WEBVTT

00:00:01.895 --> 00:00:05.970
Fifteen years ago, I thought
that the diversity stuff

00:00:05.970 --> 00:00:08.718
was not something I had to worry about.

00:00:08.718 --> 00:00:13.190
It was something an older
generation had to fight for.

00:00:13.190 --> 00:00:16.916
In my university,
we were 50-50, male-female,

00:00:16.916 --> 00:00:19.996
and we women had often better grades.

00:00:19.996 --> 00:00:23.210
So while not everything was perfect,

00:00:23.210 --> 00:00:25.764
diversity and leadership decisions

00:00:25.764 --> 00:00:27.920
was something that would happen naturally

00:00:27.920 --> 00:00:30.935
over time, right?

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:30.935 --> 00:00:33.420
Well, not quite.

00:00:33.420 --> 00:00:36.253
While moving up the ladder
working as a management consultant

00:00:36.253 --> 00:00:38.348
across Europe and the US,

00:00:38.348 --> 00:00:40.553
I started to realize how often

00:00:40.553 --> 00:00:43.147
I was the only woman in the room

00:00:43.147 --> 00:00:47.694
and how homogenous leadership still is.

00:00:47.694 --> 00:00:49.706
Many leaders I met

00:00:49.706 --> 00:00:54.802
saw diversity as something to comply with
out of political correctness,

00:00:54.802 --> 00:00:57.980
or, best case, the right thing to do,

00:00:57.980 --> 00:01:00.551
but not as a business priority.

00:01:00.551 --> 00:01:02.886
They just did not have a reason to believe

00:01:02.886 --> 00:01:07.998
that diversity would help them achieve
their most immediate, pressing goals:

00:01:07.998 --> 00:01:10.991
hitting the numbers,
delivering the new product,

00:01:10.991 --> 00:01:14.741
the real goals they are measured by.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:14.741 --> 00:01:18.147
My personal experience
working with diverse teams

00:01:18.147 --> 00:01:22.054
had been that while they require
a little bit more effort at the beginning,

00:01:22.054 --> 00:01:26.313
they did bring fresher,
more creative ideas.

00:01:26.313 --> 00:01:28.275
So I wanted to know:

00:01:28.275 --> 00:01:31.850
are diverse organizations
really more innovative,

00:01:31.850 --> 00:01:36.573
and can diversity be more
than something to comply with?

00:01:36.573 --> 00:01:39.296
Can it be a real competitive advantage?

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:40.607 --> 00:01:45.669
So to find out, we set up a study
with the Technical University of Munich.

00:01:45.669 --> 00:01:48.619
We surveyed 171 companies

00:01:48.619 --> 00:01:50.828
in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland,

00:01:50.828 --> 00:01:53.869
and as we speak, we're expanding the study

00:01:53.869 --> 00:01:56.663
to 1,600 companies

00:01:56.663 --> 00:02:00.035
in five additional countries
around the world.

00:02:00.035 --> 00:02:03.082
We asked those companies
basically two things:

00:02:03.082 --> 00:02:07.095
how innovative they are,
and how diverse they are.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:07.095 --> 00:02:08.560
To measure the first one,

00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:12.202
we asked them about innovation revenue.

00:02:12.202 --> 00:02:14.419
Innovation revenue is the share
of revenues they've made

00:02:14.419 --> 00:02:17.943
from new products and services
in the last three years,

00:02:17.943 --> 00:02:21.278
meaning we did not ask them
how many creative ideas they have,

00:02:21.278 --> 00:02:24.998
but rather if these ideas
translate into products and services

00:02:24.998 --> 00:02:29.226
that really make the company
more successful today and tomorrow.

00:02:29.226 --> 00:02:34.559
To measure diversity, we looked
at six different factors:

00:02:34.559 --> 00:02:39.615
country of origin, age
and gender, amongst others.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:39.615 --> 00:02:42.751
While preparing to go in the field
with those questions,

00:02:42.751 --> 00:02:44.808
I sat down with my team

00:02:44.808 --> 00:02:49.274
and we discussed what
we would expect as a result.

00:02:49.274 --> 00:02:52.892
To put it mildly, we were not optimistic.

00:02:52.892 --> 00:02:55.262
The most skeptic on the team thought,

00:02:55.262 --> 00:02:56.780
or saw a real possibility,

00:02:56.780 --> 00:02:59.352
that we would find nothing at all.

00:03:00.665 --> 00:03:02.970
Most of the team was rather
on the cautious side,

00:03:02.970 --> 00:03:06.892
so we landed all together at only if,

00:03:06.892 --> 00:03:08.893
meaning that we might find
some kind of link

00:03:08.893 --> 00:03:11.470
between innovation and diversity,

00:03:11.470 --> 00:03:13.209
but not across the board,

00:03:13.209 --> 00:03:16.417
rather only if certain criteria are met,

00:03:16.417 --> 00:03:18.930
for example leadership style,

00:03:18.930 --> 00:03:21.751
very open leadership style
that allowed people

00:03:21.751 --> 00:03:25.693
to speak up freely and safely
and contribute.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:26.541 --> 00:03:29.021
A couple of months later,
the data came in,

00:03:29.021 --> 00:03:34.900
and the results, the results convinced
the most skeptical amongst us.

00:03:34.900 --> 00:03:37.316
The answer was a clear yes,

00:03:37.316 --> 00:03:39.122
no ifs, no buts.

00:03:39.122 --> 00:03:41.300
The data in our sample showed

00:03:41.300 --> 00:03:47.403
that more diverse companies
are simply more innovative, period.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:47.403 --> 00:03:52.409
Now, a fair question to ask
is the chicken or the egg question,

00:03:52.409 --> 00:03:55.849
meaning, are companies
really more innovative

00:03:55.849 --> 00:03:58.553
because they have
a more diverse leadership,

00:03:58.553 --> 00:04:01.590
or the other way around? Which way is it?

00:04:01.590 --> 00:04:06.128
Now, we do not know how much
is correlation versus causation,

00:04:06.128 --> 00:04:09.138
but what we do know is that clearly,

00:04:09.138 --> 00:04:12.346
in our sample, companies
that are more diverse

00:04:12.346 --> 00:04:14.028
are more innovative,

00:04:14.028 --> 00:04:16.775
and that companies
that are more innovative

00:04:16.775 --> 00:04:18.503
have a more diverse leadership too.

00:04:18.503 --> 00:04:21.126
So it's fair to assume
that it works both ways,

00:04:21.126 --> 00:04:23.319
diversity driving innovation

00:04:23.319 --> 00:04:27.667
and innovation driving diversity.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:27.667 --> 00:04:30.652
Now, once we published the results,

00:04:30.652 --> 00:04:32.754
we were surprised

00:04:32.754 --> 00:04:34.918
about the reactions in the media.

00:04:34.918 --> 00:04:37.955
we got quite some attention,

00:04:37.955 --> 00:04:40.550
and it went from quite factual,

00:04:40.550 --> 00:04:44.553
like "Higher Female Share
Boost Innovation"

00:04:44.553 --> 00:04:47.877
to a little bit more sensationalist.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:47.877 --> 00:04:50.173
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:50.173 --> 00:04:51.790
As you can see,

00:04:51.790 --> 00:04:54.599
"Stay-at-home Women Cost Trillions,"

00:04:54.599 --> 00:04:56.598
and, my personal favorite,

00:04:56.598 --> 00:04:58.991
"Housewives Kill Innovation."

00:04:58.991 --> 00:05:02.117
Well, there's no such thing
as bad publicity, right?

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:02.117 --> 00:05:04.392
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:04.392 --> 00:05:06.457
On the back of that coverage,

00:05:06.457 --> 00:05:09.818
we started to get calls
from senior executives

00:05:09.818 --> 00:05:11.635
wanting to understand more,

00:05:11.635 --> 00:05:15.960
especially, surprise surprise,
about gender diversity.

00:05:15.960 --> 00:05:20.035
I tend to open up
those discussions by asking,

00:05:20.035 --> 00:05:24.251
"Well, what do you think of the situation
in your organization today?"

00:05:24.251 --> 00:05:27.185
And a frequent reaction to that is,

00:05:27.185 --> 00:05:31.533
"Well, we're not yet there,
but we're not that bad."

00:05:31.533 --> 00:05:33.695
One executive told me, for example,

00:05:33.695 --> 00:05:35.156
"Oh, we're not that bad.

00:05:35.156 --> 00:05:38.406
We have one member
in our board who is a woman."

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:38.406 --> 00:05:39.416
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:39.416 --> 00:05:40.787
And you laugh --

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:40.787 --> 00:05:43.320
(Applause)

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:46.872 --> 00:05:50.435
Now, you laugh, but he had a point
in being proud about it,

00:05:50.435 --> 00:05:52.010
because in Germany,

00:05:52.010 --> 00:05:56.317
if you have a company and it has
one member on the board

00:05:56.317 --> 00:05:57.723
who is a woman,

00:05:57.723 --> 00:05:59.715
you are part of a select group of 30

00:05:59.715 --> 00:06:03.398
out of the 100 largest
publicly listed companies.

00:06:03.398 --> 00:06:09.032
The other 70 companies
have an all-male board,

00:06:09.032 --> 00:06:12.430
and not even one of these hundred
largest publicly listed companies

00:06:12.430 --> 00:06:17.099
have, as of today, a female CEO.

00:06:17.099 --> 00:06:20.501
But here's the critically
important insight.

00:06:20.501 --> 00:06:24.370
Those few female board members alone,

00:06:24.370 --> 00:06:26.535
they won't make a difference.

00:06:26.535 --> 00:06:31.465
Our data shows that for gender diversity
to have an impact on innovation,

00:06:31.465 --> 00:06:35.733
you need to have more
than 20 percent women in leadership.

00:06:35.733 --> 00:06:38.650
Let's have a look at the numbers.

00:06:38.650 --> 00:06:42.589
As you can see, we divided
the sample into three groups,

00:06:42.589 --> 00:06:45.566
and the results are quite dramatic.

00:06:45.566 --> 00:06:50.291
Only in the group where you have
more than 20 percent women in leadership,

00:06:50.291 --> 00:06:55.066
only then you see a clear jump
in innovation revenue

00:06:55.066 --> 00:06:57.763
to above-average levels.

00:06:57.763 --> 00:07:01.723
So experience and data shows
that you do need critical mass

00:07:01.723 --> 00:07:03.385
to move the needle,

00:07:03.385 --> 00:07:06.661
and companies like Alibaba,
JP Morgan, or Apple

00:07:06.661 --> 00:07:12.234
has of today already
achieved that threshold.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:12.234 --> 00:07:15.896
Another reaction I got quite a lot was,

00:07:15.896 --> 00:07:19.949
"Well, it will get solved over time."

00:07:20.446 --> 00:07:23.752
And I have all the sympathy in the world
for that point of view,

00:07:23.752 --> 00:07:26.920
because I used to think like that too.

00:07:26.920 --> 00:07:30.267
Now, let's have a look here again,

00:07:30.267 --> 00:07:31.513
and look at the numbers,

00:07:31.513 --> 00:07:32.423
taking Germany as an example.

00:07:32.423 --> 00:07:34.636
Let me first give you the good news.

00:07:34.636 --> 00:07:37.478
So the share of women
who are college graduates

00:07:37.478 --> 00:07:40.648
and have at least 10 years
of professional experience

00:07:40.648 --> 00:07:44.289
has grown nicely over the last 20 years,

00:07:44.289 --> 00:07:47.951
which means the pool in which
to fish for female leaders

00:07:47.951 --> 00:07:50.280
has increased over time,

00:07:50.280 --> 00:07:51.879
and that's great.

00:07:51.879 --> 00:07:55.126
Now, according to my old theory,

00:07:55.126 --> 00:07:57.577
the share of women in leadership
would have grown

00:07:57.577 --> 00:08:00.219
more or less in parallel, right?

00:08:00.219 --> 00:08:03.701
Now, let's have a look
at what happened in reality.

00:08:03.701 --> 00:08:06.337
It's not even close,

00:08:06.337 --> 00:08:10.863
which means I was so wrong,

00:08:10.863 --> 00:08:13.815
and which means that my generation,

00:08:13.815 --> 00:08:15.911
your generation,

00:08:15.911 --> 00:08:20.803
the best-educated
female generation in history,

00:08:20.803 --> 00:08:22.393
we have just not made it.

00:08:22.393 --> 00:08:24.897
We have failed to achieve leadership
in significant numbers.

00:08:24.897 --> 00:08:29.734
Education just did not
translate into leadership.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:30.775 --> 00:08:34.290
Now, that was a painful realization for me

00:08:34.290 --> 00:08:36.654
and made me realize,

00:08:36.654 --> 00:08:38.723
if we want to change this,

00:08:38.723 --> 00:08:42.394
we need to engage
and we need to do better.

00:08:42.394 --> 00:08:45.689
Now, what to do?

00:08:45.689 --> 00:08:49.292
Achieving more than 20 percent
women in leadership

00:08:49.292 --> 00:08:51.996
seems like a daunting task to many,

00:08:51.996 --> 00:08:54.937
understandably given the track record.

00:08:54.937 --> 00:08:56.933
But it's doable,

00:08:56.933 --> 00:09:00.260
and there are many companies today
that are making progress there

00:09:00.260 --> 00:09:01.558
and doing it successfully.

00:09:01.558 --> 00:09:05.027
Let's take SAP, the software
company, as an example.

00:09:05.027 --> 00:09:09.875
They had, in 2011, 19 percent
women in leadership,

00:09:09.875 --> 00:09:11.593
yet they decided to do better,

00:09:11.593 --> 00:09:14.723
and they did what you do
in any other area of business

00:09:14.723 --> 00:09:16.282
where you want to improve.

00:09:16.282 --> 00:09:19.921
They set themselves a measurable target.

00:09:19.921 --> 00:09:24.610
So they set themselves a target
of 25 percent for 2017,

00:09:24.610 --> 00:09:27.394
which they just have achieved.

00:09:27.394 --> 00:09:30.731
The goals made them think more creatively
about developing leaders

00:09:30.731 --> 00:09:33.442
and tapping new recruiting pools.

00:09:33.442 --> 00:09:38.819
They now even set a target of 30 percent
women in leadership for 2022.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:38.819 --> 00:09:41.265
So experience shows it's doable,

00:09:41.265 --> 00:09:42.921
and at the end of the day,

00:09:42.921 --> 00:09:47.389
it all boils down to two decisions
that are taken every day

00:09:47.389 --> 00:09:49.322
in every organization by many of us:

00:09:49.322 --> 00:09:56.406
who to hire, and who
to develop and promote?

00:09:56.406 --> 00:09:59.783
Now, nothing against women's programs,

00:09:59.783 --> 00:10:01.307
networks, mentoring, trainings.

00:10:01.307 --> 00:10:03.502
All is good.

00:10:03.502 --> 00:10:05.886
But it is these two decisions

00:10:05.886 --> 00:10:07.254
that at the end of the day

00:10:07.254 --> 00:10:09.590
send the most powerful chain signal

00:10:09.590 --> 00:10:13.330
in any organization.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:13.330 --> 00:10:16.575
Now, I never set out to be
a diversity advocate.

00:10:16.575 --> 00:10:18.994
I am a business advisor.

00:10:18.994 --> 00:10:24.057
But now, now my goal
is to change the face of leadership,

00:10:24.057 --> 00:10:26.394
to make it more diverse,

00:10:26.394 --> 00:10:28.931
and not so that leaders can check a box

00:10:28.931 --> 00:10:31.980
and feel like they have
complied with something

00:10:31.980 --> 00:10:34.560
or they have been politically correct,

00:10:34.560 --> 00:10:36.492
but because they understand,

00:10:36.492 --> 00:10:40.526
they understand that diversity
is making their organization

00:10:40.526 --> 00:10:42.060
more innovative, better,

00:10:42.060 --> 00:10:45.763
and by embracing diversity,
by embracing diverse talent,

00:10:45.763 --> 00:10:48.749
we are providing
true opportunity for everyone.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:48.749 --> 00:10:49.951
Thank you.

00:10:49.951 --> 00:10:51.249
Thank you so much.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:51.249 --> 00:10:52.817
(Applause)