-
I am an astrodynamicist --
-
you know, like that guy Rich Purnell
in the movie "The Martian" --
-
and it's my job to study and predict
motion of objects in space.
-
Currently we track about one percent
of hazardous objects on orbit --
-
hazardous to services like location,
-
agriculture, banking,
-
television and communications,
-
and soon -- very soon --
-
even the internet itself.
-
Now these services are not protected
from, roughly, half a million objects
-
the size of a speck of paint
-
all the way to a school bus in size.
-
A speck of paint,
-
traveling at the right speed,
-
impacting one of these objects,
-
could render it absolutely useless.
-
But we can't track things
as small as a speck of paint.
-
We can only track things
as small as say, a smartphone.
-
So of this half million objects
that we should be concerned about,
-
we can only track
about 26,000 of these objects,
-
and of these 26,000,
only 2,000 actually work.
-
Everything else
-
is garbage.
-
That's a lot of garbage.
-
To make things a little bit worse,
-
most of what we launch into orbit
never comes back.
-
We send the satellite in orbit,
-
it stops working, it runs out of fuel,
-
and we send something else up ...
-
and then we send up something else ...
-
and then something else.
-
And every once in a while,
-
two of these things
will collide with each other
-
or one of these things will explode,
-
or even worse,
-
somebody might just happen to destroy
one of their satellites on orbit,
-
and this generates many, many more pieces,
-
most of which also never come back.
-
Now these things are not
just randomly scattered in orbit.
-
It turns out that given
the curvature of space-time,
-
their ideal locations --
-
where we put some of these satellites --
-
think of these as space highways.
-
Very much like highways on Earth,
-
these space highways can only take up
a maximum capacity of traffic
-
to sustain space-safe operations.
-
Unlike highways on Earth,
-
there are actually no space-traffic rules.
-
None whatsoever, OK?
-
Wow.
-
What could possibly go wrong with that?
-
(Laughter)
-
Now, what would be really nice
-
is if we had something
like a space-traffic map,
-
like a Waze for space that I could look up
-
and see what the current
traffic conditions are in space,
-
maybe even predict these.
-
The problem with that, however,
-
is that ask five different people,
-
"What's going on in orbit?
-
Where are things going?"
-
and you're probably going to get
10 different answers.
-
Why is that?
-
It's because information about things
on orbit is not commonly shared either.
-
So what if we had a globally accessible,
-
open and transparent
space-traffic information system
-
that can inform the public
of where everything is located
-
to try to keep space safe and sustainable?
-
And what if the system could be used
-
to form evidence-based
norms of behavior --
-
these space-traffic rules?
-
So I developed AstroGraph,
-
the world's first crowdsourced,
space-traffic monitoring system
-
at the University of Texas at Austin.
-
AstroGraph combines multiple sources
of information from around the globe --
-
government, industry and academia --
-
and represents this in a common framework
that anybody can access today.
-
Here, you can see 26,000 objects
orbiting the Earth,
-
multiple opinions,
-
and it gets updated in near real time.
-
But back to my problem
of space-traffic map:
-
what if you only had information
from the US government?
-
Well, in that case, that's what
your space-traffic map would look like.
-
But what do the Russians think?
-
That looks significantly different.
-
Who's right? Who's wrong?
-
What should I believe?
-
What could I trust?
-
This is part of the issue.
-
In the absence of this framework
-
to monitor space-actor behavior,
-
to monitor activity in space --
-
where these objects are located --
-
to reconcile these inconsistencies
-
and make this knowledge commonplace,
-
we actually risk losing the ability
-
to use space for humanity's benefit.
-
Thank you very much.
-
(Applause and cheers)