WEBVTT

00:00:00.472 --> 00:00:04.930
We often hear these days
that the immigration system is broken.

00:00:04.954 --> 00:00:09.600
I want to make the case today that
our immigration conversation is broken

00:00:09.624 --> 00:00:13.968
and to suggest some ways that, together,
we might build a better one.

00:00:14.735 --> 00:00:17.634
In order to do that, I'm going
to propose some new questions

00:00:17.658 --> 00:00:19.022
about immigration,

00:00:19.046 --> 00:00:20.252
the United States

00:00:20.276 --> 00:00:21.599
and the world,

00:00:21.623 --> 00:00:26.669
questions that might move the borders
of the immigration debate.

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:27.495 --> 00:00:31.655
I'm not going to begin with the feverish
argument that we're currently having,

00:00:31.679 --> 00:00:36.189
even as the lives and well-being
of immigrants are being put at risk

00:00:36.213 --> 00:00:38.969
at the US border and far beyond it.

00:00:39.567 --> 00:00:42.201
Instead, I'm going to begin
with me in graduate school

00:00:42.225 --> 00:00:45.905
in New Jersey in the mid-1990s,
earnestly studying US history,

00:00:45.929 --> 00:00:49.344
which is what I currently teach
as a professor at Vanderbilt University

00:00:49.368 --> 00:00:51.120
in Nashville, Tennessee.

00:00:51.602 --> 00:00:53.088
And when I wasn't studying,

00:00:53.112 --> 00:00:55.356
sometimes to avoid
writing my dissertation,

00:00:55.380 --> 00:00:58.203
my friends and I would go into town

00:00:58.227 --> 00:01:03.064
to hand out neon-colored flyers,
protesting legislation

00:01:03.088 --> 00:01:06.533
that was threatening to take away
immigrants' rights.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:07.481 --> 00:01:10.289
Our flyers were sincere,
they were well-meaning,

00:01:10.313 --> 00:01:12.537
they were factually accurate ...

00:01:12.561 --> 00:01:15.156
But I realize now, they were also
kind of a problem.

00:01:15.642 --> 00:01:16.815
Here's what they said:

00:01:16.839 --> 00:01:21.342
"Don't take away immigrant rights
to public education,

00:01:21.366 --> 00:01:24.090
to medical services,
to the social safety net.

00:01:24.114 --> 00:01:25.661
They work hard.

00:01:25.685 --> 00:01:27.581
They pay taxes.

00:01:27.605 --> 00:01:29.460
They're law-abiding.

00:01:29.484 --> 00:01:32.451
They use social services
less than Americans do.

00:01:33.054 --> 00:01:35.111
They're eager to learn English,

00:01:35.135 --> 00:01:39.539
and their children serve
in the US military all over the world."

00:01:40.419 --> 00:01:43.918
Now, these are, of course, arguments
that we hear every day.

00:01:43.942 --> 00:01:47.420
Immigrants and their advocates use them

00:01:47.444 --> 00:01:51.174
as they confront those who would
deny immigrants their rights

00:01:51.198 --> 00:01:53.721
or even exclude them from society.

00:01:54.453 --> 00:01:57.098
And up to a certain point,
it makes perfect sense

00:01:57.122 --> 00:02:01.944
that these would be the kinds of claims
that immigrants' defenders would turn to.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:02.595 --> 00:02:06.424
But in the long term,
and maybe even in the short term,

00:02:06.448 --> 00:02:09.299
I think these arguments
can be counterproductive.

00:02:09.996 --> 00:02:11.501
Why?

00:02:11.525 --> 00:02:13.613
Because it's always an uphill battle

00:02:13.637 --> 00:02:16.888
to defend yourself
on your opponent's terrain.

00:02:17.669 --> 00:02:21.633
And, unwittingly, the handouts
my friends and I were handing out

00:02:21.657 --> 00:02:25.051
and the versions of these arguments
that we hear today

00:02:25.075 --> 00:02:27.844
were actually playing
the anti-immigrants game.

00:02:28.701 --> 00:02:31.437
We were playing that game
in part by envisioning

00:02:31.461 --> 00:02:33.690
that immigrants were outsiders,

00:02:33.714 --> 00:02:36.855
rather than, as I'm hoping
to suggest in a few minutes,

00:02:36.879 --> 00:02:40.930
people that are already,
in important ways, on the inside.

00:02:42.303 --> 00:02:45.840
It's those who are hostile
to immigrants, the nativists,

00:02:45.864 --> 00:02:48.658
who have succeeded
in framing the immigration debate

00:02:48.682 --> 00:02:50.889
around three main questions.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:51.588 --> 00:02:56.657
First, there's the question of whether
immigrants can be useful tools.

00:02:57.235 --> 00:03:00.752
How can we use immigrants?

00:03:00.776 --> 00:03:04.799
Will they make us richer and stronger?

00:03:05.751 --> 00:03:08.667
The nativist answer
to this question is no,

00:03:08.691 --> 00:03:11.318
immigrants have little
or nothing to offer.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:12.993 --> 00:03:17.201
The second questions is whether
immigrants are others.

00:03:18.201 --> 00:03:21.586
Can immigrants become more like us?

00:03:22.705 --> 00:03:25.371
Are they capable of becoming more like us?

00:03:25.395 --> 00:03:27.028
Are they capable of assimilating?

00:03:27.052 --> 00:03:28.795
Are they willing to assimilate?

00:03:29.477 --> 00:03:31.812
Here, again, the nativist answer is no,

00:03:31.836 --> 00:03:36.220
immigrants are permanently
different from us and inferior to us.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:37.157 --> 00:03:41.784
And the third question is whether
immigrants are parasites.

00:03:42.745 --> 00:03:46.359
Are they dangerous to us?
And will they drain our resources?

00:03:47.177 --> 00:03:50.757
Here, the nativist answer is yes and yes,

00:03:50.781 --> 00:03:54.126
immigrants pose a threat
and they sap our wealth.

00:03:55.761 --> 00:03:59.846
I would suggest that these three questions
and the nativist animus behind them

00:03:59.870 --> 00:04:03.960
have succeeded in framing the larger
contours of the immigration debate.

00:04:03.984 --> 00:04:08.835
These questions are anti-immigrant
and nativist at their core,

00:04:08.859 --> 00:04:14.753
built around a kind of hierarchical
division of insiders and outsiders,

00:04:14.777 --> 00:04:16.340
us and them,

00:04:16.364 --> 00:04:19.014
in which only we matter,

00:04:19.038 --> 00:04:20.294
and they don't.

00:04:21.201 --> 00:04:24.617
And what gives these questions
traction and power

00:04:24.641 --> 00:04:26.805
beyond the circle of committed nativists

00:04:26.829 --> 00:04:31.476
is the way they tap into an everyday,
seemingly harmless sense

00:04:31.500 --> 00:04:33.227
of national belonging

00:04:33.251 --> 00:04:35.916
and activate it, heighten it

00:04:35.940 --> 00:04:37.626
and inflame it.

00:04:38.740 --> 00:04:43.181
Nativists commit themselves
to making stark distinctions

00:04:43.205 --> 00:04:45.719
between insiders and outsiders.

00:04:45.743 --> 00:04:50.180
But the distinction itself is at the heart
of the way nations define themselves.

00:04:50.658 --> 00:04:54.416
The fissures between inside and outside,

00:04:54.440 --> 00:04:59.122
which often run deepest
along lines of race and religion,

00:04:59.146 --> 00:05:02.458
are always there to be
deepened and exploited.

00:05:03.370 --> 00:05:07.493
And that potentially
gives nativist approaches resonance

00:05:07.517 --> 00:05:11.352
far beyond those who consider
themselves anti-immigrant,

00:05:11.376 --> 00:05:15.550
and remarkably, even among some
who consider themselves pro-immigrant.

00:05:16.325 --> 00:05:20.731
So, for example,
when immigrants act allies

00:05:20.755 --> 00:05:23.957
answer these questions
the nativists are posing,

00:05:23.981 --> 00:05:25.318
they take them seriously.

00:05:25.342 --> 00:05:28.497
They legitimate those questions
and, to some extent,

00:05:28.521 --> 00:05:31.541
the anti-immigrant assumptions
that are behind them.

00:05:32.414 --> 00:05:36.130
When we take these questions seriously
without even knowing it,

00:05:36.154 --> 00:05:39.975
we're reinforcing the closed,
exclusionary borders

00:05:39.999 --> 00:05:42.180
of the immigration conversation.

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:43.458 --> 00:05:44.625
So how did we get here?

00:05:44.649 --> 00:05:48.932
How did these become the leading ways
that we talk about immigration?

00:05:49.523 --> 00:05:50.952
Here, we need some backstory,

00:05:50.976 --> 00:05:53.308
which is where my history
training comes in.

00:05:53.332 --> 00:05:59.538
During the first century of the US's
status as an independent nation,

00:05:59.562 --> 00:06:03.274
it did very little to restrict
immigration at the national level.

00:06:03.298 --> 00:06:05.823
In fact, many policymakers
and employers worked hard

00:06:05.847 --> 00:06:08.362
to recruit immigrants

00:06:08.386 --> 00:06:10.008
to build up industry

00:06:10.032 --> 00:06:13.738
and to serve as settlers,
to seize the continent.

00:06:14.948 --> 00:06:17.537
But after the Civil War,

00:06:17.561 --> 00:06:22.555
nativist voices rose
in volume and in power.

00:06:23.371 --> 00:06:28.283
The Asian, Latin American,
Caribbean and European immigrants

00:06:28.307 --> 00:06:31.081
who dug Americans' canals,

00:06:31.105 --> 00:06:32.904
cooked their dinners,

00:06:32.928 --> 00:06:34.620
fought their wars

00:06:34.644 --> 00:06:36.845
and put their children to bed at night

00:06:36.869 --> 00:06:40.428
were met with a new
and intense xenophobia,

00:06:40.452 --> 00:06:44.015
which cast immigrants
as permanent outsiders

00:06:44.039 --> 00:06:47.124
who should never be allowed
to become insiders.

00:06:48.148 --> 00:06:50.865
By the mid-1920s, the nativists had won,

00:06:50.889 --> 00:06:52.611
erecting racist laws

00:06:52.635 --> 00:06:58.254
that closed out untold numbers
of vulnerable immigrants and refugees.

00:06:59.158 --> 00:07:02.331
Immigrants and their allies
did their best to fight back,

00:07:02.355 --> 00:07:04.829
but they found themselves
on the defensive,

00:07:04.853 --> 00:07:08.070
caught in some ways
in the nativists' frames.

00:07:08.775 --> 00:07:13.609
When nativists said
that immigrants weren't useful,

00:07:13.633 --> 00:07:16.012
their allies said yes, they are.

00:07:16.932 --> 00:07:21.874
When nativists accused
immigrants of being others,

00:07:21.898 --> 00:07:24.434
their allies promised
that they would assimilate.

00:07:25.789 --> 00:07:31.819
When nativists charged that immigrants
were dangerous parasites,

00:07:31.843 --> 00:07:34.951
their allies emphasized
their loyalty, their obedience,

00:07:34.975 --> 00:07:37.439
their hard work and their thrift.

00:07:38.293 --> 00:07:41.746
Even as advocates welcomed immigrants,

00:07:41.770 --> 00:07:48.189
many still regarded immigrants
as outsiders to be pitied, to be rescued,

00:07:48.213 --> 00:07:50.024
to be uplifted

00:07:50.048 --> 00:07:52.193
and to be tolerated,

00:07:52.217 --> 00:07:58.089
but never fully brought inside
as equals in rights and respect.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:59.194 --> 00:08:05.890
After World War II, and especially
from the mid-1960s until really recently,

00:08:05.914 --> 00:08:08.271
immigrants and their allies
turned the tide,

00:08:08.295 --> 00:08:11.697
overthrowing mid-20th century restriction

00:08:11.721 --> 00:08:16.317
and winning instead a new system
that prioritized family reunification,

00:08:16.341 --> 00:08:17.960
the admission of refugees

00:08:17.984 --> 00:08:20.838
and the admission of those
with special skills.

00:08:21.642 --> 00:08:22.812
But even then,

00:08:22.836 --> 00:08:27.458
they didn't succeed in fundamentally
changing the terms of the debate,

00:08:27.482 --> 00:08:29.697
and so that framework endured,

00:08:29.721 --> 00:08:34.628
ready to be taken up again
in our own convulsive moment.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:35.744 --> 00:08:38.260
That conversation is broken.

00:08:38.793 --> 00:08:42.681
The old questions
are harmful and divisive.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:43.486 --> 00:08:46.003
So how do we get from that conversation

00:08:46.027 --> 00:08:50.576
to one that's more likely to get us
closer to a world that is fairer,

00:08:50.600 --> 00:08:52.171
that is more just,

00:08:52.195 --> 00:08:53.711
that's more secure?

00:08:55.036 --> 00:08:57.375
I want to suggest that what we have to do

00:08:57.399 --> 00:09:01.088
is one of the hardest things
that any society can do:

00:09:01.112 --> 00:09:05.089
to redraw the boundaries of who counts,

00:09:05.113 --> 00:09:08.287
of whose life, whose rights

00:09:08.311 --> 00:09:10.808
and whose thriving matters.

00:09:11.485 --> 00:09:14.284
We need to redraw the boundaries.

00:09:14.308 --> 00:09:17.747
We need to redraw the borders of us.

00:09:19.242 --> 00:09:24.521
In order to do that, we need to first
take on a worldview that's widely held

00:09:24.545 --> 00:09:27.056
but also seriously flawed.

00:09:27.080 --> 00:09:29.348
According to that worldview,

00:09:29.372 --> 00:09:33.079
there's the inside of the national
boundaries, inside the nation,

00:09:33.103 --> 00:09:37.234
which is where we live, work
and mind our own business.

00:09:37.766 --> 00:09:40.841
And then there's the outside;
there's everywhere else.

00:09:41.635 --> 00:09:45.459
According to this worldview,
when immigrants cross into the nation,

00:09:45.483 --> 00:09:48.449
they're moving from
the outside to the inside,

00:09:48.473 --> 00:09:50.534
but they remain outsiders.

00:09:51.145 --> 00:09:55.313
Any power or resources they receive

00:09:55.337 --> 00:09:58.744
are gifts from us rather than rights.

00:09:59.371 --> 00:10:04.212
Now, it's not hard to see why
this is such a commonly held worldview.

00:10:04.236 --> 00:10:08.018
It's reinforced in everyday ways
that we talk and act and behave,

00:10:08.042 --> 00:10:11.397
down to the bordered maps
that we hang up in our schoolrooms.

00:10:11.727 --> 00:10:15.355
The problem with this worldview
is that it just doesn't correspond

00:10:15.379 --> 00:10:17.616
to the way the world actually works,

00:10:17.640 --> 00:10:20.092
and the way it has worked in the past.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:21.111 --> 00:10:25.796
Of course, American workers
have built up wealth in society.

00:10:26.391 --> 00:10:27.583
But so have immigrants,

00:10:27.607 --> 00:10:31.461
particularly in parts of the American
economy that are indispensable

00:10:31.485 --> 00:10:34.287
and where few Americans work,
like agriculture.

00:10:34.840 --> 00:10:36.438
Since the nation's founding,

00:10:36.462 --> 00:10:40.741
Americans have been inside
the American workforce.

00:10:41.660 --> 00:10:46.982
Of course, Americans have built up
institutions in society

00:10:47.006 --> 00:10:48.731
that guarantee rights.

00:10:49.199 --> 00:10:50.675
But so have immigrants.

00:10:50.699 --> 00:10:54.071
They've been there during
every major social movement,

00:10:54.095 --> 00:10:56.551
like civil rights and organized labor,

00:10:56.575 --> 00:10:59.870
that have fought to expand
rights in society for everyone.

00:11:00.364 --> 00:11:03.812
So immigrants are already
inside the struggle

00:11:03.836 --> 00:11:06.708
for rights, democracy and freedom.

NOTE Paragraph

00:11:07.979 --> 00:11:12.101
And finally, Americans
and other citizens of the Global North

00:11:12.125 --> 00:11:14.516
haven't minded their own business,

00:11:14.540 --> 00:11:16.882
and they haven't stayed
within their own borders.

00:11:16.906 --> 00:11:19.059
They haven't respected
other nations' borders.

00:11:19.083 --> 00:11:21.418
They've gone out into the world
with their armies,

00:11:21.442 --> 00:11:23.898
they've taken over
territories and resources,

00:11:23.922 --> 00:11:27.593
and they've extracted enormous profits
from many of the countries

00:11:27.617 --> 00:11:29.405
that immigrants are from.

00:11:30.402 --> 00:11:36.075
In this sense, many immigrants are
actually already inside American power.

00:11:37.268 --> 00:11:42.156
With this different map
of inside and outside in mind,

00:11:42.180 --> 00:11:45.119
the question isn't whether
receiving countries

00:11:45.143 --> 00:11:47.453
are going to let immigrants in.

00:11:47.899 --> 00:11:49.544
They're already in.

00:11:50.033 --> 00:11:52.948
The question is whether
the United States and other countries

00:11:52.972 --> 00:11:57.030
are going to give immigrants
access to the rights and resources

00:11:57.054 --> 00:12:01.009
that their work, their activism
and their home countries

00:12:01.033 --> 00:12:04.815
have already played
a fundamental role in creating.

00:12:06.468 --> 00:12:08.803
With this new map in mind,

00:12:08.827 --> 00:12:13.350
we can turn to a set of tough,
new, urgently needed questions,

00:12:13.374 --> 00:12:17.093
radically different from the ones
we've asked before --

00:12:17.117 --> 00:12:21.424
questions that might change
the borders of the immigration debate.

00:12:22.509 --> 00:12:26.774
Our three questions are
about workers' rights,

00:12:26.798 --> 00:12:28.473
about responsibility

00:12:28.497 --> 00:12:30.266
and about equality.

NOTE Paragraph

00:12:32.933 --> 00:12:35.818
First, we need to be asking
about workers' rights.

00:12:36.405 --> 00:12:40.695
How do existing policies make it harder
for immigrants to defend themselves

00:12:40.719 --> 00:12:42.591
and easier for them to be exploited,

00:12:42.615 --> 00:12:46.244
driving down wages, rights
and protections for everyone?

00:12:46.742 --> 00:12:50.378
When immigrants are threatened
with roundups, detention and deportations,

00:12:50.402 --> 00:12:52.514
their employers know
that they can be abused,

00:12:52.538 --> 00:12:54.967
that they can be told
that if they fight back,

00:12:54.991 --> 00:12:56.690
they'll be turned over to ICE.

00:12:57.460 --> 00:12:59.710
When employers know

00:12:59.734 --> 00:13:03.070
that they can terrorize an immigrant
with his lack of papers,

00:13:04.161 --> 00:13:06.217
it makes that worker hyper-exploitable,

00:13:06.241 --> 00:13:09.093
and that has impacts
not only for immigrant workers

00:13:09.117 --> 00:13:10.733
but for all workers.

NOTE Paragraph

00:13:12.375 --> 00:13:15.361
Second, we need to ask questions
about responsibility.

00:13:16.004 --> 00:13:19.930
What role have rich, powerful
countries like the United States

00:13:19.954 --> 00:13:22.439
played in making it hard or impossible

00:13:22.463 --> 00:13:25.536
for immigrants to stay
in their home countries?

00:13:26.331 --> 00:13:29.562
Picking up and moving from your country
is difficult and dangerous.

00:13:29.586 --> 00:13:33.300
But many immigrants simply do not have
the option of staying home

00:13:33.324 --> 00:13:35.507
if they want to survive.

00:13:35.531 --> 00:13:37.258
Wars, trade agreements

00:13:37.282 --> 00:13:39.932
and consumer habits
rooted in the Global North

00:13:39.956 --> 00:13:44.554
play a major and devastating role here.

00:13:45.489 --> 00:13:48.540
What responsibilities
do the United States,

00:13:48.564 --> 00:13:50.593
the European Union and China --

00:13:50.617 --> 00:13:52.860
the world's leading carbon emitters --

00:13:52.884 --> 00:13:57.615
have to the millions of people
already uprooted by global warming?

NOTE Paragraph

00:13:59.979 --> 00:14:02.996
And third, we need to ask
questions about equality.

00:14:03.569 --> 00:14:07.617
Global inequality is a wrenching,
intensifying problem.

00:14:08.037 --> 00:14:11.480
Income and wealth gaps
are widening around the world.

00:14:11.504 --> 00:14:14.832
Increasingly, what determines
whether you're rich or poor,

00:14:14.856 --> 00:14:16.171
more than anything else,

00:14:16.195 --> 00:14:18.033
is what country you're born in,

00:14:18.057 --> 00:14:21.109
which might seem great
if you're from a prosperous country.

00:14:21.133 --> 00:14:25.696
But it actually means
a profoundly unjust distribution

00:14:25.720 --> 00:14:30.773
of the chances for a long,
healthy, fulfilling life.

00:14:31.464 --> 00:14:34.151
When immigrants send money
or goods home to their family,

00:14:34.175 --> 00:14:37.324
it plays a significant role
in narrowing these gaps,

00:14:37.348 --> 00:14:39.391
if a very incomplete one.

00:14:39.771 --> 00:14:42.806
It does more than all
of the foreign aid programs

00:14:42.830 --> 00:14:44.813
in the world combined.

NOTE Paragraph

00:14:46.778 --> 00:14:49.349
We began with the nativist questions,

00:14:49.373 --> 00:14:51.983
about immigrants as tools,

00:14:52.007 --> 00:14:53.618
as others

00:14:53.642 --> 00:14:54.983
and as parasites.

00:14:55.666 --> 00:14:59.156
Where might these new questions
about worker rights,

00:14:59.180 --> 00:15:00.777
about responsibility

00:15:00.801 --> 00:15:02.355
and about equality

00:15:02.379 --> 00:15:03.602
take us?

00:15:04.400 --> 00:15:09.370
These questions reject pity,
and they embrace justice.

00:15:09.888 --> 00:15:13.614
These questions reject
the nativist and nationalist division

00:15:13.638 --> 00:15:15.059
of us versus them.

00:15:15.083 --> 00:15:18.275
They're going to help prepare us
for problems that are coming

00:15:18.299 --> 00:15:22.517
and problems like global warming
that are already upon us.

NOTE Paragraph

00:15:23.493 --> 00:15:27.284
It's not going to be easy to turn away
from the questions that we've been asking

00:15:27.308 --> 00:15:29.560
towards this new set of questions.

00:15:30.281 --> 00:15:31.699
It's no small challenge

00:15:31.723 --> 00:15:36.324
to take on and broaden the borders of us.

00:15:36.874 --> 00:15:40.902
It will take wit,
inventiveness and courage.

00:15:41.228 --> 00:15:43.837
The old questions have been
with us for a long time,

00:15:43.861 --> 00:15:46.577
and they're not going
to give way on their own,

00:15:46.601 --> 00:15:48.661
and they're not going
to give way overnight.

00:15:49.907 --> 00:15:52.077
And even if we manage
to change the questions,

00:15:52.101 --> 00:15:54.043
the answers are going to be complicated,

00:15:54.067 --> 00:15:57.484
and they're going to require
sacrifices and tradeoffs.

00:15:58.377 --> 00:16:01.656
And in an unequal world, we're always
going to have to pay attention

00:16:01.680 --> 00:16:05.153
to the question of who has the power
to join the conversation

00:16:05.177 --> 00:16:06.451
and who doesn't.

00:16:06.878 --> 00:16:09.315
But the borders of the immigration debate

00:16:09.339 --> 00:16:10.697
can be moved.

00:16:11.098 --> 00:16:13.630
It's up to all of us to move them.

NOTE Paragraph

00:16:14.542 --> 00:16:15.750
Thank you.

NOTE Paragraph

00:16:15.774 --> 00:16:18.698
(Applause)