4:18 - 4:23
    that makes a university diploma
    a necessary condition
  • 4:23 - 4:27
    of dignified work and a decent life.
  • 4:27 - 4:31
    Encouraging people to go
    to college is a good thing.
  • 4:31 - 4:34
    Broadening access
    for those who can't afford it
  • 4:34 - 4:35
    is even better.
  • 4:36 - 4:38
    But this is not a solution to inequality.
  • 4:39 - 4:44
    We should focus less on arming people
    for meritocratic combat,
  • 4:44 - 4:48
    and focus more on making life better
  • 4:48 - 4:51
    for people who lack a diploma
  • 4:51 - 4:55
    but who make essential
    contributions to our society.
  • 4:56 - 4:58
    We should renew the dignity of work
  • 4:58 - 5:01
    and place it at the center
    of our politics.
  • 5:01 - 5:06
    We should remember that work
    is not only about making a living,
  • 5:06 - 5:10
    it's also about contributing
    to the common good
  • 5:10 - 5:13
    and winning recognition for doing so.
  • 5:13 - 5:17
    Robert F. Kennedy put it well
    half a century ago.
  • 5:17 - 5:21
    Fellowship, community, shared patriotism.
  • 5:21 - 5:25
    These essential values do not come
  • 5:25 - 5:28
    from just buying and consuming
    goods together.
  • 5:29 - 5:31
    They come from dignified employment,
  • 5:31 - 5:33
    at decent pay.
  • 5:33 - 5:37
    The kind of employment
    that enables us to say,
  • 5:37 - 5:39
    "I helped to build this country.
  • 5:40 - 5:44
    I am a participant
    in its great public ventures."
  • 5:45 - 5:48
    This civic sentiment
  • 5:48 - 5:52
    is largely missing
    from our public life today.
  • 5:53 - 5:57
    We often assume that the money people make
  • 5:57 - 6:00
    is the measure of their contribution
    to the common good.
  • 6:01 - 6:03
    But this is a mistake.
  • 6:03 - 6:06
    Martin Luther King Jr. explained why.
  • 6:07 - 6:11
    Reflecting on a strike
    by sanitation workers
  • 6:11 - 6:13
    in Memphis, Tennessee,
  • 6:13 - 6:15
    shortly before he was assassinated,
  • 6:16 - 6:18
    King said,
  • 6:18 - 6:23
    "The person who picks up our garbage
    is, in the final analysis,
  • 6:23 - 6:25
    as significant as the physician,
  • 6:27 - 6:29
    for if he doesn't do his job,
  • 6:29 - 6:31
    diseases are rampant.
  • 6:32 - 6:35
    All labor has dignity."
  • 6:36 - 6:38
    Today's pandemic makes this clear.
  • 6:39 - 6:42
    It reveals how deeply we rely
  • 6:42 - 6:45
    on workers we often overlook.
  • 6:46 - 6:47
    Delivery workers,
  • 6:47 - 6:49
    maintenance workers,
  • 6:49 - 6:51
    grocery store clerks,
  • 6:51 - 6:53
    warehouse workers,
  • 6:53 - 6:54
    truckers,
  • 6:54 - 6:56
    nurse assistants,
  • 6:56 - 6:57
    childcare workers,
  • 6:57 - 6:59
    home health care providers.
  • 7:00 - 7:04
    These are not the best-paid
    or most honored workers.
  • 7:05 - 7:09
    But now, we see them as essential workers.
  • 7:10 - 7:14
    This is a moment for a public debate
  • 7:14 - 7:18
    about how to bring their pay
    and recognition
  • 7:18 - 7:22
    into better alignment
    with the importance of their work.
  • 7:22 - 7:29
    It is also time for a moral,
    even spiritual, turning,
  • 7:29 - 7:32
    questioning our meritocratic hubris.
  • 7:34 - 7:38
    Do I morally deserve the talents
    that enable me to flourish?
  • 7:39 - 7:40
    Is it my doing
  • 7:40 - 7:44
    that I live in a society
    that prizes the talents
  • 7:44 - 7:46
    I happen to have?
  • 7:46 - 7:48
    Or is that my good luck?
  • 7:49 - 7:53
    Insisting that my success is my due
  • 7:53 - 7:57
    makes it hard to see myself
    in other people's shoes.
  • 7:58 - 8:01
    Appreciating the role of luck in life
  • 8:01 - 8:03
    can prompt a certain humility.
  • 8:04 - 8:08
    There but for the accident of birth,
    or the grace of God,
  • 8:08 - 8:10
    or the mystery of fate,
  • 8:10 - 8:11
    go I.
  • 8:12 - 8:15
    This spirit of humility
  • 8:15 - 8:17
    is the civic virtue we need now.
  • 8:18 - 8:21
    It's the beginning of a way back
  • 8:21 - 8:25
    from the harsh ethic of success
    that drives us apart.
  • 8:25 - 8:30
    It points us beyond the tyranny of merit
  • 8:30 - 8:34
    to a less rancorous,
    more generous public life.
Title:
The tyranny of merit
Speaker:
Michael Sandel
Description:

What accounts for our polarized public life, and how can we begin to heal it? Political philosopher Michael Sandel offers a surprising answer: those who have flourished need to look in the mirror. He explores how "meritocratic hubris" leads many to believe their success is their own doing and to look down on those who haven't made it, provoking resentment and inflaming the divide between "winners" and "losers" in the new economy. Hear why we need to reconsider the meaning of success and recognize the role of luck in order to create a less rancorous, more generous civic life.

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
TED
Project:
TEDTalks
Duration:
08:47
Oliver Friedman edited English subtitles for The tyranny of merit
Oliver Friedman edited English subtitles for The tyranny of merit
Oliver Friedman edited English subtitles for The tyranny of merit
Oliver Friedman edited English subtitles for The tyranny of merit
Erin Gregory approved English subtitles for The tyranny of merit
Erin Gregory edited English subtitles for The tyranny of merit
Krystian Aparta accepted English subtitles for The tyranny of merit
Krystian Aparta edited English subtitles for The tyranny of merit
Show all

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions