WEBVTT

00:00:16.434 --> 00:00:19.903
How often do we hear
that people just don't care?

00:00:20.758 --> 00:00:22.349
How many times have you been told

00:00:22.373 --> 00:00:25.614
that real, substantial change
isn't possible

00:00:25.638 --> 00:00:27.713
because most people are too selfish,

00:00:27.737 --> 00:00:29.669
too stupid or too lazy

00:00:29.693 --> 00:00:32.325
to try to make a difference
in their community?

00:00:32.348 --> 00:00:35.443
I propose to you today
that apathy as we think we know it

00:00:35.467 --> 00:00:37.178
doesn't actually exist;

00:00:37.202 --> 00:00:39.376
but rather, that people do care,

00:00:39.400 --> 00:00:43.109
but that we live in a world
that actively discourages engagement

00:00:43.133 --> 00:00:46.494
by constantly putting obstacles
and barriers in our way.

00:00:46.518 --> 00:00:48.550
I'll give you some
examples of what I mean.

00:00:48.574 --> 00:00:50.287
Let's start with city hall.

00:00:50.663 --> 00:00:52.376
You ever see one of these before?

00:00:52.758 --> 00:00:54.376
This is a newspaper ad.

00:00:54.400 --> 00:00:57.768
It's a notice of a zoning application
change for a new office building

00:00:57.792 --> 00:00:59.863
so the neighborhood
knows what's happening.

00:00:59.887 --> 00:01:01.809
As you can see, it's impossible to read.

00:01:01.833 --> 00:01:03.209
You need to get halfway down

00:01:03.233 --> 00:01:05.767
to even find out which address
they're talking about,

00:01:05.791 --> 00:01:07.935
and then further down,
in tiny 10-point font,

00:01:07.959 --> 00:01:09.995
to find out how to actually get involved.

00:01:10.019 --> 00:01:13.146
Imagine if the private sector
advertised in the same way...

00:01:13.170 --> 00:01:15.212
If Nike wanted to sell a pair of shoes...

00:01:15.236 --> 00:01:16.376
(Laughter)

00:01:16.400 --> 00:01:18.365
And put an ad in the paper like that.

00:01:18.389 --> 00:01:22.376
(Applause)

00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:24.376
Now, that would never happen.

00:01:25.235 --> 00:01:26.814
You'll never see an ad like that,

00:01:26.838 --> 00:01:29.269
because Nike actually wants
you to buy their shoes,

00:01:29.293 --> 00:01:32.174
whereas the city of Toronto
clearly doesn't want you involved

00:01:32.198 --> 00:01:33.450
with the planning process,

00:01:33.474 --> 00:01:35.890
otherwise their ads would look
something like this,

00:01:35.914 --> 00:01:37.931
with all the information laid out clearly.

00:01:37.971 --> 00:01:40.423
although the font has changed
on the PowerPoint

00:01:40.479 --> 00:01:43.220
so it's not as clear as I thought
it would look in the ad,

00:01:43.245 --> 00:01:44.630
but you know what I'm saying.

00:01:44.655 --> 00:01:47.072
As long as the city's putting out
notices like this

00:01:47.096 --> 00:01:48.522
to try to get people engaged,

00:01:48.546 --> 00:01:50.880
then of course people
aren't going to be engaged.

00:01:50.904 --> 00:01:53.492
But that's not apathy;
that's intentional exclusion.

00:01:55.324 --> 00:01:56.588
Public space.

00:01:56.612 --> 00:01:59.496
(Applause)

00:01:59.521 --> 00:02:01.856
The manner in which we mistreat
our public spaces

00:02:01.880 --> 00:02:06.140
is a huge obstacle towards any type
of progressive political change,

00:02:06.164 --> 00:02:09.363
because we've essentially put a price tag
on freedom of expression.

00:02:09.387 --> 00:02:11.972
Whoever has the most money
gets the loudest voice,

00:02:11.996 --> 00:02:14.395
dominating the visual
and mental environment.

00:02:14.919 --> 00:02:17.899
The problem with this model
is there are some amazing messages

00:02:17.923 --> 00:02:20.764
that need to be said,
that aren't profitable to say.

00:02:20.788 --> 00:02:23.290
So you're never going
to see them on a billboard.

00:02:29.284 --> 00:02:31.284
I'll move on to the next one -

00:02:31.712 --> 00:02:33.779
There was a closing line there.

00:02:35.014 --> 00:02:37.014
It will come back to me later.

00:02:37.355 --> 00:02:40.767
The media plays an important role

00:02:40.792 --> 00:02:43.976
in developing our relationship
with political change,

00:02:44.200 --> 00:02:48.351
mainly by ignoring politics and focusing
on celebrities and scandals,

00:02:48.375 --> 00:02:51.228
but even when they do talk
about important political issues,

00:02:51.252 --> 00:02:54.105
they do it in a way that I feel
discourages engagement.

00:02:54.129 --> 00:02:55.347
I'll give you an example.

00:02:55.371 --> 00:02:59.563
The "Now" magazine from last week:
progressive, downtown weekly in Toronto.

00:02:59.588 --> 00:03:00.776
This is the cover story.

00:03:02.900 --> 00:03:05.388
It's an article
about a theater performance,

00:03:05.412 --> 00:03:08.170
and it starts with basic
information about where it is,

00:03:08.194 --> 00:03:11.719
in case you actually want to go and see
it after you've read the article...

00:03:11.743 --> 00:03:13.526
Where, the time, the website.

00:03:13.550 --> 00:03:15.955
Same with this... it's a movie review.

00:03:15.979 --> 00:03:17.563
An art review.

00:03:17.587 --> 00:03:20.725
A book review... where the reading
is in case you want to go.

00:03:20.749 --> 00:03:23.459
A restaurant... you might not
want to just read about it,

00:03:23.483 --> 00:03:24.910
maybe you want to go there.

00:03:24.934 --> 00:03:28.707
So they tell you where it is, the prices,
the address, the phone number, etc.

00:03:28.731 --> 00:03:30.708
Then you get to their political articles.

00:03:30.732 --> 00:03:34.192
Here's a great article about an important
election race that's happening.

00:03:34.216 --> 00:03:36.545
It talks about the candidates,
written very well,

00:03:36.569 --> 00:03:39.796
but no information, no follow-up,
no websites for the campaigns,

00:03:39.820 --> 00:03:43.345
no information about when the debates
are, where the campaign offices are.

00:03:43.369 --> 00:03:44.798
Here's another good article,

00:03:45.322 --> 00:03:49.919
about a new campaign
opposing privatization of transit,

00:03:50.100 --> 00:03:52.814
without any contact information
for the campaign.

00:03:52.838 --> 00:03:54.362
The message seems to be

00:03:54.386 --> 00:03:57.797
that the readers are most likely
to want to eat, maybe read a book,

00:03:57.821 --> 00:04:00.584
maybe see a movie, but not be engaged
in their community.

00:04:00.608 --> 00:04:03.746
You might think this is a small thing,
but I think it's important,

00:04:03.770 --> 00:04:05.166
because it sets a tone

00:04:05.890 --> 00:04:11.519
and it reinforces the dangerous idea
that politics is a spectator sport.

00:04:13.963 --> 00:04:16.208
Heroes: How do we view leadership?

00:04:16.232 --> 00:04:18.894
Look at these 10 movies.
What do they have in common?

00:04:18.918 --> 00:04:20.084
Anyone?

00:04:21.838 --> 00:04:23.912
They all have heroes who were chosen.

00:04:23.936 --> 00:04:26.651
Someone came up to them and said,
"You're the chosen one.

00:04:26.675 --> 00:04:28.949
There's a prophecy.
You have to save the world."

00:04:28.973 --> 00:04:32.275
And then they go off and save the world
because they've been told to,

00:04:32.299 --> 00:04:33.858
with a few people tagging along.

00:04:33.882 --> 00:04:35.038
This helps me understand

00:04:35.062 --> 00:04:38.089
why a lot of people have trouble
seeing themselves as leaders...

00:04:38.113 --> 00:04:41.637
Because it sends all the wrong messages
about what leadership is about.

00:04:41.661 --> 00:04:44.174
A heroic effort is a collective effort,

00:04:44.198 --> 00:04:45.376
number one.

00:04:45.728 --> 00:04:49.096
Number two, it's imperfect;
it's not very glamorous,

00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:51.302
and doesn't suddenly start
and suddenly end.

00:04:51.326 --> 00:04:53.388
It's an ongoing process your whole life.

00:04:53.412 --> 00:04:55.189
But most importantly, it's voluntary.

00:04:55.213 --> 00:04:56.631
It's voluntary.

00:04:56.655 --> 00:04:59.018
As long as we're teaching our kids

00:04:59.042 --> 00:05:02.464
that heroism starts when someone
scratches a mark on your forehead,

00:05:02.488 --> 00:05:04.714
or someone tells you
you're part of a prophecy,

00:05:04.738 --> 00:05:07.767
they're missing the most important
characteristic of leadership,

00:05:07.791 --> 00:05:09.478
which is that it comes from within.

00:05:09.502 --> 00:05:13.376
It's about following
your own dreams, uninvited,

00:05:13.400 --> 00:05:16.376
and then working with others
to make those dreams come true.

00:05:17.500 --> 00:05:19.476
Political parties: oh, boy.

00:05:19.899 --> 00:05:24.392
Political parties could and should be
one of the basic entry points

00:05:24.416 --> 00:05:26.343
for people to get engaged in politics.

00:05:26.367 --> 00:05:28.632
Instead, they've become, sadly,

00:05:28.656 --> 00:05:31.542
uninspiring and uncreative organizations

00:05:31.566 --> 00:05:35.476
that rely so heavily on market research
and polling and focus groups

00:05:35.500 --> 00:05:37.548
that they end up all saying
the same thing,

00:05:37.572 --> 00:05:40.668
pretty much regurgitating back
to us what we already want to hear

00:05:40.692 --> 00:05:43.476
at the expense of putting forward
bold and creative ideas.

00:05:43.500 --> 00:05:46.256
And people can smell that,
and it feeds cynicism.

00:05:46.280 --> 00:05:52.256
(Applause)

00:05:52.624 --> 00:05:54.068
Charitable status.

00:05:54.092 --> 00:05:57.846
Groups who have charitable status
in Canada aren't allowed to do advocacy.

00:05:57.870 --> 00:06:00.401
This is a huge problem
and a huge obstacle to change,

00:06:00.425 --> 00:06:03.897
because it means that some
of the most passionate and informed voices

00:06:03.921 --> 00:06:06.804
are completely silenced,
especially during election time.

00:06:06.828 --> 00:06:10.191
Which leads us to the last one,
which is: our elections.

00:06:10.596 --> 00:06:11.764
As you may have noticed,

00:06:11.788 --> 00:06:13.895
our elections in Canada
are a complete joke.

00:06:13.919 --> 00:06:15.410
We use out-of-date systems

00:06:15.434 --> 00:06:17.735
that are unfair and create random results.

00:06:17.759 --> 00:06:19.476
Canada's currently led by a party

00:06:19.500 --> 00:06:21.948
that most Canadians didn't actually want.

00:06:21.972 --> 00:06:25.587
How can we honestly and genuinely
encourage more people to vote

00:06:25.611 --> 00:06:27.888
when votes don't count in Canada?

00:06:27.912 --> 00:06:31.280
You add all this up together,
and of course people are apathetic.

00:06:31.304 --> 00:06:33.364
It's like trying to run into a brick wall.

00:06:33.388 --> 00:06:36.705
Now, I'm not trying to be negative
by throwing all these obstacles out

00:06:36.729 --> 00:06:38.329
and explaining what's in our way.

00:06:38.353 --> 00:06:39.506
Quite the opposite...

00:06:39.530 --> 00:06:42.863
I actually think people are amazing
and smart and that they do care,

00:06:44.117 --> 00:06:46.476
but that, as I said,
we live in this environment

00:06:46.500 --> 00:06:49.638
where all these obstacles
are being put in our way.

00:06:50.388 --> 00:06:53.839
As long as we believe
that people, our own neighbors,

00:06:53.863 --> 00:06:56.559
are selfish, stupid or lazy,

00:06:57.317 --> 00:06:58.609
then there's no hope.

00:06:59.704 --> 00:07:02.015
But we can change
all those things I mentioned.

00:07:02.039 --> 00:07:03.476
We can open up city hall.

00:07:03.500 --> 00:07:05.232
We can reform our electoral systems.

00:07:05.256 --> 00:07:07.233
We can democratize our public spaces.

00:07:07.257 --> 00:07:09.029
My main message is:

00:07:09.053 --> 00:07:10.731
if we can redefine apathy,

00:07:10.755 --> 00:07:12.777
not as some kind of internal syndrome,

00:07:12.801 --> 00:07:17.595
but as a complex web of cultural barriers
that reinforces disengagement,

00:07:18.229 --> 00:07:23.792
and if we can clearly define,
clearly identify what those obstacles are,

00:07:23.816 --> 00:07:27.407
and then if we can work together
collectively to dismantle those obstacles,

00:07:27.431 --> 00:07:28.685
then anything is possible.

00:07:28.709 --> 00:07:29.869
Thank you.

00:07:29.893 --> 00:07:31.308
(Applause)